CF-18 jets intercepted plane violating restricted air space above G7 site in Alberta
Canadian fighter jets were deployed to intercept a private, civilian plane that violated restricted airspace above Kananaskis, Alta., where G7 leaders are gathering for meetings.
RCMP say in a news release that the fixed-wing Canadian aircraft entered the restricted area shortly after 11 a.m. Sunday, and NORAD's Canadian region deployed CF-18 Hornet fighter jets to intercept it.
The release says that after multiple steps were taken to gain the pilot's attention, "final warning measures" were used to contact the pilot and have them safely land under their own power.
Const. Lauren Mowbray says those measures involved the jets firing warning flares, and the plane was met on the ground by the RCMP and their partners.
The release doesn't say where the plane originated or where it landed, noting the matter remains under investigation.
It says two NOTAMs, or Notices to Airmen, of temporary air restrictions over Calgary and Kananaskis have been in place since Saturday morning and will continue until noon Tuesday.
"It is every pilot's responsibility to ensure that there are no restrictions in the air space they intend to fly," the release stated, noting that further information wouldn't be provided at this time.
"These incidents take away resources that could be utilized in police work and securing the summit site."
Mowbray did not have any information on whether the pilot is facing charges.
Prime Minister Mark Carney is hosting G7 leaders from the United States, France, the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan and Italy, in Kananaskis, southwest of Calgary in the Rocky Mountains.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, are also set to attend.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Province
an hour ago
- The Province
Transport Minister Chrystia Freeland 'dismayed' about B.C.'s choice of Chinese shipyard
Freeland says in a letter sent to provincial Transportation Minister Mike Farnworth that she expects B.C. Ferries to inform her about all measures that it plans to take to "mitigate any security risks Published Jun 20, 2025 • Last updated 10 hours ago • 2 minute read An aerial view of the China Merchants Industry Weihai Shipyards in Weihai, Shandong. Photo by China Merchants Industry Canada's transport minister says she is 'dismayed' B.C. Ferries contracted a Chinese state-owned shipyard to build four new vessels in the current geopolitical context that includes 'unjustified' tariffs on Canada. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Chrystia Freeland, in a letter to her B.C. counterpart Mike Farnworth, said she expects B.C. Ferries to inform her of all measures it plans to take to 'mitigate any security risks,' including cybersecurity problems that might arise. B.C. Ferries announced this month it had contracted China Merchants Industry Weihai Shipyards to build four new major vessels, following a five-year procurement process that did not include a Canadian bid. In her letter, Freeland said she was surprised B.C. Ferries does not have a mandate for an 'appropriate level' of Canadian procurement, given the value of the contract, although the dollar figure hasn't been made public. A statement from Farnworth's ministry said it was reviewing the letter, adding that Farnworth had spoken with Freeland about bolstering B.C.'s shipbuilding industry. Essential reading for hockey fans who eat, sleep, Canucks, repeat. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. B.C. Ferries, in a statement, said the Chinese bid was the strongest by a 'significant margin' and that security was a top priority and added all sensitive systems would be sourced separately and independently certified before the vessels enter service. Farnworth's comments echo those of B.C. Premier David Eby, who has promised to work with Ottawa to build up capacities in B.C. for future vessels. Eby also has said the province wouldn't interfere in B.C. Ferries' decision, citing the needs of coastal communities and BC Ferries' operational independence. B.C. Ferries is an independent company, with the province being its sole shareholder. Freeland said she expects 'assurances' that B.C. Ferries conducts a 'robust risk assessment' and that it engages with the relevant federal and provincial security agencies and departments. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The letter also asks B.C. to 'verify and confirm with utmost certainty' that no federal funding will be diverted to support the purchase of these new ferries. Freeland said the federal government has a long record of providing financial support to B.C. ferries, including a federal subsidy of $37.8 million in 2025-26 dating back to a 1977 agreement. Other forms of federal financial support have included $308 million to cover operational losses caused by COVID-19 and to limit average fare increases, Freeland said. She added the Canada Infrastructure Bank has given B.C. Ferries a loan of $75 million to help purchase four net-zero emission ferries and install the necessary infrastructure. The existence of Freeland's letter came to light earlier this week during Question Period in the House of Commons, when she faced questions about the BC Ferries' purchase from B.C. MP Dan Albas. '(I) share the concern and anger of other member of this House about the purchase of Chinese ferries,' Freeland said during debate. 'I have written to the Province of B.C. to make it clear that the federal government's support for BC Ferries, which is explicitly for operating support, must not be used for anything other than the operation of ferries.' Read More
Calgary Herald
2 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Opinion: Cynicism masquerades as insight, but at heart, it's a defence of disengagement
Rick Bell's recent column (G7 protest in Calgary: One hell of a goat rodeo on the streets, June 15) is a classic entry in a long-standing tradition: the takedown of public expression of discontent. Whether it's community members gathering at city hall to protect an urban wild space they've come to know as a commons, or protesters rallying against injustice in Palestinian territories, this column performs the same move — it belittles them. Article content Article content With phrases such as 'play-acting and posturing,' the writer seems to ask: What's the point? Article content Article content Article content But here's what's telling. In these dismissives, the heroic figure is always the one who does not. Not the one who protests. Not the one who speaks at city hall. Not the one who marches. Article content The hero is the one who stays home. Who says nothing. Who drinks their beer undisturbed while the world burns on the livestream in the background. Article content It's not insightful to mock protesters for being performative. All protest is performance. It always has been. But it's also effort, presence and sometimes desperation. It's what people do when all the other doors are closed — when letters, meetings and 'appropriate channels' fail. Article content What Bell fails to address is the kind of dissent that erupted in Fort Macleod at the UCP 'town hall' on coal — where 70 per cent of the crowd took vivid, emancipatory glee in tearing apart the optics of a 'consultation,' whose real purpose was to manufacture a media image of monolithic consent. Article content Article content That was protest in its unruly, disruptive form. And yet, even that kind of collective defiance is dismissed when it doesn't fit the right caricature. Article content And still, I find myself partially in agreement. A young Communist I met two weeks ago said something that stayed with me: That once upon a time, power didn't know what to do when the streets flooded with people. That unpredictability disturbed them. Article content Now, norms and containment define protest. Marches follow routes agreed upon with police. Cordiality reigns. The site is remote from where decisions are actually made — just as Calgary City Hall is from Kananaskis. Article content And yes, the recent protest was a bazaar of causes. That's what happens when people are told they have one designated chance to be heard — when the system reduces democratic expression to a side-stage act, offered once every few years.
Calgary Herald
2 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Opinion: India relations are complicated; but remembering the dead is not
Article content As we approach the 40th anniversary of Canada's worst mass-casualty event — an act of domestic terrorism — families of the victims must contend not only with their loss but also the pain of abandonment by this country. As illustrated by the Angus Reid Institute two years ago, nine out of 10 Canadians know little or nothing of the bombing of Air India Flight 182 on June 23, 1985, that killed all 329 people aboard, including 280 Canadians. Article content Article content This action was conceived and executed from within our borders by individuals bent on maintaining a cycle of revenge. As has been covered for decades by Postmedia's Kim Bolan and Terry Glavin, and CBC's Terry Milewski, it began with extremists in India waging war on innocents. This seemed reason enough for Canadian disinterest to set in; in the eyes of authorities, those who died when Flight 182 exploded off the coast of Ireland were not our own. Article content Article content Writing for the Ottawa Citizen in 2023, Shachi Kurl describes this event as 'a near blank page: a calamity that has morphed from open wound to an unhealed scar, and risks fading from our collective memories entirely.' Inconceivably, that blank page is increasingly filled not by the truth, but by what can only be charitably described as fantasy. Article content Some members of Canada's Indian community — those who wish to carve out a theocratic homeland, Khalistan, from India — continue to perpetuate a baseless argument that the Indian government was responsible for the bombing. That theory was given consideration and duly dismissed, during the meticulous public inquiry led by retired Supreme Court Justice John Major. Article content Article content Major was clear in his conclusions, among them that the bombing could have been prevented. The Government of India had fulsomely shared its intelligence; it warned Canada to be wary of bombs in luggage and even identified the doomed flight. But Canadian officials of the day dismissed India's warnings, instead chalking it up to India wanting free security for its planes. Article content There was an unmistakable whiff of condescension in those Canadian attitudes, an unwillingness to see India as a partner in global relations. That attitude seems only to have deepened; many contemporary Canadian politicians prefer to support Canadians who continue to agitate for Khalistan in defiance of the wishes of Indians living in India. Article content Yet, when U.S. President Donald Trump expressed his views that Canada should become the 51st American state, Canadians made their feelings quite clear. We are a sovereign nation, our borders are inviolate and our affairs are not to be interfered with by outsiders.
