Calcutta High Court Blocks Bengal Government's Stipend Plan For Dismissed Staff
The Calcutta High Court has intervened to block the West Bengal government's attempt to provide monthly stipends to non-teaching staff who lost their positions following a Supreme Court ruling on recruitment irregularities.
Justice Amrita Sinha delivered the order on Friday, effectively halting the state government's stipend payments that were designed to support Group C and D non-teaching employees affected by the April Supreme Court judgment.
The controversy stems from a major recruitment fraud that occurred in 2016 through the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC). The Supreme Court had previously upheld the Calcutta High Court's decision to terminate the appointments of over 25,000 teaching and non-teaching staff members due to irregularities in the selection process.
In April, a Supreme Court bench comprising former Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice PV Sanjay Kumar characterized the recruitment process as fundamentally flawed and fraudulent. The court found evidence of systematic manipulation including OMR sheet tampering and rank falsification.
Following the mass dismissals, the Mamata Banerjee-led state government announced a financial support package for affected non-teaching staff. The scheme proposed monthly stipends of Rs 25,000 for Group C employees and Rs 20,000 for Group D staff members.
This compensation plan was the government's response to the widespread job losses resulting from the Supreme Court's strict enforcement of recruitment integrity standards.
Multiple petitions were filed in the Calcutta High Court challenging both the government's stipend decision and the format of new recruitment processes being planned for teaching positions. The court reserved judgment on these matters the previous Monday before delivering Friday's ruling.
The High Court's intervention reflects ongoing judicial scrutiny of how the state government handles the aftermath of the recruitment scandal.
The Supreme Court's April decision was unambiguous in its condemnation of the 2016 recruitment process. The court described the appointments as fraudulent and equivalent to cheating, finding no grounds to overturn the High Court's original dismissal order.
However, the Supreme Court did provide some relief by ruling that dismissed employees would not be required to return salaries they had already received during their employment period. The case highlights the broader implications of recruitment fraud in public sector employment. With over 25,000 positions affected across state-run and state-aided schools, the scandal has had significant consequences for both the education system and the individuals whose careers were disrupted.
The High Court's latest ruling adds another layer of complexity to the state government's efforts to address the fallout from the recruitment irregularities while maintaining judicial oversight of remedial measures.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
31 minutes ago
- Mint
ASHA worker duped in ₹4 lakh scam, still believes fraudsters were ‘good people'
An ASHA worker from Madhya Pradesh's Jabalpur fell prey to an elaborate lottery scam that left her not only financially devastated but also psychologically scarred. Pushpalata Jharia, 36, from the Bargi police station area, was lured by the promise of diamonds, gold, and a ₹ 10 lakh cash prize – a lie that spiralled into months of emotional manipulation, financial ruin, and a staged kidnapping. Pushpalata, who balances her role as a health worker with raising two children and supporting a husband doing odd jobs, had only ever believed that rewards came from hard work. But a single phone call in March changed the course of her life. The call came from a foreign number via a VPN line. The caller claimed Pushpalata had won a mega lottery but needed to pay a small processing fee to claim it. What began as a minor payment soon escalated into a string of transfers. The fraudsters kept her on the hook with repeated calls, threats, and false assurances. At one point, she was told her Aadhaar card had been discovered with a courier carrying her 'lottery prize' who had been arrested. Unless she paid more, they warned, she too could be in trouble. Trapped between fear and desperation, Pushpalata sent ₹ 4 lakh over a span of one and a half months. The money was sourced through loans from relatives and desperate pleas for help. 'She kept asking villagers and relatives for money. When we asked why, she said she was helping a relative,' her sister-in-law Asha Jharia told NDTV. 'Once, she even sent money using my daughter's phone. We begged her to stop — we barely had enough for ourselves.' On April 23, Pushpalata visited her maternal home. Three days later, she vanished, telling her family she was headed to Bargi but never returned. A missing person's report was filed on May 4. In reality, she had begun a lonely journey across several cities — Jabalpur, Mumbai, Surat, and Delhi — surviving on free meals, sleeping at stations, and taking up odd jobs. She would use borrowed phones to occasionally contact her family, all while continuing to send money to her unseen handlers. The fraudsters later forced her to record a distressing video. In it, Pushpalata is seen crying and pleading for help. The video was sent to her husband, along with a demand for ₹ 2 lakh. The threats were severe: if the money wasn't paid, her body would be 'chopped into pieces and thrown into the forest.' 'She got a call in March about some prize. Slowly she started sending money. Then one day, we got a video where she was crying, and it said she'd been kidnapped. We were terrified,' her daughter Poonam said. The incident left the family shaken. Pushpalata's mother approached the Madhya Pradesh High Court and filed a habeas corpus plea. On the court's orders, four police teams were assigned to trace her. The breakthrough came when Pushpalata made a call from a stolen phone in Greater Noida. Authorities traced the number and found her on a quiet Monday afternoon. 'She was physically weak and mentally disoriented,' CSP Anjul Mishra of Bargi was quoted by NDTV. 'She's still under the illusion that this was all part of a bigger plan and she will be rewarded in the end.' Even after her rescue, Pushpalata believes the fraudsters are 'good people' and that her prize is still real. Police officials have begun counselling her to help break the psychological hold of the scam. Investigators are now working to trace the digital footprint of the scam, which appears to originate from foreign servers. 'We received multiple audio messages with horrific abuse,' said Mishra. 'The kidnapping video came from a foreign source. The country hosting the IP is not cooperating, making it harder to trace the fraudsters.'
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Dhankhar slams Supreme Court over Emergency-era verdict, says darkest in judicial history
Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar on Friday (June 20, 2025) slammed the Supreme Court for its verdict delivered during the Emergency, dubbing it as the "darkest" in the judicial history of the world. According to an official statement, he said the judgment of the Supreme Court overruling that of nine High Courts legitimised dictatorship and authoritarianism. Mr. Dhankhar also questioned the then President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed for signing the proclamation of Emergency on the "instance" of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and not the entire council of ministers. Addressing a group of Rajya Sabha interns, the Vice-President said, "A president cannot act on the advice of an individual, the prime minister. The Constitution is very categorical. "There is a council of ministers headed by the PM to aid and advise the president. This was one violation, but what was the result? More than 1,00,000 citizens of this country were put behind bars in hours," he said. Referring to the role of the judiciary during the Emergency, Mr. Dhankhar said, "That was a time when the fundamental essence of democracy capsized in times of distress. People look up to the judiciary. "Nine high courts in the country have gloriously defined that emergency or no emergency, people have fundamental rights and there is access to the justice system. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court overturned all nine high courts and gave a judgment which will be the darkest in the history of any judicial institution in the world that believes in the rule of law," he further said. Mr. Dhankhar pointed out that the decision was that "it is the will of the executive to have Emergency for as much time as it thinks fit". The top court also ruled that during an Emergency, there are no fundamental rights. "So the judgment of the Supreme Court legitimised dictatorship, authoritarianism and despotism in this land," he said. The Vice President said the present government has "wisely" decided to observe June 25 every year as 'Samvidhan Hatya Diwas'. Emergency remained in force between June 25, 1975 and March 21, 1977.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Delhi Judge Cash Row: SC Probe Panel Report Says Misconduct Proved, Proposes Justice Varma's Removal
A Supreme Court-appointed panel has recommended the removal of Justice Yashwant Varma after finding 'clear and serious misconduct' linked to a late-night fire at his Delhi residence. The panel cited strong evidence of large amounts of burnt cash and suspicious removal of currency soon after the fire. Justice Varma's explanations and his daughter's testimony were found inconsistent. Following the report, former CJI Sanjiv Khanna had written to the President and the Prime Minister, calling for impeachment, marking a critical test of transparency in the Indian judiciary.#justiceyashwantvarma #delhihighcourt #judgeimpeachment #judicialmisconduct #burntcash #supremecourt #sanjivkhanna #impeachment #judicialintegrity #publictrust #indianjudiciary #courtscandal #legalnews #indiajustice #judicialaccountability #firecontroversy #varmafire #delhicourt #judiciaryscandal #cashscandal #highcourt #legalethics #indiajudiciary #judicialprobe #explainer #toi #toibharat Read More
