Can Digital Therapy Improve Mental Health Among Teens?

TOPLINE:
In a randomised trial of adolescents with mental health issues, the use of a 6-week online emotion-regulation therapy was found to be feasible and acceptable. Compared with an active control therapy, this online therapy significantly alleviated symptoms of anxiety, depression, and maladaptive coping.
METHODOLOGY:
This single-blind randomised clinical trial conducted between 2022 and 2023 in Swedish primary care included 30 adolescents aged 12-17 years (93% girls) with mental health problems and their parents.
Participants were randomly assigned to receive 6 weeks of either therapist-guided primary care online emotion-regulation treatment (POET; n = 15) or supportive treatment (n = 15) as an active control.
Primary outcomes included feasibility and acceptability; secondary outcomes included symptom severity and improvement (measured using the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale [CGI-S] and CGI-Improvement Scale), symptoms of anxiety and depression (measured using the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale [RCADS-47]), global functioning (measured using the Children's Global Assessment Scale [CGAS]), and emotion regulation (measured using the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire [CERQ]).
Outcomes were self-reported online or obtained via telephonic interviews immediately after treatment and at a 3-month follow-up.
TAKEAWAY:
The study had a consent rate of 81%, with 93% of participants completed at least one assessment immediately after treatment and 87% completed 3-month follow-up assessments.
Treatment satisfaction was high among both adolescents (mean Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 [CSQ-8] score: POET, 20.6; supportive treatment, 22.8) and parents (mean CSQ-8 score: POET, 24.8; supportive treatment, 23.1).
When comparing before and immediately after treatment, the POET group showed significant reductions in symptom severity (CGI-S: effect size, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.73-1.86), symptoms of anxiety and depression (RCADS-47: Cohen d, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.37-1.84), and maladaptive cognitive coping (CERQ: Cohen d, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.52-1.70), as well as improvement in global functioning (CGAS: Cohen d, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.66-1.85). The control group showed no significant differences.
When comparing before treatment and at 3 months post-treatment, the POET group maintained reductions in symptom severity (CGI-S: effect size, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.76-1.88), symptoms of anxiety and depression (RCADS-47: Cohen d, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.51-2.08), and maladaptive cognitive coping (CERQ: Cohen d, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.22-1.40), as well as improvement in global functioning (CGAS: Cohen d, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.95-2.14). The control group showed no significant differences.
IN PRACTICE:
"Given that adolescents represent a large patient group with limited access to psychological treatment, these findings suggest that POET is a promising treatment in primary care, with the potential for broad outreach and improved accessibility for adolescents with mental health problems," the authors wrote.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Katja Sjöblom, MSc, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. It was published online on June 11 in JAMA Network Open.
LIMITATIONS:
A small sample size and lack of stratification in the randomisation procedure prevented the between-group analysis of effectiveness. Most participants were self-referred, potentially introducing selection bias. The active control study design limited clinical interpretation compared with a control group using treatment as usual or gold standard treatment.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was supported by grants from the Kavli Trust, Region Stockholm, and the Swedish Research Council. Several authors reported receiving grants, royalties, and personal fees from various academic, governmental, and private sources, and one author reported holding shares in companies outside the submitted work. Details are provided in the original article.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

an hour ago

• Yahoo

What Age Is Right for Dating? Therapists and Parents Weigh In

I can still remember the day my 5-year-old son started telling me all about his four (!) kindergarten girlfriends. I thought it was pretty darn cute and, to be honest, I was just relieved that my shy and sometimes truculent little kid was making friends with such ease. Now that my daughter (who is my oldest child) is 10 years old and definitely on the cusp of puberty, conversations about crushes feel a little more like the real thing—namely because it's clearly the earliest form of hormone-driven feelings for a peer. And to be honest, this development does contribute to a growing sense of dread about the teen years that lie ahead. Anyways, you can probably see where I'm going with this, so I'll get straight to the point: How soon is too soon for kids to start doing the boyfriend/girlfriend thing? And when can they graduate to actual dating? I went to two Clinical Psychologists (PhD) and a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist (LMFT) for some expert advice, plus pooled parents across the country, and the answer is… it depends. Experts and caregivers pretty much agree that there is no single age where dating becomes acceptable, and that it's more about your child's maturity level and understanding. Read on for more nuance on the subject. Dr. Bethany Cook, PsyD, MT-BC, is a licensed clinical psychologist and author of For What It's Worth: A Perspective on How to Thrive and Survive Parenting. She's a sought after therapist and quoted media expert who brings accessible, real-world guidance to families of all socioeconomic and mental health backgrounds, based on over 20 years of clinical experience in the field. Jephtha Tausig, PhD, Clinical Psychologist and Supervisor at Columbia University, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Adelphi University, and the Fairwinds Clinic. Dr. Jeph received her doctorate in clinical psychology with distinction from Columbia University and has over 20 years experience working with children, adolescents and adults. Jonathan W. Smith, LMFT is the Founder and Director at The Center for Family Wellness. His areas of expertise include individual therapy for mood and behavior issues, child behavior as well as couples and family therapy. JT: It's important to remember that our definitions of the terms 'girlfriend' or 'boyfriend' may mean something different to us as adults from what they mean to your child. Similarly, the way that young children, or older children, teens, and young adults define terms like 'dating' changes over time as they evolve developmentally. So, this is where open communication with your child becomes very important. JS: First, I want to point out that this topic is very expressly separate from sexual behaviors, which should be discouraged until the child is developmentally able to comprehend the consequences and implications of that type of relationship and how to stay safe and maintain self-respect. That said, the answer as to when a kid should be allowed to date is that it depends. Children are not one size fits all and will all demonstrate varying levels of maturity and readiness for dating at differing ages. BC: Biology alone can't decide this because puberty might ignite interest by ages 10 to 12 but the brain's circuitry for self-regulation lags behind by about a decade. That's why when biology hits the gas early in puberty, it's the job of society (specifically the parents) to supply a learner's permit. Parents need to look for behavioral readiness rather than a birthday. That said, typical guardrails are casual group dates around ages 12-13 (i.e., middle school) and solo dating around age 16. JT: It's really about what your 7-year-old feels 'a boyfriend' means. See if you can find out more from her about this in a genuinely curious, interested manner. What does she think having a boyfriend means and how does that work? (Very often at this stage, having a 'boyfriend' or 'girlfriend' could be something that lasts for a few hours or days at most). As for kissing on the lips, you should certainly ask about that. (Why did they do that? Whose idea was it? Are they following behaviors that they have seen adults do? Is this something they were dared to do by peers?) It's good to find out information first before providing a boundary for your child. (This could be something along the lines of 'you will have plenty of time to kiss someone on the lips later, right now you don't need to do that.') JS: A 7-year-old who is "dating" a classmate might believe it is dating just to declare that they are dating. [At this age], a child who kisses another child on the lips is likely copying behavior modeled by television, parents, older siblings or other adults rather than acting on an internal drive for intimacy. This child can be told about social rules and "time and place" rules society has about dating and affection. Children can be allowed to pretend to "date" without developmental harm, and any correction for kids who either intentionally or unintentionally go "too far" should be without shame and humiliation, and couched in terms of readiness, not appropriateness. BC: At 7 years old a child is in the 'playground romance' stage: concrete, imaginative, and heavily influenced by peer story-lines (think recess versions of Disney plots). There's no mature concept of intimacy yet—just experimenting with labels and mimicry. If you hear from your child that they kissed at this age, I recommend that you keep your tone light and curious. Ask open questions and mirror the facts back without judgment. If you respond initially with visible shock or concern, your child will feel that they did something wrong and will avoid sharing this type of information with you in the future for fear of getting in trouble. I also strongly encourage parents to take this as an opportunity to introduce or revisit the importance of consent by having a conversation about it using age-appropriate language. JT: It's good to understand what is meant by 'dating.' Is this a large-group or small-group or one-on-one activity? Who else will be present? What are the expectations you have, as well as those held by your child, their peer and their peer's parents? It's always helpful for everyone to be on the same page and comfortable with whatever the boundaries/limits are. JS: What dating means to the child is very important contextual information for determining the correct age for dating. Cultural considerations are also relevant for parents and teens. In some families, a child may only be allowed to date based on strict codes regarding the purpose of dating and this, too, is not detrimental in and of itself. BC: Context is everything—and this includes family values and culture, peer environment and the individual temperament of the child. A practical rule of thumb is this: If a young person can calmly discuss boundaries, respect curfew/tech rules without constant reminders, and cope with rejection without emotional free-fall, they're probably ready for the kind of dating they're requesting. The experts covered this general question already, but Dr. Cook has a helpful list of specific signs to look for when assessing your child's readiness for dating. Here's a breakdown of what it should look like when your kid is ready to date for real: Self-Driven SafetyThey pack contraception info, have safe-ride apps (or other parent numbers) because they thought of it—not because you packed their metaphorical backpack. Boundary BossThey can say 'No, thanks' (and accept 'no' from others) without meltdowns or persuasion tactics. Emotional Seatbelts FastenedBig feelings—crushes, rejections, jealousy—show up, and your kid can label them ('I'm hurt, not ruined') and use coping tools instead of doom-scrolling or door-slamming. Respectful Tech HabitsPhones, texts, and DMs are handled with the same care you expect for a pet goldfish: fed responsibly, no late-night chaos, no disappearing 'secrets.' Curfew CredThey come home (or log off of tech) on time without 37 reminder texts. Reliable time-keeping = reliable rule-keeping. Friend-Group FirstRomance interests don't eclipse healthy friendships, sports or homework. A balanced social diet beats the all-crush crash diet. Additionally, dating fits alongside their current goals (grades, team try-outs, summer job), not against them. They treat relationships as add-ons, not identity makeovers. Problem-Solving MusclesWhen rides fall through, plans change, or someone flakes, they troubleshoot calmly instead of calling you to 'fix it now!' Consent Scripts on Speed DialThey know how to ask ('Is it OK if I…?'), check in ('Still comfortable?'), and adjust when the other person hesitates. Low Drama, High RepairDisagreements end with apologies and behavior changes—not revenge posts or silent treatment. Logical Leap CapacityThey can link actions to consequences ('If I ghost someone today, I'll see them in class tomorrow—awkward!') and plan accordingly. According to Dr. Cook, the best thing you can do is to start early. 'Start before they're even interested, because kids who have conversations about bodies, boundaries and crushes before their hormones hit are more likely to keep you in the loop later.' In other words, don't wait for 'the talk.' Talking to kids about dating shouldn't be one dreaded and awkwardly formal conversation. Or, in the words of Dr. Cook, 'think drip-irrigation, not fire-hose: dozens of short chats, started early, that grow with your child's brain and body.' Still feeling a little unsure with regards to boundary setting and dating between kids? We don't blame you. When in doubt, phone a friend. Actually, we did that for you by taking the question to a handful of parents across the country. Here's where they stand on the subject: 'I'd say 16. Kids don't have the maturity before that age to make solid judgments about mates and dating and sex…and they usually suffer from under-developed self-esteem.' — Debbie, California mom-of-two. 'I mean, my kids are both under the age of 5 right now so it's hard to say…but I guess I didn't have a boyfriend until age 12, so somewhere around there seems about right. Then again, it does feel like kids are growing up much faster now, so who knows.' — Nicole, New Jersey mom-of-two. 'Hmm…I think no earlier than 16 years old, but ideally 18, just due to emotional maturity and priorities to school, activities, friends, etc. Dating can get intense and also be a distraction if not ready!' — SZ, New York mom-of-one. 'I think it's totally fine for kids as young as 8 to say they have a girlfriend or boyfriend, because I'd assume the title is more just a statement of friendship without any understanding or intention of romance. As for real, romantic dating…maybe 14 or 15 sounds fine, provided they take it really slow, and I know what's up. But boy, I don't know. My kids are still young (5 and 7) so I'm not there yet!' — Vivian, Rhode Island mom-of-two. 'I don't believe there's an age at which it starts being appropriate. What we do in my house is ask our kids what dating means to them, and then we decide if they are ready for that thing. So for example, last year my 12-year-old asked if she could date a boy. I asked her what that meant and she said, 'going out to lunch,' so we allowed her to do that. Additionally, there's so much nuance these days with gender fluidity that I don't think it makes sense to have hard and fast rules there. My daughter asked to have a sleepover with a boy who is her friend, and we simply evaluated based on these two kids and decided she could.' — Denise, Maryland mom-of-two When it comes to kids and dating, the therapists advise parents to ask neutral questions, consider the context (i.e., the maturity and intentions of your own kid) and then start a relevant and age-appropriate conversation about boundaries. In other words, understanding and communication is key. Allowances for Kids: How Much, Why Do It and When to Start

News24

2 hours ago

• News24

Rethinking screen time: Are we modelling healthy habits for our kids?

Noel Hendrickson, Getty Images South Africans rank among the highest in global screen time usage, with adults averaging nearly 10 hours daily on devices, raising concerns about the impact on children observing these habits. Experts warn of the mental, emotional, and physical risks excessive screen time poses, from anxiety to poor academic performance. By making small lifestyle changes, such as having device-free family time and using built-in screen-time tools, parents can lead by example and promote a healthier, more balanced approach to technology. South Africa has earned a dubious distinction: its citizens spend more time glued to screens than most other nations. With the average South African adult devoting a staggering nine hours and 37 minutes daily to smartphones, nearly a third of their waking hours, it's clear we're in the grip of a digital addiction. But as parents scroll through social media (which alone consumes 22% of daily usage), what lessons are we teaching our children about healthy technology use? The disturbing cost of screen obsession The SA Society of Psychiatrists (SASOP) warns that our screen addiction is fuelling a mental health crisis among young people. The statistics paint a troubling picture: - Adolescents spending more than five hours daily on devices are 70% more likely to have suicidal thoughts than those with less than an hour of screen time. - Even moderate use (four to six hours) increases risks of anxiety and depression compared to peers with just two hours less exposure. - Studies across 14 countries found cellphones consistently disrupt learning - with notifications alone requiring up to 20 minutes for children to refocus. Psychiatrist Professor Renata Schoeman explains the ripple effects: Excessive screen time links to depression, anxiety, poor sleep, declining academic performance, social withdrawal, and exposure to harmful content like cyberbullying or eating disorder promotion. Physical consequences include obesity, eye strain, and poor posture. Parents' confessions: Holding a mirror to our habits Before reading SASOP's findings, I started to think about what my phone usage looks like to my four-year-old after she chastised her father for always being on his phone. After reading SASOP's warning, I wondered about my own usage stats. According to the dashboard in my device's Digital Wellbeing and Parental Controls centre, I spend four to five hours on my phone daily. Screenshot Screenshot Screenshot I contacted other South African parents about their screen habits for this piece. Here's what they shared: Khaya (8h25m): Acknowledges work demands that necessitate usage but vows to be more present. Tinashe (eight to 10 hours): Admits his daughter associates him with his computer. Marilynn (5h45m): Calls her usage 'excessive' and feels guilty. Iavan (5h50m): Justifies nighttime scrolling as 'downtime'. Lerato (7h40m): Shares devices with kids watching YouTube. Hein (10h20m): Acknowledges that his screen time doesn't set a healthy example. Their honesty reminds me of an uncomfortable truth: children learn by observation. 'I don't think it's the healthiest example because my daughter associates me with my computer a lot, however I do try and manage her screen time and encourage breaks for outdoor time or other activities. Sometimes I'll switch everything off and leave music in the background,' says Tinashe. Lerato's screen time. As Schoeman notes: 'We cannot expect children to moderate screen time when they see adults constantly glued to phones.' Practical tools for change The solution isn't shaming ourselves and others or abandoning screens but finding balance. Both Apple and Android devices offer built-in tools: - Screen Time Tracking (iOS/Android): Shows daily/weekly usage per app. - App Limits: Set daily caps on usage for specific apps. - Downtime/Focus Mode: Blocks non-essential apps during set hours. - Bedtime Mode: Silences notifications and grays out screens. - Do Not Disturb: Pauses alerts during family time or work. Schoeman also recommends: - No screens under age two; less than one hour for ages two to five; less than two hours for older kids. - Device-free meals and bedrooms. - Modelling breaks and offline activities. - Overnight device custody for teens. Small changes, big impact As Lerato discovered, simple swaps, like outdoor chores with kids, can reshape family habits. Reflecting on her goals, Marilynn says: 'Ideally, I'd like to take that number down to two hours or so. With all the research around the negative impacts of increased screen time, I feel quite guilty that I'm not setting a better example and do hope to do better.' 'Children don't need perfection,' reminds Schoeman, 'they need consistency.' Putting phones away at dinner or disabling notifications during homework sends powerful messages. With South Africa's screen stats among the world's highest, I find it ironic that we must not forget that our children are watching (us). The question of what our solution to the crisis highlighted by SASOP isn't just about their screen time but ours, too. As the parents, we spoke to demonstrate that awareness is the first step toward change. What will your screen time teach your child today? - To check your screen time on an Android device, open your settings and scroll to Digital Wellbeing and Parental Controls or a similar setting. You can find your screen time report on an Apple device in your control centre.

Medscape

2 hours ago

• Medscape

ECG Challenge: On-Again, Off-Again Lightheadedness

A 72-year-old man with a history of coronary artery disease treated medically presents to his primary care provider with complaints of palpitations and occasional episodes of lightheadedness. He has had episodic lightheadedness with presyncope, but no syncope, over the past 2 months. The episodes have become more frequent over the past 2 weeks. While an ECG is obtained, he complaints of lightheadedness. Figure 1. Courtesy of Philip J. Podrid, MD. The correct diagnosis is tachycardia-bradycardia (sick sinus syndrome; Figure 2). Figure 2. Courtesy of Philip J. Podrid, MD. Discussion The initial four RR intervals are irregularly irregular. No organized P waves are seen, but there are irregular undulations of the baseline (^). The QRS complexes have a normal duration (0.08 sec) and morphology. Therefore, the initial rhythm is atrial fibrillation. The atrial fibrillation abruptly terminates after the first four QRS complexes, followed by a QRS complex (*) that has the same duration and morphology as the first four. However, no P wave occurs before this QRS complex. Therefore, this is a junctional escape complex. This is followed by three additional junctional QRS complexes (v). The RR intervals are shortening (rate faster) because the junctional complexes are from an ectopic focus which manifests a change in its rate. The last two QRS complexes have the same duration and morphology. However, they are preceded by a P wave (+) with a stable PR interval (0.16 sec). Thus, these are sinus complexes. The QT/QTc intervals are normal (320/390 msec). After the termination of the atrial fibrillation there is a delay of 8 seconds before sinus rhythm is restored. This represents a tachycardia-bradycardia (tachy-brady) syndrome, which is a common manifestation of sick sinus syndrome. Philip Podrid, MD, is an electrophysiologist, a professor of medicine and pharmacology at Boston University School of Medicine, and a lecturer in medicine at Harvard Medical School. Although retired from clinical practice, he continues to teach clinical cardiology and especially ECGs to medical students, house staff, and cardiology fellows at many major teaching hospitals in Massachusetts. In his limited free time he enjoys photography, music, and reading.