Elon Musk's stunning three-word reaction to SpaceX Starship exploding in fireball
Elon Musk shared a stunning three-word reaction after his SpaceX rocket exploded into a massive fireball while being tested Wednesday night in Texas.
The SpaceX owner seemed to joke about the failed test, writing, 'Just a scratch' on X after the Starship suffered a 'major anomaly' and shot up into flames, ruining yet another test for the space company.
While SpaceX hopes their Starship will one day carry humans to the Moon and Mars, test flights in May, March, and January also ended in failures. The Starship program, SpaceX's central project and the most powerful rocket to date, is also crucial to NASA's Artemis program.
Meanwhile, SpaceX chalked the explosion up to the rocket experiencing 'a major anomaly' just ahead of its flight test.
'A safety clear area around the site was maintained throughout the operation and all personnel are safe and accounted for,' the company said.
SpaceX said that there are no hazards to residents in the surrounding areas; however, people are being asked to avoid the site.
The company said it is working with local officials to respond to the explosion.
Footage captured the 36 rocket, which was undergoing a static fire test, abruptly exploding into a dramatic fireball around 11 p.m. Wednesday night.
Video from NASASpaceflight.com shows the rocket standing in the dock before exploding without warning, sending a wave of flames toward the cameras.
It's not the first time Musk has downplayed his company's shortcomings. Following the SpaceX explosion in May, he said, 'Success is uncertain, but entertainment is guaranteed!'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Nasa spacecraft around the Moon photographs crash site of Japanese lunar lander
Nasa released the pictures on Friday, two weeks after ispace's lander slammed into the moon. The images show a dark smudge where the lander, named Resilience, and its mini rover crashed into Mare Frigoris or Sea of Cold, a volcanic region in the moon's far north. As of 8:00 a.m. on June 6, 2025, mission controllers have determined that it is unlikely that communication with the lander will be restored and therefore completing Success 9, is not achievable. It has been decided to conclude the mission. 'Given that there is currently no… — ispace (@ispace_inc) June 6, 2025 A faint halo around the area was formed by the lunar dirt kicked up by the impact. Nasa's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter captured the scene last week. The crash was the second failure in two years for Tokyo-based ispace. Company officials plan to hold a news conference next week to explain what doomed the latest mission, launched from Cape Canaveral in January.
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Nasa spacecraft around the Moon photographs crash site of Japanese lunar lander
A Nasa spacecraft around the moon has photographed the crash site of a Japanese company's lunar lander. Nasa released the pictures on Friday, two weeks after ispace's lander slammed into the moon. Advertisement The images show a dark smudge where the lander, named Resilience, and its mini rover crashed into Mare Frigoris or Sea of Cold, a volcanic region in the moon's far north. As of 8:00 a.m. on June 6, 2025, mission controllers have determined that it is unlikely that communication with the lander will be restored and therefore completing Success 9, is not achievable. It has been decided to conclude the mission. 'Given that there is currently no… — ispace (@ispace_inc) June 6, 2025 A faint halo around the area was formed by the lunar dirt kicked up by the impact. Nasa's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter captured the scene last week. The crash was the second failure in two years for Tokyo-based ispace. Company officials plan to hold a news conference next week to explain what doomed the latest mission, launched from Cape Canaveral in January. Advertisement
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Dead NASA satellite inexplicably comes back to life to fire huge pulse that lit up the sky
A NASA satellite that had remained inactive in orbit for nearly six decades suddenly emitted a powerful radio signal, leaving astronomers around the world stunned. The brief but intense signal, detected by radio telescopes in Western Australia, lasted only a fraction of a second yet became the brightest object in the sky, momentarily outshining entire galaxies and stars. The source of this unexpected burst was Relay 2, a communications satellite launched by NASA in 1964. After both of its transmitters failed in 1967, the satellite had been silent and declared defunct until now. Experts believe the signal wasn't deliberately transmitted by the satellite, but was triggered by an external event. One possibility is an electrostatic discharge: a sudden release of electrical energy, similar to a spark, caused by the satellite building up charge as it orbits through Earth's magnetic field. Another theory is that a micrometeoroid, a tiny piece of rock traveling at high speed, struck Relay 2, causing a burst of heat and charged particles that emitted the brief but intense signal. The burst briefly emitted about 400 watts of power, similar to a small microwave oven. The fact that this signal remained that powerful after traveling from space to Earth makes it especially rare. Australian scientists, who were scanning the sky for fast radio bursts (FRBs)—short, high-energy flashes typically originating from deep space—made the startling discovery. According to NASA, FRBs can briefly outshine entire galaxies, a phenomenon that occurs in the blink of an eye. However, this signal was unique: it originated not from a distant galaxy but from within Earth's orbit, just about 2,800 miles above the planet's surface. 'We thought we might've found a new pulsar or a never-before-seen object,' Dr. Clancy James, lead researcher and associate professor at Curtin Institute of Radio Astronomy, told New Scientist. 'Instead, we saw an incredibly powerful radio pulse that eclipsed everything else in the sky for a split second.' The burst was detected by the Australian Square Kilometer Array Pathfinder (ASKAP), a network of 36 radio telescopes. Researchers quickly traced the source to Relay 2, which happened to be passing overhead at that exact moment. Despite lasting only nanoseconds, the radio burst was extraordinarily strong. Scientists estimated its strength at more than three million janskys, a unit used to measure radio wave intensity. That's roughly 100 billion times stronger than the radio signals from your typical smartphone. The shape of the signal was clean and well-defined, allowing scientists to analyze it in detail. Relay 2 was originally launched to improve satellite communication and conduct studies on Earth's radiation belts, areas filled with charged particles trapped by the planet's magnetic field. It carried two transmitters and was designed to spin for stability. But by mid-1967, both transmitters had failed, and the satellite became just another piece of space junk orbiting Earth. At first, researchers thought the detected signal came from a distant cosmic object. But a closer look confirmed it aligned exactly with Relay 2's position in the sky. 'This must have been caused by an external trigger, like an electrostatic discharge or a micrometeorite hit,' Dr. James explained. The burst lasted 1,000 times faster than previous electrostatic signals detected from satellites, which typically last a microsecond (one-millionth of a second). This makes it the fastest and most powerful signal of its kind ever recorded near Earth. While the signal caused a stir in the astronomy world, it also raised concerns. Many telescopes scan the sky for signals from far-off galaxies, and an unexpected burst from a nearby defunct satellite could cause confusion or lead to false discoveries. Still, some scientists see a silver lining. Dr Karen Aplin, a space weather expert at the University of Bristol, said this surprise detection could lead to new tools for studying electrical activity in space. 'It may ultimately offer a new technique to evaluate electrostatic discharges in orbit,' she said.
