Sweden well-placed to deal with trade uncertainty, Riksbank's Seim says
STOCKHOLM, April 10 (Reuters) - Sweden is well-placed to deal with the changing environment brought on by abrupt shifts in trade and security policies, the Swedish central bank's Deputy Governor Anna Seim said in a speech on Thursday.
"In Sweden we have stable economic-policy frameworks and strong public finances. All this puts us in a favourable position that many other countries lack," Seim said.
The Riksbank held its key interest rate at 2.25% at its latest meeting, on March 20, and forecast unchanged rates for the foreseeable future though uncertainty, not least linked to U.S. policy moves and global trade, is unusually great.
Since then President Donald Trump's sweeping new tariffs and the market turbulence surrounding them have unsettled the outlook still further. Trump said on Wednesday he was again increasing tariffs on China but pausing recent hikes for others.
Seim said Sweden's position was good despite details of Trump's trade policy remaining unclear and the uncertainty making assessing developments in economic activity and inflation unusually difficult.
"It's hard to assess the effects of these tariffs - we think they will be inflationary but mainly in the U.S., but we could have some contagion on the Swedish economy," Seim said in a presentation.
"We are vigilant and ready to act if developments so require," she said.
Analysts at several of Sweden's biggest banks, whose predictions had largely chimed with the Riksbank rate forecast, have in recent days predicted the trade turmoil and related economic downturn may lead to one or more rate cuts this year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
3 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Huge carmaker ‘may sell iconic luxury motor brand' as sales dive and new CEO takes charge
The new CEO faces huge financial decisions as a result of President Trump's brutal trade tariffs ENGINE STUTTER Huge carmaker 'may sell iconic luxury motor brand' as sales dive and new CEO takes charge Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) ONE of the world's largest car manufacturers looks set to sell an iconic sports car brand as sales plummet. Discussions over the future of Maserati remain ongoing as industry giant Stellantis prepares to welcome its new CEO in the coming days. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 Discussions over the future of Maserati remain ongoing Credit: Alamy 5 Stellantis could be forced to sell the luxury car brand Credit: Reuters 5 Last year, the number of Maserati units sold plunged from 26,600 to just 11,300 Credit: Alamy The French-Italian company could be forced to sell the luxury car brand on the back of poor sales over the past year. New CEO Antonio Filosa - who starts on Monday after being appointed last month - faces huge financial decisions as a result of President Trump's brutal trade tariffs. Stellantis - which owns 14 brands across the globe - was reported to have hired management consulting firm McKinsey and Co to review the situation. McKinsey was called in April this year to advise on struggling brands Maserati and Alfa Romeo, with both experiencing a dire 2024. Last year, the number of Maserati units sold plunged from 26,600 to just 11,300. Stellanis told Motor1: "McKinsey has been asked to provide its considerations regarding the recently announced U.S. tariffs for Alfa Romeo and Maserati." Trump's new legislation means tariffs of at least 25 percent on anything imported into the US. Maserati has no new model launches scheduled as it waits for a new business plan, with the last one having been put on hold by Stellantis in 2024. The plan is expected to be presented soon after Filosa starts his new role. But as things stand, it is understood that all options remain on the table for the world-renowned Italian brand. It came after the global firm pulled the plug on a £1.3billion investment in Maserati earlier this year. Plans for the hotly anticipated electric MC20 Folgore were also binned due to low demand. WHO ARE STELLANTIS? The EV, which translates to 'lightning' in Italian, was intended to be the brand's electric alternative to the stunning MC20 sports car. It promised a power output and performance characteristics similar to the existing V6-engined MC20. The Folgore was set to be one of six Maserati EVs set for launch over the next year or so. But Stellantis chief financial officer Doug Ostermann said they had pulled the plug on Maserati projects, claiming they wanted to review the pace in which sports car owners move over to EVs. He said: "We have to recognise the dynamics in that business, particularly in the Chinese market, and our expectations in terms of how quickly that luxury market would transition to electrification." What is Stellantis? Stellantis is the company behind iconic motor brands such as Fiat, Vauxhall and Peugot. The conglomerate, which is the second-largest maker of cars in Europe, owns 14 badges, including Chrysler, Citroen, Jeep and Maserati. The company itself is the product of a merger between Fiat-Chrysler and France's PSA, the maker of Peugeot and Citroen, in 2021. But the motoring giant has encountered increasingly stuttering financial success. And an initial manufacturing break at Stellantis has now been extended as bosses report a collapse in demand for electric cars. Other projects, including EV replacements for the Levante and Quattroporte models, are in danger of being cancelled too. The vehicles were set to be released in 2027 and 2028 respectively. It is understood the three models would have been Maserati's electric line-up as the firm looked to adapt to the EV revolution. Before he left the firm last year, Stellantis boss Carlos Tavares claimed the low sales at Maserati were due to advertising issues. He told Top Gear: "Maserati is in the red. The reason is marketing. "The Maserati brand is not clearly positioned and the storytelling is not how it should be. "The brand is not just about sports cars, it's about gran turismo, it's about quality of life, dolce vita and technology." 5 Former Stellantis boss Carlos Tavares said the low sales at Maserati were due to advertising issues Credit: Alamy
Scottish Sun
13 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Israel will keep bombing Iran's nuke sites even without Trump – we will finish the job, says Netanyahu's ex-adviser
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) ISRAEL will continue blitzing Iran's nuclear sites with or without the US joining strikes, Benjamin Netanyahu's ex-adviser says. It comes as Donald Trump has revealed he has opened a two-week window for talks as he mulls whether America will intervene in the conflict. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 9 Israel has already struck a number of nuclear targets in Iran Credit: AFP 9 Damage inflicted on Tel Aviv after a missile Credit: Getty 9 Netanyahu will push on with his bombing campaign with or without US help Credit: EPA 9 Iran and Israel have been trading missiles for over a week Credit: Getty The US president, through White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, said there is "a substantial chance of Iran in the near future". Trump had previously tried to curb Tehran's sprawling nuclear scheme through diplomacy. He gave Iran's regime 60 days to thrash out a deal - a deadline that passed two days before Israel unleashed unprecedented strikes on Iran's nuke sites last Friday. Trump has this week been weighing whether to give the green light for the US to step in and deploy a 15-ton mega bunker buster bomb. America's intervention has repeatedly been touted by Trump, who warned Iran would suffer the "full strength and might" of his military. But Netanyahu's ex-adviser Nadav Shtrauchler - who told The Sun the Israeli PM was preparing to strike Iran alone days before he did - said the embattled nation is prepared to carry on without the US. He said: "Of course Israel can carry on. "I think it is going swifter here than people thought when they planned it. "So Israel can proceed and have many targets to go through." Strategic adviser Shtrauchler said he believes the conflict will end with an agreement being thrashed out - and said America's involvement could change the course of the conflict. How Trump COULD destroy Iran's prize nuclear bunker US participation would most likely involve strikes against Iran's underground Fordo uranium enrichment facility, considered to be out of reach to all but America's bunker-buster bombs. Shtrauchler added: "It's a different story with the US, both with the military and the geopolitical side. It's a big deal and will change things. "It's going to end with an agreement if the regime does not fall, but it is too soon to know that. "So if the US decides against intervening you wil see more from the Israel side and at some point it will end with an agreement. "It will make an effect and will change the end result. "But for now we can see that Israel is working very well itself and we can proceed like this - not without the US support but without the US intervening." It comes as Israel and Iran continue to trade heavy blows - with no sign of de-escalation in the weeklong battle. Israel's 'Churchill moment' by Katie Davis, Chief Foreign Reporter (Digital) BRITAIN will never be safe until Iran's nuclear scheme is wiped out, Israel's ambassador told The Sun. Tzipi Hotovely said Israel is facing its "Churchill moment" and doing the UK a "huge service" by wiping out the rogue state's efforts to create a nuke weapon. She also rebuked Sir Keir Starmer's calls for de-escalation as she insisted Tel Aviv acted at the "last minute" to save their country from "nuclear holocaust". The PM - who chaired an emergency Cobra meeting this week - has insisted that the UK wants to de-escalate the situation and resolve it through diplomacy. But Amb. Hotovely said Iran had its chance for diplomacy during Donald Trump's 60-day deadline to thrash out a deal over its nuclear programme. And she warned the UK would never be safe until Iran loses any chance of developing a nuke. The diplomat said Israel is facing its "Churchill moment" as Netanyahu finds himself in a similar position as the British wartime leader did in 1940 - drawing the US into a war with its enemy. Speaking to The Sun at its headquarters in London, she said: "When they're calling for de-escalation, you need to understand that the only way to de-escalate the situation is by removing the threat. "As long as Iran will race faster to have its ballistic missile programme that can destroy cities in Israel, if we will let them continue with that, cities in the UK won't be safe." READ THE INTERVIEW HERE European and Iranian officials met yesterday in Geneva, and Trump has said he will allow two weeks for negotiations before deciding whether to strike the rogue nation. Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi made a condition for renewed talks a ceasefire, saying: "There is no room for negotiations with the U.S. until Israeli aggression stops." Talks later on Friday between Araghchi and officials from the EU ended without a breakthrough after four hours. No date was set for the next round of talks, aimed at getting Iran back to the negotiating table with the US. Missiles continued to rain down in Iran and Israel as the talks were held on Friday in a scramble to de-escalate the conflict. Netanyahu has insisted Israel's military operation in Iran would continue for as long as it takes to eliminate the "existential threat" of Iran's nuclear program and arsenal of ballistic missiles. 9 9 Trump will decide within two weeks whether to join Israel's campaign Credit: Getty 9 Smoke pours from Iran's state broadcaster building following an Israeli attack Credit: Reuters 9 Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is refusing to back down Credit: AFP Israel's top general echoed the warning, saying the Israeli military was ready for a prolonged campaign. Iran previously agreed to limit its uranium enrichment and allow international inspectors access to its nuclear sites under a 2015 deal. But after Trump pulled the US unilaterally out of the deal during his first term, Iran began enriching uranium up to 60 per cent a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90 per cent. Access was also restricted access to its nuclear facilities. Netanyahu signed off a plot to bomb Iran's nuke facilities last week - killing several of its top generals and nuclear scientists, and striking several nuclear facilities. Iran has retaliated by firing 450 missiles and 1,000 drones at Israel, according to Israeli army estimates. Most have been shot down by Israel's multitiered air defenses, but at least 24 people in Israel have been killed and hundreds wounded.
The Herald Scotland
21 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump approval rating tanks as Americans oppose GOP agenda
It's summer now, and the report card has arrived. Americans give Trump a failing grade on the budget, trade and immigration. That's tough to swallow for a politician who gauges everything on public perception. Trump, being Trump, is now pivoting to distractions, touting a military parade that flopped as an expensive boondoggle and then flipping from diplomacy with Iran to potentially ordering air strikes on that country. Take our poll: Should US go to war with Iran or support Israel from afar? | Opinion Americans disapprove of budget bill slashing Medicaid Let's start with Trump's budget, which Republican leaders in Congress call the "one big, beautiful bill" in honor of their continuing deference to whatever he wants and the dereliction of their duty to serve as a coequal branch of our government. The version that narrowly passed the House slashed federal safety net programs to boost tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. Some senators, seeking to make things even better for the rich at the expense of the poor, want bigger cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and other programs. Opinion: Trump lied about the LA protests so you wouldn't see what he's really doing A batch of recent polls shows Americans reject that: A June 11 Quinnipiac University poll found that 53% of American voters oppose the budget bill, while 27% approve it. Nearly half of the voters polled said funding for Medicaid should go up, not down, while 40% said it should stay the same and just 10% wanted it cut. A June 16 Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll found that 50% of Americans think we spend too little on Medicaid, while 31% say we spend enough and just 18% say we spend too much. Forty-five percent of Americans think we should spend more on food and nutrition assistance, while 30% say we spend enough and 24% say we spend too much. A June 17 KFF Health Tracking Poll found that 64% of Americans hold an unfavorable view of Trump's budget bill, while 83% of them hold a favorable view of Medicaid. Republican support for the bill came in strong at 61% at first, but then dropped by 20 points when the Republicans polled heard details about how the legislation would force millions off their health care plans. Polling finds Americans disagree with Trump on immigration, economy, border security This much seems clear: The more Americans learn about Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the more they find it small-minded and ugly. That explains the artificial deadlines. Opinion newsletter: Sign up for our newsletter on people, power and policies in the time of Trump from columnist Chris Brennan. Get it delivered to your inbox. Trump and his Republican allies in Congress want to wrap this up by July 4. But Republican infighting - moderates who fear it goes too far, far-righters who complain it doesn't go far enough - will make for a contentious Congress for at least the next two weeks. While we wait, Trump is seeing his support on immigration - once his strongest issue - melt away in the summer of Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. The Quinnipiac University poll found 54% of the registered voters surveyed opposed his approach to immigration, while 43% approve and 3% had no opinion. Trump campaigned in 2024 on reviving America's economy. But his trade wars, which have hit our country's international allies just as hard or harder than our geopolitical foes, are unpopular. Quinnipiac found that just 38% approve of Trump's trade policy, while 57% disapprove and 6% had no opinion. The AP-NORC poll found that 32% of Americans think we spend too much on border security, while 37% think we spend the right amount and 29% think we spend too little. Trump's approval rating continues to tank. Does it matter? In this time of divisiveness, a majority of Americans can agree on one thing: Trump is disappointing them as president. Just 38% of the votes surveyed by Quinnipiac approve of Trump's job performance, while 54% disapprove. Opinion: Threats against judges nearly doubled under Trump. Republicans blame the victim. That tracks with a Pew Research Center poll released June 17, which found that 41% of those polled approve of Trump's performance while 58% disapprove. Pew noted that Trump has lost ground in his approval rating since he was sworn into office again on Jan. 20. Don't expect Trump to spend too much time worrying about what Americans tell pollsters. He has a long history of touting polls when they hold good news for him and dismissing them when they don't. He also suggested just before the 2024 election that releasing poll results he didn't like "should be illegal." Here's what you can expect: more distractions from Trump as the Republicans fights it out on which version of his budget bill passes or fails in Congress. If they listened to Americans, they would kill the bill and start from scratch. Follow USA TODAY columnist Chris Brennan on X, formerly known as Twitter: @ByChrisBrennan. Sign up for his weekly newsletter, Translating Politics, here.
