&w=3840&q=100)
'Unreasonable, counterproductive': Spain's Sánchez rejects push to increase Nato defence spending to 5%
Spanish PM Sánchez has told Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte that the proposed increase in the alliance's defence spending target to 5% of GDP would be 'not only unreasonable, but also counterproductive', according to a report read more
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has told Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte that the proposed increase in the alliance's defence spending target to 5% of GDP would be 'not only unreasonable, but also counterproductive,' according to a report.
According to The Guardian report, citing Spanish newspaper El País, in a letter responding to Rutte's proposals for next week's Nato summit in the Hague, Sánchez declared his opposition for the proposed change arguing 'it is not necessary to fulfil our commitments to the alliance.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Sánchez reportedly argued that the proposed 5% GDP defence spending target 'has nothing to do with the level of commitment to collective defence,' asserting that Spain remains confident in its ability to meet Nato obligations with lower spending levels.
He warned that adopting such a target would negatively impact the Spanish economy, potentially requiring tax hikes, cuts to public services, and delays in the country's green transition plans.
'We choose not to make those sacrifices,' The Guardian quoted Sánchez to have told Nato Rutte.
According to the report, the new Nato defence spending goal had been expected to pass unanimously, but Spain's opposition could now prompt further discussions among member states.
A Spanish government source told El País that while Madrid does not intend to 'veto anything' for other countries, it wants to be clear that it 'can't commit to it.'
Spain's national broadcaster RTVE also reported on Sánchez's stance.
The latest Nato data shows Spain's defence spending at just 1.3% of GDP — the lowest among all alliance members.
In April, the Spanish government announced tentative plans to raise that figure to 2%.
With inputs from agencies

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘Second time my son's wedding cancelled': Netanyahu says his family not exempt from ‘personal costs' amid Israel-Iran conflict
Amid the ongoing Israel-Iran tensions, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu provided the example of his son's postponed wedding in an attempt to drive home the point of 'personal costs' during conflict situations, and highlight that even his family 'has not been exempt'. Speaking from outside Soroka Medical Center in Beersheba — struck earlier by an Iranian missile — Netanyahu on Thursday said the ongoing war was affecting every Israeli family, including his own. 'It really reminds me of the British people during the blitz. We are going through a blitz,' Netanyahu said, referring to the current conflict in context to the World War II bombing of Britain which claimed the lives of over 40,000 civilians. 'There are people who were killed, families who grieved loved ones, I really appreciate that,' he added. 'Each of us bears a personal cost, and my family has not been exempt,' he continued. 'This is the second time that my son Avner has cancelled a wedding due to missile threats. It is a personal cost for his fiancée as well, and I must say that my dear wife is a hero, and she bears a personal cost.' Avner Netanyahu's wedding was first scheduled for November but was postponed due to security reasons. It had been rescheduled for this Monday, despite ongoing tensions and threats of protests. According to The Guardian, reports that Netanyahu planned to take a short leave from official duties for the ceremony may have contributed to a false sense of calm in Tehran ahead of Israel's aerial strike. The prime minister's remarks, intended to show solidarity with Israeli citizens, instead drew sharp criticism from the public and the political spectrum. Anat Angrest, whose son Matan has been held hostage in Gaza since the Hamas attack on 7 October 2023, responded: 'I have been in the hellish dungeons of Gaza for 622 days now,' she wrote on social media, adding that the Netanyahu family's suffering 'didn't go unnoticed by my family either.' Gilad Kariv, a Knesset member with the Democrats, called Netanyahu a 'borderless narcissist.' He also challenged Netanyahu's praise of his wife Sara as a 'hero,' stating, 'The doctors who leave home for night shifts are the heroes. The teachers who keep our children together on Zoom and phone calls are the heroes.' As the two sides continue to trade strikes for the seventh straight day, Netanyahu said he trusted that Trump would 'do what's best for America'. 'I can tell you that they're already helping a lot,' he said. This comes as a new diplomatic initiative appeared to be underway as Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi prepared to travel Friday to Geneva for meetings with the European Union's top diplomat and counterparts from the United Kingdom, France and Germany. On Thursday, President Donald Trump said he will decide within two weeks whether the US military will get directly involved in the conflict between the two longstanding foes, given the 'substantial chance' for renewed talks with Iran over its nuclear programme. So far, at least 639 people — including 263 civilians — have been killed in Iran, with more than 1,300 injured, according to a Washington-based Iranian human rights group. Israeli officials estimate that Iran has launched roughly 450 missiles and 1,000 drones. Most have been intercepted, but at least 24 Israelis have died and hundreds more have been injured, the military had said. (With inputs from The Guardian)
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
3 hours ago
- First Post
As NATO prepares for summit in Hague, will West convince Trump to take stern stance against Russia?
Since coming back to office, US President Donald Trump has upended the West's approach towards Russia's war on Ukraine by undercutting Kyiv and opening the door to closer ties with Moscow read more When leaders from NATO's 32 countries gather for a summit in The Hague next week, most want to send a clear message: Russia is the main threat to their alliance. But the loudest voice in the room likely won't be on the same page. Since coming back to office, US President Donald Trump has upended the West's approach towards Russia's war on Ukraine by undercutting Kyiv and opening the door to closer ties with Moscow. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While the volatile leader has expressed some frustration with Russia's Vladimir Putin for refusing a ceasefire, he has steered clear of punishing the Kremlin. At a G7 summit this week Trump made waves by saying the group of industrialised countries should never have expelled Russia. Ahead of the Hague gathering, diplomats at NATO have been wrangling over a five-paragraph summit statement, with many countries pressing for a full-throated assertion of the menace from Moscow. That, they say, will help explain the main thrust of the meeting: an agreement for countries to ramp up defence spending to satisfy Trump's demand for it to reach five per cent of GDP. Statement on Russia's threat' Since the Kremlin launched its 2022 invasion of Ukraine, the alliance has called Russia 'the most significant and direct threat to allies' security and to peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic area'. But this time around the United States – backed up by Moscow-friendly Hungary and Slovakia – has been intent on watering that down. Diplomats have been juggling with variants such as referring to 'threats, including Russia' or mentioning 'the long-term threat posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic security'. The verbal nuances may seem slight, but they mean a lot to those countries being asked to massively ramp up spending and those on NATO's eastern flank most threatened by the Kremlin. NATO has warned that Russia could be ready to attack an alliance country within five years. 'If we can get Trump to sign off on calling Russia a long-term threat then that would be a good result,' a senior European diplomat told AFP. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Near threat' As US peace efforts between Russia and Ukraine have stalled, the diplomat said that Washington appeared to have 'moved a centimetre in our direction' on taking a stronger stance on Russia. 'Of course more hawkish countries want to go further – but just getting Trump to agree that would still be fine,' the diplomat said. Part of the US reasoning is that Washington is more worried about the threat China poses worldwide – and that Russia is more a problem just in Europe. 'Russia is the near threat,' said US ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker. 'But China is obviously a big challenge for all of us, and we need to be allied and address those threats as well.' Camille Grand of the European Council on Foreign Relations said that beneath the diplomatic fine-tuning, NATO was being confronted by a 'fundamental question'. 'How does the United States view Russia?' he said. 'So far we haven't really got an answer.' Even if NATO does opt for stronger wording on Moscow, there is always the possibility that Trump could show up in The Hague and directly contradict it. But the debate could come into sharper focus in the months after the summit when the United States could announce a pull-back of forces in Europe as part of a review of its global deployments. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Division on Ukraine One area where Washington appears clearly not on board with most other allies is on backing Ukraine. Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky is set to attend on the sidelines of the summit but his involvement is being kept to a minimum to avoid a bust-up with Trump. Diplomats said there should be a reference in the summit statement linking new defence spending to helping Ukraine – but there will be no talk of Kyiv's long-term push to join NATO. 'The US does not see Ukrainian security as essential to European security,' said Kurt Volker, a former US ambassador to NATO. 'Our European allies do, so they feel that if Putin is allowed to prevail in Ukraine, or if Ukraine does not survive as a sovereign, independent state, they are at risk.'


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Israel-Iran conflict: Netanyahu shares 'personal cost' of ongoing war on him, says had to cancel son's wedding due to threats
Amid escalating Middle East tensions, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu revealed the personal impact of the conflict, stating his son's wedding was postponed twice due to missile threats. Israel initiated attacks on Iran, aiming to prevent nuclear weapon development, while Iran retaliated with missile and drone strikes. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads As tensions soar in Middle East, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu while sharing the 'personal cost' of ongoing war with Iran said that he had to cancel his son's wedding twice due to missile threats.'Each of us bears a personal cost, and my family has not been exempt,' reported The Guardian quoting Netanyahu. 'This is the second time that my son Avner has cancelled a wedding due to missile threats. It is a personal cost for his fiancee as well, and I must say that my dear wife is a hero, and she bears a personal cost.'Avner Netanyahu's wedding was first scheduled for November but was postponed for security reasons. Then it was due to take place on Monday, despite the threat of opposition began attacking Iran last Friday, saying it aimed to prevent its longtime enemy from developing nuclear weapons. Iran retaliated with missile and drone strikes on Israel. It says its nuclear programme is air attacks have killed 639 people in Iran, said the Human Rights Activists News Agency. Those killed include the military's top echelon and nuclear scientists. Israel has said at least two dozen Israeli civilians have died in Iranian missile attacks. Reuters could not independently verify the death toll from either has targeted nuclear sites and missile capabilities, but also has sought to shatter the government of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to Western and regional officials."Are we targeting the downfall of the regime? That may be a result, but it's up to the Iranian people to rise for their freedom," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on has said it is targeting military and defense-related sites in Israel, but it has also hit a hospital and other civilian accused Iran on Thursday of deliberately targeting civilians through the use of cluster munitions, which disperse small bombs over a wide area. Iran's mission to the United Nations did not immediately respond to a request for comment.