Homelessness is getting worse, but advocates say it's all but forgotten in this election

Social Sharing
Efforts are underway to help unhoused people vote in the upcoming federal election — a race advocates say is letting the issue of homelessness take a back seat to the political turmoil coming from south of the border.
The Canadian Press spoke with shelter and frontline workers across the country who say homelessness is getting worse and their capacities are being stretched to record levels. Unhoused people are eager to vote but few candidates are speaking to them or their needs, advocates say.
"Decisions made by all the tiers of government affect homeless people at a disproportionate rate," said Susan Smith, chair of the lived experience council with End Homelessness St. John's, N.L. "These issues are important and part of what [candidates] should speak out about and stand for."
Little more than a year ago, homelessness was a prominent political issue as the federal housing advocate released a sweeping report on the stubborn growth of encampments and called for a national strategy to solve the problem. But U.S. President Donald Trump's global trade war and calls to annex Canada have shifted focus away from the homelessness crisis.
Darren Nodrick, director of development at the Siloam Mission in Winnipeg, said his 143-bed shelter has been full every night for almost two years, "which is unprecedented."
Siloam staff are setting up a polling station in the shelter and helping residents prepare to vote. So far, just one local candidate — Liberal Rahul Walia — has contacted the shelter to ask to meet its clients, Nodrick said, adding he wishes more candidates would make that effort.
"It's crucial and it's important and it's something that needs to stay top of mind," he said.
At the Salvation Army's Crossroads Residential Services in Saskatoon, executive director Gordon Taylor said shelter clients would like to speak with local election candidates.
"Something we hear quite often from clients is that they feel like they don't have a voice," Taylor said.
When asked if Liberal Leader Mark Carney intends to visit people in shelters or encampments, a party spokesperson said she couldn't disclose his campaign stops ahead of time. She pointed to Carney's housing announcement last month, which included $6 billion for "deeply affordable," supportive and Indigenous housing and shelters.
The NDP said some local candidates have been talking to homeless voters but the party did not say if leader Jagmeet Singh will do the same. The Conservatives did not respond to questions about whether leader Pierre Poilievre would visit homeless shelters or encampments.
Jim Gurnett of the Edmonton Coalition on Housing and Homelessness has posted a picture to social media from the front lines of the city's growing homelessness crisis on every day of the federal campaign. The photos of brightly coloured tarps tied into haphazard shelters, or tents lined up in encampments, are reminders "of the misery caused when governments ignore people's human right to housing," his posts say.
"I'm really frustrated," Gurnett said in a recent interview. "I understand that the issues with the tariffs and those things are pushing other stuff aside. But people have got to understand that if everybody doesn't have adequate housing, the social and economic costs of that are gigantic."
A report last week from the Ottawa Mission said the city's homeless population has grown to about 3,000 people. Approximately 500 of them are living on the streets, some within sight of Parliament Hill. Mission spokesperson Aileen Leo said they released the report during the election campaign to draw parties' attention to the situation.
"There has been a shocking rise in homelessness, and there's also been a shocking rise in unsheltered homelessness, which is very troubling, very disturbing," Leo said in an interview. "And we need a sustained and appropriate government response."
Voting is difficult for unhoused people, who are often focused on basic survival and don't have identification or permanent addresses, she said. But many are quite determined to cast a ballot and clients at the mission's shelter can use its address to do so, she added.
She encouraged local candidates to speak to voters in shelters and encampments, as long as they get permission and respect residents' rights.
"I think it would be very instructive for anyone running for public office to see what living in an encampment is like," she said.
Last week in Newfoundland, End Homelessness St. John's hosted an outreach event at its transitional home to help people get identification and other documents they need to vote or file taxes.
Staff have been helping people file taxes for months, said executive director Doug Pawson, adding that T4 slips can be used as identification to vote.
Pawson and his staff will also offer rides to Elections Canada offices for early voting, and there will be a designated polling station on the April 28 election day for transitional home residents, he said.
And though no local candidates have approached End Homelessness St. John's to speak to its clients, the group will co-host a candidates' forum on housing and homelessness next week.
The idea came from its advisory council of people who have experienced homelessness, which is led by Smith.
"We want all of the folks running in this election to understand that the needs of people who are experiencing issues around housing are important," Smith said.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CBC

44 minutes ago

• CBC

Carney calls for diplomatic resolution after U.S. airstrikes on Iran

Social Sharing Prime Minister Mark Carney says U.S. military attacks on Iranian nuclear sites were designed to alleviate the threat of the country's nuclear program, and reiterated that Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon. The prime minister's statement comes in response to U.S. strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran, further escalating the crisis in the Middle East. In a statement posted to social media, the prime minister urged parties to immediately return to the negotiating table to reach a diplomatic resolution. Carney echoed calls from last week's G7 leaders' joint statement, calling for "de-escalation" of hostilities in the Middle East and a ceasefire in Gaza. U.S. President Donald Trump left the G7 summit early to address the Middle East crisis following Israel's latest attacks targeted at Iran's nuclear program. Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand urged Canadians in the region to register with Global Affairs Canada for updates on available travel options. In an interview with the CBC's Power & Politics on Thursday, Anand said Canadians fleeing Israel and Iran should head to Jordan, Turkey and Armenia, where Canada is boosting its consular services. Both Carney and Anand released statements prior to departing for Europe for back-to-back EU and NATO summits. Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre says allowing Iran to get a nuclear weapon would have been "reckless," and that U.S. and Israeli actions to stop Iran's nuclear proliferation are justified. Poilievre said the federal government must protect Canadians from spillover violence in Canada and take action to stop "intimidation and foreign interference by the Iranian regime targeting Canada's Jewish and Persian communities." Calls for diplomacy Meanwhile, the United Nations Security Council will convene an emergency meeting on the matter later today. Hours after the strikes, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi accused the U.S. of crossing a "very big red line," and said he was headed to Moscow for urgent talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin. In an interview with Fox News Sunday morning, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S. is not at war with Iran, and called for direct talks.

Globe and Mail

an hour ago

• Globe and Mail

What are bunker-buster bombs the U.S. used to attack Iran's nuclear facilities?

In inserting itself into Israel's war against Iran, Washington unleashed its massive bunker-buster bombs on Iran's Fordo fuel enrichment plant. Those bombs were widely seen as the best chance of damaging or destroying Fordo, built deep into a mountain and untouched during Israel's week-long offensive. Air Force Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said 14 of the bombs were used in Sunday's attack on Fordo and a second target. The U.S. is the only military capable of dropping the weapons, and the movement of B-2 stealth bombers toward Asia on Saturday had signalled possible activity by the U.S. Israeli leaders had made no secret of their hopes that President Donald Trump would join their week-old war against Iran, though they had also suggested they had backup plans for destroying the site. In all, the U.S. hit three nuclear sites and Caine told reporters Sunday that 'initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage.' The mission could have wide-ranging ramifications, including jeopardizing any chance of Iran engaging in Trump's desired talks on its nuclear program and dragging the U.S. into another Mideast war. Here's a closer look. 'Bunker buster' is a broad term used to describe bombs that are designed to penetrate deep below the surface before exploding. In this case, it refers to the latest GBU-57 A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb in the American arsenal. The roughly 30,000 pound (13,600 kilogram) precision-guided bomb is designed to attack deeply buried and hardened bunkers and tunnels, according to the U.S. Air Force. It's believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. It was not immediately known how many were used in the Sunday morning strike. The bomb carries a conventional warhead, but the International Atomic Energy Agency has confirmed that Iran is producing highly enriched uranium at Fordo, which had raised the possibility that nuclear material could be released into the area if the GBU-57 A/B were used to hit the facility. Initial assessments by the IAEA, however, were that this had not happened. Fordo is Iran's second nuclear enrichment facility after Natanz, its main facility, which already has been targeted by Israeli air strikes and was also hit by the U.S. on Sunday, along with Isfahan. The IAEA says it believes those earlier strikes have had 'direct impacts' on the facility's underground centrifuge halls. Fordo is smaller than Natanz, and is built into the side of a mountain near the city of Qom, about 60 miles (95 kilometres) southwest of Tehran. Construction is believed to have started around 2006 and it became first operational in 2009 — the same year Tehran publicly acknowledged its existence. Analysis: Israel eyes the heart of Iran's nuclear ambitions In addition to being an estimated 80 meters (260 feet) under rock and soil, the site is reportedly protected by Iranian and Russian surface-to-air missile systems. Those air defences, however, likely have already been struck in the Israeli campaign, which claims to have knocked out most of Iran's air defences and the U.S. bombers were not fired upon during their mission. Still, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the goal of attacking Iran was to eliminate its missile and nuclear program, which he described as an existential threat to Israel, and officials have said Fordo was part of that plan. 'This entire operation ... really has to be completed with the elimination of Fordo,' Yechiel Leiter, Israel's ambassador to the U.S., told Fox News. In theory, the GBU-57 A/B could be dropped by any bomber capable of carrying the weight, but at the moment the U.S. has only configured and programed its B-2 Spirit stealth bomber to deliver the bomb, according to the Air Force. The B-2 is only flown by the Air Force, and is produced by Northrop Grumman. According to the manufacturer, the B-2 can carry a payload of 40,000 pounds (18,000 kilograms) but the U.S. Air Force has said it has successfully tested the B-2 loaded with two GBU-57 A/B bunker busters – a total weight of some 60,000 pounds (27,200 kilograms). In the attack on Fordo, Caine said the first B-2 dropped two of the bunker busters on the facility. The strategic long-range heavy bomber has a range of about 7,000 miles (11,000 kilometres) without refuelling and 11,500 miles (18,500 kilometres) with one refuelling, and can reach any point in the world within hours, according to Northrop Grumman. The mission against Iran was flown from its home base in Missouri. Whether the U.S. would get involved had been unclear in recent days. At the G7 meeting in Canada, Trump was asked what it would take for Washington to become involved militarily and he said: 'I don't want to talk about that.' Then on Thursday, Trump said he would decide within two weeks whether to get involved, to give another chance to the possibility of negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program. In the end, it took just two days to decide. Sunday's attack was specifically restricted to the three nuclear sites, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said. 'The scope of this was intentionally limited, that's the message that we're sending, with the capabilities of the American military nearly unlimited,' he told reporters. 'So Iran, in that sense, has a choice.'

Toronto Star

2 hours ago

• Toronto Star

US signals a willingness to renew talks with Iran and avoid a prolonged war

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration on Sunday signaled a willingness to renew talks with Iran and avoid a prolonged war in the aftermath of a surprise attack on three of the country's nuclear sites as U.S. officials assessed Tehran's nuclear ambitions and the threat of retaliation against American interests. President Donald Trump, who had addressed the nation from the White House on Saturday night, allowed his national security team to speak for him the next morning, staying quiet on social media and scheduling no public appearances. The coordinated messaging by his vice president, Pentagon chief, top military adviser and secretary of state suggested a confidence that any fallout from the attack would be manageable and that Iran's lack of military capabilities would ultimately force it back to the bargaining table.