Convicted murderer snapped volunteering for Labor Party with Queensland MP Wendy Bourne in lead up to federal election
Queensland MP Wendy Bourne has been pictured next to a convicted murderer sporting a Labor Party T-shirt as the pair campaigned together for the party in April, a now-deleted post on social media has revealed.
John William Holznagel was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of his estranged wife and her boyfriend in 1979, but he only ended up serving around 13 years of the sentence imposed.
The Sunday Mail revealed that Mr Holznagel is now a preacher in the southeast Queensland town of Rosewood, west of Ipswich.
He has also helped campaign for the Labor Party in the town in the lead up to this year's federal election.
The revelation comes after the convicted murderer was spotted with the Queensland member for Ipswich West in a picture posted to social media on April 19, which has since been deleted from the website.
In the photo, Mr Holznagel appears to be volunteering for the political party as he wears a Labor Party T-shirt displaying Ms Bourne's name on the front.
The pair had been spreading the word about the Albanese government's 'record cost of living relief' and 'record spending on locals roads' in Rosewood that day, according to the caption of the post.
Labor have said Ms Bourne was unaware of the convicted murder's background when the photo was taken, The Courier Mail has reported.
SkyNews.com.au has approached Ms Bourne for comment.
Mr Holznagel was aged 24 when he killed his estranged wife Christine Joan Holznagel, 20, and her boyfriend John Steven Kingston, 22, more than 40 years ago in suburban Brisbane.
The apparent blunder by the Queensland MP to be in a picture with Mr Holznagel joins a number of controversies that have surrounded 2025 federal election campaign volunteers.
Minister for Housing Clare O'Neil became entangled in a controversy after it was revealed that ten individuals associated with Hubei Association, a group accused of having ties to the Chinese Communist Party, were being recruited to staff her polling booths on election day.
Teal MP Monique Ryan was also embroiled in the situation as a video emerged of a volunteer for her campaign saying that Hubei Assocation president Ji Jianmin "required us Chinese diaspora to support her".
Labor MP Andrew Charlton was also filmed questioning Liberal Party volunteers about their religion in his Parramatta electorate, in footage which showed him approaching a person and asking "Are you a member of the exclusive Brethren? Are you?".
Sky News host Chris Kenny at the time the footage surfaced suggested Mr Charlton's questioning of volunteers was "odd".
"What business is it of Charlton's to ask people about their religion. Why is it relevant?" Kenny asked.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
42 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Albanese should find a seat at the everyday Aussie kitchen table where the bills are piling up, instead of looking for a place next to Trump
While Australians again struggled to afford fuel and basic groceries this week, the Prime Minister had in his sights another overseas trip to enhance foreign optics instead of fixing problems at home. Mr Albanese has now ditched a last-minute appearance at next week's NATO summit in The Hague, some 16,000 kms away, in the hope it would produce a face-to-face with US President Donald Trump. The decision to instead send his deputy Richard Marles follows the PM's scheduled G7 encounter with Mr Trump in Canada which was scuttled by President's early exit to address the Iran-Israel conflict. What we are now also witnessing in the aftermath of that snub is a diplomatic dance which underscores just how far Mr Albanese is willing to go to secure a seat at the grown ups' table. At home, Australians are hurting and the cost of living remains the number one issue in this country. It has been for three years, probably more. The PM needs to stop eyeing a meeting with Trump overseas and start restoring confidence in his government's ability to manage both domestic and foreign affairs in a strategic and strong fashion. Sure, the US President's brush-off was a diplomatic embarrassment especially as it lacked a private heads-up to Mr Albanese before publicly pulling the plug on their meeting. But it's time to move on. The real questions are these: when was the last time this government delivered a serious and immediate policy to cut household energy bills? When was the last time this government offered tangible relief to small businesses buckling under the weight of supply chain blowouts and relentless interest rate pressure? This week it was announced that a productivity roundtable in Canberra was in the works to 'shape our government's growth and productivity agenda'. But already this is being picked apart as a consensus talkfest if cutting net immigration and net zero targets are not seriously considered. I don't think we are dealing with an abstract economic trend here because for nine million Australians it has nearly reached the point of financial collapse. New research from comparison site Finder paints a grim picture. Nearly half the country is the cost of a cracked windscreen or dentist's bill away from the edge. The average savings for this group? A paltry $215 which in NSW I would argue doesn't even cover a week's groceries. I saw a 1kg bag of ordinary coffee beans at the supermarket this week for $80. Dishwasher tablets, 82 of them, for $78. There was plenty of room to move in the fruit and vegetable aisle, with the least expensive thing to buy some apple varieties I'd never heard of and likely tasteless and cold-storaged for months. You're trying your luck if you fancy 350g of multi-coloured mini tomatoes for under $6.50, punished for your caviar-style tastes. The frozen food aisle with the cheaper dinners like fish fingers and bulk meat pies was doing brisk business, however. Local Facebook group chat is dominated by members asking for money saving tips including what time of day do local supermarket staff appear in store with a yellow sticker gun to discount products. According to Finder, 43 per cent in the cohort referenced have less than $1,000 in a bank account. More than half live pay transfer to pay transfer and 47 per cent are banking on a tax refund to plug holes in the dam. And a $12 coffee? Don't laugh, it's coming to a cafe near you. When inflation is combined with supermarket gouging, international trade instability and policy gridlock, prices only go in one direction. In cafes, once the beating heart of urban Australia, small business owners continue to be crushed. Wages, energy, rent, beans, you name it. Roasters say stress on the international coffee bean market means the only solution is to jack up prices. This isn't indulgence anymore. It's economics at gunpoint. Meanwhile, those brewing at home are finding supermarket shelves are no longer a refuge. Instant coffee is probably booming but that's less about convenience and more about budget. And then there's fuel. If you're still planning on driving to work, brace yourself. Petrol is tipped to hit $2.20 per litre with Middle East tensions sending the global oil markets into panic mode and we're all meant to just accept it like it's the weather. Australia may not import oil from Iran but that's no comfort at the bowser. Our prices are still shackled to global markets which drives up costs at the pump while hammering fuel-reliant industries nationwide. Australia used to have several oil refineries and now we have just two - Queensland's Lytton Refinery operated by Ampol and Victoria's Geelong Refinery, operated by Viva Energy. We can blame globalisation and "market efficiency" for that and we now import most of our refined fuel. With petrol spiking, inflation stays high too so consider that in terms of the Reserve Bank delaying any long-awaited interest rate cuts. And let's not forget the cherry on top: fuel excise and GST. What's the domestic agenda? Because from where most Australians stand at the petrol pump, in the supermarket aisle or checking their empty bank apps, it doesn't feel like there is one. We don't need a seat at NATO next week. Mr Albanese has had months to build a relationship with the Trump administration and should now plan to see him in Washington. We need a seat at the kitchen table where bills are piling up and no one from Canberra seems to be listening. Louise Roberts is a journalist and editor who has worked as a TV and radio commentator in Australia, the UK and the US. Louise is a winner of the Peter Ruehl Award for Outstanding Columnist in the NRMA Kennedy Awards for Excellence in Journalism and has been shortlisted in other awards for her opinion work
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Shadow fleets and ‘grey-zone' sabotage: The communication battleground beneath the waves
In October 2023, damage to the Balticconnector gas pipeline and telecom cables linking Estonia, Sweden and Finland made headlines. Official statements were cautious, but satellite data later tracked a Chinese-flagged vessel suspiciously close to the damage zone. A similar pattern repeated off the coast of Denmark's Bornholm island just months later. Each time, attribution proved elusive – but not implausible. Loading CSRI executive director Andrew Yeh said the involvement of commercial shadow fleets was consistent with grey-zone doctrine. 'Undersea cables underpin prosperity and security in the digital age,' he said. 'We cannot afford to be naive about the unprecedented threat that China and Russia's grey-zone operations pose to the UK's undersea infrastructure. The Baltic Sea is a peculiar theatre for modern maritime competition. At first glance, it's a crowded body of water – shallow, narrow, hemmed in by nine countries, six of them NATO members. But that congestion is precisely what makes it a high-stakes flashpoint. It has become a transport lifeline for Vladimir Putin's Russia, both in terms of exports and imports, and strategically. About 60 undersea cable systems crisscross the Baltic, with more added each year. These cables don't just power Netflix in Norway or Zoom in Zeebrugge – they form the encrypted foundation of NATO's command networks, trans-Atlantic data flows, and even the control systems for power grids and offshore wind farms. Yet NATO admits that it can't see everything. Much of the Baltic's maritime domain isn't covered by the automatic identification system that tracks commercial ships. Vessels operating 'dark' – without beacons, under false flags or masking their activity – have found freedom in the grey. That's where Task Force X comes in. Onboard Alliance, we're watching unmanned surface vehicles such as the Saildrone Explorer and Martac's Devil Ray glide in formation with crewed vessels. These aren't science-fair toys. They're the spear point of a NATO-wide effort to fill the surveillance gaps in increasingly contested waters. This week in The Hague, the issue will be high on the agenda of world leaders as they come together to discuss and debate European security and, in particular, the rate of spending needed to keep the continent safe. Data from the new systems and unmanned vehicles taking part in these exercises will be fed directly to a screen in real-time during the summit, showcasing the technology's effectiveness in enhancing NATO's understanding of the Baltic region. Leaders will also be asked to endorse a new rapid adoption action plan to ensure NATO's defences remain fit for purpose in an era of rapidly evolving threats and disruptive technological advancements. Task Force X is designed to integrate uncrewed systems – surface, subsurface and aerial – into NATO's maritime task groups. It's a lesson in agility, drawn from the US Navy's successful experiments in the Persian Gulf and Red Sea. But where those missions focused on anti-terrorism and anti-piracy, this one is squarely about deterring sabotage, especially to undersea infrastructure. The recent spate of attacks has accelerated the mission's rollout, with several NATO nations contributing commercial off-the-shelf systems upgraded with AI detection, sonar arrays and encrypted communications. 'The idea is to decentralise detection,' says Captain David Portal of Allied Maritime Command. 'We use autonomous vessels to track anomalies – dark ships, unexpected activity around known cable routes – and then feed that data into a real-time, pan-alliance picture.' The goal? To spot suspicious activity before the cable is cut – not after. What makes this different from past NATO initiatives is its scope. Task Force X isn't just plugging in new drones – it's part of a broader 'digital ocean vision', which seeks to use AI, big data and machine learning to create a living, learning map of NATO waters. Simon Purton, the head of innovation at NATO's Allied Command Transformation, says the organisation has moved with unprecedented speed following the disruptions to undersea infrastructure in the past year, integrating the allies' capabilities with scalable platforms to provide situational awareness, and deterrence, 24/7. 'The future that we see for the military exists in our industry ... in academia ... in our science and technology labs,' he says. 'So what we're trying to do then is create some tangible delivery on that, and also make sure that things are operationally relevant.' Loading Onboard the ship Alliance, that transformation is tangible. In the ship's command centre, researchers and officers watch sonar feeds and machine-learning-driven anomaly alerts. On-screen blips mark every commercial vessel. More worrying are the gaps – ship tracks that go dark near critical cable corridors, only to reappear hours later, far from where they should be. The stakes aren't abstract. In January, foreign ministers from Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania issued a joint communique pledging to 'intensify maritime patrols' after more confirmed sabotage incidents. While none pointed fingers directly, the language was unequivocal: this was the work of hostile actors. Russia, for its part, denies involvement. But few NATO commanders are buying that narrative. Australia's vast digital economy, worth billions of dollars, relies almost entirely on a surprisingly small and vulnerable network: just 15 known international subsea cables. These vital conduits, stretching to international hubs such as Singapore and Hawaii, carry 99 per cent of the nation's data traffic. It is one of the many reasons NATO is working with its 'Indo-Pacific 4' partners – Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand. A NATO official tells me that the need to protect critical undersea infrastructure is a 'topic of increasing concern' in both the Euro-Atlantic and the Indo-Pacific. 'For this reason, we are sharing information and best practices about how we are going about it,' the official says. 'We also see potential for co-operation ... specifically in the area of technology development to allow us to better survey our critical undersea infrastructure.' With its blend of national contributions and off-the-shelf tech, the exercises are designed to deter further mischief, not through confrontation, but through visibility. The thinking is simple: if you can be seen, you can be deterred. Still, Task Force X is not without challenges. As with any move towards automation, there are questions around command authority, cyber vulnerabilities and even the ethics of allowing AI to classify potential threats. But few aboard Alliance seem bogged down in philosophical hand-wringing. The pace of experimentation is brisk. The political appetite, sharpened by recent attacks, is real. As I disembark under a steely Nordic sky, one thing is clear: the front lines of conflict are no longer just on land, sea or air. They are digital, invisible and, increasingly, underwater.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
The Libs have been handed a golden opportunity. Now, watch them stuff it up
One of the great entertainments of political commentary in Australia over the past decade-and-a-bit has been speculating on what new and inventive way the Liberal Party will find to comprehensively bugger itself up. I can't help thinking this must have crossed Treasurer Jim Chalmers' mind as he fronted the National Press Club this week to announce that he will undertake a process to develop a new productivity agenda. Chalmers' speech was solid, but then so it should be after so many have said the same things so often to so little avail. His words and aspirations have been written for him many times over, sometimes with hope, other times with emotions ranging from dull rage to despair. Sometimes even by the Coalition. We need productivity reform, politicians all know we need it, the media all know they know we need it, yet no-one ever does it. There's a simple reason for that: it's hard. The treasurer dwelt in his speech on why it's hard. Reforming an economic system requires trade-offs. Some choices will cost some people. They may or may not be recompensed in the rejig. Chalmers doesn't want the media to simplify economic reform by explaining it in terms of 'winners and losers', as they do after each budget, but there will be winners and losers in the short, medium, or long term as a result of any new tax system. And, naturally, the opposition will do what the name says on the tin. It will oppose. Given the last years of Liberal shenanigans, the real question is how it chooses to do that. In one scenario, Sussan Ley leads a team which analyses and criticises the government's productivity proposals to ensure the best outcome for Australia and Australians. Should they choose this version of their own adventure, there will be plenty of material to tackle. The prime minister has already shown that he has no instinct for making business more efficient or even any understanding that a healthy economy relies on the private sector, creating new wealth instead of just shifting existing money around. In the first term of the Albanese government, the size of the public sector grew relative to the size of the private sector, so now each private employee is supporting more public sector salaries. Loading Then-employment minister Tony Burke passed through an industrial relations bill which makes it harder for businesses to scale up without locking themselves into costly arrangements. Meanwhile, the 'Future Made in Australia' slush fund has been 'picking winners' (code for government making decisions on industries it poorly understands) by investing in bringing in an overseas quantum technology firm rather than backing existing quantum technology firms – ahem – made in Australia. Labor is even trashing its own legacy by changing the rules on the superannuation system it forced people to contribute to, undermining trust that the money you lock away for retirement is really yours for later. It's hard to see how a government which made policies of this sort a priority and prefers the public to the private sector will back a productivity agenda which turns Australia around. But one of the great paradoxes of politics is that sometimes you need the party which is seen to be the touchy-feely side to deliver hard-nosed decisions. Think Labour prime minister Tony Blair in the UK, Democrat president Bill Clinton in the USA, or chancellor Gerhard Schroeder in Germany, all of whom delivered welfare reform in the face of their countries' badly designed benefits systems, which were creating disincentives to work.
