Ministers urged to give pensions to retired police dogs

Charity the Thin Blue Paw Foundation said it has provided grants of £380,000 to owners since it was set up in August 2020 to cover vet bills, because the animals are often left with health issues after working hard physically during their careers.
Chairman Kieran Stanbridge said: 'Police dogs give the best years of their lives to the job.
'They throw themselves into dangerous situations without a second thought, they show unwavering loyalty to their handler and their job, and they give so much to help fight crime and keep the public safe.
'During their careers they receive the very best care and support from the force they serve with but, as soon as they hang up their harness, they're on their own, and the responsibility for their often-expensive care falls to their ex-handler or new owner.
'We believe that the Home Office, who allocate funding to police forces nationally, have an ethical and moral obligation to these dogs and shouldn't turn their backs on them when it's time to pay them back for everything they've done.'
There are around 1,700 serving police dogs in the UK, according to the foundation, and around 100 retire each year.
It has launched a petition to push the Government for a ring-fenced budget to provide support for the owners of retired police dogs.
Mr Stanbridge added: 'Police dogs lead physically demanding lives and, when they retire – whether due to injury or age – they often have health problems as a result of their career, which can require expensive medication, therapy and management throughout their retirement.
'Taking on any dog is a responsibility, but taking on an older retired police dog with health problems is a huge commitment, particularly during the current cost of living crisis.
'We need to ensure that there is support in place for these heroic police dogs so that people aren't put off the idea of rehoming them when they retire and so that owners are never faced with the heartbreaking decision of having them put to sleep because they can't afford their treatment.'
Conditions such as arthritis can mean bills of up to £2,400 per year for pain medication, the charity said, and because these are pre-existing medical complaints they would not be covered by pet insurance.
Police Scotland dog handler Julie Roy was faced with large vet bills caring for retired German shepherd Keach, who worked for West Midlands Police before moving north of the border.
Keach has arthritis in her spin and knee, and the Thin Blue Paw Foundation pays for her pain medication.
Ms Roy said: 'Vet bills are expensive and our dogs have worked hard in their working life, putting extra strain on the joints and the body.
'These dogs deserve to have ongoing support when they retire, so they can access the medication and treatment they need having served their communities for so long.'
Fellow dog handler Claire Bird, form West Sussex, adopted Belgian Malinois Fiji, who worked for Surrey Police.
She has required two operations, one for an infection of the uterus and a gastric procedure, and needs regular medication for allergies. So far the foundation has paid £10,000 for her care.
Ms Bird said: 'I've kept all of my working dogs when they retire and, as any dog owner knows, taking care of them is expensive.
'But I couldn't turn my back on them after everything they've given.
'I believe that there should be more support in place for these incredible heroes when they retire.
'They do so much for us while they're serving and yet when they retire, the Government and the police turn their backs on them.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Wales Online

5 hours ago

• Wales Online

New Michael Schumacher health condition update as truth and fiction cleared up

New Michael Schumacher health condition update as truth and fiction cleared up There have been true and false claims made to date about Michael Schumacher's health status, with more than a decade having past since his skiing accident which left him with life-altering injuries Flavio Briatore has revealed he is contact with Michael Schumacher's wife, Corinna (Image: Getty Images ) There have been precious few detailed updates on Formula 1 icon Michael Schumacher's condition following his devastating skiing accident. Schumacher was in the French Alps in December 2013 where he hit his head on a rock and suffered a near-fatal brain injury. Now 56, he has been kept out of public view ever since, with only a select number of visitors allowed inside the family home near Lake Geneva in Switzerland, where he is receiving round-the-clock medical care. ‌ Earlier this month, one of his former team bosses, Flavio Briatore, revealed he is in regular communication with Schumacher's wife, Corinna. The Italian, who was in charge at Benetton, where the German won his first two F1 titles, told Corriere della Sera: "If I close my eyes, I see him smiling after a victory. ‌ "I prefer to remember him like that rather than him just lying on a bed. Corinna and I talk often, though." That followed a more detailed update from Briatore's ex-wife, Elisabetta Gregoraci, who claimed: "Michael doesn't speak, he communicates with his eyes. Only three people can visit him and I know who they are." Following that update, here is what we know to be true about Schumacher's condition… Article continues below Claims Schumacher could walk In 2016,German magazine Bunte claimed in an article Schumacher was able to walk and "raise an arm". It raised huge hopes among fans amid previous rumours of progress in his condition. However, the Schumacher family took legal action against the magazine, with the report branded 'irresponsible' . The court hearing resulted in Schumacher's lawyer, Felix Damm, revealing that the then-47-year-old was unable to walk or stand, even with assistance. 'Unfortunately, we are forced by a recent press report to clarify that the assertion that Michael could move again is not true,' a family statement said. 'Such speculation is irresponsible because, given the seriousness of his injuries, his privacy is very important for Michael. Unfortunately, they also give false hopes to many involved people.' ‌ Reported stem cell treatment In 2019, Schumacher was reported to have undergone stem cell treatment in an effort to regenerate his nervous system. Le Parisien claimed he was admitted for transfusions of inflammation-reducing stem cells, and also quoted an anonymous nurse who claimed Schumacher was showing signs of recovery. "Yes he is in my service," the nurse said. "And I can assure you that he is conscious." However, the racer is believed to have developed muscle atrophy and osteoporosis after being bed-bound. French magazine Paris Match spoke to what it described as "close relatives" ahead of his 50th birthday in January 2019. The magazine quoted one as saying: "When you put him in his wheelchair facing the beautiful panorama of the mountains overlooking the lake, Michael sometimes cries." ‌ The Schumacher family refused to comment on any of the reports or confirm the stem cell treatment. Daughter's wedding claim rebuffed Reports surfaced in Germany last year claiming Schumacher was present at the wedding of his daughter, Gina-Maria, and Iain Bethke in Majorca. While the family does have a home on the Spanish island, reports that Michael attended his daughter's nuptials were dismissed as 'fake news'. One of his former team-mates, Johnny Herbert, said: 'Unfortunately, from what I understand, that was all A1 fake news and no truth in it.' ‌ Johnny Herbert and Schumacher were Benetton team-mates in the mid-1990s (Image: Ben Radford/ALLSPORT ) Helmet signing Earlier this year, it was revealed that Schumacher had signed a helmet for F1 legend Sir Jackie Stewart's dementia charity. The seven-time world champion signed his initials 'MS' on the helmet with the aid of Corinna. It will be auctioned to raise money for Stewart's Race Against Dementia charity, set up by the three-time world champion after his wife Helen began suffering from the disease. ‌ Stewart confirmed to the Daily Mail: 'It is wonderful that Michael could sign the helmet in this worthy cause, a disease for which there is no cure." However, Stewart did also dispel the idea that Schumacher did the act by himself, adding: "His wife helped him, and it completed the set of every single champion still with us.' Sir Jackie Stewart with the helmet with the signatures of all 20 living world champions, including Schumacher's (Image: Mark Sutton - Formula 1/Formula 1 via Getty Images ) ‌ Watching F1 with former boss One of the Schumacher family's most trusted confidantes is Jean Todt, Michael's team boss during his run of five straight F1 titles with Ferrari between 2000 and 2004. The Frenchman has offered updates about his friend's condition while asking for the media to respect the family's privacy. Todt told La Repubblica earlier this year: 'The family has decided not to answer the question [on his condition], a choice that I respect. "I see him regularly and with affection, him and his family. Our bond goes beyond the past work. It is part of my life, which today is very far from Formula 1." ‌ Jean Todt is a trusted confidante of the Schumacher family (Image: Getty Images ) Todt previously revealed he watches F1 races with Schumacher, telling German broadcaster RTL in 2022: "I don't miss Michael. I see him. Yes, it's true, I watch races with Michael. But sure, I guess what I miss is what we used to do together." In 2023, he revealed to L'Equipe : "[He] is simply not the Michael he used to be. He is different and is wonderfully guided by his wife and children, who protect him.' ‌ Schumacher's inner circle Earlier this year, Felix Gorner – a reporter for RTL – said that Schumacher is "completely dependant" on caregivers and "can no longer express himself verbally". Gorner added that 20 people have access to the former Mercedes driver, a deliberate choice by the family to protect his privacy. That should come as no surprise, as Schumacher was fiercely protective of his family's privacy during the height of his racing fame. Schumacher's privacy has been fiercely protected by Corrina (Image: Getty Images ) Article continues below 'Michael is here' Corinna has been at the forefront of the battle to ensure her husband's privacy. However, as part of the 2021 Netflix documentary Schumacher, she offered a rare truthful insight into his condition. "Michael is here. Different, but he's here, and that gives us strength, I find," she shared with fans. "We live together at home. We do therapy. 'We do everything we can to make Michael better and to make sure he's comfortable, and to simply make him feel our family, our bond. And no matter what, I will do everything I can. We all will.'

Telegraph

7 hours ago

• Telegraph

Asylum seekers allowed to stay because of high blood pressure

An elderly Sri Lankan couple won the right to stay in the UK after claiming that treatment for high blood pressure in their home country was 'inadequate'. The unnamed husband and wife, who are in their late 60s, came to Britain to visit their daughter and son-in-law in 2022. But two months later they claimed asylum, and when this was denied by the Home Office they successfully appealed. The husband told an immigration tribunal he was suffering from depression, severe anxiety, hypertension and diabetes and suggested he was 'unwilling' to access care in the South Asian nation. An asylum judge agreed that sending them back would breach their human rights. The Home Office challenged the ruling that they could stay because of poor quality medical treatment in Sri Lanka by arguing the first judge had not shown that the husband was 'seriously ill'. But the Upper Tribunal of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber disagreed and ruled in favour of their claim. The hearing was told that the couple, who were granted anonymity by the court, entered the UK in May 2022. In July that year the husband made a claim for asylum with his wife as a dependent, alleging a fear of persecution due to threats made by the family of another son-in-law. They then brought further claims on protection and human rights grounds that were rejected by the Home Office in February last year. The husband appealed the decision at a First-tier Tribunal, where he confirmed they were not challenging the protection or asylum decisions, just the human rights claim. He made his argument under Articles 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), respectively covering inhumane or degrading treatment and the right to a family life. The husband submitted that he would not be able to get adequate care in Sri Lanka for his depression, severe anxiety, high blood pressure and diabetes. The couple also claimed there was a 'real risk' they could commit suicide if they were forced to return to their home country based on their mental state and 'subjective fear'. Their appeal was granted by the First-tier Tribunal. The Home Office chose to appeal the asylum tribunal's findings, arguing that 'inadequacy' of treatment is not the same as someone being unable to access it. Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Stuart Neilson found that there was no legal error by the First-tier tribunal. The judge dismissed the Home Office's appeal, meaning the First-tier Tribunal's decision stands and the couple will be allowed to remain in the UK. He said: 'Finally on the issue of the First-tier Tribunal referencing both the 'inadequacy' of the treatment and the 'willingness' of the respondent to undertake any treatment in Sri Lanka I do not consider that the use of this language in the determination represents an error of law. 'The inadequacy of the treatment may amount to absence of appropriate treatment and depending upon the circumstances both 'willingness' and the 'inadequacy' of the treatment may have some relevance to the issue of access.'

Glasgow Times

a day ago

• Glasgow Times

Historic vote brings assisted dying closer to becoming law in England and Wales

More than 300 MPs backed a Bill that would allow terminally ill adults with a life expectancy of less than six months to end their lives. Yes campaigners wept, jumped and hugged each other outside parliament as the vote result was announced, while some MPs appeared visibly emotional as they left the chamber. Others lined up to shake hands with Kim Leadbeater, the Bill's sponsor through the Commons, with some, including Home Office minister Jess Phillips, stopping to hug the Spen Valley MP. Despite warnings from opponents around the safety of a Bill they argued has been rushed through, the proposed legislation has taken another step in the parliamentary process. MPs voted 314 to 291, majority 23, to approve Ms Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill at third reading. Kim Leadbeater has been the MP behind the assisted dying bill (Jonathan Brady/PA) This means the Bill has completed its first stages in the Commons and will move to the House of Lords for further debate and scrutiny. Both Houses must agree the final text of the Bill before it can be signed into law. Due to the four-year implementation period, it could be 2029 – potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's Parliament – before assisted dying is offered. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. Supporters of assisted dying have described the current law as not being fit for purpose, with desperate terminally ill people feeling the need to end their lives in secret or go abroad to Dignitas alone, for fear loved ones will be prosecuted for helping them. Public support for a change in the law remains high, according to a poll (James Manning/PA) Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer remained supportive of the Bill, voting yes on Friday as he had done last year. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, who had urged MPs to vote against the legislation, describing it as 'a bad Bill' despite being 'previously supportive of assisted suicide', voted no. Friday was the first time the Bill was debated and voted on in its entirety since last year's historic yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55 at second reading. Labour MP Ms Leadbeater has argued her Bill will 'correct the profound injustices of the status quo and to offer a compassionate and safe choice to terminally ill people who want to make it'. During an hours-long date on Friday, MPs on both sides of the issue recalled personal stories of loved ones who had died. Conservative former minister Sir James Cleverly, who led the opposition to the Bill in the Commons, spoke of a close friend who died 'painfully' from cancer. He said he comes at the divisive issue 'not from a position of faith nor from a position of ignorance', and was driven in his opposition by 'concerns about the practicalities' of the Bill. MPs had a free vote on the Bill, meaning they decided according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Campaigners in Parliament Square, central London, ahead of the vote (PA) The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Public support for a change in the law remains high, according to a YouGov poll published on the eve of the vote. The survey of 2,003 adults in Great Britain, suggested 73% of those asked last month were supportive of the Bill, while the proportion of people who feel assisted dying should be legal in principle stood at 75%.