S. Korea on course to conclude negotiations on Czech nuclear power plant project: minister
South Korea is on course to conclude negotiations for a project to build a nuclear power plant in the Czech Republic, Seoul's industry minister said Wednesday, as the final agreement for the highly anticipated project is being delayed.
"We have completed documentations for the project, and local procedures, such as a legal review and board meetings, are currently under way," Industry Minister Ahn Duk-geun told the parliamentary committee on industry and trade.
"We hope to finalize the agreement in late April or early May at the latest," he added.
A South Korean consortium, led by the state-run Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co. (KHNP), was selected as the preferred bidder in July 2024 to build two reactors at the Dukovany power plant in the East European country.
If finalized, the deal, estimated at 24 trillion won ($16.7 billion), would mark South Korea's first overseas nuclear power plant project since 2009, when KHNP won the Barakah Nuclear Power Plant contract in the United Arab Emirates.
The consortium had initially aimed to strike a final deal on the project by the end of March.
Meanwhile, Ahn said the government is also working to resolve Seoul's designation as a "sensitive" country by the US Department of Energy, set to take effect Tuesday.
In early January, the DOE placed South Korea in the "lowest" category of its "sensitive and other designated countries list," reportedly due to technical security issues.
The listing has sparked concerns it may hinder bilateral technology cooperation between Seoul and Washington.
In a recent meeting with US Energy Secretary Chris Wright, the two sides agreed on the need for bilateral cooperation in the nuclear power plant sector, Ahn said.
Ahn met with Wright in Washington last month to discuss the "sensitive" country listing issue and energy cooperation. (Yonhap)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
44 minutes ago
- Korea Herald
Seoul shares snap 5-day rally following US strike on Iran; won at 1-month low
South Korean stocks ended lower Monday to snap a five-day winning streak, over heightened Middle Eastern uncertainties following the United States' bombing attacks on key Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend. The local currency was trading sharply lower against the US dollar. The benchmark Korea Composite Stock Price Index slid 7.37 points, or 0.24 percent, to close at 3,014.47, after dipping to an intraday low of 2,971.36. Trade volume was heavy at 619.8.7 million shares worth 17.76 trillion won ($12.8 billion), with losers outnumbering winners 646 to 265. Foreigners and institutions combined sold local shares worth 1.32 trillion won, while retail investors snapped up shares worth 1.4 trillion won. On Friday, the Kospi topped the 3,000-point mark for the first time in more than three years, backed by investor optimism over policies under the Lee Jae Myung administration. But investor sentiment was dampened by heightened tensions in the Middle East over the weekend. The US used B-2 bombers to launch air strikes on three key nuclear sites in Iran on Saturday, with President Donald Trump describing the operation as "successful" and claiming the Iranian sites were "obliterated." Chip and bio shares led the overall losses, with market heavyweight Samsung Electronics dropping 2.52 percent to 58,000 won and Samsung Biologics slumping 2.36 percent to 992,000 won. Battery and heavy machinery shares also retreated, with top battery manufacturer LG Energy Solution down 3.61 percent to 294,000 won and defense systems giant Hanwha Aerospace dropping 2.03 percent to 919,000 won. Automotive and shipbuilders also lost ground. Top automaker Hyundai Motor plunged 4.05 percent to 201,500 won, and leading shipyard HD Hyundai Heavy Industries slid 2.14 percent to 433,500 won. In contrast, internet-related shares and financial companies advanced. Top portal operator Naver soared 7.61 percent to 290,000 won, and KB Financial climbed 1.03 percent to 107,600 won. The local currency was trading at 1,384.3 won against the greenback at 3:30 p.m., down sharply by 18.7 won from the previous session, and marking the lowest since May 21, when the corresponding reading was 1,387.2. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
Trump struck Iran — but North Korea is a different story
Iran strike hardens Kim Jong-un's nuclear resolve, pushes Pyongyang deeper into China-Russia orbit, say experts US President Donald Trump's decision to authorize airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities has been widely seen as reinforcing North Korea's long-held belief: that nuclear weapons are essential for regime survival. The strike would further dim the already unfavorable prospects for nuclear dialogue with Washington and accelerate Pyongyang's push for deeper military cooperation with Russia. Still, analysts in Seoul stressed that North Korea's case is fundamentally different from Iran's. Not only does Pyongyang already possess nuclear weapons and advanced delivery systems, it also maintains a distinct rationale and motivation for nuclear armament — unlike Tehran, whose program is framed around deterrence and national pride, Pyongyang's is centered on the survival of the Kim regime. One of the most significant differences, observers noted, is that the likelihood of Trump ordering a similar strike on North Korean nuclear facilities is considered extremely low. A key reason lies in North Korea's counterstrike capabilities: intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of reaching the US mainland and massed artillery aimed at densely populated areas of Seoul. Joung Kyeong-woon, a senior research fellow at the Seoul Defense Forum, pointed out that densely populated areas — including the Seoul metropolitan area and the city of Goyang — are well within range of North Korean artillery. 'The primary reason North Korea cannot be attacked lies in the fact that we are essentially held hostage by its artillery — far more easily usable than nuclear weapons,' Joung told The Korea Herald. "This reality was confirmed when South Korea opposed, and then-US President Clinton ultimately abandoned, the idea of a surgical strike." Then-President Kim Young-sam opposed the US proposal to strike the Yongbyon nuclear facility during the 1994 nuclear crisis under the Clinton administration. North Korea can launch immediate strikes on the densely populated South Korean capital and its vicinity using artillery systems such as 170mm self-propelled guns and 240mm multiple rocket launchers, in addition to missiles targeting South Korea, including nuclear-capable solid-fuel short-range missiles like the KN-23. 'Since then, North Korea has secured layered deterrence through its possession of various medium- and long-range ballistic missiles, in addition to nuclear weapons,' Joung said. Joung further explained that North Korea's deeply fortified underground nuclear facilities are nearly impossible to neutralize. 'North Korea's key nuclear and missile facilities are located hundreds of meters underground, beneath solid bedrock in the mountainous regions of the country's northwest," Joung said. 'There are no existing weapons capable of directly destroying them — not even tactical nuclear weapons.' Lim Eul-chul, a professor at Kyungnam University's Institute for Far Eastern Studies in Seoul, pointed out, 'North Korea's possession of nuclear weapons and second-strike capabilities are the biggest constraints on a US airstrike" against nuclear facilities in North Korea. In April 2025, Gen. Xavier Bruson, the commander of US Forces Korea, testified before the House Armed Services Committee that the 'DPRK's chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons programs and formidable missile force (ballistic and cruise) pose a threat to the US homeland, US forces in the Indo-Pacific, and allied nations." Pyongyang has formalized a preemptive, or first-use nuclear policy in accordance with the law on North Korea's policy on nuclear forces, promulgated in September 2022. 'This marks a shift from its previous stance of using nuclear weapons solely for defensive purposes, allowing their use also for repelling or retaliating against an enemy's invasion or signs of an impending attack,' Lim said. The roles of Russia and China also set North Korea apart from Iran. 'Unlike the case of Iran, Russia is obligated to intervene automatically under the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Treaty between North Korea and Russia," Lim said. North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and Russian President Vladimir Putin signed the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Treaty, which stipulates a mutual defense obligation, in June 2024, during Putin's visit to Pyongyang. 'China is likely to view a US airstrike on North Korea's nuclear facilities as a direct threat to stability on the Korean Peninsula and to security along the China–North Korea border," Lim added. Leif-Eric Easley, professor of international studies at Ewha Womans University in Seoul, pointed out that 'China and Russia are better positioned to help Pyongyang than Tehran.' 'The North Korean case is very different," Easley said. More importantly, experts in Seoul underscored that the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities is likely to have far-reaching implications for North Korea — reinforcing Pyongyang's nuclear posture, deepening its distrust of Washington, and reshaping its approach to diplomacy and military cooperation. Kim Dong-yub, a professor at the University of North Korean Studies in Seoul, pointed out that what matters to South Korea is 'the impact on the Korean Peninsula and how North Korea perceives the situation." 'North Korea is likely thinking that its choice was the right one following the US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities. It will further solidify its belief that 'possessing nuclear weapons is the only means of survival' and will continue to maximize the legitimacy of its nuclear possession,' Kim said. 'Beyond the economic shock, this crisis is highly likely to trigger widespread security instability on the Korean Peninsula and lead to a fundamental shift in the strategic environment,' Kim added. Lim said Trump's decision to strike Iranian nuclear facilities 'has a significant impact on North Korea's foreign policy.' 'North Korea will reinforce the legitimacy of its existing policy that prioritizes regime survival and nuclear weapons development, and expand military cooperation rooted in anti-Western solidarity — particularly with Russia and China,' Lim said. 'It will also shift further toward deepening skepticism of inter-Korean dialogue and negotiations with the United States.' The US military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities will further deepen North Korea's distrust of the US — already hardened by Washington's withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal, or JCPOA, in 2018 and the breakdown of the 2019 North Korea–US summit in Hanoi during the first Trump administration.
Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Korean students seek "digital undertakers" amid US visa social media screening
The US Embassy in Seoul resumed accepting applications for student and exchange visas but requested that applicants make any private social media accounts public, prompting some South Korean students pursuing studies in the US to seek the help of "digital undertakers." On June 20, the US Embassy in Seoul announced that it will resume taking in applications for its F, M and J nonimmigrant visas, saying it will conduct 'thorough vetting' of applicants' presence on social media. In a notice posted on X, the embassy announced that all applicants should 'adjust the privacy setting on all their social media profiles to 'public.'' Seeing the US Embassy's recent announcement, 28-year-old Kim, who wished to be identified only by her last name, told The Korea Herald that she felt 'stressed,' as it felt like the recent announcement was just another 'daunting task' she was required to complete as part of her preparation in pursuing a Ph.D. at a US university. 'I've been preparing to further my studies by applying to a graduate school in the US for about a year and a half -- writing up personal statements, taking language proficiency exams and speaking with professors at schools I was interested in,' said Kim. 'I felt like I was ready this year and was going to apply. But knowing that my social media accounts and the stuff I posted in the past could be an obstacle to me studying in the States and not something like my school grades, is really stressful to me.' While the US has mandated that visa applicants list their social media accounts on their applications since 2019, Kim stated that the screenings conducted under the current administration feel 'different' to her. 'I don't know how strictly they handled the screening of social media accounts in the past, but seeing the current administration's stance against illegal immigration and national security, this year feels different, more intense,' Kim continued. 'I've looked into online reputation firms in Korea to help me permanently delete data that could work against my favor, as I've voiced opinions on political and social issues on social media in the past that oppose the current US administration's stance.' Often called digital undertakers, these services are offered by online reputation firms and specialize in curating or scrubbing an individual's online presence by removing posts, photos or comments that may be considered controversial in the eyes of others -- such as employers, or more recently, immigration authorities. Kim isn't the only Korean student seeking such services in Korea. According to a representative from Santa Cruise Company, an online reputation firm offering digital undertaker services, the firm has begun receiving more requests from clients claiming they were planning to apply to schools in the US in recent months. 'While personal requests we received from individual clients were mostly springing from those wanting to delete personal data before applying to a company, these days, we've seen a growing number of individual clients seeking assistance before they apply for a visa to study in the US,' said the representative. With the cost of the company's services ranging from 100,000 won ($72) to millions of won depending on the number of posts the client asks to delete, the company representative added that some of the posts the firm deleted 'ranged from politically sensitive content to some that were rather personal, including posts confessing personal struggles or photos of them partying, to avoid damaging their image.'
