Populists versus bureaucrats
Populists love to hate bureaucracy. Alice Weidel, the leader of the far-right Alternative für Deutschland – now the country's second-strongest party – says that clueless European Union bureaucrats are destroying the bloc's free-market foundations. Santiago Abascal, who leads Spain's far-right Vox party, accuses the same bureaucrats of attempting to 'liquidate freedom", while Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni calls the EU an 'invasive bureaucratic giant.' Across the Atlantic, US President Donald Trump is dismantling a federal bureaucracy that he claims is rife with 'waste, fraud, and abuse,' and 'stifles personal freedom.' Bureaucracy, as they portray it, is the enemy of progress.
The populists are wrong. As I pointed out at the recent Delphi Economic Forum, far from a sclerotic force destined to strangle innovation and liberty, bureaucracy forms the scaffolding for both. From drafting legislation and issuing permits to composing communications and coordinating crisis responses, bureaucrats carry out the mundane tasks that keep society functioning. Without them, economies would stall, the rule of law would collapse, and political visions would never be realised.
Bureaucracy is, at its core, an exercise in rationality. As US president Woodrow Wilson pointed out, administration demands expertise – which is fundamentally neutral, not ideological – and thus exists outside the turbulent sphere of politics. For Max Weber, an intellectual titan in administrative theory, obedience to the impersonal, rules-based order that bureaucracy represents – rather than to charismatic individuals or entrenched traditions – is a mark of a society's maturity.
But maturity implies patience, which populists notoriously lack. It took EU institutions more than 260 days to get the Recovery and Resilience Facility – a lifeline for struggling EU countries during the Covid-19 pandemic – from proposal to passage. The Artificial Intelligence Act took 1,199 days, and the Asylum Procedure Regulation nearly eight years. While these timelines could undoubtedly be shortened, crafting policies that balance the interests of 27 countries is an inescapably complicated affair requiring careful deliberation. In any case, the main source of delays is not EU bureaucrats, but the European Council's member governments and the European Parliament's elected politicians.
None of this matters to populists. They paint pictures of lumbering giants, like those depicted at the Siphnian Treasury in Delphi. Just as the gods of Mount Olympus – with the help of the mortal Heracles – had to vanquish those power-hungry giants, so, too, must today's populist 'gods' defeat a monstrous bureaucracy that seeks dominion over all aspects of life.
This is the vision that animates the Department of Government Efficiency, established by Trump and led by the world's richest person, Elon Musk. But far from crushing a dangerous foe, DOGE is destroying America's ability to confront the giants that actually threaten it, from climate change to technological disruption. These giants can be defeated only through the kind of disciplined, long-term coordination at which bureaucracy excels.
Ironically, there could be no more compelling argument for the value of measured governance carried out by seasoned bureaucrats than DOGE's reckless gutting of America's state capacity. This has included the decimation of crucial agencies, such as the US Agency for International Development, and programmes ranging from lifesaving medical research to projects supporting teenagers with disabilities.
While DOGE's approach has satisfied the populist hunger for daring over deliberation, it has also required a number of hasty reversals, including halting the firing of hundreds of federal employees working on America's nuclear-weapons programmes. And this is to say nothing of escalating privacy and security concerns, as DOGE staff access sensitive databases with virtually no oversight.
Musk might have made much of his fortune in a sector known for 'moving fast and breaking things,' but the government is not a tech company. As many observers, including veteran Republican budget experts, have warned, DOGE's cuts – driven by ideology and self-interest, not pragmatism and the common good – are jeopardising public welfare. The same goes for Trump's reinstatement of Schedule F, which makes it easier to fire civil servants. This move threatens to politicise the federal workforce, making it less capable, as loyalty is rewarded over merit, and less equipped to fulfil its role as a critical source of continuity across administrations.
The allure of political audacity is undeniable. When Trump issues ultimatums – to universities, trading partners, Nato allies, and others – he projects strength. When Meloni performs a foreign-policy balancing act – courting Trump while championing Western unity – she exudes pragmatism. When French far-right leader Marine Le Pen defies EU financial probes – much to Trump's delight – she appears dauntless. Such acts electrify supporters, replacing feelings of helplessness and stagnation with the thrill of brashness, the exhilaration of disruption and the promise of power.
But good governance demands discipline, not spectacle. The EU's Competitiveness Compass, a strategic framework aimed at strengthening growth and innovation without sacrificing environmental goals, is a case in point. There is only one way to chart a credible path forward that accounts for multiple complex and competing goals – and it involves bureaucratic expertise, not a chain saw.
None of this is to say that bureaucracies are above reproach. The EU's sluggish lawmaking and America's labyrinthine administrative system warrant scrutiny. But the solution is reform, not demolition. Streamlining regulations, as the EU's Omnibus packages seek to do, can enhance the bloc's agility. And measures that guarantee merit-based hiring and protect civil servants from political purges would support US efforts to improve governance.
To defend bureaucracy is not to fetishise red tape, but to recognise the vital role it plays in making our societies work. In the fight against the 'giant' challenges we face, bureaucracy is Heracles, the flawed but knowledgeable ally that makes victory possible. To vilify it is to mistake the servant for the master, risking the very future we seek to reclaim. @Project Syndicate, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
21 hours ago
- Observer
Iran says will return to talks if Israel halts attacks
DUBAI/CALGARY, CANADA: US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi have spoken by phone several times since Israel began its strikes on Iran last week, in a bid to find a diplomatic end to the crisis, three diplomats said. According to the diplomats, who asked not to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter, Araqchi said Tehran would not return to negotiations unless Israel stopped the attacks, which began on June 13. They said the talks included a brief discussion of a US proposal given to Iran at the end of May that aims to create a regional consortium that would enrich uranium outside of Iran, an offer Tehran has so far rejected. US and Iranian officials did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment on the matter. This week's phone discussions were the most substantive direct talks since the two began negotiations in April. On those occasions, in Oman and Italy, the two men exchanged brief words when they encountered each other after indirect talks were held. A regional diplomat close to Tehran said Araqchi had told Witkoff that Tehran "could show flexibility in the nuclear issue" if Washington pressured Israel to end the war. A European diplomat said: "Araqchi told Witkoff Iran was ready to come back to nuclear talks, but it could not if Israel continued its bombing." Other than brief encounters after five rounds of indirect talks since April to discuss Iran's decades-old nuclear dispute, Araqchi and Witkoff had not previously held direct contacts. A second regional diplomat said "the (first) call was initiated by Washington, which also proposed a new offer" to overcome the deadlock over clashing red lines. US President Donald Trump wants Tehran to end uranium enrichment on its soil, while Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has said Tehran's right to enrichment is non-negotiable. Trump has been keeping his cards close to his chest over whether he will order US forces to join Israel's bombing campaign that it says aims to destroy Iran's nuclear programme and ballistic capabilities. But Trump offered a glimmer of hope that diplomacy could resume, saying Iranian officials wanted to come to Washington for a meeting. European officials have been coordinating with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who was also at the G7 summit. Britain, France and Germany, known as the E3 and party to a 2015 nuclear deal between world powers and Iran, held a ministerial call with Araqchi on Sunday. The three countries and the European Union are set to meet him in Geneva on Friday, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei and an EU official said. Earlier in the week, both Rubio and Araqchi told the Europeans in separate talks about a possible diplomatic initiative, three diplomats said. Given the Israeli strikes and Trump's rhetoric, diplomats said Iran was in no position to hold public talks with the US, but that a meeting with the Europeans as a link to try and advance diplomacy was deemed more realistic for Tehran.
Observer
2 days ago
- Observer
European, Iranian FMs to hold nuclear talks in Geneva
BRUSSELS: Foreign ministers from Britain, France and Germany together with the EU's top diplomat will hold nuclear talks with their Iranian counterpart in Geneva on Friday, officials and diplomats said. The meeting comes as European countries call for de-escalation in the face of Israel's bombing campaign against Iran's nuclear programme -- and as US President Donald Trump weighs whether to join the strikes against Tehran. 'We will meet with the European delegation in Geneva on Friday,' Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a statement carried by state news agency IRNA. European diplomats separately confirmed the planned talks, set to involve French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy and German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, as well as EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas. Lammy was in Washington on Thursday, where he was due to meet US Secretary of State Marco Rubio for talks focused on Iran, the State Department said. Trump has said he is weighing military action against Iran's nuclear facilities as Israel pummels the country and Tehran responds with missile fire. France, Germany, Britain and the European Union were all signatories of the 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran sunk by Trump during his first term in office. The EU's Kallas, in coordination with European capitals, has insisted diplomacy remains the best path towards ensuring that Iran does not develop a nuclear bomb. On Wednesday, French President Emmanuel Macron said European nations were planning to suggest a negotiated solution to end the Iran-Israel conflict. He has asked his foreign minister to draw up an initiative with 'close partners' to that end. Barrot has been in regular touch with his German and British counterparts since Israel launched massive air strikes against Iran on Friday. Speaking in Paris after talks on the crisis on Thursday, Barrot said the three nations 'stand ready to bring our competence and experience on this matter. 'We are ready to take part in negotiations aimed at obtaining from Iran a lasting rollback of its nuclear and ballistic missile programmes,' he added. The French top diplomat also underlined Iran's 'willingness to resume talks' including with the United States 'on condition there is a ceasefire'. Israel says its air campaign is aimed at preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Iran had been enriching uranium to 60 per cent -- far above the 3.67-per cent limit set by a 2015 deal with international powers, but still short of the 90-per cent threshold needed for a nuclear warhead. — AFP
Observer
2 days ago
- Observer
Syria completes first global SWIFT transfer since war, governor says
Syria has carried out its first international bank transaction via the SWIFT system since the outbreak of its 14-year civil war, its central bank governor said on Thursday, a milestone in Syria's push to reintegrate into the global financial system. Central bank governor Abdelkader Husriyeh told Reuters in Damascus that a direct commercial transaction had been carried out from a Syrian to an Italian bank on Sunday, and that transactions with U.S. banks could begin within weeks. "The door is now open to more such transactions," he said. Syrian banks were largely cut off from the world during the civil war after a crackdown by Bashar al-Assad on anti-government protests in 2011 led Western states to impose sanctions, including on Syria's central bank. Syria needs to make transfers with Western financial institutions in order to bring in huge sums for reconstruction and to kickstart a war-ravaged economy that has left nine out of 10 people poor, according to the United Nations. Husriyeh chaired a high-level virtual meeting on Wednesday bringing together Syrian banks, several U.S. banks and U.S. officials, including Washington's Syria envoy Thomas Barrack. The aim of the meeting was to accelerate the reconnection of Syria's banking system to the global financial system and Husriyeh extended a formal invitation to U.S. banks to re-establish correspondent banking ties. "We have two clear targets: have U.S. banks set up representative offices in Syria and have transactions resume between Syrian and American banks. I think the latter can happen in a matter of weeks," Husriyeh told Reuters.
