How oil will react if U.S. bombs Iran and other scenarios, according to JPMorgan

U.S. or Israeli military action that leads to regime change in OPEC member Iran would have a profound impact on the global oil market, according to JPMorgan. "If history serves as a guide, further destabilization of Iran could lead to significantly higher oil prices sustained over extended periods," Natasha Kaneva, head of global commodities research at JPMorgan, told clients in a note published Wednesday. Pressure is mounting on Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, as President Donald Trump considers joining Israel's air campaign against the Islamic Republic's nuclear sites. Trump demanded Iran's unconditional surrender on Tuesday, threatening Khamenei's life in a social media post. Israel sought to assassinate Khamenei in the opening days of its military operation, but Trump vetoed the plan, a U.S. official told NBC News. 'Profound impact' Regime change in oil-producing nations such as Iran "can have a profound impact" on the country's oil policy, production and global prices in the short and long term, Kaneva said. Iran is the third-largest producer in OPEC and exports about 1.6 million barrels of crude per day. Eight major regime changes have occurred in major oil producing countries since 1979, with crude prices spiking about 76% at their peak compared to pre-crisis levels, according to JPMorgan. Oil prices eventually stabilized at levels about 30% higher compared to before the crisis, the bank said. Supply losses in the wake of a regime change "are challenging to recover quickly, further supporting elevated prices," Kaneva said. Oil prices, for example, spiked dramatically in the wake of the 1979 Iranian revolution that overthrew Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and brought the Islamic Republic under Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini to power. Iran's crude oil exports plummeted by 4.8 million barrels per day by January 1979, according to JPMorgan. OPEC compensated for some of the lost supply from Iran but prices still rose, more than doubling to $34 per barrel by the middle of 1980 and causing a worldwide economic recession, according to JPMorgan. Today, Iranian crude oil production stands at 3.3 mbd, "significantly below the volumes seen before the revolution" of 1979. Fleeting spike The current spike in oil prices might not last in the absence of major political upheaval in Iran. Oil shocks in response to conflicts involving Israel are usually short lived, with prices returning to fair value fairly quickly, with the exception of the 1973 Yom Kippur war that led to the Arab oil embargo, according to JPMorgan. The risk of Iran blocking the Strait of Hormuz is "very low" because the U.S. would consider it an act of war, according to the bank. The U.S. Fifth Fleet is based in Bahrain across the Persian Gulf from Iran, tasked with protecting commercial shipping, the bank said. About one-fifth of the world's oil passes through the narrow strait between Iran and Oman. The oil market has so far remained relatively calm in response to the current Iran-Israel conflict, with prices gaining about 10% since Israel's air campaign began last Friday.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

6 minutes ago

Israel-Iran live updates: US attack 'outrageous,' Tehran says, vowing response

The United States struck three nuclear sites in Iran on Saturday, President Donald Trump announced. B-2 bombers dropped a number of Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs -- known as "bunker busters" -- during the U.S. mission over Iran, a U.S. official confirmed. A number of Tomahawk cruise missiles were also fired at targets inside Iran from a U.S. Navy submarine, the official confirmed. Following the strikes, Trump addressed the nation, calling it a "spectacular military success." Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth will speak from the Pentagon at 8 a.m. on Sunday.

Yahoo

8 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Why Trump's Decision To Bomb Iran Is A Personal Blow For Keir Starmer

Keir Starmer's response to Donald Trump's decision to bomb Iran was predictably diplomatic. 'Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security,' the prime minister said. 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat. 'The situation in the Middle East remains volatile and stability in the region is a priority. We call on Iran to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis.' But there is no doubt that the US air strikes are a personal blow, if not a humiliation, for the prime minister. Just three days ago, with speculation rife that Trump was preparing to give the green light to military action, a spokesman for Starmer urged the president to step back from the brink. 'Clearly de-escalation is the priority, and we would not want to see anything that ramps up the situation. 'That is our priority. We have been clear on that for a number of days now. De-escalation remains this government's priority.' Clearly, those pleas from No.10 fell on deaf ears. The US strikes also call into question Starmer's judgment, given the assessment he made of the crisis in the Middle East while at the G7 summit in Canada. Trump stunned the world by leaving the gathering a day early, triggering fresh speculation that American involvement in Israel's bombardment of Iran was imminent. The president also demanded Iran's 'unconditional surrender' and urged Tehran's 10 million residents to evacuate the city. But despite all of the evidence to the contrary, Starmer insisted that military action was not on Trump's mind. 'I don't think you should read into that that an American attack is imminent,' the PM told Sky News political editor Beth Rigby. That analysis has proved to be spectacularly wrong. As Starmer makes a forlorn call for 'stability' in the region, it is hard to escape the conclusion that the UK government is a helpless bystander to the rapidly unfolding crisis. 'Stability Is A Priority': Keir Starmer Responds To Trump's Strikes On Iran Donald Trump Confirms US Launched Strikes Against Iran In Major Escalation Of Middle Eastern War Iran-Israel Conflict: How The UK Could Become A 'Target' If It Helps America With The War

Yahoo

8 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Iran strikes mark Trump's biggest foreign policy gamble

With his unprecedented decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites, directly joining Israel's air attack on its regional arch-foe, US President Donald Trump has done something he'd long vowed to avoid - intervene militarily in a major foreign war. The dramatic US strike, including the targeting of Iran's most heavily fortified nuclear installation deep underground, marks the biggest foreign policy gamble of Trump's two presidencies and one fraught with risks and unknowns. Trump insisted on Saturday that Iran must now make peace or face further attacks. But the strikes could provoke Tehran into retaliating by closing the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most important oil artery, attacking US military bases and allies in the Middle East, stepping up its missile barrage on Israel and activating proxy groups against US and Israeli interests worldwide, analysts said. Such moves evoke echoes of the "forever wars" the US fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, which Trump had derided as "stupid" and promised never to be dragged into. In the lead-up to the bombing, the US President had vacillated between threats of military action and appeals for renewed negotiation to persuade Iran to reach a deal to dismantle its nuclear program. A senior White House official said that once Trump was convinced that Tehran had no interest in reaching a nuclear agreement, he decided the strikes were "the right thing to do." Trump gave the go-ahead once he was assured of a "high probability of success," more than a week of Israeli air attacks on Iran's nuclear and military facilities had paved the way. But some experts suggested that while Iran's nuclear program may have been set back for many years, the threat may be far from over. Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon, saying its program is for purely peaceful purposes. "In the long term, military action is likely to push Iran to determine nuclear weapons are necessary for deterrence and that Washington is not interested in diplomacy," the Arms Control Association, a non-partisan US-based organisation that advocates for arms control legislation, said in a statement. In the immediate aftermath of the US strikes, Iran showed little appetite for concessions. Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation said it would not allow development of its "national industry" to be stopped, and an Iranian state television commentator said every US citizen or military member in the region would now be legitimate targets. Some analysts suggested that Trump, whose administration has previously disavowed any aim of dislodging the Iranian leadership, could be drawn into seeking "regime change" if Tehran carries out major reprisals or moves to build a nuclear weapon. "Beware mission creep, aiming for regime change and democratisation campaigns," said Laura Blumenfeld, a Middle East analyst at the Johns Hopkins School for Advanced International Studies in Washington. "You'll find the bones of many failed US moral missions buried in Middle East sands." Jonathan Panikoff, a former US deputy intelligence officer for the Middle East, said Iran's leadership would quickly engage in "disproportionate attacks" if it felt its survival was imperilled. But Tehran will also have to be mindful of the consequences, he said. While actions such as closing the Strait of Hormuz would pose problems for Trump with the resulting higher oil prices and potential US inflationary impact, it would also hurt China, one of Iran's few powerful allies. At the same time, Trump is already facing strong push-back from congressional Democrats against the Iran attack and will also have to contend with opposition from the anti-interventionist wing of his Republican MAGA base. Trump's slogan of "peace through strength" will certainly be tested as never before, especially with his opening of a new military front after failing to meet his campaign promises to quickly end wars in Ukraine and Gaza.