SLPRB Assam Police Constable Results 2025 declared at slprbassam.in, direct link to download here
State Level Police Recruitment Board (SLPRB) Assam has declared the results of the Combined Written Test (CWT) for Constable (UB & AB) and equivalent posts. Candidates who appeared in the examination can check their result on the official website at slprbassam.in.
To check the result, candidates will need to enter their Application Number, Name, and Date of Birth.
Notably, the written test for Constable and equivalent posts was held on April 6. Following this, the board had released the answer key and said candidates who wanted to obtain scanned copies of their OMR answer sheets could download it on the payment of ₹50.
Also read: AHSEC 12th Result 2025: Assam HS results declared at ahsec.assam.gov.in, direct link here
Along with the answer key, the board had also shared question papers of all four sets.
Candidates were allowed to raise objections against the provisional answer key on the same portal on the payment of ₹500 per question.
Also read: CBSE Results 2025 News: Know important credentials to be kept ready, websites to check 10th, 12th marks when out
Qualifying candidates will now have to appear for the next round of examinations. The admit cards for the exams will be available from 11 AM of May 5 on the official website of SLPRB.
Also read: Kerala SSLC Result 2025 Date: Kerala Board 10th results releasing on May 9, websites to check
Candidates can follow the steps mentioned below to download the results on the official website:
For more related details, candidates are advised to visit the official website.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
2 days ago
- Hans India
Calcutta High Court Blocks Bengal Government's Stipend Plan For Dismissed Staff
The Calcutta High Court has intervened to block the West Bengal government's attempt to provide monthly stipends to non-teaching staff who lost their positions following a Supreme Court ruling on recruitment irregularities. Justice Amrita Sinha delivered the order on Friday, effectively halting the state government's stipend payments that were designed to support Group C and D non-teaching employees affected by the April Supreme Court judgment. The controversy stems from a major recruitment fraud that occurred in 2016 through the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC). The Supreme Court had previously upheld the Calcutta High Court's decision to terminate the appointments of over 25,000 teaching and non-teaching staff members due to irregularities in the selection process. In April, a Supreme Court bench comprising former Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice PV Sanjay Kumar characterized the recruitment process as fundamentally flawed and fraudulent. The court found evidence of systematic manipulation including OMR sheet tampering and rank falsification. Following the mass dismissals, the Mamata Banerjee-led state government announced a financial support package for affected non-teaching staff. The scheme proposed monthly stipends of Rs 25,000 for Group C employees and Rs 20,000 for Group D staff members. This compensation plan was the government's response to the widespread job losses resulting from the Supreme Court's strict enforcement of recruitment integrity standards. Multiple petitions were filed in the Calcutta High Court challenging both the government's stipend decision and the format of new recruitment processes being planned for teaching positions. The court reserved judgment on these matters the previous Monday before delivering Friday's ruling. The High Court's intervention reflects ongoing judicial scrutiny of how the state government handles the aftermath of the recruitment scandal. The Supreme Court's April decision was unambiguous in its condemnation of the 2016 recruitment process. The court described the appointments as fraudulent and equivalent to cheating, finding no grounds to overturn the High Court's original dismissal order. However, the Supreme Court did provide some relief by ruling that dismissed employees would not be required to return salaries they had already received during their employment period. The case highlights the broader implications of recruitment fraud in public sector employment. With over 25,000 positions affected across state-run and state-aided schools, the scandal has had significant consequences for both the education system and the individuals whose careers were disrupted. The High Court's latest ruling adds another layer of complexity to the state government's efforts to address the fallout from the recruitment irregularities while maintaining judicial oversight of remedial measures.
India Today
2 days ago
- India Today
Calcutta High Court stops Bengal's stipends for non-teaching staff move
The Calcutta High Court on Friday paused the Bengal government's decision to offer stipends to non-teaching staff of the 2016 batch after the Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of their jobs in April in the jobs-for-cash Amrita Sinha, who had reserved the order last Monday, halted the payment of stipends for Group C and D non-teaching Mamata Banerjee-headed Bengal government announced a Rs 25,000 stipend for Group C staff, and Rs 20,000 for Group D after the top court's massive April Separate petitions were filed at the Calcutta High Court, challenging the format of the fresh selection process for teachers and also Banerjee's decision to provide non-teaching staff with a monthly April, the Supreme Court had blasted the Bengal government as it upheld the High Court's decision to reject the appointments of more than 25,000 teaching and non-teaching staff by the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) in 2016 in connection with the jobs-for-cash scam.A bench of former Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, and Justice PV Sanjay Kumar called the selection process fraudulent, amounting to cheating."We find no reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court that the services of tainted candidates and their appointment be terminated. Since their appointment was by fraud, this amounts to cheating," the bench High Court had cited serious irregularities such as OMR sheet tampering and rank manipulation, thereby dismissing the appointments of 25,753 teachers and non-teaching staff in state-run and state-aided schools. In its April ruling, the Supreme Court, however, said that candidates already appointed need not hand over the salary given so far. IN THIS STORY#West Bengal#Mamata Banerjee
Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test candidate alleges OMR manipulation, plans legal action
Bengaluru: A National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) candidate from the city has claimed that the OMR sheet displayed on the NTA (National Testing Agency) website under her name was manipulated and didn't match the responses she had given during the exam. At a press conference, Spurthy S, a student of Soundarya PU College, said she found a stark mismatch between the responses she had given and those in the OMR sheet provided on the website. In a letter written to NTA, she said: "Upon attempting to download my OMR sheet, I encountered initial technical errors. When it became accessible, I observed that the shaded bubbles for the register number were correct, but the handwritten number appeared overwritten. I also remember writing the time under my signature, as instructed by the invigilator during the exam. However, the time written on the OMR sheet isn't visible in the scanned copy. This raised concerns about possible technical misread or mismatch during evaluation." "Several answers I attempted and marked are left unshaded. Some questions I didn't attempt are marked. This has led to a discrepancy of nearly 174 marks, inconsistent with my performance and expectations," she alleged. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo According to her, while currently her rank is around 93,000, it should have been around 200, based on the answers she claimed to have marked. While she wrote to NTA on June 3, the agency replied on June 12 stating that the OMR sheet was indeed hers. "We'd like to assure you that the OMR sheet displayed on the portal is the same as the one submitted by you at the exam centre. The sheet includes the details filled in by you, such as your roll number (both in figures and bubbled format), the question paper booklet number and series code, and bears both your signature and that of the invigilator. The image visible to you is a scanned copy of the original OMR sheet received from the centre under due process. The responses shown are those marked by you during the exam. We hope this clarifies your concern," the response read. The student said she intends to approach Karnataka high court over the matter. "I secured 625 out of 625 in SSLC and 99% in II PU. In CET, I have a rank of 1,386," she added.
