Sean McGovern concerned over ‘legality, propriety, process' of Dubai arrest and extradition, court told
The legal team hired by alleged Kinahan cartel senior figure Sean McGovern has told the Special Criminal Court in Dublin it was very concerned about the legality of his arrest in Dubai, his extradition to Ireland and his arrival in Dublin last week.
Olan Callanan BL, for Mr McGovern, on Thursday told the court those reservations would be formally raised and set out to the Director of Public Prosecutions by the office of Michael Staines solicitors.
'What is to the fore, and of fundamental concern, is the legality, propriety and process which surrounded his arrival in Dublin last week,' Mr Callanan told the three-judge court.
After a brief hearing of the court in central Dublin, during which Mr McGovern appeared by video link from Portlaoise Prison, he was further remanded in custody pending his next court appearance on June 18th.
READ MORE
Thursday's hearing was taking place a week after Ms Govern (39), a father of two, was extradited from the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
He is charged in relation to the Kinahan-Hutch feud murder of Noel Kirwan (62), conspiracy to murder another man, directing a crime organisation and enhancing the capacity of a crime organisation.
The murder charge he faces carries a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment, while the offence of directing a criminal organisation carries a sentence of up to a life term.
At the accused's first court hearing last Thursday, Mr Callahan said his client was reserving his position in relation to the 'lawfulness of his arrest' and the jurisdiction of the Special Criminal Court.
Mr McGovern is the first Irish person to be extradited from the UAE and the first alleged Kinahan cartel member arrested there. He had been in detention in the UAE since his arrest at his Dubai home last October on foot of an extradition request from the Irish authorities.
The accused man arrived into Casement Aerodrome, Baldonnel, on an Air Corps Casa C295 plane last Thursday, May 29th, before being taken to the Courts of Criminal Justice for an evening sitting of the Special Criminal Court.
He appeared before Ms Justice Karen O'Connor, Judge Elma Sheahan and Judge Gráinne Malone and was remanded in custody to Portlaoise Prison to today's date – Thursday, June 5th – when he appeared before the court again via video link from jail.
Mr McGovern is charged with five alleged offences including the December 22nd, 2016, murder of Christopher 'Noel' Kirwan on St Ronan's Drive, Clondalkin. He is also charged with directing a criminal organisation between October 20th and December 22nd, 2016, and with enhancing the capacity of a criminal organisation between the same dates, all in relation to the Kirwan murder.
Separately, he is charged with directing a criminal organisation between October 17th, 2015, and April 6th, 2017, in relation to the surveillance of Dubliner James Gately in preparation for the commission of indictable offence.
He was further charged with facilitating a criminal organisation engaged in a conspiracy to murder Mr Gately between the same dates.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
41 minutes ago
- Irish Times
EU may be finally approaching ‘point of departure' on Gaza war
After 20 months of war that has seen tens of thousands of Palestinians killed, large parts of Gaza reduced to rubble and continued warnings about dire humanitarian conditions and possible famine, the European Union may finally be approaching a 'point of departure' in its relations with Israel , several diplomats say. Throughout Israel's military campaign in Gaza the response of the EU to the conflict has been defined by its inability to agree on a response. For a long period Spain and Ireland, as well as Belgium and Slovenia at times, were lonely outliers calling for the bloc to use what leverage it has to hold Israel accountable for the mounting deaths of Palestinian civilians. More than 55,000 Palestinians have been killed during Israel's invasion of Gaza, which followed the October 7th, 2023 attacks by Hamas militants in southern Israel. READ MORE In a sign the tide of opinion had begun to shift against Israel, some 17 of the EU's 27 states last month backed a review into whether Israel's actions in Gaza had breached human rights commitments it signed up to, as part of an EU-Israel association agreement. The agreement governing relations between the two has been in place since 2000. Crucially, it includes a free trade deal, which is economically valuable to Israel, given the EU is its biggest trading partner. The EU review said evidence 'indicates' Israel's actions in Gaza had breached its human rights obligations under the deal. Foreign ministers are meeting in Brussels on Monday to discuss the findings. One big question mark is how Israel's war with Iran will shift the dynamics in the room when the doors close behind the ministers. The Coalition of states who favour tougher consequences for Israel has grown to include Sweden, Finland, Luxembourg, Portugal and the Netherlands . The push to order a review of the EU-Israel deal was led by the Dutch, a traditional ally of Israel. The fact the move came from a government who previously sat in the middle ground of the debate probably convinced others to shift position. One of the union's two big powers, France, was also on board. Just because 17 capitals voted in favour of a review taking place does not mean they will all agree about what should be done now. 'This group is not homogenous, there are those who would wish to see more immediate measures taken [and] those who still want to give Israel a chance to act,' one diplomat involved in negotiations said. 'It is clear that the grouping of 17 member states is not one big bloc ... I'm hopeful that most of that group will stay together,' another diplomat said. Behind the scenes the Dutch are trying to keep the wide level of support intact, to secure a voting majority in support of some EU action to put pressure on Israel. 'We don't expect any decisions on Monday,' one EU diplomat said of the foreign ministers meeting. Kaja Kallas, the EU's foreign affairs chief who chairs the meetings, will take soundings from the room about the findings of the review. It is likely Ms Kallas will be asked to go away and prepare possible options to put on the table at the next meeting of foreign ministers on July 15th, several diplomatic sources said. A group of nine states recently suggested the EU needs to do more to cut off trade with illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank and other occupied Palestinian territories. In a separate June 10th letter to Ms Kallas, the Swedish government said the EU should 'urgently' adopt sanctions targeting Israeli ministers who promote illegal settlements. There had been signs that even Germany, one of Israel's biggest defenders, might be poised to change its position. That was before the fighting between Israel and Iran escalated so significantly. Comments from German chancellor Friedrich Merz since then suggest the government is rowing in behind Israel, lowering the chances of Berlin supporting any EU penalties or sanction. Hungary and the Czech Republic have consistently opposed the EU taking against Israel. That means suspending the EU-Israel agreement in full is off the table, given such a move would require the unanimous backing of all 27 states. Suspending elements of the deal may only require a majority. One EU diplomat speculated recent strikes in Iran, which Israel justified as necessary to prevent Tehran developing nuclear weapons, should not divert the world's attention from the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The EU should be careful not to 'fall into the trap' and totally shift its focus, the diplomat said. Agnes Bertrand Sanz of aid charity Oxfam said the cost of inaction by the EU would be measured in lives. 'Homes flattened, hospitals destroyed and looming famine ... There is no time for more debate,' she said. The cumbersome process of agreeing on a common foreign policy position in a union of 27 governments, means any EU decision to sanction Israel – if a decision is taken – probably remains weeks or even months away.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Oil prices expected to jump after US attacks on Iran
US president Donald Trump 's decision to intervene on Israel's behalf in its war with Iran is likely to see crude oil prices spike when commodities markets open on Sunday night, experts have warned, with potential consequences for the Irish and world economies. Oil prices have increased by 11 per cent since Israel's June 13th attack on Iran, but moved sharply up and down last week as investors weighed the potential for the conflict to impact global oil supply. Mr Trump's decision to bomb Iranian nuclear sites overnight on Saturday is likely to result in spot crude prices surging in early trading when the market reopens at 11pm on Sunday. Brent crude, the global benchmark for oil prices, closed at $77 (€67) a barrel on Friday evening. READ MORE While it could take several weeks for higher crude oil prices to feed into petrol and diesel costs in Ireland, prices at the pump have been ticking upwards in recent days as tension ratcheted up in the Middle East. Saul Kavonic, an energy analyst at MST Marquee, told Bloomberg on Sunday the market's reaction will largely depend on Iran's response. 'But this could set us on a path toward $100 oil, if Iran responds as they have previously threatened to. 'This US attack could see a conflagration of the conflict to include Iran responding by targeting regional American interests that include Gulf oil infrastructure in places such as Iraq, or harassing passage through the Strait of Hormuz.' The maritime chokepoint at the mouth of the Gulf is a vital conduit for not just Iranian shipments, but also for those from Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait and other members of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. Washington's intervention in the war and the White House's messaging have injected fresh uncertainty into an already anxious macroeconomic environment. Even before Israel's strikes on June 13th that killed several senior Iranian military commanders, economists warned that the global economy had entered into a period of heightened volatility with clear risks for Ireland. In its financial stability review earlier this month, the Central Bank of Ireland warned that the structure of the Republic's economy and its high level of integration with global capital means the effects of 'geopolitical and macroeconomic shifts abroad' can be amplified domestically. 'The potential for further fragmentation in global supply chains or tightening in international financial conditions could have material implications for Irish firms and households,' the regulator said. – Additional reporting: Bloomberg
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
House raffles are a big, beautiful, awful sign of the times
'There are days I am still in disbelief that it happened and it actually happened to me. I don't want to say I believe in miracles, but I always try and give it a go to see what happens. I'm over the moon,' delighted homeowner Imelda Collins told The New York Times this week. The miracle she had experienced was not, although you might be forgiven for making the assumption in this broken housing market of ours, managing to buy a house , but succeeding in selling one. Collins's joy becomes a bit easier to understand when you see the figures involved. A two-bedroom cottage on 1.75 acres in Leitrim which she bought three years ago for €133,000 and spent €147,000 restoring has just grossed her €1.2 million. She did this by selling it in an online raffle hosted by a UK-based company, shifting 206,815 tickets priced at €5.92 a pop. The €1.2 million doesn't go straight into her pocket – there were marketing costs of €25,000 along the way, €2,600 in affiliate fees, and she has agreed to pay the winner's stamp duty and legal fees as part of the prize. Raffall, the lottery agent she chose (there are several based in the UK, where the raffles are classed as 'prize competitions'), takes 10 per cent. Then there's 33 per cent capital gains tax. READ MORE She had hoped to net €400,000 after costs on a house she reckons is worth €300,000. Instead, she'll walk away with over half a million – more than enough to fund her planned move to Italy. Collins is so thrilled by her success, she's considering abandoning plans to teach English and become a full-time internet marketer. The winner, Kathleen Spangler, a 29-year-old US marine corps officer, is ecstatic too. Coincidentally, as she told The New York Times, she applied for her Irish citizenship through lineage on her father's side last year. Raffall must also be chuffed with its 10 per cent. And even the losers are only out by €6 each. This can be read two ways: as the a heart-warming tale of a clever woman using her entrepreneurial flair and marketing skills to shift a house in Leitrim for four times its value and simultaneously making a young family's dreams come true. And no one really loses out; at least, not by very much. Or – miserable killjoy that I am, the way I can't help reading it – as a bleak statement about the housing dystopia we are experiencing. House raffles are a big, beautiful, awful idea. Their popularity is a grim reflection on a property market in which your best prospect of owning a house may well be to win one in a lottery. In 1984, George Orwell wrote about the lottery run by the Ministry of Plenty as a way of preventing 'the proles' from dwelling on the misery of their existence. 'It was probable that there were some millions of proles for whom the Lottery was the principal if not the only reason for remaining alive. It was their delight, their folly, their anodyne, their intellectual stimulant.' [ How to give yourself the best chance of buying a home amid Ireland's housing crisis Opens in new window ] If the odds of today's house lotteries are not as small as in Orwell's world, where the largest prizes do not exist at all, they're still less than spectacular. The majority of houses put up for raffle do not meet the minimum threshold of ticket sales. Raffall's founder and chief executive Stelios Kounou told The New York Times that 18 houses have been sold so far on the platform, while 50 others did not make their target. House lotteries may feel like a contemporary antidote to a modern affliction, but they are not a new idea – though the last time they got this level of attention might also have been the last time decent housing was this difficult to access in Ireland. In 1948, a giant house raffle was held in Dublin by the government of the day, when families on the social housing list were offered a chance to win one of between 220 and 250 brand new houses in Ballyfermot, according to historian Cathy Scuffil, who says there were lines of prams up and down Dawson Street. 'Every time somebody's name was called out, a big cheer would go up,' she said. Occasional 'newly wed draws' were held up to the 1970s for recently married couples on the housing list in Dublin. As a means of getting on the housing ladder, it probably beats bidding against wealthy Americans on a cottage in Leitrim. Today's house lotteries often inspire scepticism online, though, unlike in Orwell's dark vision, the prizes are real – a house if enough tickets are sold, a pile of cash if they're not. That is a fairly big qualifier. If the minimum number of tickets are not sold, the owner can cancel the raffle and keep 40 per cent of the funds and the house, giving 50 per cent of the cash to the winning ticket holder. Or they can give the house away anyway and keep more of the money. In Collins's case, if she had not met her goal of 150,000 tickets, she planned to give 40 per cent to the winner. [ Dolores McNamara: Whatever happened to the €115m lotto winner? Opens in new window ] On Raffall right now, you can buy a ticket for a semi-d in Yorkshire, apparently being raffled for the second time ('after the previous winner received the alternative huge cash prize option'), a villa with a pool in the Algarve or a beachfront villa on the island of Samui. Presumably most sellers are well-meaning people who want to try to pay off their mortgage, but it is not terribly difficult to imagine someone unscrupulous setting a wildly unrealistic ticket sales target – and pocketing 40 per cent of the cash when they don't make it. Still, browsing the listings, it's hard for even this sceptical prole to resist the temptation to splurge €6 on a ticket or two.
