Public Inquiry to start into Leeds Bradford Airport night flights
A public inquiry into night-time flying rules at Leeds Bradford Airport's is set to begin later. Ahead of the hearing, BBC Yorkshire's Transport Correspondent Spencer Stokes takes a look at the key issues at stake.
What is the inquiry about?
Chaired by an independent planning inspector, the inquiry will consider the legal meaning of the night-time flying rules at Leeds Bradford Airport (LBA).Currently the airport is permitted 2,920 take offs and landings between 23:00 and 07:00 during the summer.However, campaign group Group for Action on Leeds Bradford Airport (GALBA) say the airport has breached that limit in each of the past three years.But LBA chief executive, Vincent Hodder says the rules, agreed by Leeds City Council in 1994, do not take into account changes to aircraft technology over the past 30 years to reduce noise.
What's the background to the inquiry?
GALBA say LBA has exceeded its night-time flight limits in 2022, 2023, and 2024 - in the most recent year it said the airport operated 820 more flights than permitted.The airport has admitted it did "accidentally" breach the night time regulations in 2022 due to "errors taking place in reporting procedures", but claimed it had not gone over in 2023 and 2024 based on its interpretation of the rules.In a bid to update the 1994 planning consents, LBA applied to Leeds City Council last year for a Certificates of Lawfulness of Existing Use Development (CLEUDs).It said updating the rules would "provide the correct legal interpretation of the existing planning conditions governing the operation of night flights at LBA".However, two CLEUD applications were rejected by the council and the third was left "undecided", prompting LBA to appeal to the government's planning inspectorate.
Where does Leeds City Council stand?
Leeds City Council agreed the original planning consent in 1994 permitting 2,920 night flights, and is responsible for monitoring to make sure LBA does not breach the night time flights cap.It issued a breach of condition notice against LBA for the additional flights in 2022 and accepted the rules were broken again in 2023, but said the public interest for a prosecution had not been met.No action has been taken after the alleged breach in summer 2024.
Has aircraft technology changed?
The European Commission said aircraft have become 75% quieter over the last 30 years, but an increase in the number of flights has resulted in a rise in noise disturbance for a greater number of people.Jet2, who are based at Leeds Bradford Airport, have ordered 146 Airbus A320 Neo aircraft, which the airline said are 50% quieter than their current Boeing 737s.
When will the public inquiry reach a decision?
The Planning Inspector will hear evidence for four days, but it's likely to be several weeks or months before the final decision is announced.GALBA says if LBA is successful at public inquiry "they will continue to fly hundreds more night flights than the original rules intended to allow.".The airport said it would not be going through the "difficult, time-consuming and expensive process if this wasn't important to our customers and the airport".
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
11 hours ago
- Reuters
India's watchdog warns Air India for breaching pilots' flight duty timings
NEW DELHI, June 21 (Reuters) - India's aviation watchdog has issued a warning to Air India for "repeated and serious violations" related to pilot duty scheduling and oversight, according to government directives reviewed by Reuters on Saturday. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) directed Air India to remove three company executives from crew scheduling roles - a divisional vice president, a chief manager of crew scheduling and one planning executive - for lapses linked to flights from Bengaluru to London on May 16 and May 17 that exceeded the stipulated pilot flight time limit of 10 hours. The June 20 order cited "systemic failures in scheduling protocol and oversights" and criticised the lack of strict disciplinary measures against responsible officials. The latest action by the aviation authority against the airline is unrelated to this month's crash of an Air India Boeing (BA.N), opens new tab 787-8 plane that killed all but one of the 242 people onboard but signal heightened scrutiny of the airline. On Thursday, Reuters reported the authorities had also warned Air India for breaching safety rules after three of its Airbus planes flew despite being overdue for checks on emergency equipment of escape slides. The latest order by assistant director of operations at the DGCA, Himanshu Srivastava, said: "Of particular concern is the absence of strict disciplinary measures against key officials directly responsible." In a statement to Reuters, Air India said it has implemented the DGCA order and in the interim, the company's chief operations officer will provide direct oversight to the Integrated Operations Control Centre. "Air India is committed to ensuring that there is total adherence to safety protocols and standard practices," it added. The DGCA stated in its order that Air India had voluntarily disclosed the violations. Air India was taken over by the Tata Group in 2022 and faces many challenges in its attempts to rebuild its image, after years of criticism from travelers for poor service. The Indian regulator, like many abroad, often fines airlines for compliance lapses. India's government in February told parliament that authorities had warned or fined airlines in 23 instances for safety violations last year. Around half of them - 12 - involved Air India and Air India Express. The biggest fine was $127,000 on Air India for "insufficient oxygen on board" during some international flights.
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Paris airshow in subdued mood after deadly Air India crash
Every second summer more than 100,000 aviation industry professionals gather in Paris for an airshow – a flying display crossed with a vast conference. The mood at the latest gathering this week was more subdued than usual, after the deadly crash a week ago of a London-bound Air India flight in Ahmedabad. Investigators have recovered the black box from the plane to try to work out the cause of the disaster. The aircraft maker Boeing, and GE Aerospace, which made the 787 Dreamliner's engines, both cancelled many of their media-facing events out of respect for the families of the 241 passengers and crew who died, as well as at least 30 more people on the ground who were killed. At an event that presents a mix of civil and military aircraft and weaponry, the war between Israel and Iran further overshadowed proceedings. The French government forced the show's organisers to cover stands exhibiting Israeli companies' weapons, an apparent show of France's opposition to the escalation. Turbo Sjogren, the head of Boeing's international government and defence, said several Middle Eastern military customers were unable to attend meetings because of the war. The airshow and its British counterpart – held every other year at Farnborough, Hampshire – are usually dominated by a race between Airbus and Boeing to announce the most orders from airlines. Yet Boeing's string of crises, including two deadly crashes of the 737 Max in 2018 and 2019, have meant that Airbus has taken the lead for several years. The Toulouse-headquartered plane maker announced 142 firm orders plus another 102 provisional orders at the show worth a cumulative $21bn (£15.5bn), according to Cirium Ascend, the aviation consultancy. That compared with zero orders announced by its US rival Boeing. Darren Hulst, a Boeing vice-president for commercial marketing, said: 'Our hearts, our thoughts, our prayers are with all the families that have been impacted by this, as well as our partner and our long-term customer Air India.' Before an investigation shares its findings of the cause of the Air India crash, experts have mostly declined to make a judgment of what the longer-term consequences could be for Boeing. Yet assessments of the state of the global aviation market suggest that demand for air travel will remain buoyant. Hulst predicted that 43,600 new planes will be needed through to 2044. 'As we look to the end of this decade, by 2030, our industry will be about 45% larger than it was in the years before the pandemic,' he said. The majority of those deliveries will be 'narrowbody' planes with a single aisle, such as Airbus's A320 and the 737 family. Other companies are positioning to take advantage of that growth. Perhaps most notably, Britain's Rolls-Royce, now a specialist in powering the biggest 'widebody' planes, wants to make engines for the much bigger narrowbody market. Tufan Erginbilgic, Rolls-Royce's chief executive, told reporters that the UK government should part-fund the development of the company's next generation of jet engines, known as UltraFan. In a direct pitch to the government, he argued that winning orders for narrowbody engines could create 40,000 jobs. 'If you look at single-aisle, narrowbody entry could be the single biggest item for economic growth for UK, because it is that big. This is a huge market, right? A £1.6tn market.' Ahead of the UK's industrial strategy, expected to be published on Monday, Erginbilgic argued that the government should target support at industries where the country is strongest, which he said included Rolls-Royce's gas turbines and small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs). Rolls-Royce's part-owned subsidiary was chosen this month to try to build the first UK SMRs, with the first formal contract expected before October. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion 'I believe any country needs to support competitively advantaged industries,' Erginbilgic said. 'If you support competitively advantaged industries, your position in the market will be sustainable. Because it is already competitively advantaged. If you give some momentum, that will create lots of export growth, etc, and employment with that.' Rolls-Royce is also a key player in the UK's defence strategy. Erginbilgic said the government's recent strategic defence review and pledges to increase military spending to 2.5% of GDP had 'de-risked our key programmes', all but guaranteeing demand for more nuclear reactors for attack submarines and engines for the future Tempest jet, officially known as the global combat air programme (GCAP), whose costs are shared between the UK, Italy and Japan. Erginbilgic also said that the review's emphasis on autonomous drones could mean future opportunities for Rolls-Royce to power them. The UK is not the only European country rearming in response to the perceived threat from Russia after its invasion of Ukraine. Yet the Paris airshow also revealed deep tensions in another key European weapons project: a rival 'sixth-generation' fighter jet programme between France, Germany and Spain. Éric Trappier, chief executive of France's Dassault, maker of the previous-generation Rafale jets that were on show in Paris, told Bloomberg TV that 'we may go it alone' amid frustrations over who should lead. Michael Schoellhorn, chief executive of Airbus's Germany-based defence division, said that political intervention might be needed to solve the dispute. Nevertheless, the European government consensus is that military spending must increase – particularly if the US under Donald Trump cannot be relied upon for support. Deals at the show included Rheinmetall teaming up with controversial US drones startup Anduril to produce weapons in Germany, while Italy's Leonardo formalised a joint drones venture with Turkey's Baykar. With renewed war in the Middle East, defence bosses in Paris were keen to move quickly with manufacturing more lucrative weapons on European soil.
Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
Constellium bets on lighter, recycled aluminium for future planes
PARIS, June 19 (Reuters) - Constellium is testing lighter alloys and more comprehensive recycling as the aluminium processor positions itself for future single-aisle jets, where competition from composite materials is set to intensify. Having lost share to composites in larger planes like Airbus' ( opens new tab A350 and Boeing's (BA.N), opens new tab 787, aluminium suppliers have held their ground in existing smaller models like the Airbus A320, helped by low-density alloys and the industry's familiarity with using aluminium for mass-produced jets. Aluminium still has plenty of demand to come from current models, after a boom in plane orders and as recent supply chain snags ease. Metals analyst CRU projects 8% average annual growth in aluminium consumption in aerospace in Europe and North America during 2024-29. But as attention turns to the next generation of narrow-body jets, aluminium will renew its tussle with composites, with suppliers of the metal like Constellium and Novelis ( opens new tab competing with composites providers like Hexcel (HXL.N), opens new tab. Planemakers, focused on emissions savings and output rates, are studying novel materials like thermoplastics to ally composites' lightweight appeal with more efficient production processes. Constellium expects Airbus and Boeing to choose materials for future single-aisle models around 2029-2030, and the supplier aims to push aluminium's edge in recycling as well as further progress in alloys, Philippe Hoffmann, president of aerospace and transportation at Constellium, told Reuters. "Today, what's on the drawing board or at least on the agenda is the design and concepts for the successor to the A320," Hoffmann said at the Paris Airshow. In terms of weight, crucial for planemakers, Constellium has demonstrated a weight saving of 20% in tests of a wing concept involving new alloys and a welding process that removes the need for rivets, he said. The use of friction stir welding, borrowed from Constellium's work on space programmes, will also allow more automation in manufacturing panels, he added. Constellium sees more room to exploit aluminium's greater reusability compared with composites, with recycled aluminium saving 95% in energy use versus virgin metal. The firm is studying better retrieval of scrap per alloy during production as well as recovery of metal from a growing fleet of planes at the end of their lifecycle. "Aluminium was being recycled before we were born," he said. "They (composites) have a lot of qualities but the maturity in recycling is not the same."
