AI Turns Smartphone Camera into Diagnostic Tool for Balance and Eye Disorders - Jordan News
AI Turns Smartphone Camera into Diagnostic Tool for Balance and Eye Disorders Researchers have developed an innovative diagnostic tool powered by artificial intelligence that uses a smartphone camera and cloud computing to detect nystagmus—rapid, involuntary eye movements often associated with balance and neurological disorders. اضافة اعلان A Low-Cost Remote Diagnostic Alternative Unlike traditional and expensive diagnostic methods like videonystagmography (VNG)—which can cost over $100,000—the new AI-based tool offers a low-cost, user-friendly alternative for remote diagnostics. The system tracks 468 facial landmarks in real time, analyzes eye movement velocity, and generates ready-to-review reports for physicians. Early testing shows that the tool performs comparably to advanced medical equipment, expanding the possibilities of telehealth solutions. How the Diagnostic Tool Works Artificial intelligence is playing an increasingly vital role in modern medicine, particularly in medical image analysis. However, most existing models rely on static data, limiting their real-time diagnostic ability. To overcome this, researchers from Florida Atlantic University (FAU), along with other collaborators, developed a prototype powered by deep learning to detect nystagmus, a symptom linked to vestibular and neurological disorders. Unlike traditional tools like VNG or ENG—which are costly, cumbersome, and uncomfortable—the new tool offers a convenient, reliable method for detecting abnormal eye and balance conditions. Patients can record their eye movements using their smartphones and upload the video to a cloud-based platform. The system then analyzes the footage and provides remote diagnostic feedback from specialists—all without the need for clinic visits. Precision Eye Tracking with AI The AI system tracks specific facial points in high resolution to analyze eye motion and assess the slow-phase velocity (SPV)—a key metric used to determine the severity, duration, and direction of nystagmus. The results are presented through easy-to-interpret charts and reports for healthcare professionals. Promising Results and Ongoing Development In a preliminary study published in Cureus and involving 20 participants, the AI tool's results were closely aligned with those from traditional medical equipment, validating its clinical accuracy. Dr. Ali Danesh, lead researcher and professor at FAU, stated: 'Our AI model offers a promising alternative that can complement—or in some cases replace—traditional diagnostic methods, especially in telemedicine environments.' He added: 'By integrating deep learning with cloud computing, we make remote diagnostics more flexible, affordable, and accessible, especially for patients in rural and underserved areas.' The system was trained on over 15,000 videos capturing a wide range of eye movements, and it uses smart filtering algorithms to exclude normal eye activity like blinking for more accurate readings. A Tool for Modern Telehealth Beyond diagnostics, the tool helps streamline clinical workflows. Physicians can access AI-generated reports through telehealth platforms, compare them with electronic health records (EHRs), and design personalized treatment plans. Patients benefit from fewer in-person visits, lower costs, and easier follow-up assessments by uploading new video clips to monitor their condition over time. Dr. Harshal Sanghvi, postdoctoral fellow at FAU's College of Medicine and first author of the study, noted: 'Though our technology is still in its early stages, it has the potential to redefine care for patients with vestibular and neurological disorders. Its non-invasive and real-time analysis makes it highly scalable—from clinics and ERs to patients' homes.' The research team is now focused on refining the model's accuracy, expanding clinical trials across broader demographics, and obtaining FDA approval for widespread medical use.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
29 minutes ago
- Times
Notting Hill's selfie-takers are ignoring one thing: the movie's a turkey
What has been the biggest disappointment of my life? Along with losing my virginity and seeing U2 at Wembley, it was probably when the film Notting Hill came out in 1999. A romance that isn't romantic, a comedy with no good jokes, this intolerable follow-up to Richard Curtis's almost flawless Four Weddings and a Funeral sees Hugh Grant's cringing bookshop owner meeting Julia Roberts's odious actress, spending the night with her before deciding, bewilderingly, that they can't be together, then changing his mind after she gives him an original Chagall and jumping in a car for a faked-up 'rom-com run' to tell her that he loves her before she gets on a plane — which presumably, if she had, would only have meant he had to wait until she landed, when he could have given her a call. Spoiler alert, by the way. Now it turns out that this swizz, this stone-cold Turkey Twizzler of a movie, is still causing people pain a quarter of a century later. This month it was reported that residents in the candy-coloured W11 streets where it was made have had to endure fans of the film, more recently joined by Instagram influencers, thronging the pavements to get pics for their social media feeds. Some have the gall to enter the front gardens to get the right shot. They make a lot of noise. They leave rubbish behind. Locals are so irritated that a number of them have taken the desperate step of painting their homes black. What enrages me most, though, about this is the evidence it provides that there are still people out there who think Notting Hill is a good film. • Hugh Grant's best performances — ranked Let's summarise. Curtis scored a surprise hit with Four Weddings by casting Grant as a posh avoidant who panics when he sees all his posh friends getting married, until the death of a slightly older posh friend forces him to get serious. Solid. Relatable. Crammed with good jokes. The screenwriter's next move was to cast Grant as a posh avoidant with a group of posh friends, including (again) one with a disability and a working-class flatmate. Again he's in love with a glamorous American out of his league. Jokes are repeated. 'F***ety f***!' Grant exclaims in the first film. 'Shittety brickety,' he mutters, less plausibly, in the second. The laziness of all this is compounded by the film's incredibly unconvincing disavowal of privilege, which in fact it would do far better to own. In Four Weddings, Grant's friend Tom cheerfully admits to being the seventh richest man in England. In Notting Hill, even though all the characters are obviously loaded, they claim to be poor. Grant's friend's restaurant is failing. His own bookshop, located in prime real estate just off Portobello Road, is struggling to stay afloat. Yet he owns a house with a roof terrace in the heart of Notting Hill, which (a glance on Zoopla reveals) would now be worth £3 million. Need another way to relate to these guys? They're all total losers, we're assured. Grant's sister Honey works in 'London's worst record store'. His friend Max is 'the worst cook in the world'. His friend Bernie is 'the worst stockbroker in the whole world'. His friend Tony is 'the worst restaurateur'. His flatmate Spike is 'the stupidest person you've ever met'. The film is imbued with a bizarre glorification of uselessness that is epitomised in the notorious 'brownie' scene. Personally I have always struggled to care for a brownie (there's something twee about the very word), yet here it randomly becomes the prize in the sob story Olympics. One of Grant's posh friends can't have children. Roberts has no self-esteem. And so on, and so on. Supposedly a classic, the scene is actually weird and depressing. • Inside the ultimate Notting Hill bachelorette pad Vulnerability is winning. Self-contempt, less so. Given that Americans are supposedly unable to understand our tendency to talk ourselves down, it's hard to know what Roberts sees in Grant, unless it's the fact that he's the only person on the planet who is arguably better-looking than her. That said, she has some off-putting qualities herself. She's rude one moment, needy the next. And she has zero dress sense. The teenage crop top she wears in one early scene is a very odd choice. When she sports a man's tie in the Ritz, it's meant as a tribute to kooky Diane Keaton in Annie Hall. But it leaves Roberts looking like a pantomime horse. Speaking of kooky, the entire last scene — the press conference in the Lancaster Room at the Savoy Hotel — is ripped off from Roman Holiday (1953). In that much better film, Audrey Hepburn's celebrity princess reveals her love for a journalist in the crowd with a carefully nuanced answer. In Notting Hill, Roberts does something similar with a less nuanced one. We then cut to a shot of the pair relaxing together in a residents' garden, reading Captain Corelli's Mandolin, of all things. Just as Chagall (along with Munch and Dalí) is the top-dollar painter for people who don't like painting, Louis de Bernières' middle-brow blockbuster is the book for people who don't read. And Notting Hill is the film for people without eyes. (And Ronan Keating's When You Say Nothing at All, which plays over one key scene, is the song for people who lack access to any of the five senses.) It's fashionable to make a noise about how much you hate Curtis's next big rom-com, Love Actually (2003). But in fact, Love Actually is far from being the worst in his rom-com oeuvre. It contains one or two good jokes and Emma Thompson's heartbreaking turn alone makes it worth a watch. Not so Notting Hill. It's time we called time on the idea that there's any merit in this slow, insipid, neighbourhood-wrecking stinker.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Don't regulate us like radio, music streamer Spotify tells CRTC
OTTAWA — Music streamer Spotify says Canada's federal broadcast regulator shouldn't impose rules meant for radio on streaming services. Appearing before a CRTC hearing today, company representatives compared regulating Spotify like a radio station to treating Uber like a horse and buggy. In its written submission, Spotify argued the CRTC doesn't have the jurisdiction to extend rules governing commercial negotiations and disputes in the broadcast sector to online players. The CRTC is holding a hearing on market dynamics as part of its work to implement the Online Streaming Act, which updated broadcasting laws to capture online platforms. During previous hearings, large cable and broadcasting companies like Bell and Rogers called on the CRTC to loosen existing rules for traditional players. They're taking aim at regulations governing how cable channels must be packaged and disputes about carriage of cable channels. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 20, 2025. Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press
South Wales Guardian
29 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Highway Code: Warning over common speed camera myth in UK
A motoring expert has lifted the lid on whether the widely held belief that drivers can go ten per cent over the speed limit is true or not. For many years, many motorists have believed that there is a '10 per cent +2 rule' when it comes to speed cameras, suggesting that drivers can exceed the speed limit without facing consequences. However, the truth is that it's actually up to the area's individual forces themselves to decide, meaning drivers could find themselves with hefty fines or penalties. Andrew Jervis, CEO of leading online mechanic marketplace Click Mechanic, has urged caution. He said: 'Speeding costs lives and should never be encouraged, regardless of whether it can land you in trouble or not. "Speed limits are not arbitrary figures; they are carefully determined based on factors such as road design, traffic flow, and pedestrian activity. 'They should not be taken as a target that is there to be exceeded, and failure to adhere to the rules of the road can have serious consequences. 'In any case, the 10 percent rule is guidance for the police forces - and not a rule for members of the public. 'The misconception of a 10 percent leeway could not only see drivers getting fines and/or points on their licence but can cause fatal road traffic collisions. 'As road users, we all have a responsibility to drive with consideration for others to ensure our highways are safe for all to use.' It originates from speed enforcement guidance issued by the Association of Chief Police Officers and is designed to take into account speed guns used by the police aren't always 100 per cent accurate. However, it is also stated the guidelines 'do not and cannot replace a police officer's discretion', meaning it is no guarantee of avoiding prosecution. Here are some other common speed camera myths: No. There are no laws about visibility, so nothing is stopping an officer from operating in the dark. But they don't often choose to do this and maintain that being visible acts as a deterrent in its own right. Go Safe Casualty Reduction Officer, Gareth Thomas said: "Legally, we don't have to be visible. I could camouflage myself if I wanted to - but it's all about being fair, education and preventing an accident. Even if I parked my van and went for a walk somewhere, it would deter people from speeding right away." If drivers choose to flash to warn others about a speed van, they could be in breach of the law. Under section 89 of the Police Act 1997 it is an offence to "wilfully obstruct a constable in the execution of his/her duty". However, Gareth says while it is an offence, it is very difficult to prove. He said: "It doesn't bother me that people flash to warn them of the speed van - I just want to educate people and the van to act as a speed deterrent." It all comes down to the circumstances within which you were caught speeding, and how much you were more than the limit. The minimum penalty for being caught speeding on the UK's roads is a £100 fine. But Gareth explained in some circumstances, police can offer the option of attending a speed awareness course - an alternative to a fine and penalty points. Gareth, said: "An accredited course is far more likely to improve driver behaviour and consequently make our roads safer. "Courses are available to drivers who respond quickly to the 'notices' and who were driving at no more than 10 per cent, plus 9 mph above the posted speed limit." So for example, anyone travelling over 86mph on a motorway would not be offered the awareness course. Those who don't have a clean licence at the time of the office, or if you have been on the course in the last three years, it is unlikely you will be offered the awareness course as an option.
