LSM: Time machine the wrong way

The latest data from Pakistan's Large-Scale Manufacturing (LSM) sector paints a troubling picture: not of a comeback, but of an industry stuck in a prolonged state of regression.
Yes, May 2025 marked a 2.3 percent year-on-year growth — the third positive monthly print this calendar year — but this is no sign of a turnaround. It's more of a dead cat bounce than a structural recovery.
Cumulatively, LSM contraction has now entered its ninth straight month, with 10MFY25 output down 1.52 percent. The headline figure for March, previously celebrated as a return to growth at 1.78 percent, has been quietly revised down — and how. The revised March figure now shows a contraction of 2.78 percent, marking the lowest reading since the start of the current LSM base, barring the COVID-induced collapse of FY20.
The culprit? A massive downward revision in the food index, led by sugar. March's sugar output was chopped significantly in the revised data, dragging the entire sector down. Seasonal production of sugar now clocks in at 5.78 million tons — nearly a million tons short of last year's haul. And with May historically contributing little to sugar output, the final season numbers are likely to be 8–9 percent below last year.
Despite the recent uptick, the broader reality remains grim. The LSM index for April is barely above readings from the past two years, and still a full 10 percentage points below its FY18 level. In fact, output levels are now back to where they were in FY17 — wiping out nearly eight years of supposed industrial progress. On a cumulative basis, output is even lower than FY19 and only marginally ahead of FY21 — and that's saying something.
To put it bluntly: Pakistan's industrial time machine isn't broken. It's just been set permanently in reverse.
The diffusion index — a measure of how widespread growth is — offers some surface-level hope, with 12 of 22 tracked sectors in the green. But scratch the surface, and the optimism fades. Only a handful of these are growing with any real momentum. The rest are dragging their feet. Pharmaceuticals and textiles are barely growing at under 3 percent. Readymade garments have lost steam since earlier this year. The one relatively bright spot is automobiles, buoyed by a low base and some modest demand recovery.
Meanwhile, the industrial backbone continues to deteriorate. Cement, steel, chemicals, and white goods — once the bellwethers of economic progress — are stuck in the red. Food has now officially joined that club, led by the sugar slump. 10 LSM subsectors are still operating below the index level that marked the beginning of this base year. Some may never climb back.
That's not cyclical weakness. That's structural decay.
To be fair, there are glimmers of hope. The State Bank's Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) for May reached a 12-month high. Capacity utilization across industries is holding steady at 65.7 percent — broadly in line with the last year's average. And while the central bank kept interest rates unchanged in its latest policy meeting, it did signal expectations of recovery led by services and industry in FY26.
But the devil is in the details — or in this case, the omissions. The Monetary Policy Committee avoided naming any specific LSM sectors poised for growth. That's because, apart from autos, the cupboard is nearly bare. Growth in private sector credit, sentiment indicators, and import flows were cited instead. Translation: there's hope, but not a whole lot of substance behind it — at least not yet.
Lower industrial electricity tariffs and cheaper credit might help slow the bleeding. But resurrecting industrial momentum is a different beast altogether. The highs of FY22 aren't just out of reach — they're not even on the horizon.Pakistan's industrial engine isn't revving up. It's idling in neutral — and sometimes slipping into reverse. And unless there's a concerted effort to address the structural issues holding LSM back, no amount of sugar-coating is going to change that.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Recorder

21 hours ago

• Business Recorder

Dollar holds steady

LONDON: The dollar edged up on Thursday as the threat of a broader Middle East conflict loomed over markets, while a raft of rate decisions in Europe highlighted the difficulty central bankers have in dealing with heightened uncertainty. Rapidly rising geopolitical tensions have boosted the dollar, which has reclaimed its safe-haven status lately. Iran and Israel carried out further air attacks on Thursday, with the conflict entering its seventh day. Concerns over potential US involvement have also grown, as President Donald Trump kept the world guessing about whether the United States will join Israel's bombardment of Iranian nuclear sites. The Federal Reserve left rates steady on Wednesday. The Bank of England also left rates unchanged on Thursday, citing elevated global uncertainty and persistent inflation as concerns for the economic outlook. The pound fell initially, but later recouped most of those losses. The Swiss franc, meanwhile, was stronger against the dollar following an expected rate cut from the Swiss National Bank. But the surprise came from the Norges Bank, which delivered a 25 bps rate cut, while markets had expected the Norwegian central bank to hold rates. The dollar and the euro both rallied by 1% against the Norwegian crown . The crown is still one of the top-performing major currencies against the dollar this year, with a gain of around 11%. Meanwhile, the euro dipped 0.1% to $1.1473. The dollar rose 0.2% against the yen to 145.56. The dollar index, which measures the currency against six others, was flat at 98.9 and was set for about a 0.8% gain for the week, its strongest weekly performance since late February. ING strategist Francesco Pesole said the fact that geopolitical risks and high oil prices were not 'US-induced risks,' unlike the risks to US government finances from Trump's tax cut plans or his tariff policies, the dollar could once again take on its role as a safe haven. 'The dollar is still in a more favourable spot than the energy-dependent safe-haven alternatives (like the euro) in this environment,' he said. US markets were closed on Thursday for the federal Juneteenth holiday, which could mean liquidity is lower. In a widely expected move, the Fed held rates steady, with policymakers signalling they still expect to cut rates by half a percentage point this year, although not all of them agreed on a need for rate cuts. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said goods price inflation will pick up over the course of the summer as Trump's tariffs start to impact consumers. 'Ultimately, the cost of the tariff has to be paid, and some of it will fall on the end consumer,' Powell told a press conference on Wednesday. 'We know that because that's what businesses say. That's what the data say from the past.' The comments from Powell underscore the challenge facing policymakers as they navigate uncertainties from tariffs and geopolitical risks, leaving markets anxious about the path of US interest rates.

Business Recorder

a day ago

• Business Recorder

Policy issues in the EFF programme — III

Covid-19 pandemic, and then the catastrophic floods in 2022, both of which had significant climate change causality – towards which Pakistan has contributed very little in terms of global carbon footprint – and pushed the country to take on considerable amount of loan — on top of its already difficult situation in terms of debt distress before these two events — that has created a meaningful gross financing issue for the country over the last few years, and over a medium term horizon. Multilateral support during both these events has been seriously lacking, including the one-time SDR allocation by IMF to the tune of around USD 2.7 billion in August 2021 – where allocation rather than being based on needs in the exceptional environment of the pandemic, was made as per the usual criteria of quota – was significantly far less than what was needed. Despite repeated calls by development activists internationally, and similar demands made under Barbados's PM Mia Mottley-led 'Bridgetown Initiative', nothing of substance has been done in this regard by the IMF. Table 3b titled 'Pakistan: External Gross Financing Requirements and Sources, 2022/23–2029/30' from May 2025 released 'IMF Country Report No. 25/109' highlights this otherwise much needed provision of IMF SDR allocation to be zero over the medium-term, which is the entire period covered in the table. On the contrary, financing requirements are huge – from FY2025-26 to FY2029-30 they are projected at USD 19.3 billion, USD 19.8 billion, USD 31.4 billion, USD 23.1 billion, and USD 22.2 billion, respectively – even after including very modest levels of current account deficit — for the same fiscal years, being projected at USD 1.5 billion, USD 2.1 billion, USD 3.9 billion, USD 4.7 billion, and USD 5.7 billion, respectively. Policy issues in EFF programme — I Pakistan's exports depend heavily on imported intermediaries, which are not possible to be appropriately make in the wake of lack of meaningful support from IMF in terms of enhanced SDR allocation — on top of releases to the tune of only USD 1 billion from time to time over roughly three-year EFF programme, which began in September 2024, and which are quite insignificant when seen in the context of the huge gross financing requirements — since the quota-based SDR allocation as assistance in the pandemic in August 2021 was low to start with, and since then likely climate change caused floods-related losses have not received much multilateral support, not to mention that the country is among the top-ten most vulnerable countries with regard to climate change crisis, and faces significant gross financing requirements over the medium term. Hence, in the absence of meaningful SDR allocation, and the adoption of otherwise unjustified over-board austerity policy, it is hard to import needed level of intermediaries for exports, which is among the main sustainable sources to achieve macroeconomic stability, to come out of the debt distress, and to move towards higher economic growth. Moreover, a lack of exports would mean lack of capacity to sustainably meet debt obligations, where unlike IMF's assessment in the report that 'Public debt remains sustainable over the medium-term… near-term risks of sovereign stress remain high…' both short-term, and medium-term risks are high, especially due to significant downside risks on account of a very volatile geopolitical situation – the recent Iran-Israel conflict saw a sudden spike in oil prices from around USD 65 per barrel to around USD 75 per barrel — and fast-unfolding climate change crisis — the Finance Minister reportedly indicated a significant role of climate change in reducing in reducing agricultural yield of major crops over the current fiscal year — creating upward pressures on imports payments, along with likely hurting exports, which overall means further increase in external financing gap, and may also result in greater debt distress. Policy issues in the EFF programme – II Instead of realizing the need to provide meaningful support in terms of enhanced SDR allocation — which is a global need being highlighted over the last few years, as indicated above, as a number of developing countries are facing serious debt distress — IMF is dealing with this situation in a routine way, in terms of the usual prescription of country enhancing its productive efficiency, which is in general a rather long-term variable in the presence of non-radical economic reform strategy that the neoliberal, and over-board austerity-based current EFF programme is not allowing. In the meantime, the country is stuck in a low-growth equilibrium. Lack of needed much larger reform scope in the current EFF programme, austerity-based approach not allowing greater investment into the demos to enhance their economic empowerment, and political voice to put greater pressure on public policy for radical, and deeper reforms, and no enhanced allocation of SDRs – not even once over the medium-term, which is the entire time horizon reflected in the programme document – coupled with a highly volatile environment of polycrisis, will likely not allow the country to reach sustainable macroeconomic stability. This in turn, would not allow the country to board an upward moving economic growth trajectory in any sustainable way. In that sense, the current EFF programme is just providing financial support mainly for a few more years to pass in a low-growth environment, which will neither help in creating basis for enhancing the export base for meaningfully dealing with the debt distress, including bringing gross financing needs to a sustainable level, nor will allow build-up of economic growth, and resilience to lower the otherwise fast-increasing poverty levels – where close to half of the population is below poverty line as per recently released World Bank figures – and to be better prepared for climate change crisis, and related 'Pandemicene' phenomenon; where Pakistan is among the top-ten climate change crisis affected countries. (Concluded) Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Express Tribune

a day ago

• Express Tribune

MPs break ground with budget review

Listen to article Former energy and finance minister Naveed Qamar said Parliament has made history by reviewing the 2025-26 budget word by word through its standing committees on finance and revenue. Speaking at a parliamentary consultation titled 'Budget 2025-26: Numbers and Beyond' on Thursday, Qamar noted that for a hundred years, the budget-making process remained the sole domain of bureaucrats. "Parliamentarians were handed the budget as a fait accompli, only to rubber-stamp it. This time, we've amended the rules of parliamentary business, allowing committees from both houses to read the Finance Bill meticulously, calling in experts and officials to better understand the data and narrative," he said. He stressed that Parliament must take the lead in the budget process and proposed setting up a parliamentary budget office staffed by specialists. "The budget documents reach Parliament in June with only weeks to pass them. The process should start months earlier with expert input," he added. Dr Nafisa Shah and Sher Ali Arbab, co-conveners of the Parliamentary Forum on Energy and Economy, explained how the forum works across party lines to broaden public engagement and deepen debate on energy and economic policies. Former State Bank governor Shahid Kardar criticised the budget as "unimaginative" and repetitive. "It doesn't address how government operates. Both federal and provincial governments are expanding without improving performance. Salaries and pensions are rising while development projects face major delays and cost overruns," he said. He also criticised international donors like the IMF for continuing to lend without requiring real structural reforms.