"I Voted For Trump, But I'm On Elon's Side Here" — MAGA Is Choosing Sides In Trump/Musk's Breakup, And The Reactions Are Priceless
As the whole world knows by now, former besties Donald Trump and Elon Musk have beef.
This week, their bromance turned into an online feud after a string of chaotic posts slamming each other went viral, all because of differing views on Trump's "Big, Beautiful, Bill."
Trump's Vice President JD Vance quickly took Trump's side on X, saying he's "proud to stand beside him."
Twitter: @JDVance
And followed it up with another, vouching for Trump's character.
Twitter: @JDVance
Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon had a much more dramatic response, immediately calling for Elon Musk's deportation. "They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately," Bannon said in a phone interview with the New York Times.
Related: "We Don't Import Food": 31 Americans Who Are Just So, So Confused About Tariffs And US Trade
Well, conservative voters (many who claim to have supported Trump) are not holding back their reactions to the Trump vs. Elon feud, and many, surprisingly, are team Elon. Here's what they're saying over on the r/LeopardsAteMyFace and r/Conservative subreddits:
This person told Elon to "Burn it down."
This MAGA voter took Elon's side, accusing Trump of being immature.
Related: AOC's Viral Response About A Potential Presidential Run Has Everyone Watching, And I'm Honestly Living For It
"I'm with Elon."
"We all know Trump isn't that mature, unfortunately."
This user said Trump and Elon need to check their "crazy big egos."
This person compared Trump and Elon to "petty immature teenagers."
This user claimed the feud won't be a big deal in the long run, and called it "business as usual."
This user questioned if the fued was a performance.
And finally, "This is how a Democrat gets elected in 2028."
What are your thoughts on the Trump vs. Elon feud? Let us know in the comments below.
Also in In the News: People Can't Believe This "Disgusting" Donald Trump Jr. Post About Joe Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Is Real
Also in In the News: Republicans Are Calling Tim Walz "Tampon Tim," And The Backlash From Women Is Too Good Not To Share
Also in In the News: JD Vance Shared The Most Bizarre Tweet Of Him Serving "Food" As Donald Trump's Housewife
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNET
33 minutes ago
- CNET
Upgrade Your Home Security With Up to 62% Off Some of Our Absolute Favorite Arlo Security Cameras
Home security cameras are so versatile these days. From keeping an eye on pets or kids to deterring package theft and protecting your home while you're sleeping or away, there are plenty of reasons for you to invest in some cameras for your space. Right now Woot is making it even easier to get your hands on some for cheap, marking down a number of Arlo security cameras by up to 62%. Prices start at just $67. If you're looking for outside security there are a few options, but one of the best deals in this sale is the Arlo Ultra 2 Spotlight camera bundle. The cameras have 4K HDR, a 180-degree field of view, great smart home support and local storage. It's our pick for the best wireless 4K home security camera of 2025. Our biggest gripe was the price, but this deal alleviates that worry. Along with two cameras, you'll also get a SmartHub, a power adapter, two rechargeable batteries, two ethernet cables and mounting kits. This bundle would normally run you $600, but a nice 50% discount slashes that price in half so that you'll pay only $300 if you act fast. For something with a dual function, try the Arlo Pro 3 Floodlight security camera. It has a motion-activated floodlight that can reach up to 3,000 lumens, which is great for when you get home late at night. But it will also ensure anyone in your driveway is illuminated and recorded just in case they're up to something nefarious. The camera itself has 2K resolution, color night vision and two-way audio. It's also one of our favorite options for security cameras with floodlights for 2025 and won our Editors' Choice award. Regularly priced at $250, you can get yours for just $120 at Woot. Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money. For indoor coverage, grab yourself a 2-pack of 2nd-gen Arlo Essential security cameras for $67. These indoor cameras are currently our pick for the best overall nanny cam of 2025 thanks to its 2K resolution, solid two-way audio, clear night vision and zoom capabilities. There are some other choices available as well, so be sure to shop the entire sale selection to grab exactly what you need for your home. And don't forget -- Prime members get free shipping, too. Just be sure to log in with Amazon before placing your order. Why this deal matters There are a ton of great options in this sale, including some of our top picks of 2025. If you've been considering getting a home security camera (or several), now is the time. It's rare to see so many discounts saving you half the cost -- or more -- and we are fairly certain these offers will sell out quick. Lock in your order soon to avoid disappointment.


Bloomberg
35 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Tesla Robotaxi Videos Show Speeding, Driving Into Wrong Lane
Tesla Inc. 's self-driving taxis appeared to violate traffic laws during the company's first day offering paid rides, with one customer capturing footage of a left turn gone wrong and others traveling in cars that exceeded posted speed limits. In a video taken by Rob Maurer, an investor who used to host a Tesla podcast, the Model Y he's riding in enters an Austin intersection in a left-turn-only lane. The Tesla hesitates to make the turn, swerves right and proceeds into an unoccupied lane meant for traffic moving in the opposite direction.


CNN
35 minutes ago
- CNN
Tesla finally begins long-promised robotaxi service
Tesla's much-publicized robotaxi service began this weekend — but only in one neighborhood in Austin, Texas, only for a select group of the company's fans and only with a Tesla employee in the front passenger seat. It was a far more modest rollout for robotaxis than Tesla CEO Elon Musk had promised. While other companies have already achieved and surpassed this initial test, Tesla fans still cheered the unassuming launch as a game-changing first step. Musk has promised since 2019 that Tesla was on the verge of providing a wide-ranging ride-hailing service that would change the basic way riders get around, including the promise that Tesla owners would profit from renting their cars to the service. Last fall, Musk debuted a prototype for a 'Cybercab' without a steering wheel or pedals, and he said the service would greatly change the financial outlook for Tesla, making it the most valuable company on the planet. But the start of the Tesla service Sunday was only a fraction of any of that. A small number of company-owned cars were used and they were existing Model Y vehicles — not Cybercabs, which are not yet allowed on roads, let alone produced on a mass scale. It was not even the most extensive robotaxi service in Austin — a joint effort between Uber and Waymo, the self-driving car unit of Google parent Alphabet, has been up and running in Austin since March. But the Austin test pressed on regardless. The rides were made available to a select group of Tesla fans, according to Dan Ives, a tech analyst with Wedbush Securities and an effusive Tesla bull, and Joey Klender, who writes for the site Klender and a member of Ives' team took multiple rides in a Tesla Model Y robotaxi on Sunday. Ives' note to clients, which cited how a Tesla 'safety monitor' sat in the front passenger seat while no person was in the driver's seat, praised the quality of the rides taken by his team member. 'We took a route through a park with dirt roads and traffic cones, yet the car was able to navigate perfectly and picked us up right at our exact location,' Ives said in the note. 'To really put it into perspective, there was a moment where we drove up a narrow road going up a hill with cars parked on both sides with oncoming traffic and people opening their car doors into the road and the Robotaxi masterfully maneuvered.' But it was not all smooth sailing, with multiple videos showing the car making mistakes. In one YouTube video, the robotaxi drove on the wrong side of the road after it attempted and abandoned a left turn, only to continue traveling down the street on the opposite side of a double yellow line before making the left turn on the following block. Fortunately, there were no vehicles driving on the other side of the road. A separate YouTuber posted a video in which the robotaxi kept driving past its destination for several minutes as he tried to get it to pull over so he could get out. 'Please exit safely,' a screen in the rear seat of the car said, as it continued driving down the road. All the rides on Sunday, no matter the distance, cost $4.20, a favorite number of Musk based on its association with marijuana. Musk reposted tweets on X from others who took rides on the initial day of service. Unsurprisingly, all the posts were positive. Musk and his fans have insisted the service will rapidly be expanded to other cities and will dramatically change the financial performance of Tesla. But the EV maker is playing a game of catch up. Waymo, a unit of Google parent Alphabet, has been providing paid rides since 2020, and now provides more than 250,000 rides a week to paying riders in Austin, Phoenix, Los Angeles and San Francisco. It soon plans to expand the service to Atlanta, Miami and Washington, DC. General Motors pulled the plug on its own self-driving car hailing service in December, citing the 'considerable' resources needed and 'an increasingly competitive robotaxi market.' It also had an accident in which one of its robotaxis in San Francisco hit a pedestrian and dragged the woman along the road for 20 feet. The woman had already been hit by a human-driven car before she was struck by GM's robotaxi. California authorities ordered the company to halt its operations in the state as a result.