Global streamers fight CRTC's rule requiring them to fund Canadian content
A person browses a television menu showing icons for streaming services Netflix and Amazon Prime in a photo illustration made in Toronto on Friday, March 22, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Giordano Ciampini
OTTAWA — Some of the world's biggest streaming companies will argue in court on Monday that they shouldn't have to make CRTC-ordered financial contributions to Canadian content and news.
The companies are fighting an order from the federal broadcast regulator that says they must pay five per cent of their annual Canadian revenues to funds devoted to producing Canadian content, including local TV news.
The case, which consolidates several appeals by streamers, will be heard by the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto.
Apple, Amazon and Spotify are fighting the CRTC's 2024 order. Motion Picture Association-Canada, which represents such companies as Netflix and Paramount, is challenging a section of the CRTC's order requiring them to contribute to local news.
In December, the court put a pause on the payments — estimated to be at least $1.25 million annually per company. Amazon, Apple and Spotify had argued that if they made the payments and then won the appeal and overturned the CRTC order, they wouldn't be able to recover the money.
In court documents, the streamers put forward a long list of arguments on why they shouldn't have to pay, including technical points regarding the CRTC's powers under the Broadcasting Act.
Spotify argued that the contribution requirement amounts to a tax, which the CRTC doesn't have the authority to impose. The music streamer also took issue with the CRTC requiring the payments without first deciding how it will define Canadian content.
Amazon argued the federal cabinet specified the CRTC's requirements have to be 'equitable.'
It said the contribution requirement is 'inequitable because it applies only to foreign online undertakings and only to such undertakings with more than $25 million in annual Canadian broadcasting revenues.'
Apple also said the regulator 'acted prematurely' and argued the CRTC didn't consider whether the order was 'equitable.' It pointed out Apple is required to contribute five per cent, while radio stations must only pay 0.5 per cent — and streamers don't have the same access to the funds into which they pay.
The CRTC imposes different rules on Canadian content contributions from traditional media players. It requires large English-language broadcasters to contribute 30 per cent of revenues to Canadian programming.
Motion Picture Association—Canada is only challenging one aspect of the CRTC's order — the part requiring companies to contribute 1.5 per cent of revenues to a fund for local news on independent TV stations.
It said in court documents that none of the streamers 'has any connection to news production' and argued the CRTC doesn't have the authority to require them to fund news.
'What the CRTC did, erroneously, is purport to justify the … contribution simply on the basis that local news is important and local news operations provided by independent television stations are short of money,' it said.
'That is a reason why news should be funded by someone, but is devoid of any analysis, legal or factual, as to why it is equitable for foreign online undertakings to fund Canadian news production.'
In its response, the Canadian Association of Broadcasters said the CRTC has wide authority under the Broadcasting Act. It argued streamers have contributed to the funding crisis facing local news.
'While the industry was once dominated by traditional television and radio services, those services are now in decline, as Canadians increasingly turn to online streaming services,' the broadcasters said.
'For decades, traditional broadcasting undertakings have supported the production of Canadian content through a complex array of CRTC-directed measures … By contrast, online undertakings have not been required to provide any financial support to the Canadian broadcasting system, despite operating here for well over a decade.'
A submission from the federal government in defence of the CRTC argued the regulator was within its rights to order the payments.
'The orders challenged in these proceedings … are a valid exercise of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission's regulatory powers. These orders seek to remedy the inequity that has resulted from the ascendance of online streaming giants like the Appellants,' the office of the attorney general said.
'Online undertakings have greatly profited from their access to Canadian audiences, without any corresponding obligation to make meaningful contributions supporting Canadian programming and creators — an obligation that has long been imposed on traditional domestic broadcasters.'
The government said that if the streamers get their way, that would preserve 'an inequitable circumstance in which domestic broadcasters — operating in an industry under economic strain — shoulder a disproportionate regulatory burden.'
'This result would be plainly out of step with the policy aims of Parliament' and cabinet, it added.
The court hearing comes as trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada have cast a shadow over the CRTC's attempts to regulate online streamers.
The regulator launched a suite of proceedings and hearings as part of its implementation of the Online Streaming Act, legislation that in 2023 updated the Broadcasting Act to set up the CRTC to regulate streaming companies.
In January, as U.S. President Donald Trump was inaugurated for his second term, groups representing U.S. businesses and big tech companies warned the CRTC that its efforts to modernize Canadian content rules could worsen trade relations and lead to retaliation.
Then, as the CRTC launched its hearing on modernizing the definition of Canadian content in May, Netflix, Paramount and Apple cancelled their individual appearances.
While the companies didn't provide a reason, the move came shortly after Trump threatened to impose a tariff of up to 100 per cent on movies made outside the United States. Foreign streamers have long pointed to their existing spending in Canada in response to calls to bring them into the regulated system.
Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
39 minutes ago
- CTV News
Receiver planning sale of Yukon gold mine involved in contaminant release disaster
Victoria Gold's Eagle gold mine site north of Mayo, Y.T., is shown in this handout aerial photo taken Wednesday, July 3, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/HO — Yukon Government The court-appointed receiver of a Yukon gold mine that suffered a catastrophic heap-leach facility failure last year said it plans to sell the mine and will be seeking approval within the week to start the process. In its fifth receiver's report issued earlier this month, PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. said it will seek court approval for a sale process for the Eagle Gold Mine near Mayo, Yukon, in a motion scheduled to be heard Wednesday in an Ontario court. Eagle Gold Mine was the site last June where a containment failure at the heap-leach facility released about two-million tonnes of cyanide-laced ore and water into the environment. 'The Yukon Government in its capacity as receivership lender …, the lending syndicate and the First Nation of Na-Cho Nyak Dun were consulted in the development of the Eagle Mine sale process, and each provided feedback to the Receiver,' PricewaterhouseCoopers said in its latest report summary, adding each submission was 'carefully considered' in finalizing the proposed sale process. 'The Receivership Lender (the Yukon government) has confirmed that it is satisfied with the form and substance of the proposed Eagle Mine sale process and supports the approval of the sale process at this time.' In an email, the territory's government confirmed the receiver is planning to begin a sale process by July for the Eagle Gold Mine, if it were to be approved by the court. But the territory also said it is 'premature to say what the process will look like,' stating that it will likely be 'robust, transparent and fair' since it is subject to court supervision. 'The Government of Yukon is a key stakeholder as the main mining regulator and lender to the Receiver, and it will ensure that the interests of Yukoners are protected and communicated to the Receiver,' the government's statement said. 'Right now, the focus of the government and the Receiver is to address environmental remediation and site safety.' The Yukon government said earlier this month that the work is continuing at the mine site to manage additional water from the spring snowmelt, while water contaminated from the failure is being treated and discharged. PricewaterhouseCoopers was made receiver of the mine last year by an Ontario court through an application by the Yukon government. The proposed sale process timeline listed in the latest receiver's report said the plan is for an initial bid deadline of Aug. 6, with the deadline for selecting qualified bids on Aug. 20. The process would then move to its second phase, where due diligence on qualified bidders would be completed by Oct. 15, with a selection of the successful bid for the mine on Nov. 5 and closing on Dec. 31, pending court approval. The Na-Cho Nyak Dun First Nation did not respond to requests for comment on the proposed sale process of the Eagle Mine, which is located on the nation's traditional territory. The development with the Eagle Mine comes days after another nearby Yukon mine site was sold to the Selkirk First Nation. In a statement, the nation — located about 120 kilometres south of Mayo and 280 kilometres north of Whitehorse — said it completed the acquisition of the former Minto Mine site located on its traditional territory on June 18. Chief Sharon Nelson said of the purchase that the act is 'self-determination in action' and allows the nation to 'move forward deliberately and on our own terms' with the mine's future. 'Going forward, we will be guided by our responsibilities to protect the land, promote economic self-reliance, and ensure that any opportunities will benefit our people and our community,' Nelson said in her statement. The Selkirk First Nation said it plans to conduct feasibility studies on the site to determine long-term options, and it is possible that the mine could 'develop into an economic stimulant' for both the community and Yukon. The nation also said mine ownership paves the way for the Indigenous community to operate it 'in ways that reflect First Nation values and priorities.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 22, 2025. Chuck Chiang, The Canadian Press
CTV News
39 minutes ago
- CTV News
Peel Pub closes suddenly after 60 Years, leaving staff and performers in the dark
After more than 60 years, Montreal's Peel Pub abruptly closed due to bankruptcy, leaving staff unpaid and performers scrambling for new venues. After more than 60 years, Peel Pub in downtown Montreal has suddenly shut its doors. On June 20, a bankruptcy notice went up on the locked front door. Clients and staff were caught off guard by the news. Erik Intrevado has two sisters who worked at the downtown mainstay for more than a decade and were notified by text of the closure. Intrevado produced the weekly comedy night at the pub and had no idea an insolvency notice would be posted. 'Coming in without the permission of the trustee is guilty of an offense and basically breaking and entering,' says Intrevado, reading the notice on the locked front door of the pub. When he heard about the closure, he came to collect his gear, but he was out of luck. 'Maybe a few hundred dollars a year, a microphone, speakers, some cables, power bar.' Intrevado says comedy night was doing well, but Peel Pub was on the decline. Raby, who didn't want his family name used, has friends who worked at the pub. He came by to take a photo of the notice on the door. Raby also pointed out the terrasse wasn't installed for this summer season — a sign, he says, staff took as a sign the end was near. 'They don't get paid on time. He refused to pay them as well for their hours. And who clocked in for the Grand Prix weekend. So there's a lot of people who still have money, tips stuck in here. Completely dead silence from the owner. Just kind of disappointing,' says Raby. Ongoing construction also affected summer business, according to Dave Laanemets of McLean's Pub next door. 'Having the street closed at the intersection has been really bad for business. It hurts us. If no one's going up and down the street, no one's walking up or down the street. And it's not good. If the street was closed for a festival, that's a different story — then people have a reason to be here.' CTV News contacted Peel Pub owner Sami Jmaiel several times and did not get a response. Meanwhile, Intrevado says he's looking for a new venue to host comedy night — but lots of people, like his sisters, are looking for backpay and a job. 'I think that's where the real problem is, is what is going to be the process for everyone who's affected by this.'
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
B.C. Premier Eby says he's not opposed to privately-backed oil pipeline to north coast
Social Sharing As Alberta Premier Danielle Smith pushes for a crude oil pipeline to British Columbia's north coast, B.C. Premier David Eby says he's not simply saying no. Instead, Eby said he's against the public funding of such a pipeline. "What I don't support is tens of billions of dollars in federal subsidy going to build this new pipeline when we already own a pipeline that empties into British Columbia and has significant additional capacity — 200,000 barrels," Eby said on Sunday, referring to the Trans Mountain pipeline. He added there's no company currently advocating for Smith's pipeline proposal. "There's no money for it," Eby told CBC's chief political correspondent Rosemary Barton. Smith has been advocating for the bitumen pipeline to B.C.'s northern tidewaters and said she is actively searching for interested private sector companies. She has suggested the pipeline's end point be in Prince Rupert, B.C., avoiding the cancelled Northern Gateway pipeline's proposed terminus in another northern B.C. port, Kitimat. But Eby said he wants to prioritize projects that are "shovel-ready." "We have major projects with private proponents, cash on the table, ready to go to hire people and build — let's focus on those," he said. Eby listed B.C. energy projects including the LNG Canada project in Kitimat and the Ksi Lisims LNG project north of Prince Rupert, as well as major hydroelectric projects, mining projects in the northwest, and various wind and solar projects that he said will be interconnected with the Yukon and Alberta. WATCH | LNG Canada export facility comes online: Canada's first LNG plant expected to start up soon in Kitimat, B.C. 4 hours ago Duration 5:26 Chief political correspondent Rosemary Barton speaks with Kitimat Mayor Phil Germuth about the new LNG plant expected to start producing soon and the region's industrial history. Eby also highlighted the fact that he recently signed onto a memorandum of understanding with western premiers around a trade corridor that could include major energy projects such as heavy oil. But he noted there are major issues with a proposal for a pipeline, particularly the federal tanker ban on the north coast. The ban prohibits oil tankers carrying more than 12,500 metric tons of crude oil, or persistent oil products, from stopping, loading, or unloading at ports in a restricted area covering nearly the entire north coast. WATCH | Western premiers discuss new partnerships: Western premiers agree on economic co-operation but split over pipelines 1 month ago Duration 1:54 B.C's premier has wrapped up talks with fellow western premiers in Yellowknife. While the focus was on trade and natural resources, western separatism was on the agenda, if not unofficially. CBC's Katie DeRosa reports Smith has said she will convince Eby of the pipeline's merits, which she said could include billions in revenue. "It's Team Canada or not," she said on Rosemary Barton Live earlier this month. "I would hope that what would happen is that we would identify whatever legitimate concerns that a province might have and then work through them," Smith added. Prime Minister Mark Carney has said while he wants to , he wants to build consensus between governments. "We will not impose a project on a province," Carney said at a press conference earlier this month. Eby said he would be happy to sit down with Albertan officials if a private proponent came to the table without public money. "We'll cross that bridge when we come to it," Eby said.
