Alienware X16 R2 review: "style and substance"
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Alienware has a long and storied history in the world of gaming laptops, producing some of the most expensive, chunkiest, and best looking rigs in the game. Two of those hereditary features continue to the Alienware X16 R2 - it's certainly attractive, and definitely premium - but it's certainly trimmed down compared to the machines that ran before it. The 16-inch market is a heavy one, though, and with some of the best gaming laptops available using this middling form factor, the latest Alienware X16 has some serious competition.
This is by no means a gaming laptop for all. Its high price point, premium chassis, and luxury extras put it firmly in the upper echelons of the market. It is, however, one of the best Alienware laptops on the shelves today - especially if you're happy to splash a little extra cash for a true investment.
Very little has changed between generations, with the Alienware x16 R2 still offering the same slimline, svelte form factor as its predecessor. This is a skinnier machine than you'd usually find among enthusiasts, but it's not exactly the lightest on the market. The super-thin profile is hiding a lofty 6lb weight - the Razer Blade 16 only weighs in at 5.29lbs and the slightly chunkier Alienware M16 R2 slides in at 5.75lbs. Still, it weighs less than the 6.17lb Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 9, and is still carryable in a backpack - though I did feel the relief when removing it after an extended period of time.
I received the Lunar Silver version, a lighter, almost white design. A previous black model was also available, but it seems to have been lifted from Dell's store at the moment. With the new Alienware Area-51 gaming laptops on their way, its return is a little difficult to predict. Still, I prefer the crisp finish of the metal build I received. It's not exactly understated, that RGB lighting flashing across everything from the Alienware logo on the back panel to the touchpad under the hood certainly makes your intentions known from the outset. However, the slimline design certainly makes it feel more professional than chunky RGB-laden machines like the Asus ROG Strix Scar 16.
The top lid is fairly subtle, not counting those vivid logo LEDs, with a simple soft-touch metallic finish and an embossed 'X' in the lower left corner. I switched that RGB off when working from a coffee shop during testing, though the large rear shelf is still pretty imposing. I'm not a fan of this cooling vent, and I haven't been since I reviewed my first Alienware laptop all those years ago. I had hope when the M16 R2 shrunk its footprint, removing the shelf entirely and finally leaving some space for the rest of my desk. Unfortunately, it's back here - and it's just as annoying as ever. It means the Alienware X16 R2 struggles to fit in some smaller laptop backpacks.
I also missed the softer finish of the palm rest area in the M16 R2 here. While the cheaper device features an almost rubbery surface that provides excellent grip and ironically feels a little more premium under the hands, we're back to cold hard metal in the X16. It's plenty solid, with no flexing to the main rest area, even under heavier pushes, and the main keyboard stands firm against heavier keypresses. However, it doesn't feel quite as smart as the brand's cheaper alternative.
Those classic Alienware hexagonal grills remain along the top of the deck, with additional stripes lining each side of the keys. They make for an understated internal design that still has fun with its gaming focus - the perfect combination of class and individualism in its aesthetic.
The Alienware X16 R2 I've been testing features an Intel Core Ultra 9 185H processor with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 GPU, which puts it around the middle of the configuration pack. The base model drops things down to an Intel Core Ultra 7 155H with an RTX 4070 GPU for just under $2,500 / £1,950 - a costly price tag for the power you're buying. These are premium machines, and you'll easily find similar specs to my test unit that could well be $1,000 cheaper than its $3,199.99 / £2,999.99 MSRP - but there's more to the Alienware X16 than its internals.
This is a rig for those who want the headroom to reach higher framerates in a portable chassis, sure, but it's mostly for those who want to do it in style. The rig I tested uses Alienware's standard laptop keyboard, which feels snappy and controlled under the hand, but it can also be configured with a Cherry mechanical deck for a super slick experience. I tested a similar deck on the MSI Titan 18 HX, produced in collaboration with SteelSeries, and loved the clacky, responsive feel overall (minus some ping). The keyboard I received is nice and all - everything still feels rigid and secure, there's no mush or flex to the deck, and repeat keypresses are fast and accurate, but if you're already spending $3K on a gaming laptop you might as well spring for the boosted experience.
That seems to be Alienware's whole ethos with the Alienware X16 R2's feature list. From the massive 8TB of configurable storage to the customizable RGB trackpad, the brand wants you to really treat yourself to this investment.
That philosophy may have been backed up when the X16 first launched, but in 2025 there are a few signs of aging. The display is a perfectly serviceable 16-inch QHD+ IPS level panel running at 240Hz, but it lacks the punch and brightness I loved on the Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 9. OLED screens aren't for everyone, but the Razer Blade 16's display is running marathons around the X16 from both a contrast and brightness perspective.
This is a trend I've noticed in quite a few Alienware laptops, their faces are often a little too muted to truly compete with the vibrancy from the rest of the market. I like my games to pop - it's unfortunate that I've also been testing the fantastic 2025 Asus ROG Flow Z13, but side-by-side, the X16's display appears a little lackluster. I could overlook these drawbacks in the cheaper M16 R2 model, but at over $3,000 this is a considerable sacrifice.
While it's not exactly a treat for the eyes, the ears are well catered to. The Alienware X16 R2 features two 2W tweets, and four 3W woofers, with Dolby Atmos certification. Straight out of the box, the basslines are certainly working overtime. There's a considerable lean towards the lower ranges in this default setting, which pleased me personally but provided a clearer audio profile across all ranges with a few tweaks. Some more bass-heavy songs did come across fairly muffled, but these are powerful speakers overall, tuned to a high volume. I did notice some distortion when set at the full 100%, but kept to a reasonable 20% there was a nice sense of texture and force.
Ports are all located towards the rear of the device, which is a massive win for those neat freaks among us. I much prefer this orientation, keeping all those wires and dongles out of the way at the back for a more attractive desk-based setup. Quickly adding or removing accessories is a little trickier (when set on a desk I had to pull the whole laptop away slightly rather than just reaching over), but it's a tradeoff I would make any day of the week.
The X16 R2 offers a fairly standard collection of ports, with two USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 options (a little older than others on the market, but the real-world differences are negligible in most cases), a Thunderbolt 4, and a DisplayPort compatible USB-C 3.2 Gen 2. You'll get more USB-A connections with the Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 9 (which offers four), and the Razer Blade 16 ups both the generation of those ports and adds an extra for a total of three. I was able to get by with a wireless gaming mouse and keyboard receivers plugged in, and a separate dock connected to the Thunderbolt 4 slot. If you use a gaming headset and like to keep a PC controller connected, things might get a little tight. There's also a suspicious lack of Ethernet support here - while it's generally reserved for larger 18-inch rigs, both Lenovo and Razer's competitors include the necessary RJ45 slot.
The Alienware X16 R2 is a firm middler, coming behind the Razer Blade 16 in accordance with the price and GPU disparity, but often also being beaten by the more affordable (relatively speaking) RTX 4080 Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 9. This is still a lightning fast device, it would be difficult not to be with an RTX 4080 at the helm, but it's not topping the charts in the same way as its price tag.
Easier titles like Shadow of the Tomb Raider give the X16 R2 a chance to spread its wings. While the difference between the PC's 'performance' and 'overdrive' settings are negligible from a framerate perspective, the system scored highly in older titles like this. Not as highly as other RTX 4080 gaming laptops, but high nonetheless. It's really competing against the MSI Stealth 18 AI in the thin 'n' light category - both rigs aim to offer luxury experiences with a portable form factor, without sacrificing framerates and both were tested with RTX 4080 GPUs.
In-game, the Alienware X16 R2 is comfortably the better performer when faced with the cooling limitations of a more slimline system. Its thermals are better managed, allowing that GPU to run at framerates that regularly beat out the clunkier MSI model at 1080p. Things are a little more squeaky in this matchup when we dial things up to 1600p. Here, the MSI Stealth actually leads the pack in its class across Total War: Three Kingdoms, with the Alienware X16 R2 falling to the bottom of the RTX 4080 pack. Still, these two are trading places, as Returnal's 1440p benchmark proves far easier for Dell to manage.
If the Alienware X16 R2 is simply holding its own in in-game benchmarks, it's striding out in front across synthetic tests. It sits at the top of my testing pool in the Fire Strike test, coming in at 33,420 - beating a similarly slimline RTX 4090 Razer Blade 16 in the process. While Time Spy is a tougher battle, it's still comfortably outpacing the larger MSI 18 AI Studio and the chunkier Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 as well.
I rarely get to test the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, but luckily the MSI Stealth 18 AI Studio in my testing pool also features the Meteor Lake CPU. Unfortunately for Alienware, the extra chassis size goes in MSI's favor, with PC Mark 10 results edging slightly ahead of the X16 R2. This CPU isn't particularly geared towards gaming, so it's easy to see why the more traditional 14th Gen Intel i9 chips in the Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 9 and Razer Blade 16 were so far ahead.
The Alienware X16 R2 would have been impressive last year, and it certainly had its fans. In 2025, though, the machine doesn't make quite enough sense. If you're a die-hard fan of the space-age brand looking for both power and portability, it's the only option open to you. The Alienware M18 is too chunky to fit into a backpack, and the Alienware M16 R2 caps out at an RTX 4070 GPU.
I'd recommend the Alienware X16 R2 to anyone who prioritizes a luxury feel and a slick design over raw performance - from both a framerate and overall display perspective. There are plenty of players who will have a ball with this machine, especially if they don't want to sacrifice speed for form factor - but there are also a wide range of machines doing a lot more for a lot less these days.
If you're simply looking for a 16-inch investment laptop, I'd point you towards either the Razer Blade 16 at a slightly higher price point or the Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 9 at a slightly lower one. Both rigs are configurable all the way up the RTX 40-Series chain, offer better displays, pack more connection value, and sit more comfortably in a backpack. Neither has the pzazz of the Alienware X16 R2's light shows or sleek build, but value for money can rarely be argued with.
I used the Alienware x16 R2 for all daily play over the course of one week, further testing alongside the Acer Nitro V 14 for another week, and took a week's break in the middle to use the Asus ROG Flow Z13. In that time, I tested across my usual roster of backlog titles, including Fallout 4, Assassin's Creed: Odyssey, and Oxenfree 2, while also running Indiana Jones and the Great Circle, and dabbling in Avowed for an evening. I benchmarked against Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Total War: Three Kingdoms, Returnal, and The Talos Principle 2, at both High and Highest settings in 1080p and QHD. Each of these benchmark tests were run three times, with the results above representing average framerates over the course of testing. I used 3D Mark's Fire Strike, Time Spy, and Steel Nomad synthetic benchmarks, and PC Mark 10's CPU tool as well.
For more information on how we test gaming laptops, check out the full GamesRadar+ Hardware Policy.
I'm also hunting down all the best Razer laptops on the market if you're after an alternative brand, as well as the best Asus gaming laptops available now. For more portable play, check out the best gaming handhelds we've tested so far.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Satellites are polluting Earth's atmosphere with heavy metals. Could refueling them in orbit help?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The world at large is working to stop the fast-progressing degradation of Earth's environment. In the space sector, however, one-use-only products still reign supreme. The advent of megaconstellations has, in fact, accelerated the rate at which the space industry burns through resources, shifting from big satellites with decades-long lifespans to cheaper birds designed to expire within a few short years. The disposable approach worries some researchers, as too much aluminum is burning up in the atmosphere these days, threatening to cause a new kind of environmental disaster in the decades to come. But what can we do? Should we roll back the space revolution and put a cap on what we can do in space? Or could a circular economy, life extension, recycling and reuse be the solution to the space industry's dirty side effects? Proponents of in-orbit servicing and refueling laud the technology's potential. But most analysts remain cautious: Without strict environmental regulations, the expected cost of in-orbit servicing may not entice satellite operators to switch to reusable technology en masse. Dave Barnhart, chief executive officer of the California-based aerospace company Arkisys, first began developing concepts of recyclable satellite technology some 15 years ago as part of a project he oversaw at DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). He and his colleagues investigated how to set up a satellite recycling facility in geostationary orbit — the region about 22,000 miles (36,000 kilometers) above Earth's surface where satellites appear fixed above one spot above the equator. "We wanted to know whether we can use parts from old geo satellites to recreate new ones, because the mass is already there," Barnhart told The geostationary ring is home to some of the largest and most expensive satellites. On top of that, the long distance between Earth and this orbit makes geo missions inherently costly, as they require the most powerful rockets with a lot of fuel to reach their destination. Yet, Arkisys, the company Barnhart cofounded in 2015, is focusing on low Earth orbit (LEO) — the buzzing region closest to Earth up to altitudes of about 1,200 miles (2,000 km). Arkisyshopes to set up an in-orbit servicing and refueling depot called the Port in LEO. The main goal is to spearhead a green revolution in this region, which gives rise to thousands of tons of dangerous space debris every year. "To date, everything we have ever designed to go into space has been one mission, one life," Barnhart told "It's sort of crazy. Every other domain on Earth, we maintain, we sustain, we grow. Not in space." In 2023, Arkisys secured a $1.6 million deal from the U.S. Space Force to test satellite assembly in orbit using the Port demo module — a basic building block of a scalable orbiting garage and gas station. The company wants to launch the first component of this orbital depot next year — a last-mile transportation device called the Cutter, which is designed to help satellites to dock with the garage. In 2027, the main Port module, a hexagonal structure about 9 feet (3 meters) wide, will join the Cutter in orbit to test how the mechanical interfaces of the two work together in space. The Port, in addition to serving as a fuel depot, will arrive with a supply of components and payloads that could be attached to worn-out satellites to give them a new lease on life. "Today, everything on a satellite is done on the ground, and the satellite is launched with an end date," Barnhart said. "We want to shift that to allow extensions of both — life and business — post-launch. We want to be able to add new revenue streams post-launch. You can do that if you can add something, change something in orbit, or even sell that satellite to somebody else who could make it part of a larger platform." Cameras or antennas could be replaced with more powerful ones once those get developed, worn-out batteries could be swapped for brand-new ones, and fuel tanks would get refilled. It all makes sense on paper, but Dafni Christodoulopoulou, space industry analyst at the consultancy company Analysis Mason, warns that whether satellite operators would be inclined to ditch their disposable ways will come down to the cost of the in-orbit maintenance services. LEO is currently dominated by small, relatively cheap satellites, she says, which can be replaced more cheaply than they can be serviced and maintained. "Right now, we expect in-orbit services to come at a cost that might be quite high for operators of small satellites," Christodoulopoulou told "The operators might not be interested in those services, because the price of building a new satellite might not be higher than that of a servicing mission." Barnhart agrees that the fledgling in-orbit servicing industry is likely to face resistance not just from operators but also from satellite manufacturers, who might feel threatened by the idea of reusability and life extension. "Every time you want to make a big shift like this, it's going to be a threat," Barnhart said. "Satellite manufacturers make money by building more satellites to throw away. It might take some time for them to see that by fitting satellites with interfaces that allow them to be serviced, they could actually add some cool functionality to them after launch." Related stories: — Kessler Syndrome and the space debris problem — Pollution from rocket launches and burning satellites could cause the next environmental emergency — 2 private satellites undock after pioneering life-extension mission Still, Christodoulopoulou thinks that in-orbit servicing will eventually make a difference to how things are done in space, and also to the state of the orbital environment. "The number of satellite launches is not expected to go down, so there will be a high need for constellation management, flexibility, disposal and life extension," she said. "I think in-orbit services can definitely help prevent the buildup of space debris and maintain long-term sustainability in orbit." The U.S. government certainly appears to think that life extension is the way forward. In addition to funding the Arkisys experiment, the Space Force also funds the Tetra-5 and Tetra-6 missions to test in-orbit refueling technologies in space. The two missions, designed to test hardware developed by Orbit Fab, Astroscale and Northrop Grumman, are set to launch in 2026 and 2027, respectively. In addition, intensifying geopolitical tensions are increasing the need for quick deployment of new systems in space, which, Barnhart says, could be more speedily addressed with servicing systems such as the Port, than by building new spacecraft from scratch on Earth. "If there is a new threat that has been identified, you might need a new type of sensor or a new payload to observe it," Barnhart said. "If we can augment the satellites that the government has already put up and provide them with a new capability, a new sensor, we can address those threats much faster." Christodoulopoulou thinks that new regulations designed to protect the environment and curb the air pollution related to satellite reentries could further help move the needle toward a less throwaway culture in space utilization. "There need to be a few changes," Christodoulopoulou said. "There needs to be more awareness among satellite operators to understand that in-orbit servicing offers a value in the long term. But also on the government side, there need to be more regulations to support the in-orbit servicing providers."
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Should You Buy, Sell or Hold Dell Technologies Stock at P/S of 0.77X?
Dell Technologies DELL shares are cheap, as suggested by a Value Score of stock is trading at a significant discount with a forward 12-month P/S of 0.77X compared with the Computer and Technology sector's 6.36X. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research However, DELL's shares have risen 1.2% in the year-to-date period, underperforming the Zacks Computer and Technology sector's appreciation of 1.6%. The underperformance can be attributed to a challenging macroeconomic environment, along with stiff competition in the PC market from companies like HP and Lenovo. The broader PC market recovery is slower than expected, with customers delaying purchases to evaluate AI-enabled PCs and prepare for the Windows 10 end-of-life. A competitive pricing environment, especially in the CSG segment, has affected profitability. Additionally, investor sentiment has also soured amid rising trade tension, with additional tariffs raising fears of escalating costs. However, Dell Technologies' shares have outperformed the Zacks Computer - Micro Computers industry's decline of 20.9%. The outperformance can be attributed to DELL's expanding portfolio and rich partner base. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research DELL is benefiting from an expanding partner base that includes Lowe's Companies LOW, NVIDIA NVDA, Worley WOR, Microsoft, Meta Platforms, Advanced Micro Devices and Imbue. Dell Technologies recently partnered with Lowe's to enhance customer and associate experiences through advanced AI and PC technology. Using the Dell AI Factory with NVIDIA, Lowe's is optimizing inventory, improving asset protection, and enriching in-store service. Dell Technologies' advanced infrastructure and high-performance PCs support innovation, efficiency, and long-term growth across Lowe's more than 1,700 stores and May 2025, Dell Technologies announced major advancements across the Dell AI Factory with NVIDIA to accelerate enterprise AI adoption. These include next-generation PowerEdge servers, enhanced AI data platforms, integrated software solutions, and new managed services for streamlined AI March 2025, Dell Technologies and Worley announced a collaboration to develop secure AI solutions using the Dell AI Factory with NVIDIA. This partnership with Worley aims to enhance project delivery and innovation while ensuring data privacy and intellectual property protection. Dell Technologies' expanding portfolio has been a key catalyst. The company is benefiting from the strong demand for AI servers, which are driven by ongoing digital transformation and heightened interest in generative AI applications. Its PowerEdge XE9680L AI-optimized server is very much in demand. Strong enterprise demand for AI-optimized servers is aiding the fiscal first quarter of 2026, Dell Technologies' AI-optimized server momentum saw an increase of $12.1 billion in orders. The flagship PowerEdge XE9680 experienced strong demand, contributing to the momentum in the AI space. The company shipped $1.8 billion worth of AI servers in the fiscal first quarter, and the AI server backlog remained healthy at $14.4 PowerEdge supports the NVIDIA Blackwell Ultra platform, including the upcoming NVIDIA HGX B300 NVL16, NVIDIA GB300 NVL72 and NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition. The new Dell PowerEdge XE8712 server features the GB200 NVL4 platform and supports up to 144 NVIDIA B200 GPUs per Dell IR7000 rack. These liquid-cooled systems are tailored for AI model training and complex HPC simulations. Dell Technologies' innovative portfolio, expanding partner base and growing AI footprint are major growth drivers. For the second quarter of fiscal 2026, revenues are expected to be between $28.5 billion and $29.5 billion, with the mid-point of $29 billion suggesting 16% year-over-year Zacks Consensus Estimate for Dell Technologies' second-quarter fiscal 2026 revenues is pegged at $29.09 billion, suggesting growth of 16.23% year over earnings are expected to be $2.25 per share (+/- 10 cents), indicating 15% growth at the mid-point. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for earnings is pegged at $2.26 per share, which has increased by 5.1% in the past 30 days. This indicates year-over-year growth of 19.58%. Dell Technologies Inc. price-consensus-chart | Dell Technologies Inc. Quote Dell Technologies benefits from rising demand for AI-optimized servers and an expanding partner network. Despite PC market challenges and macroeconomic headwinds, its innovation in AI infrastructure and positive earnings outlook support long-term stock currently sports a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) and has a Growth Score of B, a favorable combination that offers a strong investment opportunity, per the Zacks Proprietary methodology. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Worthington Enterprises, Inc. (WOR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) : Free Stock Analysis Report Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL) : Free Stock Analysis Report NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Wall Street Journal
11 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
What's Ahead for Travel
The Future of Everything looks at the innovation and technology transforming the way we live, work and play, covering health, artificial intelligence and more. Here, we look at what's ahead for travel. Companies explore new ways to navigate and pass the time in self-driving cars
