Big pro-Palestine demo at Columbia
US charges NY man with hate crimes over university protests
NEW YORK: Police arrested dozens of Columbia University students who seized part of the school's main library on Wednesday in one of the biggest pro-Palestinian demonstrations on campus since last year's wave of protests against the Zionist entity's war in Gaza. At least 40 to 50 students, their hands cuffed with plastic zip-ties, were seen being loaded into New York Police Department vans and buses outside Butler Library as NYPD officers swept through the six-story building to round up other protesters who refused to leave.
Police arrived on campus in force at the request of Columbia officials who said the student demonstrators occupying the library's second-floor main reading room were engaged in trespassing. Videos and photographs on social media showed protesters, most wearing masks, standing on tables, beating drums and unfurling banners saying 'Strike For Gaza' and 'Liberated Zone' beneath the chandeliers of the Lawrence A Wein Reading Room.
US President Donald Trump had lashed out at Columbia over pro-Palestinian protests on campus last year, saying they were 'antisemitic' and showed a failure to protect Jewish students. Student protesters, including some Jewish organizers, counter that Trump and fellow conservative politicians who are strongly pro-Zionist are unfairly conflating pro-Palestinian protests and antisemitism. Columbia University said late on Wednesday that it had requested NYPD assistance 'in securing the building', and that two of its public safety officials were hurt in the standoff.
Protesters are escorted out of Butler Library after their arrest for occupying the library space.
An NYPD spokesperson confirmed 'multiple arrests' of protesters who occupied the library but did not provide an exact number. 'Everyone has the right to peacefully protest. But violence, vandalism or destruction of property are completely unacceptable,' New York Governor Kathy Hochul said on social media. Before police arrived on the scene, university public safety personnel were seen locking the front doors to the library, preventing any more students from entering the building and sparking a brief episode of pushing and shoving outside.
One student appeared to have been injured in the fracas. Another individual was seen being carried out of the building on a stretcher. With further entry to the library barred, a growing crowd of demonstrators outside the building moved to the streets just beyond the campus gates. One student organization representing the protesters said on social media that school security had assaulted demonstrators and acknowledged that some activists had refused to show their IDs to officials.
Columbia University Apartheid Divest, a collection of student groups, recirculated long-standing demands on social media on Wednesday for the university to no longer invest its $14.8 billion endowment in weapons makers and other companies that support the Zionist entity's military occupation of Palestinian territories. The protesters in the library also demanded the release of Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist and Columbia graduate student who remains in a Louisiana immigrant jail after he was among the first to be arrested for possible deportation.
On Monday, pro-Palestinian protesters occupied a University of Washington building, demanding the school cut ties with Boeing over its contracts with the Zionist military. The university said 34 protesters were arrested, and charges of trespassing, property destruction and disorderly conduct would be referred to prosecutors. On Wednesday, it said the 21 students who were among those arrested have been suspended and banned from all of the school's campuses.
Separately, the US Department of Justice charged a New York man with federal hate crimes in an indictment unsealed on Wednesday, accusing him of assaulting Jewish victims, including two Columbia University students, during three separate protests over the war in Gaza. The DOJ said that Tarek Bazrouk, 20, 'deliberately targeted and assaulted Jewish victims at protests relating to the (Zionist)/Gaza war.' Bazrouk was arrested on Wednesday morning. — Reuters
Bazrouk's case appears to be the first time the DOJ has brought federal hate crime charges related to the recent Columbia protests. The assaults allegedly all took place in Manhattan, at an April 2024 protest outside the New York Stock Exchange, a Dec 2024 protest outside Columbia University, and a January 2025 protest near Gramercy Park. The DOJ said that Bazrouk showed support for Hamas and called himself a 'Jew hater' in text messages obtained from a search of his cell phone. Bazrouk is charged with three counts of committing hate crimes, each of which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, according to DOJ. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab Times
an hour ago
- Arab Times
Hezbollah, Iraqi Militias Avoid Direct Involvement In Iran-Israel War—for Now
BEIRUT (AP) — Hezbollah has long been considered Iran's first line of defense in case of a war with Israel. But since Israel launched its massive barrage against Iran, triggering the ongoing Israel-Iran war, the Lebanese militant group has stayed out of the fray — even after the U.S. entered the conflict Sunday with strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. A network of powerful Iran-backed militias in Iraq has also remained mostly quiet. Domestic political concerns, as well as tough losses suffered in nearly two years of regional conflicts and upheavals, appear to have led these Iran allies to take a back seat in the latest round convulsing the region. 'Despite all the restraining factors, wild cards remain,' said Tamer Badawi, an associate fellow with the Germany-based think tank Center for Applied Research in Partnership with the Orient. The 'Axis of Resistance' Hezbollah was formed with Iranian support in the early 1980s as a guerilla force fighting against Israel's occupation of southern Lebanon at the time. The militant group helped push Israel out of Lebanon and built its arsenal over the ensuing decades, becoming a powerful regional force and the centerpiece of a cluster of Iranian-backed factions and governments known as the ' Axis of Resistance.' The allies also include Iraqi Shiite militias and Yemen's Houthi rebels, as well as the Palestinian militant group Hamas. At one point, Hezbollah was believed to have some 150,000 rockets and missiles, and the group's former leader, Hassan Nasrallah once boasted of having 100,000 fighters. Seeking to aid its ally Hamas in the aftermath of the Palestinian militants' Oct. 7, 2023 attack on southern Israel and Israel's offensive in Gaza, Hezbollah began launching rockets across the border. That drew Israeli airstrikes and shelling, and the exchanges escalated into full-scale war last September. Israel inflicted heavy damage on Hezbollah, killing Nasrallah and other top leaders and destroying much of its arsenal, before a U.S.-negotiated ceasefire halted that conflict last November. Israel continues to occupy parts of southern Lebanon and to carry out near-daily airstrikes. For their part, the Iraqi militias occasionally struck bases housing U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria, while Yemen's Houthis fired at vessels in the Red Sea, a crucial global trade route, and began targeting Israel. Keeping an ambiguous stance Hezbollah has condemned Israel's attacks and the U.S. strikes on Iran. Just days before the U.S. attack, Hezbollah leader Naim Kassem said in a statement that the group 'will act as we deem appropriate in the face of this brutal Israeli-American aggression.' A statement issued by the group after the U.S. strikes called for called for 'Arab and Islamic countries and the free peoples of the world' to stand with Iran but did not suggest Hezbollah would join in Tehran's retaliation. Lebanese government officials have pressed the group to stay out of the conflict, saying that Lebanon cannot handle another damaging war, and U.S. envoy Tom Barrack, who visited Lebanon last week, said it would be a 'very bad decision' for Hezbollah to get involved. Iraq's Kataib Hezbollah militia — a separate group from Hezbollah — had said prior to the U.S. attack that it will directly target U.S. interests and bases spread throughout the region if Washington gets involved. The group has also remained silent since Sunday's strikes. The Houthis last month reached an agreement with Washington to stop attacks on U.S. vessels in the Red Sea in exchange for the U.S. halting its strikes on Yemen, but the group threatened to resume its attacks if Washington entered the Iran-Israel war. In a statement on Sunday, the Houthis' political bureau described the U.S. attack on Iran as a 'grave escalation that poses a direct threat to regional and international security and peace.' The Houthis did not immediately launch strikes. Reasons to stay on the sidelines Hezbollah was weakened by last year's fighting and after losing a major supply route for Iranian weapons with the fall of Syrian President Bashar Assad, a key ally, in a lightning rebel offensive in December. 'Hezbollah has been degraded on the strategic level while cut off from supply chains in Syria,' said Andreas Krieg, a military analyst and associate professor at King's College London. Still, Qassem Qassir, a Lebanese analyst close to Hezbollah, said a role for the militant group in the Israel-Iran conflict should not be ruled out. 'The battle is still in its early stages,' he said. 'Even Iran hasn't bombed American bases (in response to the U.S. strikes), but rather bombed Israel.' He said that both the Houthis and the Iraqi militias 'lack the strategic deep strike capability against Israel that Hezbollah once had.' Renad Mansour, a senior research fellow at the Chatham House think tank in London, said Iraq's Iran-allied militias have all along tried to avoid pulling their country into a major conflict. Unlike Hezbollah, whose military wing has operated as a non-state actor in Lebanon — although its political wing is part of the government — the main Iraqi militias are members of a coalition of groups that are officially part of the state defense forces. 'Things in Iraq are good for them right now, they're connected to the state — they're benefitting politically, economically,' Mansour said. 'And also they've seen what's happened to Iran, to Hezbollah and they're concerned that Israel will turn on them as well.' Badawi said that for now, the armed groups may be lying low because 'Iran likely wants these groups to stay intact and operational.' 'But if Iran suffers insurmountable losses or if the Supreme Leader (Ayatollah Ali Khamenei) is assassinated, those could act as triggers,' he said.
Arab Times
an hour ago
- Arab Times
Reality of Israel's swelling ambitions and its agents
MANY people are increasingly convinced that Israel harbors expansionist ambitions beyond its current borders. These beliefs are rooted in religious ideologies, several statements by political leaders, policies implemented on the ground, and symbols adopted by various Israeli groups. The concept of 'Greater Israel' (Eretz Israel HaShlema) serves as the cornerstone of discussions about Israeli ambitions and is supported by Christian Zionists in America. Although there is no unified agreement on the precise borders of this territory, the most common narrative suggests it extends from the Nile to the Euphrates. This is referenced in Genesis 15:18, 'On that day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, 'To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates.' The two blue stripes on the Israeli flag are said to symbolize the Nile and Euphrates rivers, with the star between them representing the Jewish state. Many also view Israel's actual policies as the strongest evidence of its expansionist intentions, regardless of official statements. The ongoing expansion of Israeli settlements in the territories occupied since 1967, which are recognized by the international community as Palestinian land, amounts to 'creeping annexation' and represents a practical step toward realizing 'Greater Israel,' at least in its Palestinian dimension. The annexation of the occupied Syrian Golan Heights in 1981 further demonstrates that Israel is disregarding internationally recognized borders in pursuit of expanding its sovereignty. Israel has also openly expressed ambitions toward the Litani River in Lebanon, has occupied parts of it, and controlled the Sinai Peninsula for decades. The Likud Party's charter, which is the platform of Israel's most powerful political party, states that 'the right of the Jewish people to the Land of Israel is non-negotiable.' This originally included Jordan as part of the Land of Israel, though this was later amended. Nevertheless, this ideology continues to influence the party's leadership. Far-right and religious movements and parties, which have become influential components of Israeli governments, openly call for the annexation of the entire West Bank (referred to biblically as Judea and Samaria) and the imposition of Israeli sovereignty over it. These parties regard this as a religious duty. Despite denials from some of our allies, Israel's expansionist ambitions, settlement policies, and annexation of territories remain policies upheld by influential factions within the country and are evident in their actions on the ground. In light of these facts, some Israeli agents argue that Israel's relatively small population disqualifies it from ruling over Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and the Gulf states, whose combined population is approximately 250 million. However, Zionist agents overlook the example of British colonial expansion, which reached its peak after World War I, controlled 70 territories and countries with a population of 460 million, despite Britain's own population being only around 43 million at the time. Britain's success was due to its technological, military, and intelligence superiority, coupled with the weakness and backwardness of the colonized peoples, as well as the presence of mercenaries who aided British rule in their own countries. Therefore, dismissing talk of Israeli ambitions as 'nonsense' and claiming it is impossible for seven million Israelis to occupy and rule hundreds of millions of Arabs is itself pure nonsense and a lie. Mercenaries are tasked with downplaying the Zionist threat. Meanwhile, given the exceptional circumstances the region is currently facing and in anticipation of uncertain developments, I commend the decision of the First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Interior to close the Husseiniyas during the upcoming Ashura and relocate the ceremonies to safer venues.
Kuwait Times
3 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Europe seeks ‘digital sovereignty' as US tech firms embrace Trump
US tech companies still dwarf alternative providers BERLIN: At a market stall in Berlin run by charity Topio, volunteers help people who want to purge their phones of the influence of US tech firms. Since Donald Trump's inauguration, the queue for their services has grown. Interest in European-based digital services has jumped in recent months, data from digital market intelligence company Similarweb shows. More people are looking for e-mail, messaging and even search providers outside the United States. The first months of Trump's second presidency have shaken some Europeans' confidence in their long-time ally, after he signaled his country would step back from its role in Europe's security and then launched a trade war. 'It's about the concentration of power in US firms,' said Topio's founder Michael Wirths, as his colleague installed on a customer's phone a version of the Android operating system without hooks into the Google ecosystem. Wirths said the type of people coming to the stall had changed: 'Before, it was people who knew a lot about data privacy. Now it's people who are politically aware and feel exposed.' Tesla chief Elon Musk, who also owns social media company X, was a leading adviser to the US president before the two fell out, while the bosses of Amazon, Meta and Google-owner Alphabet took prominent spots at Trump's inauguration in January. Days before Trump took office, outgoing president Joe Biden had warned of an oligarchic 'tech industrial complex' threatening democracy. Berlin-based search engine Ecosia says it has benefited from some customers' desire to avoid US counterparts like Microsoft's Bing or Google, which dominates web searches and is also the world's biggest email provider. 'The worse it gets, the better it is for us,' founder Christian Kroll said of Ecosia, whose sales pitch is that it spends its profits on environmental projects. Similarweb data shows the number of queries directed to Ecosia from the European Union has risen 27 percent year-on-year and the company says it has 1 percent of the German search engine market. But its 122 million visits from the 27 EU countries in February were dwarfed by 10.3 billion visits to Google, whose parent Alphabet made revenues of about $100 billion from Europe, the Middle East and Africa in 2024 - nearly a third of its $350 billion global turnover. Non-profit Ecosia earned 3.2 million euros ($3.65 million) in April, of which 770,000 euros was spent on planting 1.1 million trees. Google declined to comment for this story. Reuters could not determine whether major US tech companies have lost any market share to local rivals in Europe. Digital sovereignty The search for alternative providers accompanies a debate in Europe about 'digital sovereignty' - the idea that reliance on companies from an increasingly isolationist United States is a threat to Europe's economy and security. 'Ordinary people, the kind of people who would never have thought it was important they were using an American service are saying, 'hang on!',' said UK-based internet regulation expert Maria Farrell. 'My hairdresser was asking me what she should switch to.' Use in Europe of Swiss-based ProtonMail rose 11.7 percent year-on-year to March compared to a year ago, according to Similarweb, while use of Alphabet's Gmail, which has some 70 percent of the global email market, slipped 1.9 percent. ProtonMail, which offers both free and paid-for services, said it had seen an increase in users from Europe since Trump's re-election, though it declined to give a number. 'My household is definitely disengaging,' said British software engineer Ken Tindell, citing weak US data privacy protections as one factor. Trump's vice president JD Vance shocked European leaders in February by accusing them - at a conference usually known for displays of transatlantic unity - of censoring free speech and failing to control immigration. In May, Secretary of State Marco Rubio threatened visa bans for people who 'censor' speech by Americans, including on social media, and suggested the policy could target foreign officials regulating US tech companies. US social media companies like Facebook and Instagram parent Meta have said the European Union's Digital Services Act amounts to censorship of their platforms. EU officials say the Act will make the online environment safer by compelling tech giants to tackle illegal content, including hate speech and child sexual abuse material. Greg Nojeim, director of the Security and Surveillance Project at the Center for Democracy & Technology, said Europeans' concerns about the US government accessing their data, whether stored on devices or in the cloud, were justified. Not only does US law permit the government to search devices of anyone entering the country, it can compel disclosure of data that Europeans outside the US store or transmit through US communications service providers, Nojeim said. Mission impossible? Germany's new government is itself making efforts to reduce exposure to US tech, committing in its coalition agreement to make more use of open-source data formats and locally-based cloud infrastructure. Regional governments have gone further - in conservative-run Schleswig-Holstein, on the Danish border, all IT used by the public administration must run on open-source software. Berlin has also paid for Ukraine to access a satellite-internet network operated by France's Eutelsat instead of Musk's Starlink. But with modern life driven by technology, 'completely divorcing US tech in a very fundamental way is, I would say, possibly not possible,' said Bill Budington of US digital rights nonprofit the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Everything from push notifications to the content delivery networks powering many websites and how internet traffic is routed relies largely on US companies and infrastructure, Budington noted. Both Ecosia and French-based search engine Qwant depend in part on search results provided by Google and Microsoft's Bing, while Ecosia runs on cloud platforms, some hosted by the very same tech giants it promises an escape from. Nevertheless, a group on messaging board Reddit called BuyFromEU has 211,000 members. 'Just cancelled my Dropbox and will switch to Proton Drive,' read one post. Mastodon, a decentralized social media service developed by German programmer Eugen Rochko, enjoyed a rush of new users two years ago when Musk bought Twitter, later renamed X. But it remains a niche service. Signal, a messaging app run by a US nonprofit foundation, has also seen a surge in installations from Europe. Similarweb's data showed a 7 percent month-on-month increase in Signal usage in March, while use of Meta's WhatsApp was static. Meta declined to comment for this story. Signal did not respond to an e-mailed request for comment. But this kind of conscious self-organizing is unlikely on its own to make a dent in Silicon Valley's European dominance, digital rights activist Robin Berjon told Reuters. 'The market is too captured,' he said. 'Regulation is needed as well.'— Reuters
