Purdue Pharma's $7B opioid settlement plan could get votes from victims and cities
OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma 's $7 billion-plus plan to settle thousands of lawsuits over the toll of opioids will go before a judge Friday, potentially setting up votes on whether to accept it for local governments, people who became addicted to the drug and other groups.
This month, 49 states announced they have signed on to the the proposal. Only Oklahoma, which has a separate settlement with the company, is not involved.
U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Sean Lane could decide as soon as Friday whether to advance the nationwide settlement, which was hammered out in negotiations between the company, groups that have sued and representatives of members of the Sackler family who own the company.
If Lane moves the plan forward as it's been presented, government entities, emergency room doctors, insurers, families of children born into withdrawal from the powerful prescription painkiller, individual victims and their families and others would have until Sept. 30 to vote on whether to accept the deal.
The settlement is a way to avoid trials with claims from states alone that total more than $2 trillion in damages.
If approved, the settlement would be among the largest in a wave of lawsuits over the past decade as governments and others sought to hold drugmakers, wholesalers and pharmacies accountable for the opioid epidemic that started rising in the years after OxyContin hit the market in 1996. The other settlements together are worth about $50 billion, and most of the money is to be used to combat the crisis.
In the early 2000s, most opioid deaths were linked to prescription drugs, including OxyContin. Since then, heroin and then illicitly produced fentanyl became the biggest killers. In some years, the class of drugs was linked to more than 80,000 deaths, but that number dropped sharply last year.
Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a version of Purdue's proposed settlement. The court found it was improper to protect members of the Sackler family from lawsuits over opioids, even though they themselves were not filing for bankruptcy protection.
In the new version, groups that don't opt in to the settlement would still have the right to sue members of the wealthy family whose name once adorned museum galleries around the world and programs at several prestigious U.S. universities.
Under the plan, the Sackler family members would give up ownership of Purdue. They resigned from the company's board and stopped receiving distributions from its funds before the company's initial bankruptcy filing in 2019. The remaining entity would get a new name and its profits would be dedicated to battling the epidemic.
Most of the money would go to state and local governments to address the nation's addiction and overdose crisis, but potentially more than $850 million would go directly to individual victims. That makes it different from the other major settlements.
The payments would not begin until after a hearing, likely in November, during which Judge Lane would be asked to approve the entire plan if enough of the affected parties agree.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
As Musk's 'robotaxi' rollout approaches, Democratic lawmakers in Texas try to throw up a roadblock
A group of Democratic lawmakers in Texas is asking Elon Musk to delay the planned rollout of driverless 'robotaxis' in the state this weekend to assure that the vehicles are safe. In a letter, seven state legislators asked Tesla to wait until September when a new law takes effect that will require several checks before autonomous vehicles can be deployed without a human in the driver's seat. Tesla is slated to begin testing a dozen of what it calls robotaxis for paying customers on Sunday in a limited area of Austin, Texas. 'We are formally requesting that Tesla delay autonomous robotaxi operations until the new law takes effect on September 1, 2025,' the letter from Wednesday, June 18, reads. 'We believe this is in the best interest of both public safety and building public trust in Tesla's operations.' It's not clear if the letter will have much impact. Republicans have been a dominant majority in the Texas Legislature for more than 20 years. State lawmakers and Republican Gov. Greg Abbott have generally embraced Musk and the jobs and investment he has brought to Texas, from his SpaceX rocket program on the coast, to his Tesla factory in Austin. The company, which is headquartered in Austin, did not responded immediately to a request for comment from The Associated Press. The law will require companies to secure approval from the state motor vehicles department to operate autonomous cars with passengers. That approval, in turn, would depend on sufficient proof that the cars won't pose a high risk to others if the self-driving system breaks down, among other reassurances. Companies would also have to file detailed plans for how first responders should handle the cars if there is a problem, such as an accident. The letter asked Tesla to assure the legislators it has met all the requirements of the law even if it decides to go ahead with the test run this weekend. The letter was earlier reported by Reuters. Musk has made the robotaxi program a priority at Tesla and a failure would likely be highly damaging to the company's stock, which has already tumbled 20% this year. Musk's political views and his affiliation with the Trump administration have drastically reduced sales of Tesla, particularly in Europe, where Musk's endorsement of Germany's far-right Alternative for Germany party in February's election drew broad condemnation. Tesla shares bottomed out in March and have rebounded somewhat in recent months. Much of the rise reflects optimism that robotaxis will not only be deployed without a hitch, but that the service will quickly expand to other cities and eventually dominate the self-driving cab business. Rival Waymo is already picking up passengers in Austin and several other cities, and recently boasted of surpassing 10 million paid rides. In afternoon trading Friday, Tesla shares were largely unchanged at $320. ________ AP reporter Jim Vertuno contributed from Austin.
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Inside Scott and Kelley Wolf's troubled marriage - actor swerved jail days before split as neighbor tells of WEEKS of 911 calls
Scott Wolf and his wife Kelley had a 'constant police presence' at their Utah home, according to a neighbor who said their marriage had been 'going downhill' for months. Kelley, 48, announced their separation on Instagram last week, one day after her estranged husband filed for divorce on June 9. The news came a month after Scott, 57, was charged with reckless driving, and just days before a string of 911 calls were made from their family home, including reports of trespassing and an individual being choked. Kelley later shared shocking footage to Instagram showing her being detained by police on June 13. 'Scott and Kelley's marriage has been going downhill fast the last couple of months,' a neighbor exclusively told 'There has been what seems like a constant police presence at their house and at all hours. 'Scott had his brother, Michael, move into the house temporarily to watch over the kids and this seems to have caused a problem with Kelley.' They claimed: 'The only ones who are going to suffer in this are the children.' Police were called multiple times this year to attend to reports of altercations involving Kelley, Scott, his brother Michael and their children. A shocking 911 call on June 13, obtained by revealed that an unidentified female friend requested assistance from Utah County Sheriff deputies over concerns for Kelley's 'escalating mental health crisis,' which the friend said had stretched over 'several weeks to months.' 'Last night she threatened to kill herself a couple times,' they told the dispatcher of Kelley who was staying at the scenic Sundance Resort. 'I'm terrified she's gonna act on it.' A representative from the Utah County Sheriff's Office told that she was 'temporally detained by our Deputies while she was transported to a local area hospital where she was transferred over to their care.' It came hours after cops were called to Kelley and Scott's marital home in Park City after a 'family fight' took place. According to a police report obtained by the personal development coach got into a 'verbal dispute' with her brother-in-law around 2:50am. Although his name is redacted on the report, a separate detailed call log obtained by confirmed it was Scott's brother Michael Wolf. It appears that Kelley requested he be removed from the home, claiming he 'trespassed,' but the brother-in-law noted that he was 'granted permission to stay in the home', presumably by Scott, who is 'one of the owner's of the residence.' Kelley also had a 'physical confrontation' with one of her three children, according to the police report. The author, who married Scott in 2004, has Jackson, 16, Miller, 12, and Lucy, 11, with the actor. She allegedly 'grabbed' her son - who was identified as Jackson in a 911 call -'by the wrists and restrained him to the point that she scratched his arm' after he held his phone over a bathtub of water and threatened to call 911. The 'juvenile son' told police that 'her grabbing his wrist did physically hurt.' Given that the actions between the involved parties 'did not reach the level of a criminal offense,' deputies helped with 'keeping the peace' and assisted with Kelley leaving the residence. In recently released audio from the 911 call, obtained by TMZ, Kelley asked for assistance to grab her belongings because she got into a heated argument with Jackson over a cell phone. She said she did not feel safe in her home and claimed that her brother-in-law had convinced her children that she is a 'cheater' and 'adulterer.' Kelley can also be heard accusing Scott of being 'controlling' and 'insane' during their marriage, which in recent weeks had forced her to repeatedly leave the family home. Also included in the June 13 police report was information about an alleged assault on March 6, 2025 that took place at Scott and Kelley's home. Although the names are redacted it appears it is between the now-estranged couple, given terms 'their son' and other clues in the police report, such as a 'past-occurred assault.' The report claimed that an aggressor put 'her hands around his neck,' but 'did not choke him hard enough to restrict blood or air flow.' 'Their son' witnessed the assault and was interviewed by cops, along with the victim who was assaulted, but the victim 'no longer wished to pursue charges,' so the incident was never sent to the County Attorney's Office. In a similar incident that took place on June 8, cops were called to reports of an unwanted person after, presumably Kelley, requested that her brother-in-law be removed from her property since she 'did not want him there.' The brother-in-law stated that he was in town to help watch their three children while Scott was working in Los Angeles. He 'advised that he believed the kids were unsafe in [redacted] care without another adult around.' However, authorities investigated no signs of any risk to the children's safety or well being, according to the report. Weeks before, on May 31, an 11-minute welfare check was carried out at the marital home. The incident was cleared and no further details were given. A second welfare check took place the following day around 5:39pm after a male juvenile had made a complaint about how his mother was '30 minutes overdue and he didn't know who else to call.' The juvenile's mother, Kelley - although her name is redacted - stated she was having some sort of 'an [redacted] attack,' but did not need medical assistance. She said that her divorce from her husband had 'caused emotional issues in the family,' according to the report. The call out came days after Party of Five star Scott was caught speeding on Utah Highway State Route 191 on May 11. The actor was driving at 128 miles per hour in a 65 miles per hour zone, according to a police citation exclusively obtained by In a statement, the trooper who cited Scott claimed 'he was in a hurry because his child needed to use the bathroom.' They said there was 'no indication of impairment.' According to court records, Wolf entered a guilty plea on May 23. Five days later, a judge found him convicted of Reckless Driving, a Class B Misdemeanor, and sentenced him to a term of five days in jail. However, the judge stated that if he paid a fine of $690, his jail term would be suspended. As of June 13, the payment has been received and his jail term was suspended. He was also placed on six months probation, specifically meaning that he is 'to be supervised by court probation' and 'Defendant (Wolf) is to notify the court of a current address at all times.' has reached out to Scott and Kelley for comment. When attempted to reach the family for further comment, Gary Wolf, one of Scott's other brothers, 'respectfully declined' to comment, and said that 'the family is handling it privately.' Kelley addressed the reporting on her divorce last night, asking in an Instagram post: 'Can we please SHUT THE 'F' UP about me and my family unless you're ready for a conversation like an adult?' In another posted one hour later she claimed she had been held against her will. 'Their reason? 'I'm worried about you.' Wow. F*** them,' she wrote, adding: 'I've been grieving this marriage for years. This isn't avoidance—it's acceptance. I'm far past the grief. I'm well into the healing. Very much so.' Five months prior to the divorce filing, Scott opened up about the 'challenges' he and Kelley had faced in recent years. 'My family's been through some stuff over the past few years,' he told UsWeekly. 'This period of time has been weird for a lot of people. And we sort of got blown in the wind a little bit, moved around a bunch, and [I] watched my children deal with all of that.'
Reuters
36 minutes ago
- Reuters
Apple sued by shareholders over AI disclosures
June 20 (Reuters) - Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab was sued by shareholders in a proposed class action on Friday, accusing it of downplaying the time needed to integrate advanced artificial intelligence-based features into its Siri assistant, hurting iPhone sales and its stock price. The complaint filed in San Francisco federal court seeks unspecified damages for shareholders who lost money in the year ending June 9.
