G7 Summit: Is South Korea Being Passed Over?
As the two-day G7 Summit wraps up in Canada, South Korea is facing renewed fears of diplomatic marginalization.
On June 16, Seoul officials were caught off guard when they learned, via a breaking news report, that President Donald Trump would be leaving the summit a day early. The announcement came despite a planned meeting between Trump and South Korea's newly elected president, Lee Jae-myung, on the sidelines of the international forum.
That South Korean side was not informed in advance through official channels has raised eyebrows. It is irregular for a foreign leader to abruptly cancel a meeting without prior consultation, and even more so for the other party to learn of it through the media.
Seoul had anticipated holding the bilateral talks on June 17. While Trump's early departure, reportedly due to escalating Israel-Iran tensions, may appear understandable, it's reigniting a deeper anxiety in South Korea: the specter of Korea Passing.
The term describes a tendency of major powers to discuss geopolitical matters surrounding the Korean Peninsula while excluding the South from the discourse.
Strain in Seoul-Washington relations appeared almost immediately after Lee was inaugurated on June 4.
His first phone call with Trump was delayed by three days and passed without any formal statement from the White House.
By contrast, Lee's predecessor, Yoon Suk-yeol, received a congratulatory call from Washington on the day of his election victory. Lee Jae-myung is sworn in as South Korea's president and delivers his inaugural speech on June 4. (©Lee Jae-myung/Facebook)
As the Trump administration remains preoccupied with escalating global crises, the lack of coordination with its treaty ally signals more than a mere oversight. For some in South Korea, it reflects a growing misalignment between the two capitals.
That misalignment may partly stem from unease in Washington over Lee's approach to China. Within days of his electoral win, American policy analysts cautioned that the new South Korean leader could veer away from the traditional alliance.
At a Washington Times Foundation forum in June, Patrick Cronin, Asia-Pacific security chair at the Hudson Institute, said: "If you're going to be closely allied with the United States on security, you're going to be alienating North Korea, China, and Russia."
"How Lee Jae-myung's government manages that relationship," he continued, "is going to be crucial for the future of US interests, the future of the Korean Peninsula, and the future of the Korean people." Lee, then head of the Democratic Party, meets with Chinese Ambassador Xing Haiming in June 2023. The meeting drew criticism over what some viewed as Lee's excessive deference to Beijing. (©National Assembly Press Team)
Such concerns are not without basis. During a campaign rally in March 2024, Lee appeared to downplay frictions in the Taiwan Strait, remarking, "Why are you picking on China? Just say xie xie [to China] and xie xie to Taiwan, too."
The phrase xie xie, meaning "thank you" in Chinese, was widely interpreted as a rhetorical gesture suggesting that South Korea should remain neutral in the cross-Strait conflict. Lee framed the issue as having no relevance to his country's national interests, saying that Seoul should avoid entanglement altogether.
Although Lee has been a vocal critic of former President Yoon's perceived deference to Tokyo, he now faces similar criticism for his apparent pro-Beijing proclivities.
The collapse of the Lee-Trump talks marked a diplomatic setback for Lee's administration. This is especially true given that his invitation to the G7 came just days after taking office, with many on his team hoping for a successful diplomatic debut.
Meanwhile, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba met with Trump on Monday in Canada to discuss a range of pressing issues, including tariffs.
The new South Korean president did regain some footing on Tuesday during a 30-minute meeting with Ishiba, where the two agreed to maintain active dialogue and pursue robust bilateral ties.
For Lee, who lacks prior foreign policy experience, the challenges are piling up. Beyond establishing personal rapport with foreign leaders, he must soon tackle thornier matters such as the future of American forces on the Peninsula and managing relations with a nuclear-armed North Korea.
Whether Lee can recalibrate his strategic posture to reassure Washington while preserving South Korea's autonomy remains an open question.
But for now, speculation over Korea Passing lingers.
Author: Kenji Yoshida
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
32 minutes ago
- CBC
Carney talks de-escalation with Trump, as Belgian's PM offers no sympathy for Iran
Social Sharing There was little sympathy for Iran and reluctant backing for regime change among some European leaders, following the weekend airstrikes by the United States on Iran's nuclear facilities. On Monday, newly minted conservative Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever described Iran as an "evil regime" and a sponsor terrorism throughout the Middle East and Europe. He spoke to Canadian journalists following a Second World War commemoration event at the Antwerp Schoonselhof Military Cemetery, where he and Prime Minister Mark Carney laid wreaths to remember the fallen. Carney, in a social media post early Monday, said he spoke with U.S. President Donald Trump overnight about "de-escalating the conflict in the Middle East." The two leaders talked about the weekend's events and also the upcoming NATO Summit. De Wever, however, took a harder line and spoke about a foiled Iranian-sponsored terrorism plot, where the suspect was headed to Paris, but arrested on Belgian soil — something that prompted retaliation from the regime in Tehran. "Iran is the big sponsor of terrorism," De Wever said. "Without Iran, there would have been no Hamas. Without a Hamas, not a 7th of October. Without the 7th of October, [not] another war in Gaza," he said. "Without Iran, there wouldn't be Hezbollah, there wouldn't be Houthis. So it's a hard regime to feel sorry for." Trump, in a post on his Truth Social media platform, suggested he might welcome the toppling of the Iranian government, but insisted the weekend attacks — which saw the three Iranian nuclear sites hit with missiles and 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs — were not intended to bring about "regime change." For his part, De Wever said, as a believer in the rule of law, it's unfortunate that the situation has come to a point where military action was required to stop Iran's nuclear program. "It would be best if there would be a regime change in Iran, but … you would prefer that it would be a democratic process or another process" that doesn't start with bombing, De Wever said. 'Within striking distance of Europe' One defence expert said that kind of reaction shouldn't be surprising, because of the long history of tension with the hard-line regime in Iran. "I think you might have European leaders publicly calling for restraint, but privately, very at ease that an extremist-led regime that was within striking distance of Europe wasn't able to develop up to 10 nuclear weapons that they could mate with ballistic missiles and hold Europe hostage," said Benjamin Jensen, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies in remarks made ahead of the U.S. strikes. The Breakdown | U.S. attack on Iran nuclear sites 4 hours ago Duration 20:42 Jensen cautioned, however, there might be a limit to the support of Trump's actions. "If those attacks, though, spread to targeting leaders and a wider rollback of Iranian military capability, it creates the risk of second- and third-order effects that would really cause concern in Europe," he said. Indeed, while Russia's reaction to its ally and important weapons supplier being bombed has been limited to rhetoric, the Kremlin drew a line at the notion of regime change in Tehran. Russian President Vladimir Putin's spokesperson Dmitry Peskov described the notion of toppling the Iranian government as "unimaginable" and "unacceptable."
Toronto Star
32 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Israel targets Iran's government and a key Tehran prison as Iran launches more attacks on Israel
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Israel hit Iranian government targets in Tehran on Monday in a series of strikes that followed a salvo of missiles and drones fired by Iran at Israel in the wake of the Trump administration's massive strikes on Iranian nuclear sites the day before. The Israeli military also confirmed it struck roads around Iran's Fordo enrichment facility to obstruct access to the site. The underground site was one of those hit in Sunday's attack by the United States on three nuclear facilities. The Israeli military did not elaborate.
Winnipeg Free Press
33 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Support for solar energy and offshore wind falls among Democrats and independents, AP-NORC poll says
Americans' support for green energy tax credits and renewable energies like wind and solar power has decreased in recent years, according to a new poll, driven by a softening in support from Democrats and independents. The poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research finds that U.S. adults' support for tax credits for electric vehicles and solar panels has weakened, as well as their enthusiasm for offshore wind farm expansion. While Democrats remain the strongest supporters of these initiatives, the poll reveals signs of growing cynicism within their ranks. The poll results coincide with sweeping changes President Donald Trump's Republican administration is making to regulations related to energy and climate change, including slashing the federal workforce in these departments. And although Democrats and independents have weakened their support for some green energy initiatives, there has not been an increase in support for Trump's energy policies. The poll found only about 4 in 10 U.S. adults — including only 1 in 10 Democrats and about 2 in 10 independents, along with three-quarters of Republicans — approve of the way Trump is handling climate change, which largely tracks with his overall approval rating. Democrats and independents drive decline in support for renewable energy credits About 6 in 10 Democrats, 58%, favor tax credits for purchasing an electric vehicle, down from about 7 in 10 in 2022. Among independents, support declined from 49% in 2022 to 28%. Only one-quarter of Republicans supported this policy in 2022, and that hasn't changed measurably. 'As far as the pollution goes … the vehicles nowadays put out very little emissions to the air,' said JD Johnson, a 62-year-old Democrat from Meadowview, Virginia, who somewhat opposes tax credits to purchase an electric vehicle. That's partly because he sees the electric vehicle manufacturing process as energy intensive and believes gasoline-powered vehicles have made improvements with the pollutants they emit. The decline in favoring solar panel tax credits was across the board rather than being concentrated among Democrats. 'For solar panels, in all honesty, I don't think they're that efficient yet,' said Glenn Savage, 78, a left-leaning independent from Rock Hill, South Carolina. 'I'd rather see them pour money into research and try to get the solar panels more efficient before they start giving tax breaks to the public. I may be wrong on that, but that's just my thought.' Scientists say transitioning to renewable energies and ditching fossil fuels that release planet-warming emissions are essential to protect the planet. Billions of dollars in project grants for clean technologies awarded during President Joe Biden's Democratic administration have been canceled by the Trump administration, and the offshore wind sector has been stunted by Trump's executive order that paused approvals, permits and loans for wind energy projects. Fewer than half of U.S. adults, 44%, now say that offshore wind farms should be expanded in the U.S., down from 59% in 2022. About half favor expanding solar panel farms, while about two-thirds were in support in 2022. When people are concerned about the economy and their personal finances, environmental issues are sometimes prioritized less, said Talbot Andrews, an assistant professor in the department of government at Cornell University who was not involved in the poll. 'I think it makes people anxious to think about increased taxes or increased spending on environmental issues when the cost of eggs are going through the roof,' Andrews said. Low support for Trump's efforts to expand offshore drilling and coal mining Trump has championed the expansion of offshore oil drilling, as well as domestic coal production. Despite a decline in support for expanded renewable energies, the new poll shows that only about one-third of U.S. adults think offshore drilling for oil and natural gas should be expanded in the U.S., and only about one-quarter say this about coal mining. In both cases, Republicans are much more likely than Democrats to support expanding these energy sources. Trump has sought to open up national monuments for oil drilling, but more U.S. adults oppose than support auctioning off more public space for oil drilling. Only about one-quarter of U.S. adults favor this, while 4 in 10 are opposed. Republicans are much more likely than independents or Democrats to be in support. Bipartisan support for consumer rebates and home appliance ratings The Energy Star program that certifies appliances, such as dishwashers and refrigerators, as energy efficient recently appeared in headlines when the EPA made plans to scrap the program. The blue and white logo is well recognized, and experts say the program has long had bipartisan support until recently. The poll found three-quarters of Democrats support providing consumer rebates for efficient home appliances, compared with 6 in 10 Republicans. Patrick Buck, 54, from Chicago, describes himself as a liberal Republican and is a fan of the consumer rebates for energy-efficient appliances. 'It seems to work in terms of transforming what people have in their houses, because a lot of people have a lot of old appliances and just can't afford new ones,' he said. Safe air, water, meat and produce The poll found only about 2 in 10 U.S. adults are 'extremely' or 'very' confident in the federal government's ability to ensure the safety of their drinking water, the air they breathe and the meat, poultry, fruits and vegetables they buy in grocery stores. About 4 in 10 U.S. adults are 'somewhat' confident in the federal government's ability to ensure the safety of each of these, and about 4 in 10 are 'not very' or 'not at all' confident. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. The Trump administration has announced plans to roll back rules and policies related to limiting pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, such as rules that limit pollution from power plants and blocking California's efforts to phase out cars that run on gas. The federal government has also cut staff at the Food and Drug Administration, the federal agency tasked with protecting public health and ensuring food supply safety. ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find the AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
