Reality of Israel's swelling ambitions and its agents
MANY people are increasingly convinced that Israel harbors expansionist ambitions beyond its current borders. These beliefs are rooted in religious ideologies, several statements by political leaders, policies implemented on the ground, and symbols adopted by various Israeli groups.
The concept of 'Greater Israel' (Eretz Israel HaShlema) serves as the cornerstone of discussions about Israeli ambitions and is supported by Christian Zionists in America. Although there is no unified agreement on the precise borders of this territory, the most common narrative suggests it extends from the Nile to the Euphrates. This is referenced in Genesis 15:18, 'On that day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, 'To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates.' The two blue stripes on the Israeli flag are said to symbolize the Nile and Euphrates rivers, with the star between them representing the Jewish state.
Many also view Israel's actual policies as the strongest evidence of its expansionist intentions, regardless of official statements. The ongoing expansion of Israeli settlements in the territories occupied since 1967, which are recognized by the international community as Palestinian land, amounts to 'creeping annexation' and represents a practical step toward realizing 'Greater Israel,' at least in its Palestinian dimension.
The annexation of the occupied Syrian Golan Heights in 1981 further demonstrates that Israel is disregarding internationally recognized borders in pursuit of expanding its sovereignty. Israel has also openly expressed ambitions toward the Litani River in Lebanon, has occupied parts of it, and controlled the Sinai Peninsula for decades.
The Likud Party's charter, which is the platform of Israel's most powerful political party, states that 'the right of the Jewish people to the Land of Israel is non-negotiable.' This originally included Jordan as part of the Land of Israel, though this was later amended. Nevertheless, this ideology continues to influence the party's leadership. Far-right and religious movements and parties, which have become influential components of Israeli governments, openly call for the annexation of the entire West Bank (referred to biblically as Judea and Samaria) and the imposition of Israeli sovereignty over it.
These parties regard this as a religious duty. Despite denials from some of our allies, Israel's expansionist ambitions, settlement policies, and annexation of territories remain policies upheld by influential factions within the country and are evident in their actions on the ground. In light of these facts, some Israeli agents argue that Israel's relatively small population disqualifies it from ruling over Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and the Gulf states, whose combined population is approximately 250 million. However, Zionist agents overlook the example of British colonial expansion, which reached its peak after World War I, controlled 70 territories and countries with a population of 460 million, despite Britain's own population being only around 43 million at the time. Britain's success was due to its technological, military, and intelligence superiority, coupled with the weakness and backwardness of the colonized peoples, as well as the presence of mercenaries who aided British rule in their own countries. Therefore, dismissing talk of Israeli ambitions as 'nonsense' and claiming it is impossible for seven million Israelis to occupy and rule hundreds of millions of Arabs is itself pure nonsense and a lie. Mercenaries are tasked with downplaying the Zionist threat.
Meanwhile, given the exceptional circumstances the region is currently facing and in anticipation of uncertain developments, I commend the decision of the First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Interior to close the Husseiniyas during the upcoming Ashura and relocate the ceremonies to safer venues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
3 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Kuwait Times Editor-in-Chief meets Russian ambassador
By Faten Omar KUWAIT: The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the State of Kuwait Vladimir Zheltov visited the offices of Kuwait Times and Kuwait News on Sunday, where he was warmly received by the editorial teams and given a tour of the various departments, including the newsroom, the printing press, and the archive room. During the visit, the ambassador met Editor-in-Chief of Kuwait Times Dr M Ziad Al-Alyan. The two discussed the situation in the Middle East in light of the American strikes on Iran. The Palestinian issue and the Ukrainian crisis were also touched upon.
Arab Times
5 hours ago
- Arab Times
Hezbollah, Iraqi Militias Avoid Direct Involvement In Iran-Israel War—for Now
BEIRUT (AP) — Hezbollah has long been considered Iran's first line of defense in case of a war with Israel. But since Israel launched its massive barrage against Iran, triggering the ongoing Israel-Iran war, the Lebanese militant group has stayed out of the fray — even after the U.S. entered the conflict Sunday with strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. A network of powerful Iran-backed militias in Iraq has also remained mostly quiet. Domestic political concerns, as well as tough losses suffered in nearly two years of regional conflicts and upheavals, appear to have led these Iran allies to take a back seat in the latest round convulsing the region. 'Despite all the restraining factors, wild cards remain,' said Tamer Badawi, an associate fellow with the Germany-based think tank Center for Applied Research in Partnership with the Orient. The 'Axis of Resistance' Hezbollah was formed with Iranian support in the early 1980s as a guerilla force fighting against Israel's occupation of southern Lebanon at the time. The militant group helped push Israel out of Lebanon and built its arsenal over the ensuing decades, becoming a powerful regional force and the centerpiece of a cluster of Iranian-backed factions and governments known as the ' Axis of Resistance.' The allies also include Iraqi Shiite militias and Yemen's Houthi rebels, as well as the Palestinian militant group Hamas. At one point, Hezbollah was believed to have some 150,000 rockets and missiles, and the group's former leader, Hassan Nasrallah once boasted of having 100,000 fighters. Seeking to aid its ally Hamas in the aftermath of the Palestinian militants' Oct. 7, 2023 attack on southern Israel and Israel's offensive in Gaza, Hezbollah began launching rockets across the border. That drew Israeli airstrikes and shelling, and the exchanges escalated into full-scale war last September. Israel inflicted heavy damage on Hezbollah, killing Nasrallah and other top leaders and destroying much of its arsenal, before a U.S.-negotiated ceasefire halted that conflict last November. Israel continues to occupy parts of southern Lebanon and to carry out near-daily airstrikes. For their part, the Iraqi militias occasionally struck bases housing U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria, while Yemen's Houthis fired at vessels in the Red Sea, a crucial global trade route, and began targeting Israel. Keeping an ambiguous stance Hezbollah has condemned Israel's attacks and the U.S. strikes on Iran. Just days before the U.S. attack, Hezbollah leader Naim Kassem said in a statement that the group 'will act as we deem appropriate in the face of this brutal Israeli-American aggression.' A statement issued by the group after the U.S. strikes called for called for 'Arab and Islamic countries and the free peoples of the world' to stand with Iran but did not suggest Hezbollah would join in Tehran's retaliation. Lebanese government officials have pressed the group to stay out of the conflict, saying that Lebanon cannot handle another damaging war, and U.S. envoy Tom Barrack, who visited Lebanon last week, said it would be a 'very bad decision' for Hezbollah to get involved. Iraq's Kataib Hezbollah militia — a separate group from Hezbollah — had said prior to the U.S. attack that it will directly target U.S. interests and bases spread throughout the region if Washington gets involved. The group has also remained silent since Sunday's strikes. The Houthis last month reached an agreement with Washington to stop attacks on U.S. vessels in the Red Sea in exchange for the U.S. halting its strikes on Yemen, but the group threatened to resume its attacks if Washington entered the Iran-Israel war. In a statement on Sunday, the Houthis' political bureau described the U.S. attack on Iran as a 'grave escalation that poses a direct threat to regional and international security and peace.' The Houthis did not immediately launch strikes. Reasons to stay on the sidelines Hezbollah was weakened by last year's fighting and after losing a major supply route for Iranian weapons with the fall of Syrian President Bashar Assad, a key ally, in a lightning rebel offensive in December. 'Hezbollah has been degraded on the strategic level while cut off from supply chains in Syria,' said Andreas Krieg, a military analyst and associate professor at King's College London. Still, Qassem Qassir, a Lebanese analyst close to Hezbollah, said a role for the militant group in the Israel-Iran conflict should not be ruled out. 'The battle is still in its early stages,' he said. 'Even Iran hasn't bombed American bases (in response to the U.S. strikes), but rather bombed Israel.' He said that both the Houthis and the Iraqi militias 'lack the strategic deep strike capability against Israel that Hezbollah once had.' Renad Mansour, a senior research fellow at the Chatham House think tank in London, said Iraq's Iran-allied militias have all along tried to avoid pulling their country into a major conflict. Unlike Hezbollah, whose military wing has operated as a non-state actor in Lebanon — although its political wing is part of the government — the main Iraqi militias are members of a coalition of groups that are officially part of the state defense forces. 'Things in Iraq are good for them right now, they're connected to the state — they're benefitting politically, economically,' Mansour said. 'And also they've seen what's happened to Iran, to Hezbollah and they're concerned that Israel will turn on them as well.' Badawi said that for now, the armed groups may be lying low because 'Iran likely wants these groups to stay intact and operational.' 'But if Iran suffers insurmountable losses or if the Supreme Leader (Ayatollah Ali Khamenei) is assassinated, those could act as triggers,' he said.
Arab Times
5 hours ago
- Arab Times
Reality of Israel's swelling ambitions and its agents
MANY people are increasingly convinced that Israel harbors expansionist ambitions beyond its current borders. These beliefs are rooted in religious ideologies, several statements by political leaders, policies implemented on the ground, and symbols adopted by various Israeli groups. The concept of 'Greater Israel' (Eretz Israel HaShlema) serves as the cornerstone of discussions about Israeli ambitions and is supported by Christian Zionists in America. Although there is no unified agreement on the precise borders of this territory, the most common narrative suggests it extends from the Nile to the Euphrates. This is referenced in Genesis 15:18, 'On that day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, 'To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates.' The two blue stripes on the Israeli flag are said to symbolize the Nile and Euphrates rivers, with the star between them representing the Jewish state. Many also view Israel's actual policies as the strongest evidence of its expansionist intentions, regardless of official statements. The ongoing expansion of Israeli settlements in the territories occupied since 1967, which are recognized by the international community as Palestinian land, amounts to 'creeping annexation' and represents a practical step toward realizing 'Greater Israel,' at least in its Palestinian dimension. The annexation of the occupied Syrian Golan Heights in 1981 further demonstrates that Israel is disregarding internationally recognized borders in pursuit of expanding its sovereignty. Israel has also openly expressed ambitions toward the Litani River in Lebanon, has occupied parts of it, and controlled the Sinai Peninsula for decades. The Likud Party's charter, which is the platform of Israel's most powerful political party, states that 'the right of the Jewish people to the Land of Israel is non-negotiable.' This originally included Jordan as part of the Land of Israel, though this was later amended. Nevertheless, this ideology continues to influence the party's leadership. Far-right and religious movements and parties, which have become influential components of Israeli governments, openly call for the annexation of the entire West Bank (referred to biblically as Judea and Samaria) and the imposition of Israeli sovereignty over it. These parties regard this as a religious duty. Despite denials from some of our allies, Israel's expansionist ambitions, settlement policies, and annexation of territories remain policies upheld by influential factions within the country and are evident in their actions on the ground. In light of these facts, some Israeli agents argue that Israel's relatively small population disqualifies it from ruling over Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and the Gulf states, whose combined population is approximately 250 million. However, Zionist agents overlook the example of British colonial expansion, which reached its peak after World War I, controlled 70 territories and countries with a population of 460 million, despite Britain's own population being only around 43 million at the time. Britain's success was due to its technological, military, and intelligence superiority, coupled with the weakness and backwardness of the colonized peoples, as well as the presence of mercenaries who aided British rule in their own countries. Therefore, dismissing talk of Israeli ambitions as 'nonsense' and claiming it is impossible for seven million Israelis to occupy and rule hundreds of millions of Arabs is itself pure nonsense and a lie. Mercenaries are tasked with downplaying the Zionist threat. Meanwhile, given the exceptional circumstances the region is currently facing and in anticipation of uncertain developments, I commend the decision of the First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Interior to close the Husseiniyas during the upcoming Ashura and relocate the ceremonies to safer venues.
