The key change to PIP in the welfare bill that will affect your benefit payments
PIP claimants will be given three months of payments if their next application is rejected to adjust to life without the benefit, according to the government's newly published welfare bill.
The first draft of the bill, published on Wednesday, includes a "transitional window" for claimants of the disability benefit totalling 13 weeks to soften the blow for those losing thousands of pounds as the government tightens the benefit's eligibility criteria.
It is one of a number of measures the government has introduced to soften its controversial welfare bill over a fear of backlash from its own Labour MPs.
However, the government has fallen short of making the qualifying for PIP less strict, which was meant to spare 195,000 fewer disabled people from losing out.
Both campaigners and MPs have voiced concerns over the damage the cuts could cause for vulnerable and disabled people, with at least 800,000 people claiming PIP expected to lose an average of £4,500 per year by 2029/30.
At the last count, a reported 170 MPs from Labour said they would oppose the bill during the parliamentary vote, which is expected later on this month.
The plans were outlined by work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall earlier this year, who proposed overhauling welfare system through a series of benefit cuts.
The move is expected to save the government £5bn as it restricts the eligibility criteria for PIP, as well as freezing the rate for the health component of universal credit.
The bill is expected to be voted on by MPs later on this month.
Yahoo News takes a look at what this means for PIP.
When a PIP claimant receives the benefit, they are given a set amount of funding, which lasts for up to ten years. The amount of time this claim lasts varies.
However, if a person's circumstances change, or their award expires, they need to apply to the department for work and pensions (DWP) to receive payments in the future.
Now, if a person's next PIP claim is rejected, their claim is stopped entirely and their financial support is cut immediately.
The only exception is if a person who has previously claimed youth disability benefit the disability living allowance (DLA), and applies for PIP when they turn 16 and has their claim rejected. Then, they are given five weeks of payments.
Now, the government wants to introduce a transitional period so those who claim PIP and have their next claim rejected have financial support to adjust to to life without the benefit.
This would also mean applicants have time to apply for another benefit and have it instated, if they qualify.
Campaigners and charities have argued that with around 1.2 million people now expected to miss out on PIP until 2029/30, it's the least the government can do.
James Watson-O'Neill, Chief Executive of the disability charity Sense, told Yahoo News: 'The government's proposed cuts to disability benefits will have devastating consequences for disabled people across the country - pushing thousands further into poverty, hardship, and isolation.
'Many disabled people already find themselves in debt because current benefits don't stretch far enough. Cutting support further at a time when the cost of living remains high is not only unjust — it is cruel.
'We urge MPs to listen to disabled people and reject this legislation. Our welfare system should support those who need it most — not abandon them.'
The second reading of the bill will take place on Thursday 19 June.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
DWP has new 13-week rule for people on PIP and Universal Credit
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has announced a new 13-week rule for people on Personal Independence Payment (PIP) as part of its massive benefits cuts. The DWP confirmed the Bill this week, with £5 billion worth of savings expected from it. But despite cuts, the DWP offered people on PIP somewhat of a boost via a 13-week transitional phase which has been introduced before stopping payments. It offers additional time for those affected by changes to the PIP daily living component. Ir is set to benefit current recipients who may lose their entitlement to Carers Allowance and the carer's element of Universal Credit due to the amendments. READ MORE: NS&I handing 'bonus' to millions of people who have Premium Bonds READ MORE: DWP told to scrap 'unsustainable' state pension triple lock and replace it READ MORE New UK heatwave set to hit next week with 22 counties in England roasted The transitional protection significantly exceeds the duration offered during the transition from Disability Living Allowance (DLA) to PIP, which was previously the primary disability benefit in the UK before PIP took over. Labour Party minister Liz Kendall said: "Our social security system is at a crossroads. Unless we reform it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it. "This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity. "This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot - putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth as part of our Plan for Change." Thomas Lawson, CEO of anti-poverty charity Turn2us, said: "There is no moral justification for cutting the support that allows sick and disabled people to meet their basic needs, live independently, and fully take part in society. "The positive plans of the government's longer-term reforms are being undermined by these harmful Treasury-driven cuts. Stripping away support will push people deeper into hardship, not employment. It will worsen health conditions, and make recovery harder."
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Customer shocked by Aussie cafe's extra 30 per cent charge: 'Not normal'
A Sydney woman's breakfast treat got off to a sour start after she was faced with an additional cost she wasn't expecting. After ordering the $13 breakfast combo from the takeaway menu, she went to find a table but was stopped by the cashier who told her she'd have to pay more to sit down to have her egg and bacon roll and hot chocolate. When asked how much, the cashier at the Broadway cafe told her it would be $17 if she wanted to dine-in — an increase of 30 per cent. 'So now sitting comes with a $4 upgrade? Maybe the chair reclines, plays Netflix, and offers emotional support?' the stunned diner said. She declined to pay extra for a table, and instead stood 'awkwardly' in front of a bank, 'holding my greasy brown paper bag and eating like a pigeon' while she waited for the bank to open. The customer, who preferred to remain anonymous, told Yahoo News the charge came as a shock and has changed the way she buys coffee. "I mean, I know life is getting more and more expensive, but that much just to sit down and enjoy the brekky, then I don't think it's normal," she said. The woman said she couldn't see any signs advising of the price difference, but later noted the menu had 'takeaway' written on it. Another customer's review of the cafe from three years ago complained of the same issue. She was told a takeaway coffee would cost $3.70, whereas sitting in would be $4.50. When she asked why, staff told her it's "because we have to clean the mug". Yahoo News has approached the cafe to confirm its pricing policy but they have not responded. On the cafe's standard menu, viewed online, an egg and bacon roll was $13 and a regular hot chocolate $5.30. The takeaway combo of the two items sells for a discounted $13. Aussies reject tipping as restaurants and bars warned over cashless trend: 'Not part of our culture' Cafe defends 'ludicrous' $1 surcharge for no ice Cafe owner hits back at customer's wild public holiday surcharge threat: 'Scum of the earth' Franco Amitrano, who owns Cafe & Cuchina in Surry Hills, explained to Yahoo why dining in comes with a higher cost. His cafe, which has been operating for 11 years, charges customers an additional 20 cents if they choose to drink their coffee at the venue. Food is the same price, whether it's takeaway or dine-in. "Mainly it's because the barista takes a bit longer to make it look nice, to make latte art," he said. "For me, it's not the washing up that is part of (the cost), because you have to pay for cups anyway when you take it away. So it's kind of the same. "It's more because the barista has to take a bit longer to do the service and you have to get someone to deliver it to the table. So that's the extra in labour." Franco added that his customers have never had an issue with the additional cost, but he does think charging $4 extra for dining in is too much. "I don't think many people charge that kind of increase if you dine in," he said. While the different pricing structures for takeaway and dining in are becoming more common, they may not be in the best interest of the venue, Professor of Marketing at UNSW Nitika Garg told Yahoo News. 'It's becoming more common with prices going up and costs going up. People are reasonable and people are understanding of these structures, but I think there is a way to do it," she said. Garg explained that adding on extra costs to the customer is known in the marketing world as "unbundling". "Instead of bundling, you're unbundling the cost," she said, giving budget airlines as an example where the fare, the seat, the food and the luggage are all available but for additional costs. Unbundling typically leads to a poor customer experience and is usually "not advisable", she added. What would be more satisfactory from a diner's perspective is to have the same price across the board, "even if the takeaway price is slightly high",Garg said. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Latest polling says if an election was held tomorrow Reform UK would win a majority
Since the local elections Reform UK has had no shortage of good polls. But a new one suggests Nigel Farage's party has a chance not only of winning the next election, but of claiming a decent Commons majority, too. In February, Reform topped a Sky News/YouGov poll for the first time, with Nigel Farage's party edging in front on 25%, Labour pushed into second on 24%, with the Tories on 21%. But a fresh one from Ipsos puts Reform on 34%, nine points ahead of Labour on 25%, with the Conservatives a distant third on 15%. While the other parties are flatlining, Reform appears to be pushing boundaries. Were these figures to be replicated across the country at a general election, with every constituency behaving the same way, then Reform could win as many as 340 seats, giving it a majority of 30, Sky News analysis suggests. Labour could be reduced to 176 seats, down 236 on last year's election, while the Tories would hit a record low of 12 seats. But polling should always be taken with a pinch of salt and with the firm acknowledgement that there is not an election coming any time soon. Conservative backbenchers might also tell you publicly that opinion polls are notoriously difficult to translate into seat numbers because voting percentages in individual constituencies can vary hugely from the overall average. But the truth is that the symbolism of Reform UK topping another poll is likely to be noticed by MPs from all parties, especially backbench Conservatives who have actively been hoping their leader, Kemi Badenoch, can help them climb the polls and bring the party back into public favour. Politics is a brutal game and when it comes to toppling underwhelming party leaders, the Tories are more ruthless than most. One wonders how many of these polls Mrs Badenoch's party will allow her to endure. Read more: This poll is also a warning to Labour. As the party approaches a year since its major victory, it will not have much to celebrate if these numbers are anything to go by. According to this survey, only 19% are satisfied with the job Sir Keir Starmer is doing as prime minister, with 73% dissatisfied. And the figure of 25% of voters intending to vote Labour is a level not seen since October 2019. While abstract to much of the public, polling can often shape not only the chatter inside Westminster but how and when plots by MPs begin. For Reform UK, this is a much-needed morale boost after a surprise resignation by their former Chairman Zia Yusuf, and then an almost immediate U-turn back into the party. And Kemi Badenoch - who said during her leadership campaign that the Conservatives needed to go back to first principles and that this would take time - will be wondering, seven-and-a-half months after winning the leadership, how much time she really has left.
