'Narendra ... surrender' jibe at PM: It's BJP vs Congress over Rahul Gandhi's remark
NEW DELHI: Bharatiya Janata Party and the
Congress
on Wednesday engaged in a war of words over leader of opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi's "Narendra ... surrender" jibe at Prime Minister
Narendra Modi
.
While the saffron party declared Rahul of being too "immature to be an LoP", the grand old party reiterated the "surrender" jibe at the prime minister further questioning his leadership.
Calling it "cheap politics" on
Operation Sindoor
,
BJP
spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi said, "By making extremely cheap, low-level statements, the self-proclaimed, self-styled, supreme leader, the leader of opposition, Rahul Gandhi, is telling the world that even after becoming the LoP, he lacks seriousness and maturity that the post requires...
How Rahul Gandhi compared our armed forces' valour and army officers' brief on Operation Sindoor's success with surrender, shows how sick and dangerous his mentality has become.
"
Rahul sparked a controversy after he questioned the repeated claims made by Trump over mediation in India-Pakistan truce saying, "Trump gave a sign from there. He (Trump) picked up his phone and said, 'Modiji, what are you doing? Narendra ...
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
Surrender.' And PM Modi complied."
Though New Delhi has not explicitly refuted former Trump's recent claims, the ministry of external affairs has reiterated that the India-Pakistan ceasefire was a purely bilateral decision. It also clarified that no trade-related discussions with the US have taken place in connection with Operation Sindoor.
'Not even Masood Azhar or Hafiz Saeed ... '
BJP compared Rahul to terrorists like Masood Azhar and Hafiz Saeed and said that even those "have not said such a thing".
"He has used such a word which even Pakistan's Army, terrorist organisations, or UN-designated terrorists Masood Azhar or Hafiz Saeed have not used," Trivedi said.
He further accused accused Rahul of repeatedly undermining the country's self-respect and the bravery of its armed forces.
"The level of intelligence and wisdom of someone who sees receiving less than three points in their third attempt in the election result as a success, and sees being elected as the Prime Minister for the third time as a defeat is obvious...
I want to ask the Congress party, has Rahul Gandhi insulted the Army by using the word surrender or not?" he said.
'
Narendra ka surrender
'
Meanwhile, Congress accused the BJP of projecting false bravado, claiming the party spent 11 years crafting a narrative of strength akin to a film titled "Muqaddar Ka Sikandar", only for it to end as "Narendra Ka surrender."
"BJP people were making a film for the last 11 years- 'Muqaddar Ka Sikandar' But when the film was ready, it turned out to be 'Narendra Ka Surrender' Actually, there is no injection of bravery, but it is in the character of a person.
The history of BJP-RSS people has been of cowardice. When such a person takes over the reins of the country, the future of the country comes in danger, which we are seeing at present," Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera said.
"When the brave Indian Army had Pakistan on its knees, Trump called and Narendra Modi surrendered. Trump said many times that we got the ceasefire done by threatening with trade, but Narendra Modi has not replied to Trump till date. He will not even answer, because name is Narender, work is surrender – this is the reality and truth," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
31 minutes ago
- India.com
Pakistan finally breaks silence over US strikes on Iran nuclear sites, leaves everyone in shock, says...
New Delhi: America's entry in the war between Israel and Iran has increased the stir in the Middle East. America carried out rapid attacks on three major nuclear bases of Iran. Meanwhile, Pakistan has strongly condemned the US attack on Iran's nuclear bases. Pakistan's Foreign Ministry posted on its official social media account that America has violated all the rules of international law by carrying out airstrikes. Under the United Nations Charter, Iran has full right to defend itself. The statement said that we have expressed deep concern about the current tense situation in the Middle East. The situation arising from this is very worrying because it will have dire effects in the Middle East and beyond. These attacks are a violation of international law and Iran has full right to defend itself. Let us tell you that Pakistan shares its border with Iran. Pakistan shares a 900 km long border with Iran. Pakistan had also called upon Israel and Iran to end this war as soon as possible. Pakistan had said that diplomacy is the only way to peace, not military conflict. Pakistan had lobbied for the Nobel Prize for Trump Pakistan had lobbied for the Nobel Peace Prize for US President Donald Trump a day earlier. The Pakistan government had formally proposed Trump's name for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. The Pakistan government had said that the way Trump resolved the war with India in 2025 through diplomatic intervention and important leadership, it has been decided to propose Trump's name for the Nobel Peace Prize. The neighbouring country had said that it was because of Trump's efforts that a ceasefire took place between India and Pakistan, which averted the major threat of war. For this reason, Trump is the most deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize. After the Pahalgam terrorist attack, Islamabad started Operation Bunyan Un Marsoos in response to India's Operation Sindoor.
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
World Bank and IMF climate snub 'worrying', says COP29 presidency
The hosts of the most recent UN climate talks are worried international lenders are retreating from their commitments to help boost funding for developing countries' response to global warming. Major development banks have agreed to boost climate spending and are seen as crucial in the effort to dramatically increase finance to help poorer countries build resilience to impacts and invest in renewable energy. But anxiety has grown as the Trump administration has slashed foreign aid and discouraged US-based development lenders such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund from focussing on climate finance. Developing nations, excluding China, will need an estimated $1.3 trillion a year by 2035 in financial assistance to transition to renewable energy and climate-proof their economies from increasing weather extremes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Laxmi Ji Idol For Wealth, Peace & Happiness Luxeartisanship Shop Now Undo Nowhere near this amount has been committed. At last year's UN COP29 summit in Azerbaijan, rich nations agreed to increase climate finance to $300 billion a year by 2035, an amount decried as woefully inadequate. Azerbaijan and Brazil, which is hosting this year's COP30 conference, have launched an initiative to reduce the shortfall, with the expectation of "significant" contributions from international lenders. But so far only two -- the African Development Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank -- have responded to a call to engage the initiative with ideas, said COP29 president Mukhtar Babayev. "We call on their shareholders to urgently help us to address these concerns," he told climate negotiators at a high-level summit in the German city of Bonn this week. "We fear that a complex and volatile global environment is distracting" many of those expected to play a big role in bridging the climate finance gap , he added. - A 'worrisome trend' - His team travelled to Washington in April for the IMF and World Bank's spring meetings hoping to find the same enthusiasm for climate lending they had encountered a year earlier. But instead they found institutions "very much reluctant now to talk about climate at all", said Azerbaijan's top climate negotiator Yalchin Rafiyev. This was a "worrisome trend", he said, given expectations these lenders would extend the finance needed in the absence of other sources. "They're very much needed," he said. The World Bank is directing 45 percent of its total lending to climate, as part of an action plan in place until June 2026, with the public portion of that spilt 50/50 between emissions reductions and building resilience. The United States, the World Bank's biggest shareholder, has pushed in a different direction. On the sidelines of the April spring meetings, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged the bank to focus on "dependable technologies" rather than "distortionary climate finance targets." This could mean investing in gas and other fossil fuel-based energy production, he said. Under the Paris Agreement, wealthy developed countries -- those most responsible for global warming to date -- are obliged to pay climate finance to poorer nations. Other countries, most notably China, make voluntary contributions. - Money matters - Finance is a source of long-running tensions at UN climate negotiations. Donors have consistently failed to deliver on past finance pledges, and have committed well below what experts agree developing nations need to cope with the climate crisis. The issue flared up again this week in Bonn, with nations at odds over whether to debate financial commitments from rich countries during the formal meetings. European nations have also pared back their foreign aid spending in recent months, raising fears that budgets for climate finance could also face a haircut. At COP29, multilateral development banks (MDBs) led by the World Bank Group estimated they could provide $120 billion annually in climate financing to low and middle income countries, and mobilise another $65 billion from the private sector by 2030. Their estimate for high income countries was $50 billion, with another $65 billion mobilised from the private sector. Rob Moore, of policy think tank E3G, said these lenders are the largest providers of international public finance to developing countries. "Whilst they are facing difficult political headwinds in some quarters, they would be doing both themselves and their clients a disservice by disengaging on climate change," he said. The World Bank in particular has done "a huge amount of work" to align its lending with global climate goals. "If they choose to step back this would be at their own detriment, and other banks like the regionally based MDBs would likely play a bigger role in shaping the economy of the future," he said. The World Bank declined to comment on the record.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Have supplies of several weeks': Puri assures fuel stability amid US-Iran strikes; India leans on Russian Crude
NEW DELHI: As military conflict escalates between Israel and Iran, Union minister Hardeep Singh Puri on Sunday assured citizens that India's fuel supplies remain secure despite growing volatility in the Middle East. 'We have diversified our supplies in the past few years, and a large volume of our energy no longer passes through the Strait of Hormuz,' Puri posted on X, adding that Oil Marketing Companies have 'supplies for several weeks' and continue to receive fuel from multiple routes. His comments come as India dramatically increased Russian oil imports in June, buying more crude from Moscow than from all Middle Eastern suppliers combined. According to preliminary data from Kpler, Indian refiners are set to import 2 to 2.2 million barrels per day (bpd) from Russia, up from 1.96 million bpd in May. In comparison, total imports from traditional Gulf partners like Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Kuwait are projected to be slightly lower at around 2 million bpd. US strikes add to region's instability The latest geopolitical instability stems from a direct US military intervention in Iran. Yesterday, American forces bombed three Iranian nuclear sites, joining Israel's June 13 attacks on Iran's nuclear infrastructure. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Tehran has responded with strong warnings, including threats to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global chokepoint through which 40% of India's oil and 50% of its gas transits. Analysts believe a full closure is unlikely. 'Iran would risk hurting allies like China and Gulf neighbours, as well as provoke military retaliation,' said Sumit Ritolia of Kpler. 'At most, isolated disruptions could occur for 24–48 hours.' India's energy strategy pivots India's import strategy has shifted significantly since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Russian oil now makes up about 40-44% of India's crude basket, compared to under 1% before the war. US oil imports have also jumped, from 280,000 bpd in May to 439,000 bpd in June. Ritolia says India is now better prepared for supply shocks. 'Russian barrels come via routes detached from Hormuz. India is also sourcing more from the US, West Africa, and Latin America,' he noted. In the event of disruption, India may dip into its strategic reserves, which can cover around 9–10 days of imports. For now, Puri reiterated the government's commitment: 'We will take all necessary steps to ensure the stability of fuel supplies for our citizens.' Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
