Ukrainian diplomat urges Merz to deliver Taurus missiles to Kyiv, lead Europe in ending Russia's war
Ukrainian diplomat Andrii Melnyk has called on Germany's incoming chancellor, Friedrich Merz, to fulfill his campaign promise and immediately deliver 150 Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine, alongside a broader set of decisive actions to stop Russia's full-scale war.
"Germany, of all places, has a decisive role to play in stopping murder and bringing about a just peace," Melnyk wrote in a letter published in German by Die Welt, a national daily newspaper. "Not only does the future of the Federal Republic depend on your success as chancellor, but also the fate of Ukraine — and the whole of Europe."
Andrii Melnyk served as Ukraine's ambassador to Germany from December 2014 to October 2022, then as Deputy Foreign Minister, and since June 20, 2023, he has been Ukraine's ambassador to Brazil.
In the letter, published shortly before Easter, Melnyk outlined five steps Merz should take during his first 100 days in office. First, he proposed a coalition decision to allocate 0.5% of Germany's GDP annually — around 21.5 billion euros ($24.5 billion) per year, or 86 billion euros ($98 billion) by 2029 — for arms supplies to Ukraine. The funding, he said, should go toward the production of advanced weapons in both Germany and Ukraine, calling it "a huge investment in Germany's security."
Read also: 'Today we will pledge billions' for Ukraine — allies begin Ramstein-format meeting in Brussels
Melnyk also called for the same 0.5% commitment to be adopted at the EU and G7 levels, excluding the United States. He said the resulting 550-billion-euro ($622 billion) investment in Ukraine's defense over the next four years would send a powerful message to Moscow.
"This mega-commitment… would be a huge warning signal to Putin that you, Mr. Merz, and our allies are serious about Ukraine's aid," he wrote. "This will impress Putin."
One of the most urgent demands in the letter is the immediate announcement and implementation of Taurus missile deliveries. "This election promise must be fulfilled, despite the expected resistance from the (Social Democratic Party) SPD," Melnyk wrote, adding that Germany does not need "coordination with partners" or to issue ultimatums to the Kremlin.
The outgoing German chancellor, Olaf Scholz, has repeatedly blocked the delivery of Taurus missiles over his concerns about escalation. Merz has been critical of this position and advocated for Ukraine's ability to strike strategically.
In an interview on April 13, Merz also suggested that the long-range missiles, if supplied to Ukraine, could be used to target strategic Russian military infrastructure in occupied Crimea. The Telegraph reported on April 16 that the U.K. would support a potential German decision to send Taurus missiles to Ukraine.
"These inferno weapons should simply be delivered, without 'ifs' and 'buts', to stop the creeping advance of the Russians and change the current war dynamics at its core," Melnyk wrote, according to the Welt.
The letter also proposes transferring 30% of Germany's available fighter jets, helicopters, and armored vehicles to Ukraine and adopting a lend-lease-style law to enable swift deliveries.
Melnyk concluded by urging Merz to push to confiscate 200 billion euros in frozen Russian assets and use the funds for Ukraine's reconstruction.
Read also: As Trump mulls cuts, NATO's integrity is on the line
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
9 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
NATO chief says Ukraine remains vital at summit despite Zelenskyy's absence from leaders' meeting
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte insisted Monday Ukraine would remain a vital topic at an alliance summit this week despite President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's absence from a leaders' meeting aiming to seal an agreement to boost military spending. 'You will see important language about Ukraine, including connecting the defense spending up to 2035 to Ukraine, and the need for Ukraine to stay in the fight,' Rutte told reporters on the eve of the two-day summit. 'This is a clear commitment by allies.' But the Ukrainian leader hasn't yet publicly confirmed he'll attend a dinner laid on for leaders attending the NATO summit, where his country has had a diplomatic downgrade from previous alliance meetings, even as leaders stress that their militaries need to muscle up to counter the threat of Russia. It's a big change since the summit in Washington last year, when the military alliance's weighty communique included a vow to supply long-term security assistance to Ukraine, and a commitment to back the country 'on its irreversible path' to NATO membership. But with Zelenskyy's relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump still strained since a testy Oval Office meeting earlier this year, finding a place for the Ukrainian leader at NATO's top table has proved a bridge too far. There are other meetings scheduled for Zelenskyy at the summit, but the doors remain shut to the leaders' working meeting Wednesday, even as Rutte acknowledged how heavily the war weighs on the leaders. 'Of course, the most significant and direct threat facing this alliance remains the Russian Federation," he said. "Moscow continues to wage war against Ukraine with the support of North Korea, Iran and China, as well as Belarus.' European allies and Canada, 'will provide over €35 billion of additional security assistance to Ukraine for the year ahead,' he said. 'So in a couple of months, we went from €20 billion to €35 billion. And I think that is great news.' Meanwhile, Moscow bombarded Ukraine with 352 drones and decoys, as well as 11 ballistic missiles and five cruise missiles overnight Monday, Ukraine's air force said, killing at least 14 people and injuring several dozen others.
The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
US on high alert after Iran strikes
Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here It's Monday. This humidity is on another level. 🥵 Oh, and if you're in the Washington area, be aware that the new Metro rail changes are in effect. 🗺️ Here's the new Metro map In today's issue: President Trump is meeting with his national security team this afternoon after taking the extraordinary step of inserting the United States into the escalating Israel-Iran conflict. Here's where things stand: Potential retaliation against U.S. troops: Fears over Iran potentially retaliating are high, including against any of the 40,000 U.S. forces in the Middle East. Americans are on alert: The U.S. has issued a number of alerts since the weekend strikes against three Iranian nuclear sites. Russia backs Iran: A Russian spokesperson says Russia is ready to help Iran. And Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi is in Moscow today to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Iran may retaliate economically: Iranian Parliament has reportedly approved a measure to close the Strait of Hormuz. This is a vital passage for trade — especially oil. That could cripple the global economy. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asked China to step in and prevent Iran from closing the strait. 🗨️ Follow today's live blog ➤ THE TWO BIG QUESTIONS: 1 — Did the strikes destroy Iran's nuclear program? The Trump administration has expressed confidence that Saturday's mission to bomb Iran's nuclear sites was successful. Trump claimed he 'obliterated' their nuclear sites — and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told ABC News this morning that the White House is confident it hit Iran's enriched uranium stockpiles. 2 — Is the U.S. pushing for a regime change? Vice President Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio andDefense Secretary Pete Hegseth all insisted Sunday that the U.S. strikes were *not* intended to force a 'regime change' in Iran. But Trump then left that door open, floating a possible regime change on Truth Social. ➤ HAPPENING TUESDAY: Trump will travel to the Netherlands for the annual NATO summit Tuesday. ➤ HOW WE WENT FROM 0 TO 60 IN A FEW DAYS: Trump said in a statement read by the press secretary at Thursday's White House briefing that he would take up to two weeks to decide whether to strike Iran. But just two days later, the U.S. lobbed bombs at three Iranian nuclear sites. 📸 Satellite images of the strikes What changed in that time?: The New York Times reports that it was intentional 'political and military misdirection' from the White House. 'It was almost entirely a deception. Mr. Trump had all but made up his mind to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities, and the military preparations were well underway for the complex attack.' Plus: Everyone in Trump's orbit had been trying to get in his ear about war vs. diplomacy. Read the NYT report: 'Shifting Views and Misdirection: How Trump Decided to Strike Iran' ➤ MORE READS: The Washington Post: A weakened Iran could turn to assassination and terrorism to strike back The Wall Street Journal: Trump's Iran Attack Revives Questions About War Powers NPR: Iran's relationship with Russia and China could come into play after U.S. strikes The Atlantic: Trump Changed. The Intelligence Didn't.: The president's decision to drop bombs on Iran was opportunistic, not a result of new information. Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough has nixed several more provisions in Republicans' 'big, beautiful' megabill. ⭕ The first — holding White House officials in contempt: Republicans have included language to make it very difficult for courts to hold Trump administration officials in contempt. If passed, that could give Trump officials power to ignore court rulings because there's no easy enforcement mechanism to hold them in contempt. ^ Wow, this is a wild stat: Since January, courts have already ruled *against* the Trump administration at least 197 times, per The New York Times tracker. ^^For context: This controversial provision was included in the House-passed bill, but it went unnoticed by many. Several Republicans later realized it was in the bill after voting 'yes' and publicly said they regret their vote. ⭕ The second — border security and immigration enforcement: MacDonough rejected language that would authorize states — as opposed to the federal government — to conduct border security and immigration enforcement. ⭕ The third — increasing contributions for retirement: MacDonough ruled against GOP language to increase what federal employees would contribute to the Federal Employees Retirement Systems if they don't agree to become at-will employees. 🟩 But what is allowed to stay — AI: A 10-year ban on states regulating artificial intelligence (AI). This is important to keep in mind: The Senate parliamentarian's role is nonpartisan, and she is not deciding what lawmakers can and cannot pass. MacDonoughis sifting through the bill to decide what is allowed to be included in Republicans' reconciliation bill. Remember: Reconciliation is a legislative loophole to pass a bill with just 51 votes, not the usual 60 votes. MacDonough ruled these provisions are a violation of the Byrd Rule. If Republicans want to include them, they will need 60 votes. ➤ WHAT'S HAPPENING ON CAPITOL HILL THIS WEEK?: The Hill's Mychael Schnell posted a helpful breakdown of what to expect in Congress this week. Read: 'Congress returns to divisions over Iran strike amid budget battles' Coming tomorrow: In the latest edition of The Movement, The Hill's latest newsletter, Schnell will take a look at the inside the group making an 'EPIC' impact on the GOP's megabill. Click here to sign up & get it in your inbox. The Supreme Court just agreed to hear a case on whether a former Louisiana inmate can receive damages for having his dreadlocks forcibly shaved in prison. But the court said 'no' to hearing an appeal to Virginia's lifetime voting ban for felons. The House and Senate are in. President Trump is in Washington. (All times EST) 1 p.m.: Trump meets with his national security team. 5:30 p.m.: The Senate holds a vote to end debate on a nomination. 📆Today's agenda 6:30 p.m.: First and last House votes. 📆Today's agenda Tuesday: New York City's Democratic mayoral primary. 🔎What to know Thursday: The next scheduled day for Supreme Court opinions. 🍪 Celebrate: Today is National Pecan Sandies Day. 📱 No more WhatsApp for House staffers: Axios reports that the popular messaging app WhatsApp will be banned on House staffers' devices for security reasons. If you know of any dogs with dog walkers in the Boston seaport, this woman wants you to know that they are being *very* good boys and girls.
Miami Herald
22 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Mercedes Boss Hands The Combustion Engine Another Lifeline
Mercedes has been teasing AMG's first in-house all-electric vehicle, a 1,000-horsepower-plus super sedan that will redefine Affalerbach's definition of an Autobahn animal. On the other end of the spectrum, the entry-level CLA has arrived with similarly brilliant all-electric technology, and the automaker had previously announced intentions for all its products to be EVs around the end of the decade. Those plans have continually shifted as demand has, and based on comments Mercedes CEO Ola Källenius recently made to German publication Auto Motor und Sport, they're seemingly shifting again. When asked if the decision to offer the GLC SUV as an EV and also with a hybridized combustion engine was a stopgap measure, Källenius responded, "The electrified, high-tech combustion engines will run longer than we originally expected. We have made this course correction." The CEO added, "I believe the most rational approach in the current situation is for an established manufacturer to do both [EV and gas] and not neglect one technology." If those sorts of comments sound familiar, BMW CEO Oliver Zipse and Toyota Chairman Akio Toyoda have expressed similar sentiments, saying that focusing all one's resources on exclusively building cars that are not yet fully supported in terms of worldwide infrastructure and demand is simply implausible for any automaker that wishes to exist long enough to see global EV adoption take hold en masse. To be fair, Källenius hasn't just come to this realization now. Last year, he announced plans to move the EQS and S-Class under one nameplate, and Mercedes, like most of its peers, has always accompanied its all-electric goals with the condition that they are subject to market conditions. And let's face it, the market for new luxury EVs is not exactly booming. "The new CLA is the greeting from the kitchen of an entire family," Källenius said. "Then the core segments will follow with the electric versions of the GLC, C-Class, and E-Class. We still have an incredible amount in the pipeline." As we touched on above, Mercedes is dropping the EQ "sub-brand," which was essentially a gamble based on the supposition that EV buyers wanted association with the Mercedes brand but also a unique identity. It was also a marketing ploy because Mercedes EQ models looked vastly different from traditionally named and powered Benzes, but the combination of a new name and jellybean styling led one dealer to tell Automotive News (subscription required) in 2023, "Our cars need to be 'want' cars. The S-Class has maintained good loylty because it's aspirational. An EQS is not something that most people aspire to own." Källenius' comments indicate that, like BMW (which sells identically styled i7 EV and 7 Series sedans), future EVs will look similar to their combustion-powered counterparts, and those hybridized counterparts will now likely be sold well into the next decade. The shift in styling strategy has already begun. The all-electric G 580 with EQ Technology has a silly name, but it looks like the solid G-Wagen it is. Notably, Porsche is also now working on a new gas Macan after the EV's sales failed to sustain the nameplate, reports Autocar. In America, both the old gas and new electric Macan are sold concurrently, but in Europe, cybersecurity laws meant Porsche had to move on, and with the 718, too. Now, it may be returning to combustion, but have no doubt, more EQs and electric Caymans will still be developed. Related: Genesis Is Going After BMW And Mercedes Where It Will Hurt Most Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
