How to claim part of Apple's $95 million Siri lawsuit settlement
Some owners of Apple devices are eligible to file a claim for a piece of a $95 million class-action lawsuit settlement over allegations that voice-activated Siri assistant violated users' privacy by recording conversations.
Why it matters: Time is running out to file a claim for the settlement against the tech giant.
"Apple denies all of the allegations made in the lawsuit and denies that Apple did anything improper or unlawful," according to the settlement website.
Lopez v. Apple lawsuit
Catch up quick: In 2019, Apple suspended a program that had contractors listening to some Siri queries and apologized for how it handled recordings, Axios' Ina Fried reported.
The resulting lawsuit, Lopez v. Apple, filed in 2019, alleges recordings happened even when users didn't say the prompt "Hey, Siri."
The settlement was filed in court on Dec. 31, 2024.
What they're saying: An Apple spokesperson said in a statement to Axios in January that "Siri has been engineered to protect user privacy from the beginning" and its "data has never been used to build marketing profiles and it has never been sold to anyone for any purpose."
"Apple settled this case to avoid additional litigation so we can move forward from concerns about third-party grading that we already addressed in 2019," the spokesperson said. "We use Siri data to improve Siri, and we are constantly developing technologies to make Siri even more private."
Apple settlement: Who is eligible to claim up to $100
The big picture: Individuals who purchased or owned devices with Siri enabled between Sept. 17, 2014, and Dec. 31, 2024, may receive up to $20 per device under the settlement.
The amount "will increase or decrease pro rata depending on the total number of valid claims submitted, and Siri Devices claimed," documents show.
"Settlement Class Members may submit claims for up to five Siri Devices on which they claim to have experienced an unintended Siri activation during a conversation intended to be confidential or private," the settlement says.
iPhone, iPad among eligible Siri-enabled devices
Eligible devices include Siri-enabled iPhones, iPad, Apple Watch, MacBook, iMac, HomePod, iPod touch or Apple TV, the court documents show.
Apple Siri settlement deadline is July 2
Zoom in: The deadline to submit a claim is July 2, 2025.
The postmark deadline to opt out of the settlement also is July 2 and requests need to be mailed in, per the settlement website.
Siri claim form: How to file in Lopez Voice Assistant Settlement
State of play: Eligible Apple customers can claim to be a part of the settlement on the Lopez Voice Assistant Settlement website.
Some users received an email or postcard with a claim identification code and confirmation code that can be used to make the claim.
If not, you can still submit a claim online.
Yes, but: If you are still not sure whether you are included in the settlement class, you can contact the Settlement Administrator through one of the methods listed on the website's contact page.
Penalty of perjury for submitting false claim form
Threat level: For each device you are submitting a claim, you are required "to attest under penalty of perjury" that they "purchased or owned a Siri Device in the United States or its territories, and enabled Siri on that device/those devices."
You also need to claim under oath that you "experienced at least one unintended Siri activation" and that it "occurred during a conversation intended to be confidential or private."
Siri settlement payment: When to expect money
What's next: The court is currently scheduled to hold a final approval hearing on Aug. 1, 2025 at 9am at the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Oakland Courthouse.
The date and time can change and will be confirmed on the settlement website.
The site notes if the settlement is approved, there can still be appeals and the process can take time.
"If there is no appeal, your settlement benefit will be processed promptly. Please be patient," the website notes, adding settlement and payments updates will be posted on it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I ditched my AirTag for this smarter key tracker — and I love it
Everyone I know raves about how helpful it is for them to attach an AirTag on their keychain to keep track of their keys, but my issue is that AirTags are quite obvious — which gives potential thieves a quick opportunity of removing them. That's why I ditched mine in favor of this smart key tracker that doubles as a handy key organizer. The KeySmart iPro is a smart key organizer that neatly organizes my keys together, while also acting as a lifesaving tool in the event it goes missing thanks to its Find My support. Essentially, it's an AirTag disguised as a key organizer and I love it. For less than the cost of two AirTags, I think the KeySmart iPro still has value. I'd go far to say it's one of the best key finders around. Here's why. Keep your keys organized and in one place with the KeySmart iPro, which also supports Apple's Find My function to keep track of its location in the event it's lost or missing. There's also a built-in flashlight when you need check: $49 @ KeySmart I have so much stuff on my keychain that it's gotten so out of control in the last year, so I needed a change — but still want the peace of mind that an AirTag offers. I got all of that and more when I finally switched to the KeySmart iPro because of how it better organizes my keys. In fact, it can support up to 14 keys thanks in part to its design that lets me quickly expand it. While I don't have that many keys on me, I did manage to get the six main keys I need for my home. Much like a Swiss Army Knife, all the keys fold inside of it — but it typically accommodates standard keys that are uniformly flat. Meaning, I can't install my car key because of how the fob has a thicker base for its controls. Despite this, I managed to get all my other keys to fit inside of the KeySmart iPro after carefully figuring out how to best place them inside. What I really love most about it is how it supports Apple's Find My function, which practically gives it the same tracking abilities of the AirTag — but in a discreet design. Through the Find My app, I can see its location on a map and even play a sound to help me track it down easier around my home if I forgot where I put it last. On top of that, I really appreciate the notification I get every time it senses that I've left it behind. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Unlike other smart key finders, like those from Tile or Nomad's Tracking Card, it doesn't rely on a battery I need to replace — nor does it require a proprietary charging cable. Instead, the KeySmart iPro features a USB-C port covered by a plastic flap that's much more convenient in my opinion. Not only is it rated for up to 30 days of battery life, but the simple fact it's a USB-C port makes it more ideal because I can charge it just about anywhere. There's also a built-in flashlight, which isn't as powerful as my phone's flashlight, but nonetheless helpful when I can't find anything else around. Now that I've been using this, I don't plan on going back to a regular keychain with an AirTag attached to it. For its $49 cost, I think it justifies its value over other smart key finders, especially when it actually organizes my keys. And yes, it comes with a bottle opener as well so now I don't have to ask a waiter for one at a BYOB restaurant.
Digital Trends
2 hours ago
- Digital Trends
I tested 10 flagship phones. This one has the best battery
When it comes to selecting the best phones, three key areas are most important. The display and the best smartphone camera are integral parts of the experience on most phones — especially with the display on the best folding phones — but battery life is important to every smartphone user. Between different types of battery technology and a lot of variety in capacity and charging speeds, there's a lot to take into consideration when evaluating the best smartphone battery life, especially as usage patterns vary so wildly as well. Recommended Videos Yet, the question remains unanswered: which phone has the best battery life and charging? Since the iPhone launch last year, I've been testing the best phones as they've come into my possession. I've tested over 50 phones — folding and non-folding — over the past year, and here's what I've found. Understanding battery technology Before we dig into the testing, a quick primer on battery technology. For almost three decades, the smartphone industry has been using lithium-ion batteries to power phones and other electronic devices that require a battery. The next generation of smartphone batteries uses Silicon Carbon technology, which offers higher energy density, faster charging capabilities, and potentially a longer lifespan. This means you can fit a bigger battery in the same-sized phone or a bigger battery in a thinner device, making it ideal for the best thin phones. The first smartphone with a Silicon Carbon battery was the Honor Magic V5 Pro, which was introduced two years ago. Since then, we've seen many other Asian phone makers launch phones that utilize this battery technology. Samsung, Apple, and Google have yet to follow suit, but OnePlus launched the OnePlus 13 in January, making it the first smartphone in the US to utilize this architecture. Curating the best phones for testing There are so many phones released each year, both inside and outside the US, that testing every single device wouldn't be feasible, at least not for this mid-year test. However, the data I collected over the past year, combined with my own subjective experiences with each device, means it's possible to calculate which phones to include in these tests. To simplify the testing and results, I've split the shortlist into two categories: candybar phones and the best folding phones: Here's a quick overview of the key battery specs for the shortlist: Battery Size (mAh) Battery Type Charging Speed (W) Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4,685 mAh Lithium-Ion 37W Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5,000 mAh Lithium-Ion 45W Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3,900 mAh Lithium-Ion 25W Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 5,060 mAh Lithium-Ion 37W OnePlus 13 6,000 mAh SIlicon Carbon 80W Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 4,700 mAh SIlicon Carbon 68W Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 4,000 mAh Lithium-Ion 25W Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 4,400 mAh Lithium-Ion 25W Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 4,650 mAh Lithium-Ion 21W Oppo Find N5 5,600 mAh SIlicon Carbon 80W How I tested these phones I have been reviewing phones for almost twenty years, and have been objectively testing phones since 2015. To reduce the number of variables, I ensured that these tests were run after a factory reset, with a specific test account installed on the phone. This helped limit any potential data corruption caused by a particular app or background data usage. Each phone underwent the same testing. Each test was conducted with the display set to 200 nits of brightness to minimize variations caused by auto-brightness or different display brightness controllers. For the folding phones, the tests were conducted on the cover display. To test the phones, I charged each to 100% and then ran various tests. The first involved browsing a looping set of websites and social feeds, while the second ran the same test, but with a looped video. The gaming test involved playing Genshin Impact for 60 minutes and extrapolating battery usage from there. The best battery life for web browsing and social media Let's first take a look at the results of the browsing and social media test for each of the five non-folding phones: Rank Phone Capacity Duration Points 1st Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 4,700 mAh 15:48 h 10 2nd Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4,685 mAh 15:42 h 9 3rd OnePlus 13 6,000 mAh 15:02 h 8 4th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 5,060 mAh 11:58 h 7 5th Oppo Find N5 5,600 mAh 11:25 h 6 6th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 4,650 mAh 11:01 h 5 7th Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5,000 mAh 10:57 h 4 8th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3,900 mAh 8:59 h 3 9th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 4,400 mAh 8:58 h 2 10th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 4,000 mAh 7:59 h 1 The biggest surprise through all of this testing is just how capable the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra battery proves to be. In this test, it outranks the iPhone 16 Pro Max, which lasted considerably longer than any other phone since the iPhone 15 Pro Max. Both of these devices outperform your expectations based on their capacity, whereas the opposite is true of the Galaxy S25 Ultra, which should be better. The best battery life for video playback Of course, web browsing and social media playback is only one test, albeit the most varied one I tried. A more strenuous test is video playback, especially as it engages the graphics card more strenuously than the simpler first test. Rank Phone Capacity Duration Points 1st OnePlus 13 6,000 mAh 23:21 h 10 2nd Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4,685 mAh 23:04 h 9 3rd Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 4,700 mAh 19:22 h 8 4th Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5,000 mAh 18:42 h 7 5th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3,900 mAh 16:58 h 6 6th Oppo Find N5 5,600 mAh 15:01 h 5 7th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 4,400 mAh 14:58 h 4 8th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 4,650 mAh 14:31 h 3 9th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 4,000 mAh 14:21 h 2 10th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 5,060 mAh 14:02 h 1 The OnePlus 13 unsurprisingly outperforms the competition here, as the larger capacity and software optimizations work their magic. The iPhone 16 Pro Max meets expectations here as Apple's software and hardware integration proves to be magical for endurance. It'll be interesting to see how the new background tasks feature in iOS 26 affects this. I'm very impressed by the Galaxy S25 Edge here, as it has the smallest battery in this list — unsurprising as it's the thinnest non-folding phone — but it ranks 5th in one of the more strenuous tests. If you watch a lot of movies, this phone will likely handle what you throw at it. The best battery life for gaming The first two tests have become progressively more strenuous, but how does each phone endure when tested under heavy gaming conditions? Where applicable, I enabled game mode (or a similar feature) but left the settings at their default values. Rank Phone Capacity Duration Points 1st Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5,000 mAh 9:42 h 10 2nd Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4,685 mAh 9:38 h 9 3rd Oppo Find N5 5,600 mAh 7:58 h 8 4th Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 4,700 mAh 7:42h 7 5th OnePlus 13 6,000 mAh 7:13 h 6 6th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 5,060 mAh 7:03 h 5 7th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 4,400 mAh 6:58 h 4 8th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 4,650 mAh 6:40 h 3 9th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3,900 mAh 6:03 h 2 10th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 4,000 mAh 6:02 h 1 I was taken aback by the Galaxy S25 Ultra's results here, but a retest revealed similar results, so this is a clear example of how a feature like Samsung's Game Booster can extend your battery life under heavy gaming conditions. This is made even more surprising, given that it shares the 8-core Snapdragon 8 Elite processor with the OnePlus 13, albeit Samsung has developed an optimized version of the processor for its flagship devices. The iPhone proves to be an endurance champion yet again, and the Find N5 and Razr 60 Ultra both continue to prove that folding phones can offer better battery life than non-folding phones. The rest of the results are as I expected: the Pixel 9 Pro Fold, Z Fold 6, and Flip 6 all rank low in most of the tests. Before we head to the charging tests, here's a quick look at the overall top 3 in the battery tests: iPhone 16 Pro Max (27 points), Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (25 points), and OnePlus 13 (24 points). The phones that charge the fastest Of course, when your battery is running low, you need fast charging, so which of these phones charges the fastest? First, a quick note about mAh/min. It's a metric I have been using for years, and it's designed to standardize charging speeds while eliminating the variability of battery capacity and charging speed. It also applies to the 15-minute reading, where we record the battery percentage reported by the phone and multiply it by the capacity to estimate the mAh charged during those 15 minutes. Let's take a look, first, at the time taken for a full charge: Rank Phone Speed Full charge m/Ah min Points 1st OnePlus 13 80W 35 mins 171.4 10 2nd Oppo Find N5 80W 50 mins 112 9 3rd Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 68W 48 mins 93.8 8 4th Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 45W 64 mins 78.1 7 5th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 37W 78 mins 64.9 6 6th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 25W 67 mins 58.2 5 7th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 25W 91 mins 48.4 4 8th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 21W 105 mins 44.3 3 9th Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 37W 114 mins 41.1 2 10th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 25W 102 mins 39.2 1 For more than a decade, one thing has been clear: companies like Huawei, Oppo, Honor, and OnePlus have all figured out how to recharge phones quickly and safely. This has been the case since long before the introduction of the new generation of Silicon Carbon batteries, and the technology is significantly faster than its competitors. The result is that it's no surprise that OnePlus and Oppo dominate the list. However, the biggest surprise comes from the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and its new 68W charging, which significantly increases charging speeds. I don't know about you, but I often forget to charge my phone, or the battery runs low when I only have a short moment to recharge. For those times, I also noted the percentage each phone added to the battery after a 15-minute charge. Rank Phone Speed % at 15 m ~mAh Points 1st OnePlus 13 80W 55% 3,300 10 2nd Oppo Find N5 80W 42% 2,352 9 3rd Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 68W 48% 2,160 8 4th Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 45W 40% 2,000 7 5th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 37W 35% 1,771 6 6th Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 37W 27% 1,265 5 7th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 25W 30% 1,170 4 8th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 25W 26% 1,144 3 9th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 21W 24% 1,116 2 10th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 25W 23% 920 1 This overall charging test is when Apple's core weakness becomes apparent. The battery life of the iPhone 16 Pro Max is fantastic, but the charging speeds leave much to be desired. As you'll see below, however, this is not always the case, and the slower overall iPhone charging speeds are usually due to the device charging more slowly (to protect the battery) once it reaches 80%. The phone with the best battery is… There's a lot more testing to do on these phones and many of the best upcoming folding phones like the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Galaxy Z Flip 7, but where do Samsung's current folding phones stand? How about the new Galaxy S25 Edge? How does the thin body affect that battery compared to its beefier sibling? Let's look at the final results to find out! Rank Phone Total Points 1st OnePlus 13 44 2nd Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 41 3rd Oppo Find N5 37 4th Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 35 5th Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 33 6th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 25 7th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 21 8th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 17 9th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 16 10th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 6 It's no surprise that the Galaxy Z Flip 6 comes last, especially given it's been there for most of these tests, but it does have me curious whether they'll be able to improve it in the upcoming Z Flip 7. The Galaxy S25 Edge performs admirably given the capacity constraints, especially as it has the smallest battery of all. In the top 5, Apple is the most interesting. Improving charging speeds would eliminate the gap to the top of the leaderboard, especially since it currently ranks first in the battery life tests. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a solid contender, but it shows that there's still room for Samsung to improve. The top 3 are very interesting. The Oppo Find N5 has the best book-style folding phone battery life that I've tested, and this rings true in the testing. The same applies to the Razr 60 Ultra, which proves that flip phones can be just as capable as non-flip ones. I'm very surprised by just how capable the Razr 60 Ultra battery life proves to be in this test. The best phone for overall battery life, however, is the OnePlus 13, which continues the OnePlus trend of offering outstanding battery life and super-fast charging. This is the biggest and best battery in a OnePlus phone to date, and shows that Silicon Carbon is the smartphone battery future we've been waiting for.
Digital Trends
5 hours ago
- Digital Trends
The best part of macOS Tahoe is it feels more like an iPhone than ever
It's been over a week since Apple dropped the first developer preview of macOS Tahoe. Most of the chatter is centered around the glass-inspired design makeover, and deservedly so. For me, Spotlight upgrades, especially the Quick Keys system, have been the standout element. Yet, as I delved deeper and pushed it as my workhorse computing platform, despite all the bugs and performance snags, I have come to realize that it feels like home. And by that, I mean closer to the iPhone's native feel than expected. Recommended Videos And it's not solely due to the aesthetic uniformity, but owing to the functional changes. Apple didn't only carry over system functionalities, but also some of the iPhone's defining apps. The Phone app, for example, is one of them. And it's not a half-hearted attempt either. From computing to communication When Apple first enabled iPhone mirroring on macOS, it was a huge sigh of relief. Of course, being able to access all my chats scattered across WhatsApp, Discord, Telegram, and Slack — right on my Mac was a huge convenience. But more than the ease aspect, it was the freedom from checking my phone that came as the real liberator. At the end of the day, however, it's still mirroring, and not something native to the Mac. Alerts for calls still came as a tethered notification, not natively. With macOS Tahoe, Apple is finally bridging the gap, thanks to the Phone app's arrival on Macs. We're talking about the full package here. You get access to a familiar dialer, the recents list, and access to voicemails. I tried it a few times, and the whole telephony experience worked just fine on my M4 MacBook Air, while my iPhone 16 Pro lay comfortably resting in my backpack. Of course, make sure you're connected to earbuds while engaged in Mac calls. Leaning and speaking into your MacBook is a terrible sight. Trust me. I tried it and got a few odd looks in a coffee shop. And if you need more convincing, read this fantastic piece on why you should invest in a pair of earbuds, even if it's the cheapest pair on the market. What surprised me, however, was that even the next-gen calling features that have only arrived with iOS 26 are also being ported over to the macOS experience. I recently wrote how Apple is falling far behind Android when it comes to safety features such as scam detection and spam blocking. This year, Apple finally made some strides as it brought Call Screening and Hold Assist to iPhones. Both these features are available in the Phone app running on Macs, with macOS Tahoe. I also love how Apple has offered a less-distracting way to handle calls, one where the video call window doesn't occupy the whole screen and neatly slots in a small preview window alongside the top edge. And yeah, the painstakingly designed contact posters are here to stay, as well. Seamless transition, at last Carrying over the hot streak built atop the Phone app, Apple is also porting over the full text and video calling experience from iOS 26 to macOS Tahoe, thanks to the Apple Intelligence stack. In Messages, users can take advantage of Live Translation, while live captions will be available for FaceTime sessions. A similar translation facility will be accessible within the Phone app, too. But there's more to the mobile-inspired conveniences in macOS than meets the eye. Live activities are one of my favorite iPhone features, but to access them, I have to keep an eye on my iPhone. Needless to say, it's not the most productive act. Thankfully, Apple finally paid attention to the conundrum and has decided to import Live Activities in macOS Tahoe. From food delivery alerts to live score updates, if they land on your iPhone's screen, you will see them in the Menu Bar of your Mac. The best part? You can interact with these live activity alerts on your Mac. When you click on them, they open the iPhone Mirroring experience so that you can see them in the exact way they are intended to appear on iOS. From there, you can choose to close them, minimize them, or execute whatever action you deem fit. I love this actionable live activity update, but what I am more excited to see is Apple paying attention to the Menu Bar. So far, the company has ignored the humble Menu Bar, while the developer community has built some fantastic utilities such as Maccy and Antinote that live in the Menu Bar. A few smaller tweaks So far, the control center on Macs has felt like a rigid pool of preset tools. With the arrival of macOS Tahoe, Apple has given it the iPhone treatment. Not only can you customize the entire dashboard with quick access tools of your choice, but you can also do it using a simple drag-and-drop gesture. On a similar note, the lock screen customizations also borrow the core design ideas from iOS 18. Even the icon theming and tinting system is now identical to how you make aesthetic adjustments on your iPhone. The Journal app has also made its way to the Mac, while the redesigned Photos app makes it easier to handle the gallery using filtering and sorting tools. Overall, it is pretty evident that harmony was the overarching theme with Apple's OS updates, both in form and function. Some of the changes in macOS Tahoe may appear a bit divisive, but everything feels just a bit more familiar from an iPhone user's perspective, which is a fantastic strategy for onboarding more people into the ecosystem while keeping the existing user base locked in.
