Illinois mulls ending a health program for some immigrants living in the US illegally
Gov. JB Pritzker 's positioning of Illinois as a sanctuary state, a welcoming port for immigrants from across the globe, hit the hard reality of state budgeting this spring.
The Democrat is a leading critic of President Donald Trump 's administration, especially its immigration policies. But facing a budget shortfall for the upcoming fiscal year, Pritzker's proposed $55.2 billion fiscal plan would cut part of a four-year-old program providing health coverage to some adults regardless of immigration status. Illinois is one of seven states and the District of Columbia to offer such a program.
California, which last year one-upped Illinois by offering health care to all adult immigrants, has run into a similar revenue problem and plans to halt enrollment in its program.
Rep. Barbara Hernandez, a suburban Chicago Democrat, said the program helps many families.
'There's a huge need in the undocumented community that cannot get health care otherwise,' she said.
If Democrats, who control the Illinois General Assembly, can't find money to continue the plan — estimated to cost $404 million this year — tens of thousands of migrants will be left without Medicaid-style health coverage.
It might not be just a question of revenue, but of will, given threats by congressional Republicans. As the GOP attempts to cut spending, including Medicaid, to make Trump's hoped-for tax cuts affordable, states' immigrant health programs will be in the crosshairs.
What is the program?
In 2020, Illinois became the first state to offer needs-based health insurance to all older adults, including low-income migrants who entered the country illegally, when it introduced Health Benefits for Immigrant Seniors, covering those 65 and older. In 2021, it introduced a second program which became Health Benefits for Immigrant Adults, for immigrants aged 42 to 64.
Enrollment in both programs has been halted, but the seniors' program will continue for current enrollees after June 30, while the program for those younger than 65 will end.
What's happening elsewhere?
California, Minnesota, Oregon and Washington, D.C. also provide public health insurance to adults, regardless of immigration status, according to the Los Angeles-based National Immigration Law Center. Colorado and Washington provide insurance obtained via the private market with state financial support. Like Illinois, New York covers older migrants with a public program.
California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who like Pritzker has presidential ambitions, last week announced a freeze on enrollment in that state's immigrant health care program. Costs ran $2.7 billion over forecast for 1.6 million participants.
How big — and costly — is the Illinois program?
There are about 31,500 program participants in the under-65 crowd and the cost to cover them this year is estimated at $404 million. The two programs together enroll over 43,300 at an estimated cost of $538 million this year. With an estimated 400,000 immigrants without legal permission to live in Illinois, supporters point out that participation is likely far below eligibility.
Why is free health care available to migrants?
Supporters say the programs ensure a healthier state. People are more able to work. They're more likely to visit doctors and catch small problems before they become catastrophes. They can manage chronic illnesses such as diabetes and stave off new health concerns.
And they're not exactly getting it for free, proponents maintain. Immigrant-led households in Illinois pay $8.6 billion a year in state and local taxes, according to a 2024 University of Illinois at Chicago study.
"This argument of immigrants leeching or taking resources — they're actually more likely to be working and additionally are absolutely paying taxes for which they are not receiving benefits in return,' said Tovia Siegel of The Resurrection Project, a Chicago-based immigrant justice advocacy group.
Illinois Republicans aren't on board. Rep. Ryan Spain, a deputy House minority leader from Peoria, points out that Congressional Republicans are wondering why states complaining about federal cuts to Medicaid somehow have enough in state coffers to cover the immigrant programs.
'The high cost of the program outweighs some of the arguments proponents make,' Spain said. 'It's an unaffordable beacon to attract additional illegal immigrants to the state of Illinois.'
Are there tangible cost savings?
The programs have saved Illinois hospitals considerable sums, according to a study released this month.
People without insurance often treat the emergency room, where costs can by sky-high, as their doctor's office. Hospitals often eat those bills.
A study by the Embodying Racism Lab at the University of Chicago found that since the Health Benefits for Immigrants programs started, hospitals' bad debt — payment owed for services which administrators consider "unlikely or unattainable" — fell by 15%, the equivalent of $1.5 million per year per hospital.
'Our findings suggest these programs have the potential to both improve equity in healthcare access and ease the financial burden on hospitals that serve all residents of Illinois,' the study reported.
What are lawmakers doing?
Talks about putting together a state budget are just warming up, even though the Legislature's spring session ends May 31. Sen. Elgie Sims of Chicago, the Senate Democrats' appropriations leader, said the health program is one of many worthy endeavors vying for a place in the spending column.
Matthew Lopas, director of state advocacy for the National Immigration Law Center, issued a challenge to Pritzker and the General Assembly to 'hold the line and remain committed' during 'a time of extremist politicians who are out there scapegoating immigrants.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
PETER HITCHENS: MPs have voted to destroy even more unborn babies - and to begin the abortion of the old
Are we ruled by some sort of death cult? In just one week, our Parliament has voted for the even more ruthless destruction of unborn babies, and to begin the abortion of the inconvenient old and ill. You may be quite sure that the abortion of the old, once it gets into full swing, will solve a lot of problems for the middle-aged, afraid of nursing home fees and of losing their inheritances. Does anyone really doubt this?
BBC News
32 minutes ago
- BBC News
Voice of America: Hundreds of reporters fired as Trump guts agency
Hundreds of journalists for Voice of America (VOA) - most of its remaining staff - have been fired by President Donald Trump's administration, effectively shutting down the US-funded news Trump administration, which has long accused VOA of left-wing bias, said the layoffs were because the agency was "riddled with dysfunction, bias and waste".Steve Herman, VOA's chief national correspondent, called the dismantling of the outlet, which was set up during World War Two to counter Nazi propaganda, a "historic act of self-sabotage".Among those axed were Persian-language reporters who had been on administrative leave, but were called back to work last week after Israel attacked Iran. According to the Associated Press news agency, the Persian reporters had left the office on Friday for a cigarette break, and were not allowed to re-enter the building after the termination notices went out."Today, we took decisive action to effectuate President Trump's agenda to shrink the out-of-control federal bureaucracy," Kari Lake, whom the president appointed to run VOA, said in a statement on Friday announcing the layoffs of 639 total, more than 85% of the agency's employees - about 1,400 staff - have lost their jobs since March. She noted that 50 employees would remain employed across VOA, the Office of Cuba Broadcasting, and VOA's parent company, the US Agency for Global Media (USAGM).A statement issued by three VOA journalists who have been suing to stop the elimination of the network said about the latest firings: "It spells the death of 83 years of independent journalism that upholds US ideals of democracy and freedom around the world."The move had been expected since March when Trump ordered VOA, as well as USAGM, which oversees VOA and funds outlets such as Radio Free Europe and Radio Free Asia, to be "eliminated to the maximum extent consistent with applicable law".The agencies have won acclaim and international recognition for their reporting in places where press freedom is severely curtailed or non-existent, from China and Cambodia to Russia and North Dan Robinson, a former VOA news correspondent, wrote in an op-ed last year that the outlet had become a "hubris-filled rogue operation often reflecting a leftist bias aligned with partisan national media".Trump's criticisms of VOA come as part of his broader attacks against the US media, which studies suggest American news consumers view as highly president has also urged his fellow Republicans to remove federal funding for National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS).
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Trump reveals Harvard University feud may be coming to an end as he floats 'historic' deal
President Donald Trump has teased that his months-long battle with Harvard University may soon be over, announcing that a deal could emerge 'over the next week or so.' Thus far, Harvard has been one of the main enemies of the Trump administration, which has lobbed numerous serious accusations at the Ivy League college and yanked billions of dollars in federal funding. The accusations range from the university not doing enough to constrain antisemitism on campus, to it admitting students with views hostile to American values. More than three months after the White House 's initial letter to the university calling for major reform, Trump appears optimistic that an agreement is possible. 'We have been working closely with Harvard, and it is very possible that a Deal will be announced over the next week or so,' Trump wrote Friday afternoon on Truth Social. 'They have acted extremely appropriately during these negotiations, and appear to be committed to doing what is right,' he added. 'If a Settlement is made on the basis that is currently being discussed, it will be 'mindbogglingly' HISTORIC, and very good for our Country.' Harvard hasn't publicly responded to Trump's sentiments. Daily Mail approached the university for comment. This comes as a federal judge blocked the Trump administration from revoking Harvard's ability to admit foreign students. On June 4, Trump issued an executive order called Enhancing National Security by Addressing Risks at Harvard University, which suspended the school's student visa program - calling it a 'privilege granted by our government, not a guarantee.' Harvard has nearly 6,800 international students, making up more than 27 percent of its enrollment in the past academic year. About one-third of those international students are from China, and Trump has previously accused Harvard of 'coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party,' a claim echoed in the executive order. Friday's preliminary injunction by US District Judge Allison Burroughs extends a prior temporary block she issued last month against the administration for stopping international students from coming to Harvard. Outside of Trump's fears about foreign influence on Harvard, he has also expressed concern that university leaders have fostered a breeding ground for antisemitism, making Jewish students feel uncomfortable and unsafe. A large encampment of pro-Palestine students protesting the Israel-Hamas war formed on Harvard Yard during the 2024 spring semester and lasted for three weeks. The students wanted the university to divest from the Israeli government and Israeli businesses, but the administration did not acquiesce. Even before the encampment in April and May of 2024, there were widespread protests at Harvard immediately following the Hamas' attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. One such protest descended into a confrontation where pro-Palestine demonstrators surrounded a Harvard MBA student and repeatedly shouted 'shame' at him. Claudine Gay, Harvard's president during much of this turmoil, resigned in January 2024 after she refused to condemn students calling for the genocide of Jews when pressed by members of Congress. Gay presided over billions of dollars in lost potential donations from wealthy Jewish families appalled by what took place on campus. That's now on top of the approximately $3.2 billion in grants and contracts Harvard has lost out on from the federal government since Trump took office. Harvard sued the Trump administration for the federal funding freeze and denies accusations of alleged bias against Jewish students. Lawyers for Harvard also argue that the attempted revocation of foreign student visas violates its free speech and due process rights under the US Constitution as well as the Administrative Procedure Act, a law that constrains what federal agencies are allowed to do. Harvard says the Trump administration is retaliating against it because it refused to obey the government's demands to control the school's governance, curriculum and the 'ideology' of its faculty and students. The federal government sent a letter to Harvard President Alan Garber on April 11 claiming that the school has 'failed to live up to both the intellectual and civil rights conditions that justify federal investment.' The letter demanded university leaders adopt merit-based admissions policies, stop admitting students who are 'hostile to American values', enforce viewpoint diversity in all academic departments, and immediately end all DEI programs. Officials explained that they wanted what amounted to progress reports on these goals sent to them so they could ensure that their orders were being followed.
