Electronic Warfare Lessons From Ukraine Informing Air Force Special Operations Future
As it looks to remain relevant in a future that could see conflict with a great power like China, Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) is seeking to apply key lessons learned from the war in Ukraine, a high-ranking U.S. Air Force official told The War Zone. The ability to operate in a dense electronic warfare environment and to adapt very quickly to new tactical challenges, in particular, are great areas of interest, spurring a review of how the command views training and new acquisitions, the official said.
For the past two decades, AFSOC's arsenal of aircraft operated in largely benign electromagnetic combat environments, often guided by special tactics airmen on radios, in virtually uncontested airspace against insurgent groups possessing no electronic warfare (EW) capabilities.
In Ukraine, both sides possess such robust EW abilities that each has resorted to fiber optic cables, impervious to jamming, for a significant portion of their FPV drone operations. Communications there are often highly degraded, and offensive and defensive measures are constantly being updated by the combatants in an endless game of whack-a-mole. Jammers exist on many individual vehicles, and GPS is also under constant electronic attack. Even U.S.-donated munitions like the Ground Launched Small Diameter Bomb (GLSDB) have seen their effectiveness reported thwarted, at least in part, by EW.
One of the major takeaways from Ukraine is figuring out how special operations forces (SOF) airpower can fight 'in environments that are heavily degraded, in terms of jamming, in terms of electronic warfare, electronic attack,' said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss planning issues. The command needs to 'increase our acumen and our skill set and our ability and capability and capacity' to ensure EW success, both offensively and defensively.
In future 'GPS-denied environments, how do you have alternate [precision, navigation and timing] PNT? Resilient PNT? How do you fight and survive? Really, both of those sides of the coin in an environment like Ukraine have provided a wealth of information and lessons learned, and how you do that in an environment that is really unique to what we've seen over the last several decades?'
The Russian 'Black Eye' EW system that jams FPV and Mavic video is now in mass production and is appearing across the whole front.This is a serious development for Ukraine as one system can shut down radio drone operations across an area of 2-4 km when located high enough.1/ https://t.co/x3CCyU7sm6 pic.twitter.com/NYALxs21Lc
— Roy
(@GrandpaRoy2) May 4, 2025
As a result of these takeaways, the official said AFSOC is considering changing the way it prepares for war.
'Our people are a decisive advantage, more important than hardware,' the official posited. 'So how do we train all the way from our ground forces, the Special Tactics units, how do we train them? How do we equip them to be relevant in the EW fight, but also then onto our platform? So we're looking at, how do you leverage aircrew back onto certain platforms? … What platforms might require some of our combat systems officers to be put back into the crew complement? Once you do that, how are you training them to be effective from day one, as they come to us out of their initial qualification training, what systems are those?'
Beyond how it utilizes its airmen, AFSOC is also rethinking its acquisition process, with an eye on becoming far more nimble in this regard than in the past.
'This need to really be proactive and dynamic, to change the capabilities of either the platforms or just jump from platform to platform, in terms of capability to respond to the dynamic environment that you're experiencing. You've seen this probably plenty in your own reporting about how quickly both sides are adapting their capabilities to employ in combat, and the need to react to that rapidly. And so what that means to me, in the position that I'm in, you start to think about how do I apply this to – we talk in terms of programs of record, but maybe I need to be talking about programs of capability,' the official suggested.
'There's certainly your major platforms… But in some of the lower-level kinds of things – offensive asymmetric capabilities – what do you do there? You see… a lot of systems every day in that theater being employed, but if we are trying to plan to gain a capability, how are we flexibly able to determine what might be viable today that may not be viable, maybe in a few weeks or six months, or a year from now? So you want to have flexible programs of capability so that you can now leap to the thing that works today, may not work a year from now. So I've got to be able to make that leap in a very dynamic, rapid way to be relevant on the battlefield.'
Moving away from so-called 'exquisite' systems that are very complex, expensive, and time-consuming to build to more affordable and attritable ones is also a possibility for some mission sets and capability needs, according to the official.
'Oftentimes, we think in terms of major weapon systems. Well, some of these capabilities we may need to think more of in terms of consumables, more like ammunition. That we can employ them [in a way] if we lose them, that's not a concern the way that it would be with a major weapon system platform, so that we can then either divest and move to the next thing, or we've employed them and we've lost some, and that's okay, too.'
As for programs of record, the official said that AFSOC's recent acceptance of the last of the AC-130J Ghostrider gunships and MC-130J Commando II transport/tankers it plans to purchase 'is something to be celebrated, and that's a great milestone. But that doesn't mean we're anywhere near being done with the work that we would want to put into them to keep them relevant in the scenarios that you're asking about, certainly with what we're learning.'
The need to be able to rapidly update these platforms and other systems to keep them relevant is growing larger by the day. Addressing this, too, via systemic procurement and development changes is also important, according to the official:
'And then, in terms of the systems themselves, this is where we're working with, both the service and SOCOM, where you have autonomous systems. You get into radios that we want to be software defined, so that you aren't constantly chasing what I call the 'Box of the Month Club,' where by the time you have laid a great deal of resourcing into a system, it's got to be so dynamic that you aren't vendor locked. Thereby. You need open systems architecture, you need modularity and this notion of government reference architectures between SOCOM and the Air Force, so that you can then rapidly iterate to change, in some cases, the actual functionality of the system itself to be responsive to now what you're seeing on the battlefield.'
'How are we training our people? Do we have the right systems on the airplanes? How are we integrating those with the broader SOF and joint force to make them relevant? Those are all really key foundational considerations' that AFSOC is working on.
Contact the author: howard@thewarzone.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
As Trump floats regime change to ‘Make Iran Great Again', Deutsche Bank warns Europe has drawn the short straw in escalating conflict
President Trump abruptly escalated U.S. involvement in the Middle East by ordering airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites, sparking warnings of 'everlasting' consequences from Iran, heightened tensions over regime change, and immediate volatility in global oil markets. While U.S. officials downplayed intentions of regime change and direct war, analysts warned that the conflict could have serious and lasting economic impacts, especially for Europe, and urged investors to be wary of overreacting to sensationalist commentary amid ongoing uncertainty. This weekend Trump's two week window for a decision on Iran turned into two days, as the U.S. entered the conflict in the Middle East by bombing Iranian nuclear sites. The president had been publicly ambiguous on whether he would take military action, but in a now-familiar pattern from the Oval Office, he surprised global media by confirming that warplanes had struck three separate targets. In response Iran warned of 'everlasting' consequences. And while Trump previously said he would not harm Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, despite knowing where he is, the president has now suggested the Iranian regime should be overthrown. He wrote on his site, Truth Social: 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' Almost as soon as Trump made the suggestion members of his own cabinet began briefing to the contrary. Defense Secretary Pete Hesgeth told reporters that the mission 'was not, and has not, been about regime change' while Vice president JD Vance denied the U.S. was at war with Iran. 'We're at war with Iran's nuclear program,' he clarified. The questions for voters and analysts have inevitably turned to what Iran's 'everlasting' response could be. As Western nations weighed the possibility of Tehran acting to disrupt their economies, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also announced after the strikes that he would travel to Moscow to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Speaking in Istanbul, Araghchi told reporters Iran had a 'strategic partnership' with Russia, adding: 'We always consult with each other and coordinate our positions.' Closer to home, Iran's parliament also approved plans to shut the Strait of Hormuz which transports about one-fifth of the world's daily global oil production. This is the most immediate concern for analysts, who watched as oil prices jumped to a five-month high when markets opened in Asia on Monday morning, before falling back down with Brent crude sitting at approximately $79 per barrel. But analysts also note that the nations—and indeed the consumers—which may have drawn the short straw in the conflict could be those who were not directly involved in this weekend's action. As Deutsche Bank's Jim Reid notes, the U.S. has turned into a net energy exporter over the past few years, 'so any negative impact would be through deteriorating financial conditions or through higher for longer rates as the Fed have another reason to delay cuts.' Reid continues: 'For Europe though, the impact is potentially more serious. Every $10/bbl increase in oil has the potential to add a quarter of a percent to HICP [the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices used by the EU] within a quarter and if sustained, 0.4pp within a year. 'Growth could be lowered by around 0.25pp if such an increase was sustained.' With geopoliticians charting an uncertain path in the days ahead, economists have warned investors against any knee-jerk reactions. As UBS's Paul Donovan put it in a note seen by Fortune this morning: 'We live in a world of political polarization and soundbite economics. That encourages sensationalism. Deckchair generals will offer extreme opinions on the U.S. attacks on Iran. Both supporters and opponents the attacks are likely to dramatize events. Investors should be cautious of knee-jerk overreactions.' He continued: 'President Trump's ruling out near-term attacks immediately before attacking might be tactical, but their suggestion of regime change in opposition to official U.S. policy causes uncertainty. That raises trust issues relevant to trade negotiations. 'Even modest oil price increases will raise U.S. gasoline prices just as trade tariffs push up other prices, and may add to profit-led inflation too.' That being said, analysts at JPMorgan said investors should buckle up for prolonged volatility. In a note seen by Fortune this morning, JPMorgan's Mislav Matejka wrote Trump's conflicting statements about whether the weekend's strike will be the only action or the beginning of a series of attacks brought 'little certainty.' 'Moreover, we do not see an obvious route to a political settlement to the military conflict, which makes us think the conflict, like the one in Gaza, could last longer than many investors think,' he added. 'Moreover, Iran is both much bigger than Gaza, Syria or Lebanon and, unlike the other three areas that Israel has attacked in the past 18 months, it sits on the Straits of Hormuz. Matejka adds: 'In our view, the global economy/global investors can neither ignore the risks of conflict in Iran the way they can in Lebanon, Syria or Gaza, nor can they ignore the 10% jump in global energy prices.' This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia: Other nations ready to supply Iran with nukes after U.S. strike
June 22 (UPI) -- In the wake of President Donald Trump's strike on Iran's nuclear sites Saturday, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said Sunday that "a number of countries" are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear weapons. Gen. Dan Caine said at a Pentagon press conference Sunday that measuring the damage at the sites would take time but that an initial assessment indicates that all three sites sustained "severe damage and destruction." He revealed that the mission involved 75 precision-guided munitions, including 14 GBU-57 bunker-busters. "Do you remember that the operation was beginning, I promised you that Iran's nuclear facilities would be destroyed, one way or another. This promise is kept," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on social media, revealing that the strike was carried out by the United States in "full coordination" with the Israeli Defense Forces. While Israeli and American authorities have indicated major damage at Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan, Iranian and Russian authorities have indicated only minor damage to Iran's capabilities for nuclear enrichment. "What have the Americans accomplished with their nighttime strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran?" Medvedev questioned in a post on social media. "The enrichment of nuclear material -- and, now we can say it outright, the future production of nuclear weapons -- will continue. A number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads." Medvedev said Iran's political leadership has survived despite Israel's apparent pursuit of a regime change and may have "come out even stronger." Like Russia, Iran ally Pakistan is armed with nuclear weapons but said Thursday that it had not yet received requests for any military assistance from Iran while expressing alignment with its neighbor. It has since condemned the U.S. attack on Iran. "The unprecedented escalation of tension and violence, owing to ongoing aggression against Iran, is deeply disturbing. Any further escalation of tensions will have severely damaging implications for the region and beyond," Pakistan's Foreign Ministry said in a statement Sunday. Sa'eed Iravani, Iran's ambassador and permanent representative to the United Nations in New York, has called for an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council, Iranian state media reported Sunday. Iran is calling for the Security Council to rebuke the United States, which is a permanent member of the UNSC. The Russian Foreign Ministry also released a statement condemning the strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, calling them a violation of international law and the United Nations charter. It called the attack a "substantial blow to the global non-proliferation regime built around the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons." "They have significantly undermined both the credibility of the NPT and the integrity of the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) monitoring and verification mechanisms that underpin it," the Russian Foreign Ministry said. China's Foreign Ministry likewise said the United States had violated the U.N. charter and international law as it called for Israel to reach a ceasefire "as soon as possible." "China stands ready to work with the international community to pool efforts together and uphold justice, and work for restoring peace and stability in the Middle East. A Telegram account affiliated with the Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps said Sunday that satellite images show Iran had evacuated everything from the Fordow site 48 hours before the US attack and moved it to a safe location. "This image shows a large number of trucks that had quickly evacuated enrichment materials, equipment and other supplies from the Fordow site," the post reads. "It is clear that Trump's failed and dramatic attack not only did not damage the underground Fordow facilities, but the site was empty." Rafael Mariano Grossi, the director-general of the IAEA, said Sunday he will call an emergency meeting of the IAEA Board of Governors on Monday after the American strike. He said Iranian nuclear officials had not recorded an increase in off-site radiation levels. "As of this time, we don't expect that there will be any health consequences for people or the environment outside the targeted sites," Grossi said. "We will continue to monitor and assess the situation in Iran and provide further updates as additional information becomes available." In apparent criticism of the United States, Grossi said he had "repeatedly stated that nuclear facilities should never be attacked." He called for Israel and the U.S. to stop their "hostilities" against Iran so that the IAEA's "vital inspection work" in Iran could continue. Meanwhile, the IRGC-affiliated Telegram channel said Sunday that Iran struck Israel's Ben Gurion Airport, as well as a biological research center that reportedly housed research into biological warfare, among other military targets. "This time, sirens sounded after the precise hits, throwing the enemy off balance," the statement said. "We announce that the main parts of the capacity of the Islamic Republic of Iran's armed forces in this sacred defense have not yet been put into operation." Meanwhile, Israel's war against Gaza continues. The Gaza Health Ministry said Sunday that the death toll has risen to 55,959 people while medical facilities are facing blood shortages. The WAFA news agency reported Sunday that Israeli forces reportedly detained at least 26 Palestinians in the West Bank on Sunday after conducting overnight raids.
The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
Live updates: White House confident Iran strikes decimated nuclear sites
The Trump administration is expressing confidence that Saturday's bombings of nuclear sites in Iran did the job of dismantling Tehran's nuclear ambitions. 'This strike on Saturday did make our homeland safer because it took away Iran's ability to create a nuclear bomb. This is a regime that threatens 'death to America,' and 'death to Israel, and they no longer have the capability to build this nuclear weapon and threaten the world,' press secretary Karoline Leavitt told ABC News on Monday morning. President Trump late Sunday declared in a social media post: 'Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term!' As assessments of the damage done to the three sites — Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz — continue, the world awaits Iran's response to the U.S. strikes. 'The timing, nature and the scale of Iran's proportionate response will be decided by its armed forces,' Amir-Saeid Iravani, Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, told an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council on Sunday. Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi was in Moscow on Monday, meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Russia said it is ready to aid Iran. Against this backdrop, NATO leaders will meet in the Netherlands this week for the alliance's annual summit. Trump will arrive Tuesday. Back in D.C., Senate Republicans face a crucial stretch in moving Trump's agenda forward, with the 'big, beautiful' tax-and-spending bill expected to hit the floor by midweek. The Senate parliamentarian is assessing the legislation and approving, or in some cases knocking down, provisions that will allow it a fast-tracked vote. In the House, the annual budgeting process begins, ahead of the fiscal year's end on Sept. 30. Follow along today for updates on these topics and more.
