Net metering bill fails in Wyoming Senate

CHEYENNE – A bill to amend the calculation for net metering compensation and how it applies to new small customer generators has failed on third reading in the Senate.
Wednesday evening, the Senate voted 17-11 against Senate File 111, 'Net metering revisions.' According to bill sponsor Sen. Cale Case, R-Lander, similar bills have passed in the Senate, but have faced challenges in the House.
'Net metering' means measuring the difference between the electricity supplied by an electric utility and the electricity generated by a small customer who generates their own electricity, that is then fed back to the electric utility over an applicable billing period.
SF 111 would have revised how net metering compensation applies to new small customer generators, authorizing the Public Service Commission to use a different system of compensation for excess energy production, if that service was being subsidized by other customers. Under SF 111, existing small customers who owned an electrical production system before Dec. 31, 2025, would have been be exempted at existing rates.
"This doesn't hurt utilities. This comes out of other customers (pockets) who have to pay higher rates to cover (utility) costs," Case said on the Senate floor Monday.
However, during committee testimony Jan. 27, members of the public called the proposed legislation a solution in search of a problem.
John Burrows of the Wyoming Outdoor Council said the bill directs a foregone conclusion that rooftop solar owners are being subsidized by other ratepayers. The idea that rooftop solar owners are 'not paying their share' of the utilities' network cost, he said, does not adequately portray the system in place.
On the other side of the Capitol, the House passed its own net metering bill, House Bill 183, 'Net metering amendments,' on three readings. That bill would amend the generation capacity for net metering systems. HB 183 will head to the Senate for introduction there.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Wall Street Journal

21 minutes ago

• Wall Street Journal

Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful' Bill Gets Slimmed Down in Senate

WASHINGTON—President Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill is getting smaller just as Republicans head into a crucial week, after the Senate's rules arbiter decided several controversial provisions don't qualify for the special procedure the GOP is using to bypass Democratic opposition. The tax-and-spending megabill centers on extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts, delivering on the spirit of his campaign promises to eliminate taxes on tips and overtime, and providing big lump sums of money for border security and defense. Those new costs are partially offset by spending cuts, in particular to Medicaid.

The Hill

an hour ago

• The Hill

Senate parliamentarian rejects GOP's attempt to limit courts' contempt powers

The Senate parliamentarian has ruled against a controversial provision in the Senate Republicans' megabill that would have made it significantly more difficult for courts to enforce contempt findings against the Trump administration. The parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, ruled that limiting courts' ability to hold Trump officials in contempt violated the Senate's rules governing what can be passed with a simple-majority vote on the budget reconciliation fast track. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) hailed the parliamentarian's decision as a major victory. 'Senate Republicans tried to write Donald Trump's contempt for the courts into law — gutting judicial enforcement, defying the Constitution and bulldozing the very rule of law that forms our democracy,' Schumer said in a statement responding to the development. 'But Senate Democrats stopped them cold. We successfully fought for rule of law and struck out this reckless and downright un-American provision,' he said. The provision, tucked into the thousand-page bill House Republicans passed in May, would have required anyone suing the federal government to pay a bond before a court would be allowed to use its contempt power to enforce injunctions and other rulings. Courts have already ruled more than 190 times against the Trump administration since January. The controversial language received little notice when it came to the floor, and Rep. Mike Flood (R-Neb.) later caused an uproar at a town hall meeting when he admitted he didn't know the provision was in the legislation when he voted for it. 'If enacted, this would have been one of the most brazen power grabs we've seen in American history — an attempt to let a future President Trump ignore court orders with impunity, putting him above the law,' Schumer said Sunday afternoon. 'Donald Trump is not above the law. And thanks to Senate Democrats – including the tireless work of Senator Durbin and the Judiciary Democrats – the courts can still hold him and any president accountable,' Schumer said.

CNN

an hour ago

• CNN

Bernie Sanders reacts to US strikes on Iran during speech

Sen. Bernie Sanders held a "Fighting Oligarchy" rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, when he received news of President Donald Trump's strikes on Iran.