As the US bombs Iran and enters another war, China is the likely winner
China is publicly "deeply concerned" about events in the Middle East but privately is probably celebrating.
America is off to war again, and China will be the winner as it has been for two decades.
Throughout China's rise as an industrial power since it joined the World Trade Organisation on December 11, 2001 — exactly three months after 9/11 — America has been constantly sidetracked and weakened by wars and unrest.
It started with the "War on Terror" after 9/11, then Afghanistan, Iraq in 2003, Yemen from 2002, Libya in 2007, Syria from 2014, the contested US election and riots of January 6, 2020, Ukraine and then Gaza over the past two years, Donald Trump's two trade wars, and now … Iran.
Trump understood the problem and campaigned on "no more wars," but has been unable to resist the pressure from America's military establishment and Israel.
Meanwhile, China has been quietly making friends, building its military muscle as part of a frenetic industrial policy, and not using it (although it's been doing some industrial-scale espionage to get technology).
China's leaders still work on the old-fashioned idea that economic policy is for improving the prosperity of citizens and strengthening the country, not for conducting ideological culture wars, and that diplomacy is about winning friends and influencing people.
Events last week were a perfect example of the difference between the world's two superpowers.
As Trump was leaving the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, last week to prepare to bomb Iran, flinging threats at the other six members and refusing to sign the communique, Chinese President Xi Jinping was in Astana, Kazakhstan, for the second China-Central Asia Summit.
The Astana summit's outcome was a "Treaty of Permanent Good‑Neighbourliness and Friendly Cooperation", led and signed by Xi on behalf of China and the leaders of the five stans — Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.
They adopted the "Astana Declaration", affirming the "China‑Central Asia Spirit" of "mutual respect, trust, benefit and assistance".
Until the 20th century, wars were fought for plunder and slaves: they were mostly heists, enriching invaders with loot and hostages dragged away to work for free.
That especially goes for the British and European colonisers of the 17th to 19th centuries, and before them, ancient Rome, Carthage, Alexander the Great, and various ancient and medieval warlords and pirates.
But looting and plunder are out these days, or at least it can't be obvious, and slaves are definitely out; wars are designed to entrench or inflate national leaders, usually autocrats or would-be autocrats, and do nothing but weaken and distract everyone involved.
That is even more so when it is based on lies (Iraq) or goes too long (Vietnam and Afghanistan) or goes too far (Gaza) because it not only comes with a crippling cost, it saps morale, divides the country and erodes global support.
Russia's economy is being ruined by its invasion of Ukraine, probably irreparably, and Israel's moral foundations and international standing are being destroyed by its levelling of Gaza and refusal to accept a Palestinian state.
Iran's regime is now being brought undone by its insistence on enriching uranium for nuclear weapons of war and refusing to give up.
But the big loser throughout has been, and still is, America, debilitated by its fury and expensive over-reach.
Throughout America's warmongering, China has been peacefully remaking its history, starting with the "Four Modernisations" of Deng Xiaoping around 1980 and culminating with joining the WTO in 2001.
Then, in 2018, during Trump's first term as president, China got a wake-up call.
On December 1 of that year, Meng Wanzhou, the chief financial officer of Huawei and daughter of its founder, was arrested by the Canadian Mounties in Vancouver on a provisional US extradition request. Two months later, she was charged with fraud by the US Department of Justice. Four years later, the case was dismissed.
At the same time, the US imposed an effective embargo on semiconductor exports to China as part of a general trade war initiated by Trump.
All of which had been preceded by an Australian ban in August 2018 on Huawei taking part in the rollout of 5G mobile infrastructure because of national security concerns, which was, rightly, seen as a curtain-raiser for the US main event.
China was blindsided by the restrictions on semiconductors from the US, shocked because they pride themselves on forward planning.
So, China's leadership set about fixing it. Not only did they invest billions in developing a semiconductor industry, but they also spent even more money on virtually every other industrial product to make sure they had complete independence.
If the US could block semiconductors today, tomorrow it could be chemicals, cars, robots, or solar panels. Trump has shown they were right.
Chinese banks were told to stop lending to real estate — property developers simply couldn't get bank funding — but anyone with an industrial project got a hearing. In just a few years, bank lending shifted dramatically towards industrial products and away from real estate.
So, China has spent the past seven years since that fateful arrest in Vancouver in 2018 building a formidable industrial technology military complex, but it has not invaded anyone or gotten involved in any wars.
Meanwhile, the greatest industrial technology military complex in world history has been constantly fighting wars or supporting other countries fighting them at a total cost of at least $US6 trillion ($9 trillion).
Apart from the cost, those wars have divided and demoralised the United States, especially Iraq, Afghanistan and Gaza, and now Trump is starting another war with Iran while trying to rebuild America's industrial base with tariffs and a trade war, which won't work, having repealed Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, which at least subsidised renewable energy industries.
Will China ditch its policy of "good neighbourliness" and invade Taiwan?
Unlikely, you would think. They might blockade the place one day, but that's doubtful as well — China's leadership would be reluctant to destroy Taiwan's economy before taking it over.
And they have seen what America's aggression has done to itself over the past 24 years.
Alan Kohler is finance presenter and columnist on ABC News and he also writes for Intelligent Investor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
44 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Foreign Minister Penny Wong says Australia supports US strikes on Iran
Foreign Minister Penny Wong has confirmed the Australian government's support for the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities on Sunday. Donald Trump confirmed the strikes on three of Iran's nuclear facilities on Sunday, saying the US had dropped a 'full payload of bombs'. Labor did not hold a press conference on Sunday following the strikes, instead issuing comment via a government spokesperson acknowledging Mr Trump's statement while continuing calls for 'de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy'. Asked on Today on Monday morning whether the government supported the strike on Iran, Senator Wong said they 'support action to prevent Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon'. 'And that is what this is – so your answer, the answer is yes,' she said. 'I've said that upfront.' Host Karl Stefanovic pressed Senator Wong on whether support for the US strike contradicted the government's position of advocating for de-escalation. 'Oh, what I said was Iran had to come to the negotiating table, and we urged Iran to come back to the negotiating table and engage in diplomacy,' Senator Wong said. 'It's the same thing – I think the US President was saying it's the same thing, that Prime Minister Starmer was saying it's the same thing … but we are where we are now. 'The question is what happens next.' Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and Liberal frontbencher Andrew Hastie promptly shared a joint statement on Sunday, saying the Coalition 'stands with the United States of America today'. 'The Coalition supports actions taken by the United States of America to ensure that the Iranian regime is stopped from acquiring nuclear weapons,' it said. 'While Australians will never seek conflict in the world, we can never forget that the Iranian regime is a militantly theocratic autocracy. 'It expressly seeks the destruction of our allies, enacts extrajudicial killings of political dissidents and brutally represses the rights of women and girls. 'It is the Iranian people who are the victims of this brutal regime and we stand in solidarity with them.'
News.com.au
44 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Australia finally takes a stance on Iran attack
Foreign Minister Penny Wong has finally confirmed Australia supports the bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities but has refused to say whether Australia's Pine Gap military base was used in the US attack. Nearly 24 hours after the US President said he had 'totally obliterated' three sites and the Coalition called for 'clarity', the Albanese Government has been forced to clarify whether Australia supported the decision. Speaking on Sunrise, Labor frontbencher Tanya Plibersek was the first to speak out after the Albanese Government did not conduct any television interviews on Sunday about the bombings. 'Well, yes, we do support the strikes, and I know the foreign minister is going to be in your program later. We certainly don't want to see full scale war in the Middle East,'' Ms Plibersek said. On Sunday, the Albanese Government released a statement but did not do any on camera interviews after the attacks. 'We have been clear that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile program has been a threat to international peace and security,'' the statement said. 'We note the US President's statement that now is the time for peace.' Foreign Minister Penny Wong's first television interview was on the Today show on Monday morning where she was immediately asked to clarify that statement. 'Why did it take so long for you to publicly state your position?' Today show host Karl Stefanovic asked. 'I don't accept that characterisation, Karl. I'm here talking to you now,'' Senator Wong replied. 'That's 24 hours after the world reacted,'' Stefanovic countered. 'Well, I think you saw a statement from the government. Yesterday. The Deputy Prime Minister was obviously up in the morning. 'We support action to prevent Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon. And that is what this is. So we support action to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.' Questions over Pine Gap But questions remain over whether or not the US used the Pine Gap facility in the attacks. 'Was the US military base in Pine Gap used in this operation?' host Stefanovic asked. But Senator Wong dodged the question. 'You wouldn't expect me to comment on intelligence matters,'' she said. 'But what I would say is the US has made it clear this was a unilateral strike.' In other words, she declined to answer the question on Pine Gap but stressed the US acted alone in bombing Iran. 'So you don't know if US, Australian and satellite communications and signals intelligence?'' Stefanovic asked. 'That's the same question, and I've answered it,'' Senator Wong said. What is Pine Gap? Pine Gap is a joint US-Australian intelligence facility located near Alice Springs, Australia that is primarily used for signals intelligence collection, including telemetry from weapons systems, signals from antimissile and anti-aircraft radars, communications satellite transmissions, and microwave emissions. It also monitors military developments, and supports US military operations, including drone strikes. Senator Wong was asked the same question on ABC TV and again declined to answer. 'We don't comment on intelligence matters. We certainly don't comment on the matters you are asking me about,'' she said. 'The US made clear publicly these were unilateral 'I think it is important to remember that the facilities that were struck only existed for the purpose of Iran's nuclear program. That's what we are talking about. The world has long agreed Iran is not in compliance with its international obligations when it comes to nuclear material and the world long agreed it's not in the interests of collective peace and security for Iran to gain access to a nuclear weapon.' Defence Minister blindsided Defence Minister Richard Marles appeared blindsided by the attacks on Sunday morning telling Sky News shortly before the US dropped the bombs that he wasn't going to speculate on whether Iran was close to building a nuclear bomb and urging de-escalation and diplomacy. Do you believe the US would be justified in using a bunker bomb on the Fordow underground site?,'' Sky News host Andrew Clennell asked. 'Well, look, I'm not about to speculate on what the United States does,'' he replied. 'I mean, the position that we have articulated in relation to this conflict has been consistent from the outset, and that is that we are worried about the prospect for escalation here, and we've been urging de-escalation, we've been urging dialogue and diplomacy.' As he spoke, the US bombs were about to be dropped in Iran. Asked if he believed Iran was close to having a nuclear weapon, Mr Marles refused to say. 'Again, I'm not about to speculate on that, other than to say what I already have, and that is that the Iranian nuclear and ballistic missile program is most definitely a threat to the peace and stability of not only the Middle East, but the world,'' he said. Call for 'clarity' Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison has backed President Trump's decision to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities as 'a last resort' urging Australia to now speak with clarity about why the US had to act. Describing the bombing as 'a necessary event', Mr Morrison stressed that the United States has launched a targeted mission that reflected the fact that it was the only ally of Israel with the military hardware to penetrate Iran's underground bunkers. 'There were no other options available to the President,'' Mr Morrison said. 'I think President Trump has been very clear about seeking to get an agreement with Iran. This was completely rejected, and made it very clear that there was no negotiation now there was the opportunity for complete capitulation and that was not offered, and they are the only military in the world that is capable of doing what it has just done, and that is what has happened.' But in a barbed observation on the conduct of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong And you're right that's going to be in less than 15 minutes from now. That address to the nation, I know I've interrupted your Sunday. I won't give you much longer. I just wanted to get one last thought, your last sort of consideration on how Australia should respond. I know you don't want to give advice to your successor unnecessarily. But do you have any views on how we should view this, this huge, quite significant development that we've seen this morning? Well, it's time for some clarity. I think there's been far too much ambiguity about this from Australia, far too much ambiguity. And it's time for clarity. And the clarity is we were dealing with a theocratic authoritarian state that sponsored an attack on a close friends in Israel back on the seventh of October, and they have shown their true colours. And Iran is not a friend of Australia. It's not a friend of Australia's interests. This is a this is a conflict not with the people of Iran who are wonderful people, creative.'
AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
ASX to fall; investors fret Iran attack will upend long bull run
The price of oil will spike as markets open and could even soar beyond $US100 a barrel after the Trump administration's intervention into a weeks-long war between Israel and Iran unsettles financial markets. While the price of Brent crude has drifted more than 10 per cent higher since Israel first launched an attack on Iranian nuclear assets two weeks ago, traders fear US President Donald Trump's authorisation of bombing at the weekend will lead to a rapid escalation in the conflict. In particular, traders are worried that Iran could constrict travel through the Strait of Hormuz, a key shipping route for oil that connects the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. If this closes, prices could increase significantly, pushing inflation higher and disrupting expectations that central banks including the Reserve Bank of Australia will keep cutting rates. 'For markets, this shatters the illusion of containment. What was a regional proxy conflict is now a high-stakes, US-driven air war targeting [weapons of mass destruction] infrastructure – with unpredictable spillovers across energy markets, global shipping lanes, and risk sentiment,' wrote SPI Asset Management's Stephen Innes of the bombing of nuclear facilities. 'This is no longer a waiting game – it's a market moment that demands positioning, not passivity,' he said in his Dark Side of the Boom newsletter. The S&P/ASX 200 is priced to open 0.2 per cent lower on Monday, although those futures were set before the weekend strikes. Wall Street had ended the last week mostly lower, although traders had hedged their bets and markets had remained largely flat for days. The S&P fell 0.2 per cent, while the Dow and the Nasdaq rose 0.1 per cent and 0.2 per cent respectively. The ASX 200 eased 0.5 per cent last week, the first weekly drop in three months.
