Former Man Utd and Chelsea star Nemanja Matic slapped with football ban after taping over LGBTQ+ logo

A second player has been banned, while a third avoided punishment
ACE BANNED Former Man Utd and Chelsea star Nemanja Matic slapped with football ban after taping over LGBTQ+ logo
NEMANJA MATIC has received a ban after he covered an LGBTQ+ campaign logo on his kit with tape.
The former Manchester United and Chelsea midfielder, who now plays for Ligue 1 club Lyon, covered up the logo on his sleeve for the final game of the season.
4
Nemanja Matic has been banned for two games for covering an LGBTQ+ campaign logo on his sleeve with tape
Credit: AFP
4
The Ligue 1 rainbow logo was part of an anti-homophobia campaign
Credit: Getty
Matic, 36, used tape to cover a rainbow coloured Ligue 1 logo on his Lyon shirt for their final day victory over Angers.
The logo was part of Ligue 1's annual campaign against homophobia which sees every club shirt adorned with the rainbow design.
Matic wasn't the only player to cover the logo, with Le Havre forward Ahmed Hassan also covering the sleeve design with tape.
According to Belgian news outlet HLN, both Matic and Hassan have been handed two-match bans by the French Football Federation as a result of their actions.
The pair will also reportedly have to undergo an awareness campaign about homophobia in football.
Matic is believed to be a member of the Serbian Orthodox Church and Hassan is Muslim.
A third player, Nantes striker Mostafa Mohamed, has escaped punishment after refusing to play with the logo.
Mohamed, who is also a practicing Muslim, chose not to play in the final match of the season rather than covering the logo up.
4
Le Havre forward Ahmed Hassan (right) also covered up the logo
Credit: Getty
4
Mostafa Mohamed chose not to play with the logo on his sleeve
Credit: AFP
Mohamed cited his 'values' for not playing in Nantes 3-0 win over Montpellier.
He wrote on social media: "Living together also means recognising that this diversity can be expressed differently from one person to another.
Nemanja Matic brands Andre Onana 'one of worst keepers in Man Utd HISTORY' in savage response to goalie
"I believe in mutual respect - the respect we owe others, but also the respect we owe ourselves and our beliefs.
"As for me, there are deep-rooted values tied to my heritage and my faith, which make participating in this initiative difficult."
The actions of the Matic, Hassan and Mohamed prompted France's sports minister Marie Basacq to issue a statement after the final day of the Ligue 1 campaign.
Barsacq said: "Football has a massive platform, and the [French Football] Federation is determined to put this issue on the clubs' and supporters' agenda.
'Homophobic insults and behaviour are no longer acceptable.
"Society has evolved, and the language in football must change with it. There's a full range of sanctions available, and they must be applied.'
Although rare, some players have spoken out in support of the LGBTQ+ community in the past.
Speaking six years ago, Atletico Madrid and French international Antoine Griezmann said: "If a gay player wants to come out, he might not have all the France players with him, but he will have me.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Guardian

34 minutes ago

• The Guardian

‘A perfect storm': multi-club ownership, Crystal Palace and a looming court threat

In the waterfront offices of Uefa's House of European Football headquarters in Nyon, the legal team are preparing for an unwanted trip around Lake Geneva to Lausanne. Over the course of many internal meetings since Crystal Palace inadvertently provided Uefa with the toughest test yet of its multi-club ownership (MCO) rules by winning the FA Cup, it has become increasingly clear the ultimate arbiter on the issue is likely to be the court of arbitration for sport (Cas). 'We're going to find out if our MCO rules stand up to scrutiny as, one way or another, it looks like we're going to Cas,' says one source at Uefa, resigned to the issue of whether Palace can compete in next season's Europa League being placed in the hands of that Lausanne court. Uefa has been liaising closely with Palace, with sources claiming the issue of John Textor's dual shareholding in the club and Lyon – who qualified for the Europa League by finishing sixth in Ligue 1 – was flagged by the governing body long before the 1 March deadline for resolving MCO issues. The American is in advanced discussions over selling his 44.9% stake in Palace to the New York Jets owner, Woody Johnson, which may help the club's cause, although there is no prospect of the deal being completed before Uefa has to make a decision. The case is emblematic of the confusion surrounding club ownership and the regulatory issues facing the sport, and Uefa has delayed a ruling until the related case of Lyon's financial problems has been resolved. The DNCG – French football's financial watchdog – is auditing Lyon's accounts after imposing a provisional relegation to Ligue 2 last year owing to the club's debt levels, with a final outcome expected next week. Relegation and a ban from European competition for Lyon would make Uefa's life a lot easier, although both seem unlikely. 'It's a perfect storm,' says a sympathetic figure at another club. 'Everything that could go wrong from Uefa's point of view has done. We have three clubs involved [Palace, Lyon and Brøndby, who are owned by the Palace shareholder David Blitzer], and two multi-club groups. There's a complex ownership group at Palace who don't appear to communicate very well, and a surprise FA Cup winner. Not to mention Lyon's financial issues. You couldn't make it up really.' Palace sources acknowledge they are working with Uefa amid belief on both sides that an accommodation is wanted, but two factors beyond either party's control could count against them. First, Cas last month upheld Fifa's decision to expel the Mexican club León from the Club World Cup because they are part of the same ownership group as another qualifier, Pachuca. The owner, Grupo Pachuca, had attempted to park its León shareholding in a separate trust but this move did not satisfy Fifa or Cas. In another complication Nottingham Forest, who will be moved from the Conference League to the Europa League if Palace are kicked out, may go to Cas if denied that promotion. A source close to Forest's owner, Evangelos Marinakis, told the Guardian the Greek billionaire was opposed to many of the moves to regulate football and was prepared to take on Uefa. There are clear financial incentives to do so. Whereas Chelsea earned £21m in prize money from winning the Conference League in the past season, Tottenham's Europa League triumph could be worth well over £100m because it also delivered a Champions League place. Palace are worried the León ruling has set a precedent that could work against them. At Uefa there is a feeling that it would rather face Forest at Cas than have its multi-club framework tested in court by Palace. One figure at a European team with direct experience of multi-club contortions believes Uefa will give Palace every opportunity to pass muster, concurring that the governing body's regulations could be brought tumbling down in the event Textor and company mounted a challenge. An examination brought about by Forest would, they suggested, give the existing rules a far better chance of holding firm. Confirmation by Cas this week of the League of Ireland side Drogheda's expulsion from the Conference League owing to a multi-club breach has heightened concerns in Nyon, but the cases are different. Drogheda had qualified by winning the Irish Cup last November yet their owner, Trivela Group, failed to meet Uefa's March deadline, and unlike Textor the American investors are majority owners of two clubs: Drogheda and Denmark's Silkeborg. Uefa had caused disquiet in some quarters by shifting that deadline forward from last year's June date. Some figures involved in club acquisition have expressed surprise that Drogheda were not able to win their case at Cas. 'Uefa are trying to be flexible, but the Fifa v Club León case is making it harder for them,' a source said. 'Cas upheld Fifa's rules, which are very similar to Uefa's, so the precedent is there. The Cas ruling was based on the nature of the blind trust and the importance of the regulatory process – ie dates and deadlines. To put it simply Palace haven't complied, but Uefa want to make it work.' There is some acknowledgment at Uefa that elements of its MCO rules are not fit for purpose, although it would prefer to redraft them in Nyon than put them at the mercy of the court. There is nothing in Article 5 of Uefa's rules detailing whether Palace or Brøndby should be given precedence if both end up in next season's Conference League, for example. In ordinary circumstances it would be Brøndby by virtue of their higher league position, as stated in the rules, but Palace could also have a claim if parachuted in from the more prestigious Europa League. Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion Uefa's MCO rules have been in place without many revisions for 24 years, although one significant change was made 12 months ago when the regulations were relaxed to permit a club part of a multi-ownership group to compete in a different competition. Article 5 was drafted in 2001 after a legal challenge from Tottenham's owner, Enic, the first multi-club operation in the Premier League, after AEK Athens were blocked from taking part in the 1998-99 Uefa Cup because their sister club Slavia Prague had also qualified. The initial rule stated that 'control or influence' over more than one club was not allowed, but it was not tested until 2017 when RB Leipzig and Red Bull Salzburg qualified for the Champions League, which led to the wording being altered to 'decisive influence'. What had been a rare occurrence is now an annual problem for Uefa, with Aston Villa, Brighton and Toulouse allowed to play in Europe during the 2023-24 season only when their owners put more distance between them and Vitória de Guimarães, Union Saint-Gilloise and Milan respectively. The same issue affected Manchester City and Girona as well as Manchester United and Nice a year later. The fact that neither Girona nor Manchester United joined their partner clubs in qualifying for next season's European competitions may have kicked a further conundrum down the road. Their respective ownership groups were allowed what was, in theory, a short-term exemption last season by placing one of their clubs' shares in a blind trust until 1 July this year. One club owner wonders how Uefa would have responded if those sides had reached the same tournament for a second consecutive year. It is unclear whether they would have been allowed to roll over into a further 12 months of blind trust holding. Multi-club ownership is growing constantly; figures shared with the Guardian by the MCO Insights consultancy suggest more than 800 top- and second-tier clubs could be involved by 2030. That would roughly double the current number. By that point it would surely be uncontrollable by current rules. Simon Leaf, head of sport at the law firm Mishcon de Reya, believes Uefa and other governing bodies need clearer regulations to avoid being repeatedly taken to court. 'We are seeing an increasing number of clubs looking to use various legal avenues – in particular, competition law – to try to challenge regulations that they dislike,' Leaf says. 'This trend is likely to continue, making it much harder for leagues and governing bodies to regulate their competitions. 'On the Palace matter it is hard to have too much sympathy with Uefa given they already showed themselves to be willing to bend their own rules on MCOs last summer – and despite their efforts to strengthen the regulations since then, the bar has now been set. 'Either way, MCOs are not going away, and so football's governing bodies need to find a way to properly deal with these issues so that they are dealt with in the boardroom rather than the courtroom.'

Daily Mirror

35 minutes ago

• Daily Mirror

BRIAN READE: 'There's no stopping America destroying English football'

You may have failed to notice that there's something going on in America called the Club World Cup of football. It's not the club football you're used to seeing in the Premier League, where two psyched-up teams go like the clappers for 90 blood-curdling minutes in front of packed, passionate stadiums. This newly invented competition is quite the opposite. Take Chelsea 's game against Los Angeles FC on Monday in Atlanta, when there were so many gaps in the stands you could have played a five-a-side game as 50,000 tickets went unsold. FIFA's latest month-long, out-of-season, vanity exercise comprises hopeless mismatches between minnows and giants and slow-paced bore-a-thons in the searing heat. Which leaves European players wishing their knackered bodies and minds were recovering on a beach after a gruelling nine-month season before training starts for another one next month. Like the recent equally pointless and anaemic England games, the only reason footballers and fans are being denied a vital summer break from the sport is that those in charge of it are hopelessly consumed with greed. Spy a blank date in the calendar and a rich, relatively-untapped market like the USA, and they will pull out all the stops to squeeze more sweat from the players and money from the audiences. And, sadly, it's only going to get worse. When US tycoon Todd Boehly bought Chelsea for £4billion in 2022, he told a private equity conference: 'The global footprint of soccer is really underdeveloped' and needs 'an American mentality' to fully realise its financial possibilities. Boehly is just another Yank moneyman who sussed that the earning potential of American football had been maxed out and the hugely-popular English Premier League was the certain route to unlocking sport's global riches. Next season 11 Premier League clubs will be run by Americans, and when it reaches 14, which it soon will, they will run the show as that is the number required to rewrite the rules. Which they will swiftly do. And thus the top echelon of English football will become a closed shop run by, and for, US hedge funds. Looking at what they have already hinted at there's every chance relegation will be scrapped, eliminating financial jeopardy and demolishing the 136-year-old pyramid that sees money flow down to the lower leagues and grass roots. You can expect rounds of Premier League games played in America, or even a global day of games spread across the world's different time zones. Domestic kick-off times will be changed to suit global audiences and a cup final could be played in Baltimore or Beijing where, for one night, the teams who, for example, played in last season's FA Cup final, could be renamed The Crystaldelphia Eagles and the Manchester Dolphins. I wouldn't bet against the two top teams in the league eventually being forced into a Superbowl -style finale, with cheerleaders, Taylor Swift, tailgate parties and adverts popping up during stoppages where sponsors announce 'this substitution break is brought to you by StayHard erectile dysfunction pills'. And any complaint from the paying fans whose life revolves around following their team, will not register. They will simply be told that the Premier League is now a US-owned, blue-chip, global brand like McDonald's or Disney and, like Coca-Cola, you old school, legacy dudes will just have to suck it up. Have a nice day, y'all. Feeding naturally nourishing food shouldn't come with a side of hassle - Forthglade's subscription service takes care of your dog and your to-do list.

Daily Mirror

44 minutes ago

• Daily Mirror

Cole Palmer told he 'keeps disappearing in big games' by Chelsea legend

Cole Palmer has not been at his best in 2025, scoring just three goals for Chelsea, and former Blues star John Obi Mikel is "worried" about the fact the No.10 "disappears in games" Chelsea star Cole Palmer has been accused of disappearing in games following his side's 3-1 defeat to Flamengo at the Club World Cup. Palmer enjoyed an outstanding debut season at Stamford Bridge, netting 25 goals and providing 15 assists in 45 appearances across all competitions. He then followed that up with 15 goals and 12 assists in 46 games last season, with his output dropping off massively towards the end of the campaign as Palmer managed just three goals in 2025. ‌ And former Chelsea midfielder John Obi Mikel, who won ten major trophies during his time at the club, says he is "worried" about Palmer's tendency to disappear in matches. Speaking after another quiet showing against Flamengo, Mikel told DAZN: "It is a bit worrying. ‌ "Cole is a fantastic player, everything goes through him but sometimes he disappears in games where you don't see him and that has happened again. But he needs to know that he is now a marked man. "You will play against teams and they will know if you take out Cole Palmer, you can nullify the way they play. So he needs to find a different way. Maybe the manager needs to help him in terms of navigating games and opponents. "Maybe try to free him, give him more space. If he plays well, we play well, so I hope the combination between him and [Liam] Delap will get better. So [I am] a little bit worried but Cole is a fantastic player and will hopefully continue to develop." Chelsea began their Club World Cup campaign with a 2-0 win over LAFC, but were beaten by Flamengo after they staged a second-half comeback. Pedro Neto had given Chelsea an early lead, but goals from Bruno Henrique and Danilo turned the game on its head. Things then got even worse as Nicolas Jackson was sent off for a poor challenge on Lucas just minutes after he was introduced by manager Enzo Maresca. A third goal from Wallace Yan wrapped up the victory for Flamengo and Jackson issued an apology after the game. ‌ "I want to say sorry," he wrote on Instagram. "To the club, the staff, my teammates, and all the fans watching, I let you down. Another red card... and honestly, I'm so angry at myself. I work hard every day to help the team not to put us in this kind of situation. "I still don't fully understand how it happened. But one thing is clear: it wasn't intentional. Just a football moment that went the wrong way. No excuses. I take full responsibility. I'll reflect, I'll grow, and I'll come back stronger for the badge and for everyone who believes in me. Sorry. Sorry."