Long awaited judicial review begins in Gogrial East, with support from United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS)
Women and men in chains approach an improvised justice bench next to the main prison in Lietnhom, the county headquarters of Gogrial East, Warrap. Exhaustion is writ large on their faces. These prisoners have waited a long time for their time in court. Many of them don't even know why they have been detained.
'I really don't know my offense. I don't know my crime. I was taken from the court side, placed in a container and suddenly I ended up in prison,' one of them shares.
Another case involves a young woman who found herself imprisoned on charges of adultery—a charge often misused against women—after a tragic incident involving her stepfather and deceased daughter.
These anecdotes are a stark reminder that in South Sudan, access to justice cannot be taken for granted.
In Lietnhom, with no resident judge for some five years, customary courts, typically limited to civil disputes, have been handling criminal cases beyond their jurisdiction. This resulted in unjust imprisonment, inadequate judicial procedures, and significant distress for inmates, particularly women and young girls.
However, this week, the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS), through its Rule of Law section brought much-needed hope to communities living here by facilitating a two-week case review in collaboration with a judge, public prosecutor and defender sent by the Kuajok High Court to facilitate appropriate court hearings.
'This judicial vacuum must be addressed immediately,' Judge George Michael explained, while beginning to review cases that had gone unheard for months or even years.
On the first day, a woman detained for refusing a forced marriage burst into tears as her release was announced. 'Today I finally feel my opinion matters,' she said. Her relief was palpable.
Another compelling moment was when the judge addressed the court while reviewing the case of a teenage girl jailed for choosing a different religion. 'We fought for our independence from Sudan to uphold our freedom of beliefs and rights. How can we imprison our own children for exercising these same freedoms?' he questioned.
Within two days, substantial progress was made. 'We found that many people were imprisoned without proper documentation or sufficient evidence,' noted Deng Kuol, the prison director.
Out of 77 cases reviewed, 41 individuals were immediately freed, significantly reducing prison overcrowding and arbitrary detention. Only nine inmates remained for further legal proceedings.
'Seeing wrongfully incarcerated people walk free with happiness is one of the most rewarding parts of our work,' smiles Lena Ellen Becker, a Justice Advisor with the UN Peacekeeping mission.
'Don't be surprised if overcrowding returns in weeks because of the absence of the permanent prosecutors or judges,' cautions Mr Kuol, however.
While these initial sessions reveal deeper systemic issues, such as wrongful imprisonment, arbitrary arrests, and procedural negligence, the beginning of a comprehensive effort toward justice reform in Gogrial East is praiseworthy.
Moving forward, detailed reviews and additional judicial support will continue.
'Our roles need clarity, procedures must improve, and we must protect the vulnerable, especially women and girls,' stated Ayen Deng, a traditional leader working with the customary court.
Despite these early victories, challenges remain.
The woman released from prison faced immediate pressure from her family. They refused to return the cattle received as dowry and insisted she must either marry the man she had originally refused or face imprisonment again. "This shows us that some issues go beyond our courts," explained a UNMISS officer. "Cultural practices and social pressures require a collective change in mindsets and strong government interventions to ensure true justice and freedom for all."
As Judge Michael poignantly reminded the gathering, 'Justice delayed is justice denied,' pointing out the urgent need for continued commitment to human rights, fairness, and societal transformation across this young nation.
While this UNMISS facilitated case review may only be a temporary solution at this point, its success sets the stage for future replications and long-term investments at the state level. Achieving lasting justice in Lietnhom and beyond will ultimately depend on sustained and collective efforts at every level.
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
a day ago
- The National
Europe's tepid response to Israel's strikes says a lot
The Middle East is on edge. The crisis in Gaza deepens daily. Diplomacy has stalled – a high-level UN conferenc e to advance efforts towards a two-state solution to the Palestine-Israel conflict has been indefinitely postponed. Meanwhile, the EU – whose response to the destruction of Gaza has been woefully inadequate – is more divided than ever now that Israel has opened another front with Iran. Its 27 member states are split between those that back Israel and those that are alarmed by the collapse of international law. The EU's collective voice has largely been silent. The EU is not incapable of strong action; its robust response to the war in Ukraine proves that. But Ukraine is seen as a neighbour, and Russia as a direct threat to EU and Nato security. Brussels' rhetoric has been clear and can be summed up as the EU standing with Ukraine every step of the way. When it comes to Gaza, however, the EU defaults to financial aid. An additional €25 million ($28.7 million) was pledged recently, bringing the EU's total to more than €100 million this year. But what is sorely lacking is moral clarity – a principled, united voice calling on Israel to stop. The EU's former foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, has been one of the few to speak out clearly. Addressing dignitaries last month while collecting the Charles V European Award in Spain he said Europe was 'facing the largest ethnic cleansing operation since the end of the Second World War in order to create a splendid holiday destination once the millions of tonnes of rubble have been cleared from Gaza and the Palestinians have died or gone away'. The Middle East may lie outside the EU's immediate sphere but geography is not the only issue for the bloc's lack of action. It is also about leadership. The Middle East may lie outside the EU's immediate sphere but geography is not the only issue for the bloc's lack of action Kaja Kallas, the EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs, has shown a marked reluctance to engage on Gaza. Ms Kallas lacks knowledge of the Middle East — a startling deficiency for someone in her role. But surely within the vast bureaucracy of Brussels, she could find capable advisers with regional expertise? Ms Kallas's unwavering focus on Ukraine is personal. Her family suffered under Soviet oppression, and she has made it clear that her mission is to support Ukraine. But a seeming lack of parallel empathy for Palestinians – who are equally victims of overwhelming military force – is striking. Meanwhile, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, a German politician, has faced intense criticism for her stance. Germany has not only defended Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's actions in Gaza, but also imprisoned pro-Palestinian demonstrators and turned away Palestinian doctors invited to Germany for humanitarian lectures. Ms Von der Leyen has loudly condemned Russia's war crimes in Ukraine, but on Israel's crimes in Gaza she has remained largely silent. She continues to blame Iran for this latest regional escalation – despite Israel's initial strikes – and has been accused of pursuing a 'pro-Israel solo run,' according to Irish MEP Barry Andrews. He noted that Mr Netanyahu's recent speech justifying attacks on Iran 'echoed President Bush's justification for invading Iraq in 2003'. Meanwhile, the humanitarian group Doctors Without Borders (MSF) has gone further, accusing EU governments of 'hypocrisy and inaction' that is fuelling the suffering in Gaza. So, what can the EU do to regain its relevance – and its integrity? First, it must abandon the requirement for unanimity in foreign policy decisions and move towards qualified majority voting. This would streamline decisions and prevent a handful of member states from blocking action. Second, the EU should appoint a high-profile special envoy with real gravitas — someone respected by both Israelis and Palestinians, and who is trusted in the region. Candidates like Martin Griffiths, former UN humanitarian chief, or Kenneth Roth, long-time director of Human Rights Watch, would bring credibility, experience and moral authority. Such an envoy could engage regional players – including Hamas, Israel, Egypt and Qatar – to push for a ceasefire, demand accountability for settler violence and begin sketching a roadmap for regional de-escalation. Third, the EU must use its economic leverage. As Israel's largest trading partner, the EU has influence — but rarely applies it. Brussels could suspend parts of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, re-direct aid to vetted Palestinian civil society groups, provide economic incentives to neighbouring states for de-escalation and impose targeted arms embargoes using the EU's Common Position on Arms Exports when weapons are used in violation of international law. And when it comes to Iran, the only sustainable path is diplomacy. The EU should reactivate its backchannels — through France, Germany, and the UK — to pursue arms control, sanctions relief and renewed diplomatic engagement, including on proxy groups like Hezbollah or the Houthis. If it acts, this crisis could become an opportunity for the EU. It could reclaim its place as a regional power, not just a trade bloc. It could show that Europe can lead independently of the US. Most importantly, it could demonstrate that the EU is not just a cheque book for humanitarian aid but a credible broker for peace.
Khaleej Times
a day ago
- Khaleej Times
Argentine nurse gets life sentence for murder of five babies
A nurse was sentenced to life in prison for killing five babies and attempting to murder eight others at a hospital in Argentina, according to local media. Brenda Cecilia Aguero injected potassium and insulin into newborns between March and June 2022, taking doses from emergency medical carts without inventory control, prosecutors said. Under Argentine law, Aguero will not be eligible for parole before serving 35 years. The court clerk read out the sentencing in footage broadcast on local media on Wednesday. The babies, all born healthy, died under initially unexplained circumstances at the neonatal ward of the maternal and child hospital in Cordoba province, 370 miles (600 km) northwest of Buenos Aires. Eight others survived due to swift medical intervention. The trial also brought charges against 10 other defendants including former provincial officials and health professionals for cover-up and dereliction of duty. Those charged included a former health minister and secretary of health of Cordoba province, as well as the former hospital director. Aguero, who was arrested in 2022, denied the charges, earlier telling the court "they have no evidence" and accusing media of portraying her as a "serial killer." Of the other defendants, five were found guilty but received lesser sentences while five others were acquitted, including the former provincial officials, according to local outlet Infobae.
The National
a day ago
- The National
Israel sows panic with Tehran eviction orders that echo Gaza and Lebanon
On Tuesday, around 2am local time in Iran, the Israeli military issued an order for residents of Tehran's District 18, one of the capital's most densely populated and poorest neighbourhoods, to leave. 'In the coming hours, the Israeli army will operate in this area against military targets belonging to the Iranian regime,' army spokesman Avichay Adraee said on X. 'Your presence in this area exposes your lives to danger.' Hundreds of thousands of people live in this sprawling area of Tehran. It was the middle of the night, and Iranian authorities have restricted internet access since Israel launched its attacks on Friday. The X platform is officially banned in Iran, and not accessible without a VPN. Around 30 minutes later, the Israeli army said they were carrying out a series of strikes on Tehran. Civilians have borne the brunt of the aerial war that began on Friday when Israel started bombing Iran. Israel described it as an operation to prevent its archenemy from acquiring nuclear weapons. Since then, the two countries have engaged in their most intense exchange of attacks. In Iran, the Health Ministry said at least 224 people were killed and 1,277 admitted to hospital as a result of Israel's bombardment, and 90 per cent of the casualties were civilians. Iranian strikes on Israel have killed at least 24 civilians, according to Israeliauthorities. Human rights groups and Iranian activists have denounced Israeli bombing warnings as unlawful, ineffective and terror-inducing for the civilian population. In a press release on Wednesday calling for the protection of civilians amid the rising hostilities, Amnesty International criticised the 'alarming threats and overly broad, ineffective evacuation warnings' issued by Israel. 'Evacuation warnings, even if detailed and effective, do not release Israel from its other obligations under international humanitarian law,' the rights group said. "They must not treat as open-fire zones areas for which they have issued warnings." US President Donald Trump, who is reportedly considering military intervention to support Israel, Washington's long-time ally, added to the alarm on Monday when he said, 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!' in a post on his Truth Social platform. 'Making an entire city panic over a warning that is not even accurate – when people have nowhere to go and no logistical means to evacuate is a violation of international law,' said Bahar Ghandehari, from the Centre for Human Rights in Iran, a US-based organisation. 'Tehran has a population of nearly 10 million. Where would they even go?' she added. The Israeli bombing threat has also raised concern for political prisoners. On Monday, Israel warned residents of Tehran's District 3 to leave. Evin Prison, which holds scores of political activists, including many arrested during the 2022-23 Women, Life, Freedom protests, stands on the edge of the district. 'It is dangerously close to whatever Israel is planning to do there,' Ms Ghandehari said. The centre has been monitoring prison conditions closely, she said. 'So far, we haven't heard anything alarming happening inside the prisons. But prisoners are very panicked and stressed.' The prisoners' families also feel helpless. 'My dad is in prison, how is he supposed to evacuate?' said Mehraveh Khadan, daughter of Iranian rights activist Reza Khadan who is being held in Evin. Unlike Israel, Tehran has no public bomb shelters or air raid warning system, and its air defences are limited. 'There are no alarms, no shelters, and all the information is coming from social media, which many people can't even access due to internet restrictions,' said Ms Ghandehari. Iranian authorities have said that metro stations, schools and mosques would be used as shelters, but it is not clear whether these structures above ground can offer meaningful protection. Familiar tactics The Israel military's warnings to civilians, with maps shaded in red to show the areas under threat, are the same as those used in its wars in Gaza and Lebanon. In Lebanon and Gaza, human rights groups have already denounced these maps as inadequate and misleading, saying they do not provide safe or effective evacuation options for civilians. Israel first used disproportionate force against civilians as a military strategy during the 2006 war in Lebanon. This became known as the Dahieh doctrine, named after the southern suburbs of Lebanon's capital. The doctrine legitimises the use of maximum force against civilians and civilian infrastructure, erasing the line between military and civilian targets in a violation of international humanitarian law, as means of collective punishment to pressure the local population to distance itself from the enemy force. 'They're targeting entire residential areas, putting civilians at risk and making them collateral damage for a single military target,' Ms Ghandehari said. Amnesty noted a recent warning issued by the Israeli army told people across Iran to 'immediately leave areas … [housing] military weapons manufacturing facilities and their support institutions', spreading panic within the population. 'The locations of military facilities are not known to the general public and no clear guidance was provided on where civilians should or should not go to ensure their safety,' the rights group said. While the tactics may be similar to those used in Lebanon and Gaza, the scale is different in Iran – a much larger country with a population of more than 85 million. The panic sparked by Israel's warnings and bombings in Tehran led to massive traffic jams across the city as people tried to leave. 'People were stuck in traffic for hours, and some even ended up turning back and going home,' Ms Ghandehari said. 'Others couldn't leave at all because of fuel shortages.' The current momentum seems to favour escalation. Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Wednesday said his country would not surrender and warned that any US military intervention would have serious consequences. 'That's the most terrifying thing: the uncertainty,' Ms Ghandehari said.
