Have your say on if abortion should be decriminalised as MPs prepare to vote
Abortion laws in England and Wales could be set for a major shake-up as MPs debate decriminalisation in the Commons today. With the possibility of women no longer facing prosecution for ending a pregnancy, we want to know where you stand
A law change aimed at decriminalising abortion will be debated in the House of Commons later today - and we want to know your feelings on the matter.
It comes amid spiralling concern that more and more women are being investigated by police on suspicion of illegally ending a pregnancy. MPs are set to vote on decriminalising terminations after 24 weeks with or without approval from doctors in England and Wales, meaning women will no longer face prosecution. But do you think abortion should be decriminalised? Take our poll below.
The proposed changes follow Labour MP Stella Creasy 's e-petition, which has racked up more than 103,000 signatures since its launch in December last year. It stated: 'I am calling on the UK government to remove abortion from criminal law so that no pregnant person can be criminalised for procuring their own abortion.'
The petition also highlighted that the UK is not aligned with guidance issued by the World Health Organization in 2022, which recommends removing medically unnecessary obstacles to safe abortion, such as criminalisation. The proposed changes are reportedly widely supported, and MPs have now been granted a free vote on the matter - meaning they are not required to follow a party line when casting their vote.
As it stands, all abortions after 24 weeks are illegal, with exception of limited circumstances. This includes the mother's life being at risk, or if the child were to be born with a severe disability. Do you think abortion should be decriminalised? Take our poll below. If you can't see it, click here
The Abortion Act was introduced to Great Britain in 1967, and allowed women to legally terminate a pregnancy up to 28 weeks with the certification of two doctors. In 1990, the limit was changed to 24 weeks. This means that a woman who undergoes an abortion without the permission of two doctors – for example, by buying abortion pills online – can be charged with a criminal offence.
The Act states that abortions must be carried out either in a hospital or licensed clinic. However, this was changed during the Covid pandemic in 2020, when at-home abortion pills were made available by post for people seeking to terminate their pregnancy in the first 10 weeks.
So what are the proposed changes?
Labour MP Tonia Antonizzi is calling for an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill in her attempts to decriminalise abortion at any stage by a woman acting in relation to her own pregnancy. Consequently ending the threat of investigation or imprisonment. Access to abortion would remain the same, as would time limits in healthcare settings, and patients would still need sign off by two doctors.
Antoniazzi told the BBC: "The police cannot be trusted with abortion law – nor can the CPS or the wider criminal justice system. My amendment to the crime and policing bill will give us the urgent change we need to protect women."
Katherine O'Brien, a spokesperson for the British Pregnancy Advisory Service, previously told The Mirror: 'In recent years, more than 100 women are believed to have been investigated by the police.'
Labour MP Stella Creasy told the Mirror that "decriminalisation isn't enough" and is putting forward a second amendment to make a woman's access to an abortion a human right. Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle will decide whether to select one or both amendments for a vote today.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
19 minutes ago
- The National
Labour's plans to proscribe Palestine Action 'deeply authoritarian'
On Friday, the National told how Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is set to make the announcement on Monday, according to reports in Sky News and the BBC. It would effectively treat Palestine Action as a terrorist group and would make it illegal for people to join or express support. The decision comes after the group posted footage online showing two people inside the base at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire. The clip shows one person riding an electric scooter up to an Airbus Voyager air-to-air refuelling tanker and appearing to spray paint into its jet engine. READ MORE: Arab Strap on Kneecap, free speech and gigging in Glasgow The group said it took the action, which is now being investigated by counter terror police, as flights leave Brize Norton for RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus daily. The UK Government has been flying spy planes over Gaza from this location since December 2023. The Home Secretary has the power to proscribe Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act of 2000 – if she believes it is "concerned in terrorism" – but this must be debated and approved by both MPs and peers. The decision has been condemned by Amnesty International, which said it was "deeply concerned at the use of counter terrorism powers to target protest groups". "This is the latest in a succession of measures taken by the UK Government to clamp down on protest in the UK," the human rights organisation posted on social media. "Terrorism powers should never have been used to aggravate criminal charges against Palestine Action activists and they certainly shouldn't be used to ban them." 'Deeply authoritarian' Speaking to The National on Saturday, Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said it was "impossible to overstate how backwards Labour's priorities are". He said: 'Labour's use of terrorism legislation against non-violent protesters is deeply authoritarian, and it's astonishing that a former human rights lawyer is doing this. Patrick Harvie 'Palestine Action have been accused by Keir Starmer of 'vandalism' – which the RAF said would have no impact on their operations. "It's obviously absurd that throwing red paint on things could cause a group to be listed alongside Al Qaeda, ISIS and Russia's Wagner Group, with membership carrying a 14-year prison sentence." READ MORE: BBC officially axes documentary on Gaza doctors over 'impartiality' concerns Harvie pointed towards comments made by human rights groups such as Amnesty International, which he said 'have rightly raised significant concerns over this aggressive use of powers that should be reserved for only the most extreme and dangerous organisations". He continued: 'And while Labour pull out all the stops to prosecute these protestors, they continue to train, arm and support Israel as it regularly and openly commits war crimes as part of an ongoing genocide. "It's impossible to overstate how backwards Labour's priorities are here.' Other politicians in Scotland have also joined in, with former first minister Humza Yousaf accusing the Labour Government of "los[ing] its conscience". Humza Yousaf He said: "If the UK Government believes those protesting against the atrocities in Gaza are terrorists, but those killing children should be supported and provided with weapons, then this Government has not only lost its way, it has lost its conscience." In a statement on Friday, Palestine Action said: "We represent every individual who opposes the Israeli war machine. "We represent every person that believes Palestinians are worth more than the tools used to kill them. READ MORE: Owen Jones: Opposing Israeli violence is 'extremist'? The world's upside down "We represent every person who stands for Palestinian liberation. "If they want to ban us, they ban us all." An emergency protest has been organised outside the UK Parliament on Monday from 12pm. It has been endorsed by more than 30 different groups, including Stop The War Coalition and the Campaign Against Arms Trade.
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson raises concerns for disabled community after government passes assisted dying bill
Former Paralympian, Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson has raised her concerns for the disabled community in the wake of the government passing the assisted dying bill through the House of Commons. Grey-Thompson sits in the House of Lords and has stated she hopes to amend the bill and make it stronger so that disabled people are less likely to be coerced into agreeing to assisted dying. The baroness said, "Right now a lot of disabled people are worried and this is the job of the Lords, line by line legislation." The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill was approved by 341 votes to 291 at its third reading in the House of Commons, a majority of 23.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Why the ‘individual conscience vote' of MPs had its own assisted death last week
Two votes in the Commons split by four days laid the ground for a seismic shift in British social policy making last week one of the most significant in the modern history of Parliament. But while the votes on abortion (Tuesday) and assisted dying (Friday) were officially matters of individual conscience the evidence from both suggests that the UK is now closer than ever to a US-style party politicisation of moral issues. If you vote Labour or Lib Dem you are much more likely to get a pro-choice MP, if you vote Conservative or Reform you are more likely to get a pro-life MP. This is not an accident, it is increasingly by design. How parties voted on life and death On Tuesday the decriminalisation of abortion up to birth amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill laid down by Labour Gower MP Tonia Antoniazzi won by 379 to 137. Of this 291 Labour MPs voted in favour and just 25 against while 63 Lib Dems were in favour and just two against. On the other side 92 Tory MPs voted against and just four in favour. Another four abstained by voting in both lobbies. No Reform MPs supported and four voted against. The split is not as stark on Friday's assisted dying vote but nevertheless reveals a trend. Kim Leadbeater 's bill had the support of 224 fellow Labour MPs with 160 against and 56 Lib Dems with 15 against. On the other side the Tories split 92 against to 20 in favour while Reform were three against and two in favour. Kemi Badenoch put a two line whip on the abortion vote rather than allowing a completely free vote. This indicated a party position without the threat of disciplinary action which would come with a three line whip. But, remarkably, after the abortion vote senior Tories were complaining that Ms Badenoch had not withdrawn the whip of the four MPs who voted for decriminalisation. It was different in 1967 The last time the UK saw Parliament vote on such seismic social change was back in 1967 with Liberal MP David Steel 's abortion legislation and Labour MP Leo Abse's Sexual Offences Act which decriminalised homosexuality. In both those cases parties split down the middle on conscience votes which saw the odd alliance of rightwing Tory MP Enoch Powell and leftwing Labour MP Tony Benn coming together to support legalising homosexuality. The Ed Miliband effect The erosion of the conscience vote in the UK has actually come more from a hardening of positions from progressive leftwing parties in Britain and exacerbated by the so-called culture wars. In 2012 Ed Miliband imposed a three-line whip on gay marriage on Labour MPs. LGBTQ+ matters ended there as something of individual conscience for the first time. Then in 2019 former MP Roger Godsiff was dropped as a Labour candidate for supporting parents in his Birmingham constituency who were protesting over primary school children being taught about same-sex relationships. This year we see Reform UK banning LGBTQ+ flags from county halls where they have taken control of the council and attempting to purge councils of diversity, equity and inclusion officers and policies. While abortion officially remained a matter of conscience a comment by the now home secretary Yvette Cooper in 2017 about Jacob Rees-Mogg being unfit to be a party leader because of his views on abortion was enlightening. What has happened over a number of years is that the majority of socially conservative, mostly Catholic tradition in Labour has been removed through selection processes. David Campanale versus the Lib Dems An ongoing legal case involving the Liberal Democrats and one of its former candidates has highlighted an apparent major shift in British politics to the party politicisation of conscience issues. Former BBC journalist David Campanale was kicked out as the candidate for Sutton ahead of the last election because, he claims, of his Christian beliefs. According to documents presented in the case, Luke Taylor, who replaced him as the candidate, is alleged to have claimed that 'the party of past prominent Liberal Democrats with Christian beliefs, such as Shirley Williams and Charles Kennedy, was 'over', and that he and others were building a 'secular party' which would have no place for Christians expecting to 'hold to their religious or conscientious opinions'. Mr Taylor was the teller for the votes in favour of the abortion amendment on Tuesday, who also described the assisted dying vote, which he supported, as a good way to 'neatly bookend the week.' If Mr Campanale wins his case it will for the first time provide evidence that selection is taking place on conscience issues as well as other matters. The Lib Dems have denied the claims and pointed out that their leader Sr Ed Davey goes to church. But the Christian Lib Dems including former deputy leader Simon Hughes have voiced concerns and the party has been condemned by two bishops. and a former Archbishop of Canterbury. Added to that Tim Farron, who voted against abortion and assisted dying last week, was ousted as leader over his Christian beliefs in 2017. During the assisted dying vote a number of supporters of the bill suggested that religious belief had no place in deciding such issues. A real departure from conscience. But a brand of conservatism is emerging in the UK which openly embraces traditional Christian values. Reflecting on the assisted dying vote, Tory MP Danny Kruger, a leading opponent of the bill, said: 'If we are to withstand our enemies, bring our society together, and tame the technium (somehow ensure that human values govern the new age of machines), we are going to need values that are up to the job. 'I don't think humanist atheism or progressive liberalism or whatever the new religion should be called, is up to it. Christianity is. Only Christianity is.' A warning from America In America, the conscience vote rapidly became more party-politicised as a result of the Roe vs Wade abortion ruling in in 1973. Social conservatives gradually began to take over the Republicans on the right and social progressives the Democrats. It has played out ferociously in the selection of Supreme Court justices, who recently in effect overturned Roe v Wade with a conservative majority. The most interesting US development is the way that a man like Donald Trump, previously ambiguous over abortion, has adopted a strong anti-abortion line to please his base. This played out in the 2022 midterms to the detriment of the Republicans with the Democrats using the threat to abortion rights to great effect. But it did little to help Kamala Harris in 2024. What that shows though is that parties with very strong views one way or the other can be elected largely on economic grounds but bring with them a great deal of baggage on conscience issues. After this week some would argue the same thing has happened in the opposite direction in the UK.
