Seattle startup community Foundations adds more office space, plans expansion in Bellevue

GeekWire's startup coverage documents the Pacific Northwest entrepreneurial scene. Sign up for our weekly startup newsletter , and check out the GeekWire funding tracker and venture capital directory .
Inside the Foundations space in Seattle's Capitol Hill neighborhood. (Foundations Photo)
The experiment seems to be working.
Foundations, the Seattle-based startup community that launched last year, is doubling its physical space in Capitol Hill and is exploring an expansion in Bellevue, just east of Seattle.
This wasn't the plan when longtime entrepreneur and investor Aviel Ginzburg founded Foundations in a bid to support early stage founders. But that's part of the point.
'Everything at Foundations is an experiment,' he told GeekWire.
There are now 236 total members at Foundations, which includes longtime entrepreneurs and investors from the Seattle tech ecosystem, along with 55 'founders-in-residence' that work with Foundations for six months as part of a lightweight accelerator program until they reach certain milestones.
Some of those companies were ready to 'graduate' recently and wanted to stay engaged with the Foundations community.
At the same time, 5,000 square feet opened up on the floor below Foundations' existing space — which will now be a co-working office for Foundations members and their companies.
'It's a fun evolution of the program,' Ginzburg said. 'We didn't know what was really going to happen. We thought it was like, 'Oh, you're going to go out on your own.' But it seems like these communities of people still want to be working and building together.'
Foundations has emerged as a key support system for founders who can participate in the community without giving up equity or paying fees.
'Foundations was the catalyst that helped us transform what we were building from just a product into a fully-fledged company,' said MediScan CEO Kavian Mojabe, whose health tech startup will work out of the new space.
The group also accepts founders at varying levels of their startup journey.
'Foundations meets us where we are, with mentorship, events, and feedback that fits into our chaotic schedules,' said Shawn Ramirez, CEO of EloraHQ.
Ginzburg — who launched Foundations with Tyler Brown, Ryan Dao, and Art Litvinau — said his experience building the group has shown the strength of Seattle's startup scene.
'There is a lot more entrepreneurial talent and awesome startups here than people realize,' he said. 'They are just very disorganized, siloed and not properly networked.'
Having a community like Foundations is also helpful for founders navigating the AI boom.
'The technology changed so quickly,' Ginzburg said. 'If you're not learning through osmosis and watching others, you're falling behind. So there is this deep desire for all these early stage companies to be physically around each other.'
Aviel Ginzburg accepts the 'Geeks Give Back' award at the GeekWire Awards earlier this month in Seattle. (GeekWire Photo / Dan DeLong)
Foundations operates as a benefit corporation, a legal distinction designed for entities that want to turn a profit and also prioritize social and public good.
The co-working expansion will help provide additional revenue in addition to investment and sponsorships. Ginzburg, a general partner at Seattle VC firm Founders' Co-op who previously ran the Amazon Alexa accelerator, said he's exploring potential partnerships with commercial real estate firms to funnel companies into office space as they scale.
'Our goal here is not to make money,' he said. 'Our goal is to support the community and have this thing keep rolling and keep cranking.'
People from other big cities are now reaching out to Ginzburg about how they can launch something like Foundations in their own startup communities.
But in a lot of ways, Foundations is unique to Seattle.
'It's about the people and the community,' Ginzburg said. 'The structure and the systems are less interesting than the core group of people coming together.'
He added: 'Our mission is to make Seattle a better place to be a founder.'
Foundations is filling a gap left by the surprise departure of Techstars Seattle last year. It's one of several startup groups in the Seattle region aiming to help founders, including Pioneer Square Labs, the AI2 Incubator (which just launched the AI House), and others.
Plug and Play, a Silicon Valley-based group that operates innovation programs, recently announced two new accelerators in the Seattle region. Other accelerator programs include Creative Destruction Lab, Startup Haven, Maritime Blue, and Jones + Foster.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Fast Company

an hour ago

• Fast Company

How ‘try before you buy' can help you make better hiring decisions

Getting the hiring process right is one of the most critical and challenging aspects of building a startup. Early hires shape your company's culture, operational efficiency, and future growth, yet many founders face this task without prior hiring experience or a clear sense of what their evolving business truly needs. Without being thoughtful about hiring —from crafting compelling job descriptions to setting consistent compensation and onboarding practices—startups risk bringing in team members who are misaligned with the company's needs or culture, creating friction and slowing momentum. Over the course of my three decades as a startup operator, executive coach and educator of entrepreneurs, I've observed that investing the time upfront to build strong hiring practices not only helps attract the right talent but also lays a foundation for a healthy, scalable organization. While you can't prevent occasional mis-hires, you can try to minimize the possibility by including a project phase in your hiring process or even considering a project as a paid consulting engagement ('try before you buy') for both you and the candidate. This allows the candidate to demonstrate what they are capable of and what it might be like to work with them—and them with you—once they are on board full time. Projects can give you a higher degree of confidence that this is 'the one,' which can be super hard in the early stages of your startup when you are not sure what 'the one' even is. If this is not a try-before-you-buy situation, I recommend that projects are performed just before you are ready to do reference checks and make an offer. This can be an especially helpful step if you are down to two finalists you really like so you can compare how each one approaches a project. Unless you plan to do a trial engagement with them, try not to choose a project that takes more than one to two hours to do unless you pay them for the work. A startup I've worked with offers to pay for the time taken to do a project, and if the candidate declines payment, the startup makes a donation to a charity of the candidate's choice as compensation for their time. Below are some projects that can be effective at startups. Keep in mind that these projects test the candidate's approach more than whether they do the work perfectly. Build alignment with your team on what good looks like for each project and plan to debrief once the assignment is complete and/or presented. Here are a few examples of what good might look like. 'The First 90 Days' This is a good general test for any new hire, especially an executive, but also for a people manager or technical leader. Have the candidate explain what their first ninety days on the job will look like. Either leave it wide open or offer a few prompts like, 'Who will you spend time with?' or 'How will you get to know the business?' or 'What accomplishments do you hope to make by the end of the first ninety days?' Engineering and Design Projects While there are some nifty tools out there that can test coding skills for engineers, I am a strong advocate for testing the softer skills. Those who design and/or build your product should be able to demonstrate their work beyond coding or portfolio samples. The best type of project here is a brief scenario about building a new feature or capability for your product that will allow the candidate to demonstrate not just depth of syntax knowledge or design best practices, but also how they will work on a problem with your team. These projects can be done as 'homework,' although it's nice if it can be done in person or as part of a video interview. Present a scenario and ask the candidate how they will approach it. You could give them some alone time to think about it and then ask them to talk through it. Ask them to cite how they thought about it and to explain the direction they took and why. Prepare to have another approach or idea for the scenario when they walk through their work. This can help gauge how the candidate handles feedback and if they are willing to collaborate on ideas. Scenarios for Non-Engineering Teams (Marketing, Sales, Product) I prefer scenario tests over presentations of a non-engineering candidate's past work because such tests will show you how they use their experience to approach something new. Scenarios you may ask them to work through can be actual challenges you are facing, or they can be hypothetical. Here are some quick examples of scenario tests for a few functional areas: • Product: Our CTO just came back from a 'listening tour' with some of our customers and wants to explore a new set of features to expand our product offerings. These offerings are not on the product roadmap. What steps would you take to understand these new features and how would you approach the prioritization process? • Marketing: We're about to launch a new product for our customers. What steps would you take to plan for this product launch and how will you measure its success? • Sales: We are building a product to attract new customers in a new segment. What information do you need to prepare your team to sell this new product and how will you set sales goals for the team? You could imagine similar scenarios for finance, customer sup- port, or other functional roles. Remember, these candidates don't know how your business functions day-to-day, so this isn't about whether they have a perfect plan but more about how they approach the problem. With all the interviews and projects, you still may not get it right every time. Again, hiring is hard. That's why the try-before-you-buy approach is often the best way to go for both the candidate and your startup. One way to ease that process, if a trial candidate can work full time before converting to a permanent employee, is to offer them equity in your startup that will be granted when they convert, but with a backdated vesting schedule to when they started their trial. If you're hiring for a role for the first time and no one on your team has experience with that role—so no one knows what good looks like—ask an experienced advisor, investor, or friend with experience to be part of the interview process. They should be able to interview the candidate and help you formulate the projects you may assign.

Forbes

13 hours ago

• Forbes

Elon Musk's DOGE Wouldn't Have Worked Even If It Had Worked

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 13: Elon Musk listens as U.S. President-elect Donald Trump addresses a ... More House Republicans Conference meeting at the Hyatt Regency on Capitol Hill on November 13, 2024 in Washington, DC. As is tradition with incoming presidents, Trump is traveling to Washington, DC to meet with U.S. President Joe Biden at the White House as well as meet with Republican congressmen on Capitol Hill. (Photo by) It's easy to forget that individual saving in no way shrinks consumption. Short of placing money saved into a coffee can, to save is to shift consumptive ability to someone else. What's true about individual saving is true about government savings. No act of parsimony shrinks the size of government either. That's why Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) wouldn't have worked even if it had worked. Short of the savings being placed in a much bigger coffee can, government spending cuts born of efficiency, headcount reduction, mandate reduction, or all three would have just freed up money for Congress to spend in new ways. In government as with individual, what's not spent is shifted to other existing priorities, or much worse, all new ones. It's the new spending initiatives that are the most perilous. Most start out small, and this includes Medicare. It's so easy to forget that it began as a $3 billion program in the 1960s, but is expected to pass $1 trillion in the coming years. Which speaks to the danger of spending cuts. Talk about "regime uncertainty." Unfortunate and economy-sapping as much government spending is today, the good news is that it's a known. In other words, the myriad ways that Congress politicizes the allocation of precious resources is already priced or factored into our day-to-day existence. That's not so with new initiatives. Who knows what Congress will dream up, and who knows how what Congress will dream up will end up? To see the peril of this, ask yourself if Congress would have had the votes to pass Medicare if it was known that sixty years later it would yet again be a nearly $1 trillion annual program today. That's why without excusing most federal outlays for even a second, when it comes to government the devil you know is better than the unknown. Which is why it's better to let Congress fight over what's known and priced, as opposed to freeing it to design all new programs and initiatives from the proverbial studs. They could end up much bigger than they presently are. Logically so. To which some will reply that what's been written doesn't, or wouldn't have applied to DOGE since any savings wouldn't free up money as much as the savings would reduce government borrowing. More realistically, it would just free up Treasury to borrow $2 trillion more in the future. With our federal government, no act of not borrowing subtracts from borrowing. It's all worth keeping in mind as conservatives in particular lament the failure of the latest gallant, but surely quixotic attempt to shrink the size and cost of government. These initiatives never work simply because in government as with individuals, money saved is never money that's not spent.

Yahoo

14 hours ago

• Yahoo

New Goodwill Donation Center opens in Bellevue

BELLEVUE, Wis. (WFRV) – Goodwill North Central Wisconsin (NCW) has opened a new Donation Center in Bellevue, expanding its network of convenient drop-off locations across the state. Located at 2409 Monroe Rd. in Green Bay, the center is designed to make donating gently used items easier for local residents while supporting Goodwill NCW's mission to eliminate barriers to employment through job training and skill-building programs. Having this many convenient locations also enables our community to help extend the life of items for responsible stewardship of the planet's resources. Chris Hess, President and CEO of Goodwill NCW Green Bay native Tony Shalhoub to host global food docuseries on CNN The grand opening and ribbon-cutting event took place on Friday, June 20 at 10:30 a.m., which included remarks from local chamber leaders and Goodwill representatives. Goodwill NCW operates 27 stores and donation centers plus one outlet store throughout Wisconsin. To learn more, visit Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.