The ‘sandwich generation' and the age of caring

Pressing question
It was once not much more than a figure of speech 'the president has his finger on the button'. Now I want to know exactly what pressing that button will mean.
Elizabeth Howcroft, Hawthorn
Human rights for all
In response to your correspondent (Letters, 20/6), first, describing Israel's actions since 2006 as ″⁣restraint″⁣ ignores reality. Its withdrawal was followed by a blockade of Gaza, collectively punishing 2.3million people. This siege, intensified since 2023, restricts food, water, medicine, and movement, constituting unlawful collective punishment under international law. Decades of military operations have caused morally unacceptable civilian suffering.
Second, labelling Israel the region's ″⁣only democratic state″⁣ whitewashes its systemic discrimination against Palestinians. Within Israel, Palestinian citizens face overwhelming inequality. In the occupied territories, millions live under military rule without basic rights. Leading human rights organisations, including Israeli ones, conclude this system meets the definition of apartheid.
Finally, while criticising neighbouring states, your correspondent overlooks that Israel's prolonged occupation, settlement expansion (illegal under international law), and actions in Gaza represent a severe violation of Palestinian rights.
Calling for accountability isn't scapegoating; it's demanding adherence to universal human rights.
Paul Evans, Carrum Downs
Talking obstacles
Foreign Minister Penny Wong says Iran should return to the table to negotiate on nuclear disarmament. It did that in 2015 when, with the Obama government, it agreed to restrict uranium enrichment. In 2017, new president Donald Trump dumped the deal. Why should the Iranians believe anything would be different today? Now both Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu want to inflict more attacks on Iran. Wong couldn't be ignorant of this history, so the question is why is she calling for negotiations when she should be aware that neither the Israelis nor Trump would actually want to take part in them in a meaningful way?
Noel Turnbull, Port Melbourne
Tax reset, please
Congratulations to Treasurer Jim Chalmers for acting on tax reform and national productivity (″⁣Gentle Jim levels path to reform″⁣, 21/6).
With ″⁣gotcha″⁣ questions and negative reporting of any tax change, no wonder he avoided this at the election. Neither major party made it an issue. Even with balanced discussion and logical rationalisation of taxes, there will be lobbying by vested interests. The Ken Henry Tax Review of 2009 offered 138 recommendations. These included one that would raise much-needed revenue – the Resource Super Profits Tax. This was sunk by the mining industry. In fact, very few of those tax review recommendations were implemented. Australia clearly needs a tax reset, integrated with productivity and overall fairness considerations. Perhaps Ken Henry can assist.
John Hughes, Mentone
Not really a majority
It is true, as your correspondent says (Letters, 20/6), that Donald Trump was comfortably elected, but we should be aware of what this means in America. Only a minority of eligible US voters (less than a third) actually cast a vote for him. Well over 30 per cent preferred Kamala Harris while the largest group, about 35 per cent, did not vote. To say that most Americans really wanted another Trump administration is stretching reality.
Peter McCarthy, Mentone
On limited time
Benjamin Netanyahu claims regime change is his aim in Iran and Gaza. It seems like regime maintenance – his own, due to the biggest security failure in Israel, on his watch. Whenever the bombings cease, his political career is done.
Patrick Alilovic, Pascoe Vale South
Blackadder returns
US President and Commander-in-Chief Donald Trump's 'very clever ruse to lull the Iranians into a sense of complacency' (' Trump buys himself time, and opens up new options as Israel goes all out ', 21/6), is the sort of 'cunning plan' you might expect from Private S. Baldrick in Blackadder.
Lawrie Bradly, Surrey Hills
Bombs over boots
Remembering the Iraq invasion, the US will no doubt prefer bunker-busting bombs to boots on the ground.
Greg Curtin, Nunawading
Heart of the matter
Life mimics art, again: Monash Health is having its Yes, Minister moment (″⁣Madness as $600m heart hospital cuts theatre, beds', 21/6). No point in building a state-of-the-art facility if it cannot meet the demand for care. Another example of what can happen when public health services are run by bureaucrats and bean-counters not medical professionals.
Jenifer Nicholls, Windsor
A selfish kiss
Your correspondent (Letters, 20/6) implies that King Priam's display of humility was a peacemaking exercise. It was nothing of the sort. His kiss of Achilles' hand was for the entirely selfish motive of retrieving Patroclus' body. The handover of Helen, which might have ended the war, was a step the Trojans would not take.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

West Australian

37 minutes ago

• West Australian

Pakistan condemns Trump after Peace Prize nomination

Pakistan has condemned the strikes ordered on its neighbour Iran by Donald Trump, a day after Islamabad had said it would nominate the US President for the Nobel Peace Prize. Pakistan on Sunday said Trump's decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities violated international law and that diplomacy was the only way to resolve the Iran crisis. "The unprecedented escalation of tension and violence, owing to ongoing aggression against Iran is deeply disturbing. Any further escalation of tensions will have severely damaging implications for the region and beyond," Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said. Also on Sunday, Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif telephoned Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and "conveyed Pakistan's condemnation of the US attacks," a statement from the Pakistani leader said. Pakistan's information minister and the foreign ministry did not respond to requests for comment on the apparent contradiction in the country's positions over the weekend. In Pakistan's biggest city, Karachi, thousands marched in protest against the US and Israeli strikes on Iran. A large American flag with a picture of Trump on it was placed on the road for demonstrators to walk over. The protesters shouted out chants against America, Israel and Pakistan's regional enemy India. Pakistan on Saturday said it was nominating Trump as "a genuine peacemaker" for his role in bringing a four-day conflict with India to an end last month. It said he had "demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship".

Perth Now

38 minutes ago

• Perth Now

Pakistan condemns Trump after Peace Prize nomination

Pakistan has condemned the strikes ordered on its neighbour Iran by Donald Trump, a day after Islamabad had said it would nominate the US President for the Nobel Peace Prize. Pakistan on Sunday said Trump's decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities violated international law and that diplomacy was the only way to resolve the Iran crisis. "The unprecedented escalation of tension and violence, owing to ongoing aggression against Iran is deeply disturbing. Any further escalation of tensions will have severely damaging implications for the region and beyond," Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said. Also on Sunday, Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif telephoned Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and "conveyed Pakistan's condemnation of the US attacks," a statement from the Pakistani leader said. Pakistan's information minister and the foreign ministry did not respond to requests for comment on the apparent contradiction in the country's positions over the weekend. In Pakistan's biggest city, Karachi, thousands marched in protest against the US and Israeli strikes on Iran. A large American flag with a picture of Trump on it was placed on the road for demonstrators to walk over. The protesters shouted out chants against America, Israel and Pakistan's regional enemy India. Pakistan on Saturday said it was nominating Trump as "a genuine peacemaker" for his role in bringing a four-day conflict with India to an end last month. It said he had "demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship".

ABC News

42 minutes ago

• ABC News

As the US bombs Iran and enters another war, China is the likely winner

China is publicly "deeply concerned" about events in the Middle East but privately is probably celebrating. America is off to war again, and China will be the winner as it has been for two decades. Throughout China's rise as an industrial power since it joined the World Trade Organisation on December 11, 2001 — exactly three months after 9/11 — America has been constantly sidetracked and weakened by wars and unrest. It started with the "War on Terror" after 9/11, then Afghanistan, Iraq in 2003, Yemen from 2002, Libya in 2007, Syria from 2014, the contested US election and riots of January 6, 2020, Ukraine and then Gaza over the past two years, Donald Trump's two trade wars, and now … Iran. Trump understood the problem and campaigned on "no more wars," but has been unable to resist the pressure from America's military establishment and Israel. Meanwhile, China has been quietly making friends, building its military muscle as part of a frenetic industrial policy, and not using it (although it's been doing some industrial-scale espionage to get technology). China's leaders still work on the old-fashioned idea that economic policy is for improving the prosperity of citizens and strengthening the country, not for conducting ideological culture wars, and that diplomacy is about winning friends and influencing people. Events last week were a perfect example of the difference between the world's two superpowers. As Trump was leaving the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, last week to prepare to bomb Iran, flinging threats at the other six members and refusing to sign the communique, Chinese President Xi Jinping was in Astana, Kazakhstan, for the second China-Central Asia Summit. The Astana summit's outcome was a "Treaty of Permanent Good‑Neighbourliness and Friendly Cooperation", led and signed by Xi on behalf of China and the leaders of the five stans — Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. They adopted the "Astana Declaration", affirming the "China‑Central Asia Spirit" of "mutual respect, trust, benefit and assistance". Until the 20th century, wars were fought for plunder and slaves: they were mostly heists, enriching invaders with loot and hostages dragged away to work for free. That especially goes for the British and European colonisers of the 17th to 19th centuries, and before them, ancient Rome, Carthage, Alexander the Great, and various ancient and medieval warlords and pirates. But looting and plunder are out these days, or at least it can't be obvious, and slaves are definitely out; wars are designed to entrench or inflate national leaders, usually autocrats or would-be autocrats, and do nothing but weaken and distract everyone involved. That is even more so when it is based on lies (Iraq) or goes too long (Vietnam and Afghanistan) or goes too far (Gaza) because it not only comes with a crippling cost, it saps morale, divides the country and erodes global support. Russia's economy is being ruined by its invasion of Ukraine, probably irreparably, and Israel's moral foundations and international standing are being destroyed by its levelling of Gaza and refusal to accept a Palestinian state. Iran's regime is now being brought undone by its insistence on enriching uranium for nuclear weapons of war and refusing to give up. But the big loser throughout has been, and still is, America, debilitated by its fury and expensive over-reach. Throughout America's warmongering, China has been peacefully remaking its history, starting with the "Four Modernisations" of Deng Xiaoping around 1980 and culminating with joining the WTO in 2001. Then, in 2018, during Trump's first term as president, China got a wake-up call. On December 1 of that year, Meng Wanzhou, the chief financial officer of Huawei and daughter of its founder, was arrested by the Canadian Mounties in Vancouver on a provisional US extradition request. Two months later, she was charged with fraud by the US Department of Justice. Four years later, the case was dismissed. At the same time, the US imposed an effective embargo on semiconductor exports to China as part of a general trade war initiated by Trump. All of which had been preceded by an Australian ban in August 2018 on Huawei taking part in the rollout of 5G mobile infrastructure because of national security concerns, which was, rightly, seen as a curtain-raiser for the US main event. China was blindsided by the restrictions on semiconductors from the US, shocked because they pride themselves on forward planning. So, China's leadership set about fixing it. Not only did they invest billions in developing a semiconductor industry, but they also spent even more money on virtually every other industrial product to make sure they had complete independence. If the US could block semiconductors today, tomorrow it could be chemicals, cars, robots, or solar panels. Trump has shown they were right. Chinese banks were told to stop lending to real estate — property developers simply couldn't get bank funding — but anyone with an industrial project got a hearing. In just a few years, bank lending shifted dramatically towards industrial products and away from real estate. So, China has spent the past seven years since that fateful arrest in Vancouver in 2018 building a formidable industrial technology military complex, but it has not invaded anyone or gotten involved in any wars. Meanwhile, the greatest industrial technology military complex in world history has been constantly fighting wars or supporting other countries fighting them at a total cost of at least $US6 trillion ($9 trillion). Apart from the cost, those wars have divided and demoralised the United States, especially Iraq, Afghanistan and Gaza, and now Trump is starting another war with Iran while trying to rebuild America's industrial base with tariffs and a trade war, which won't work, having repealed Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, which at least subsidised renewable energy industries. Will China ditch its policy of "good neighbourliness" and invade Taiwan? Unlikely, you would think. They might blockade the place one day, but that's doubtful as well — China's leadership would be reluctant to destroy Taiwan's economy before taking it over. And they have seen what America's aggression has done to itself over the past 24 years. Alan Kohler is finance presenter and columnist on ABC News and he also writes for Intelligent Investor.