Should you boycott the US? The 20 biggest questions in travel right now

Hauf says the best practice is for carbon emissions to be removed or reduced where they are generated, if possible. If we must fly, 'carbon removal through carbon-offset projects is a crucial part of the global emissions reduction journey, not least because for some industries, like aviation, the technologies to get to zero emissions do not yet exist commercially'. However, she believes it's essential to have 'a robust and transparent national carbon accounting system'. It's worth checking your airline's carbon offset program to see where your money is going and whether it aligns with your values.
I love cruising but realise it's another form of travel with a big environmental footprint. How do I choose the right cruise line and what can I possibly do to help the planet while I'm on board and on shore?
Natalie Cherry, owner of Queensland's Noosa Cruise & Travel, a member of the Virtuoso (virtuoso.com) group of luxury travel advisers, says today's concerned cruisers have the option of choosing a cruise line based on how proactive it is in reducing its impact on the environment. 'You could look to see [the nature of] their investment and implementation of sustainable practices. Consider choosing a smaller vessel both for the environment and to reduce the over-tourism in ports. Ideally, a ship that uses LNG and battery power in places like Antarctica and the Arctic.'
It's not just engine power that travellers should consider. It's the kind of basic things nowadays such as food waste management and whether single-use plastics have been eliminated. Does the company partner with local suppliers to support local economies? How does it manage its excursions so as not to disrupt host communities? Does it give back to communities and climate science through foundations it has initiated, such as those run by upscale cruise lines Ponant and Hurtigruten? On shore, passengers should aim to spend generously in local communities and avoid tours herded in large groups. While the ship itself may not tread lightly, you still can.
Everyone says travelling by train is the way to go to help save the planet, but how clean is rail really? Aren't plenty of trains around the world propelled by diesel rather than electricity?
'Rail travel has a much lower fuel consumption and emissions profile than other modes of transport,' says Liam Davies, associate director of the Melbourne-based Institute for Sensible Transport. 'While electric trains can be zero emission, when run on renewables, diesel trains do have an emissions impact. However, this is much lower than planes. The single biggest thing we can do to reduce our emissions when travelling is to use trains wherever possible. Trains have a small fraction of the emissions profile of planes; in France, high-speed trains emit just 2 per cent of the CO2 of a plane travelling the same route.' Even though Australians wishing to see the world have no option but to fly overseas, once there, 'popular destinations like Europe, Japan and China all have great rail networks, with many high-speed rail options, and some incredibly scenic regular-speed rail too. Taking the train sometimes takes a little bit longer, but you can sit back and enjoy the view, knowing you are reducing your personal emissions by travelling in a lower impact way'.
I'm considering a visit to Saudi Arabia. Should I go?
'Everywhere we travel comes with risks and considerations,' says Sean Martin, managing director of Australia, Asia and New Zealand at G Adventures. 'Saudi Arabia is open to tourism, but I'd encourage each traveller to make an informed decision for themselves before going. If you do choose to go, there are so many incredible female-owned businesses there that you can choose to support, and you can put your tourism dollar into businesses and communities that are marginalised. We shouldn't underestimate the force for good that tourism presents. We have the opportunity to distribute wealth through travel and to empower communities that need it the most.'
And what about Antarctica?
Denise Sablone, executive vice-president of tour development at US-based escorted journeys operator Collette, advises travellers worried about their personal impact on the White Continent to choose companies regulated by the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators (IAATO) and the Association of Arctic Expedition Cruise Operators (AECO). 'A less harmful way to visit the most precious and important places on our planet includes small ships with teams of naturalists and scientists on board that can positively educate and influence their guests,' says G Adventures' Martin. Expedition cruise ships can play a crucial role in monitoring the fragile ecosystems of the polar regions. 'We see our travellers as ambassadors, who we know will come back with even more respect and interest in caring for the planet than what they left with.'
US President Donald Trump has pulled the US out of the Paris Agreement for a second time. Does it mean I shouldn't visit the US?
As of early January, only three countries had not ratified the Paris Agreement, a legally binding international treaty on climate change – Iran, Libya and Yemen. However, Trump withdrew the US from the agreement soon after inauguration, meaning the US is no longer required to provide annual updates on its greenhouse gas emissions. But is the only ethical path for the environmentally conscious traveller to boycott the country? We note the US government doesn't necessarily reflect the feelings of its people on this issue. Hundreds of thousands of Americans have come out in recent times to protest the present administration on many grounds, from tariffs to immigration and environmental policies. The issue for travellers now is also one of personal safety and stringent border control. Are we welcome as visitors to the US? This is a yardstick the thinking traveller should apply to every country they wish to visit.
Tipping has become a big issue, even for some Americans. If I do visit the States, should I resist tipping? Isn't it just another kind of tariff?
'When visiting any destination, we know we should be mindful and considerate of the local norms and ways of life,' says Roland Howlett, owner of Virtuoso member travel agency Frontier Travel. 'Tipping in the US is no different. It is deeply embedded in the culture and is a critical part of how many service workers earn their income. Embrace it, and you'll find you enjoy travelling around the US a lot more.' Noosa Cruise & Travel's Natalie Cherry says travellers should always check their bills first as there may already be a tip included. 'Be mindful that their wages are incredibly low, so they rely on a service fee. In general, because of this, they do give exceptional service, so be kind and grateful for this and show your appreciation.'
Are there any truly ethical hotel brands I can choose? And how do we know the difference? What do we look for?
'When it comes to ethics, the best thing to look for is always a business that really invests in its people, and the local community,' says sustainable luxury travel expert Juliet Kinsman. 'For me, economic sustainability is what's key. Seek out an independent hotel where the owners have a meaningful connection to that place and are quite literally invested; you know your cash is more likely contributing to them looking after all that's on their doorstep.' Kinsman recommends resources such as The Long Run, Regenerative Travel as well as her own list, Bouteco Loves.
Does replacing small plastic water bottles and straws in hotels really make much difference?
'The collective impact of the movement away from single-use plastic in hotels is really powerful and does make a difference,' says Elissa Keenan, chief executive of Ecotourism Australia. 'If people don't think small changes make a difference, I challenge their thinking.' As she points out, one of the single biggest risks to the three species of turtles listed as endangered and three species listed as vulnerable in Australia is plastic pollution. 'Plastic pollution is deadly to sea turtles through ingestion leading to starvation, internal injuries or entanglement resulting in life-threatening injuries. For anyone who has snorkelled or swum with these majestic creatures, or who has dreams of doing so, making small changes cannot be undervalued.'
How much so-called greenwashing is really going on, and how can we call it out?
'Yes, there's impact-washing galore,' Kinsman says. 'But dig a little deeper, or to really do your due diligence, give the hotel a call (when did anyone last do that?) and you'll soon get a sense of whether their good work is the real deal or if their virtue signalling is a load of blarney.' She's all for calling out 'greenshifting' (when a hotel doesn't take responsibility for its failings, such as plastic water bottles, and they shift the blame, saying guests insist on single use) and 'greenrinsing' (when they keep changing their targets before achieving them, such as declaring net zero by 2025 but still running on diesel generators). But she's also supportive of 'greenlighting', which she defines as spotlighting the good of an operator, even if it's not 'eco through and through'.
Do hotels that want you to keep the white towels and not change the sheets really want to help save the world or just their own bottom line?
'What we definitely need is fewer expressions of being conscious or sustainable without substantiated facts,' says luxury travel expert Kinsman. If a hotel is going to claim a 'nature positive' or 'ocean-friendly' label, they need to back it up with hard evidence. 'Considering laundry gobbles up a huge part of their energy and water budgets, I don't care if they're cutting their turnover for economic benefits, as long as the end result is that they can actually reduce the amount of towels and sheets and all the detergents they use and the fibres they release into our waterways.'
How do you know the money you donate to a social enterprise is really going to the right cause?
Collette's Sablone says social enterprises typically measure their impact through monitoring and evaluation, tracking the outcomes of their activities to confirm they are making a positive difference in their communities. Resources such as annual reports and partnership pages can be utilised to verify that donations are being used correctly. Transparency and trust are key when supporting social enterprises. 'Don't be afraid to ask many questions and to demand the details, and to see accountability being practised,' says G Adventures' Martin.
'Overtourism occurs when too many visitors flock to a destination, exceeding the local capacity to manage them sustainably,' says Mat Woods, chief executive of New Zealand's Destination Queenstown. 'This can lead to overcrowding, environmental degradation, strained infrastructure, reduced quality of life for residents and a diminished visitor experience.' But places can have both healthy tourist numbers and a happy community if tourism is managed correctly. Queenstown, says Woods, is a good example due to its destination management plan, which outlines a vision for regenerative tourism, with local community input to ensure the region thrives not just economically, but also socially, culturally and environmentally. 'A great place to holiday is a great place to live, so balance is the key,' Keenan adds.
What can I do personally to help combat overtourism? Should I just skip places such as Paris, Rome and Venice?
When people think of overtourism, they instantly think of 'bucket-list' hotspots such as Paris and Venice, G Adventures' Martin says. 'But what many don't think about is the idea that overtourism can affect small, remote communities as well. Travel should be seen as a force for good, and we shouldn't react to overtourism by turning our back on any one place, city or town. You don't need to rule out a tourist favourite to combat overtourism; you just need to be mindful and conscious about the best way and time to see it.' You can help ease the pressure on a destination by travelling more mindfully, staying longer, travelling off-peak and exploring alternative destinations and second cities. Consider holidaying at home as well, says Keenan, of Ecotourism Australia. 'We are so lucky in Australia to have so many incredible places to go with virtually no crowds. Travellers are increasingly looking for immersive and untouched experiences – we have these in spades right here.'
How can I tell if a destination really is doing the right thing?
Look closely at its marketing and storytelling, and how it engages with local communities and the environment, says Destination Queenstown's Woods. 'Look for initiatives that both strengthen the economic resilience of the destination and foster connections between visitors, community and those which protect the environment.'
I know you shouldn't ride elephants, so is it still OK to ride other animals like camels?
'Whatever the activity, ensure the animal's mental as well as physical needs are provided for,' says John Roberts, group director of sustainability and conservation at the Minor Hotels group. The most important message is to look for science-based welfare certification from any animal excursion, no matter the species, to guarantee the best of care.
Is there any way I can pack for a trip that's better for the planet?
Packing light reduces your carbon footprint and makes it easier to use trains and buses and not rely on less environmentally forgiving private transportation, says Ecotourism Australia's Keenan. 'Consider whether you really need to buy certain items before you go. If you really want to [do so], purchase them from small businesses or markets in your destination, helping the money stay in that local community.'
Loading
What's the feeling these days about visiting and supporting zoos around the world?
There's still a place for zoos, says Minor Hotels' Roberts, since it's still not possible for everyone to travel to view creatures in the wild and to be inspired to care for the natural world. A licensed and well-regulated zoo, for instance a member of the World Association of Zoos & Aquaria, will be providing the best possible care and, most importantly, will be prevented from being part of the illegal wildlife trade and other anti-conservation measures.'
How can I choose an ethical safari, as wild animals can be crowded on some tours?
Travel with a company that plays a part in conservation or pays extra for exclusivity, ideally with a local community as benefactors, says Roberts. 'Certainly, it's better for the animals' wellbeing not to be overcrowded, and for conservation in general, but it does come at a price point that excludes the vast majority of people. But overcrowding problems come when the experience is too convenient and cheap.'
PLEASE EXPLAIN: WHAT IT ALL MEANS
Sustainability Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
Greenwashing The act of making false or misleading statements about the environmental benefits of a product or practice.
Carbon offsets A system of credits used by a company or organisation to compensate for what they are emitting, thereby decreasing their net emissions.
Loading
Single-use plastic Items such as cling-wrap and plastic straws that are designed for one use only before being discarded.
Social enterprise A business designed to achieve specific social objectives as its primary purpose, benefiting marginalised or economically disadvantaged groups by permanently improving their socioeconomic conditions.
Regenerative tourism Leaving places you visit in a better state than you found them.
Paris Agreement A legally binding international treaty, entered into force in November 2016, with the goal to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions and hold global temperature increase to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursue efforts to limit it to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Sky News AU

an hour ago

• Sky News AU

Albanese should find a seat at the everyday Aussie kitchen table where the bills are piling up, instead of looking for a place next to Trump

While Australians again struggled to afford fuel and basic groceries this week, the Prime Minister had in his sights another overseas trip to enhance foreign optics instead of fixing problems at home. Mr Albanese has now ditched a last-minute appearance at next week's NATO summit in The Hague, some 16,000 kms away, in the hope it would produce a face-to-face with US President Donald Trump. The decision to instead send his deputy Richard Marles follows the PM's scheduled G7 encounter with Mr Trump in Canada which was scuttled by President's early exit to address the Iran-Israel conflict. What we are now also witnessing in the aftermath of that snub is a diplomatic dance which underscores just how far Mr Albanese is willing to go to secure a seat at the grown ups' table. At home, Australians are hurting and the cost of living remains the number one issue in this country. It has been for three years, probably more. The PM needs to stop eyeing a meeting with Trump overseas and start restoring confidence in his government's ability to manage both domestic and foreign affairs in a strategic and strong fashion. Sure, the US President's brush-off was a diplomatic embarrassment especially as it lacked a private heads-up to Mr Albanese before publicly pulling the plug on their meeting. But it's time to move on. The real questions are these: when was the last time this government delivered a serious and immediate policy to cut household energy bills? When was the last time this government offered tangible relief to small businesses buckling under the weight of supply chain blowouts and relentless interest rate pressure? This week it was announced that a productivity roundtable in Canberra was in the works to 'shape our government's growth and productivity agenda'. But already this is being picked apart as a consensus talkfest if cutting net immigration and net zero targets are not seriously considered. I don't think we are dealing with an abstract economic trend here because for nine million Australians it has nearly reached the point of financial collapse. New research from comparison site Finder paints a grim picture. Nearly half the country is the cost of a cracked windscreen or dentist's bill away from the edge. The average savings for this group? A paltry $215 which in NSW I would argue doesn't even cover a week's groceries. I saw a 1kg bag of ordinary coffee beans at the supermarket this week for $80. Dishwasher tablets, 82 of them, for $78. There was plenty of room to move in the fruit and vegetable aisle, with the least expensive thing to buy some apple varieties I'd never heard of and likely tasteless and cold-storaged for months. You're trying your luck if you fancy 350g of multi-coloured mini tomatoes for under $6.50, punished for your caviar-style tastes. The frozen food aisle with the cheaper dinners like fish fingers and bulk meat pies was doing brisk business, however. Local Facebook group chat is dominated by members asking for money saving tips including what time of day do local supermarket staff appear in store with a yellow sticker gun to discount products. According to Finder, 43 per cent in the cohort referenced have less than $1,000 in a bank account. More than half live pay transfer to pay transfer and 47 per cent are banking on a tax refund to plug holes in the dam. And a $12 coffee? Don't laugh, it's coming to a cafe near you. When inflation is combined with supermarket gouging, international trade instability and policy gridlock, prices only go in one direction. In cafes, once the beating heart of urban Australia, small business owners continue to be crushed. Wages, energy, rent, beans, you name it. Roasters say stress on the international coffee bean market means the only solution is to jack up prices. This isn't indulgence anymore. It's economics at gunpoint. Meanwhile, those brewing at home are finding supermarket shelves are no longer a refuge. Instant coffee is probably booming but that's less about convenience and more about budget. And then there's fuel. If you're still planning on driving to work, brace yourself. Petrol is tipped to hit $2.20 per litre with Middle East tensions sending the global oil markets into panic mode and we're all meant to just accept it like it's the weather. Australia may not import oil from Iran but that's no comfort at the bowser. Our prices are still shackled to global markets which drives up costs at the pump while hammering fuel-reliant industries nationwide. Australia used to have several oil refineries and now we have just two - Queensland's Lytton Refinery operated by Ampol and Victoria's Geelong Refinery, operated by Viva Energy. We can blame globalisation and "market efficiency" for that and we now import most of our refined fuel. With petrol spiking, inflation stays high too so consider that in terms of the Reserve Bank delaying any long-awaited interest rate cuts. And let's not forget the cherry on top: fuel excise and GST. What's the domestic agenda? Because from where most Australians stand at the petrol pump, in the supermarket aisle or checking their empty bank apps, it doesn't feel like there is one. We don't need a seat at NATO next week. Mr Albanese has had months to build a relationship with the Trump administration and should now plan to see him in Washington. We need a seat at the kitchen table where bills are piling up and no one from Canberra seems to be listening. Louise Roberts is a journalist and editor who has worked as a TV and radio commentator in Australia, the UK and the US. Louise is a winner of the Peter Ruehl Award for Outstanding Columnist in the NRMA Kennedy Awards for Excellence in Journalism and has been shortlisted in other awards for her opinion work

News.com.au

an hour ago

• News.com.au

Melbourne homebuyers missing out on super hack

A growing number of young Melbourne homebuyers are using a little-known super hack to beat the property market — but hundreds of thousands of others are still missing out. Finder analysis of SuperRatings data has revealed that in 190 Melbourne suburbs, house prices failed to keep pace with the average 5.7 per cent annual return delivered by top-performing superannuation funds over the past decade. That means savvy buyers who contributed voluntarily into super rather than racing into the property market in those suburbs could have ended up ahead, growing a deposit faster than prices climbed. These suburbs include a mix of prestige pockets such as Docklands, Carlton, Parkville and St Kilda West, as well as outer-fringe areas like Cranbourne South, where growth has lagged super returns. In contrast, more than 100 other suburbs, particularly in Melbourne's booming outer west and north, outpaced super fund performance. Despite the clear financial benefits, the First Home Super Saver Scheme (FHSSS), which allows Australians to grow a deposit inside super, remains significantly underused. According to the latest Australian Taxation Office data, just 27,000 Australians have accessed the scheme since it began, withdrawing a combined $370m in voluntary contributions. Yet nearly half of those — 16,500 — were Victorian buyers, indicating strong uptake in the state. However, Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show there were more than 231,000 new loans issued to first-home buyers in Victoria between the 2018 and 2024 financial years, suggesting almost 93 per cent of eligible buyers never used the scheme. Super Members Council chief executive Misha Schubert said younger Australians should not have to choose between homeownership and a secure retirement. 'They deserve the same opportunities as previous generations to have both a home and strong retirement savings,' Ms Schubert said. 'As a result of Super Guarantee rate rises from 9 to 12 per cent over the past decade, the average 30-year-old today will be more than $130,000 better off in retirement. 'That's why protecting the core of super is so important.' Under the scheme, eligible first-home buyers can contribute up to $15,000 per year and a total of $50,000 in voluntary super contributions — which can later be withdrawn to use as a house deposit. The strategy is particularly appealing for disciplined savers, as it takes advantage of concessional tax treatment and compound growth within a super fund. Experts say it could be a powerful way to close the deposit gap for many young Australians locked out of their preferred suburbs. Smart Lending managing director Melissa Gielnik said the scheme remained an under-utilised financial tool, especially for buyers in their 20s and 30s. 'In a lot of cases, the First Home Super Saver Scheme can deliver a better outcome than a standard savings account or term deposit, and it's a huge help in a rising market,' Ms Gielnik said. OpenCorp chief executive Cam McLellan said while super performance had been solid, property still offered unique advantages that couldn't be overlooked. 'Super returns sound solid, but property has a massive advantage with leverage,' Mr McLellan said. 'With a 20 per cent deposit, you control the full value of the asset, and that means better real-world outcomes — especially when you factor in rental income and tax benefits.' Mr McLellan said successful investors often used a blend of both strategies, depending on their income and long-term goals. 'Some reduce their super contributions while building a property portfolio,' he said. 'Others use a self-managed super fund to buy property inside super. The smart ones use both.' M R Advocacy director Madeleine Roberts said more younger buyers were also turning to rentvesting — renting in their preferred lifestyle locations while investing in more affordable growth suburbs. 'They're realising it's a smart way to get ahead without giving up lifestyle,' Ms Roberts said. 'We're seeing savvy buyers take a strategic approach. 'They're arming themselves with the right information and using it to their advantage.' She said that while super could be a useful long-term growth tool, the right property purchase in the right location had the potential to outperform in real dollar terms, particularly when timed well. 'Smart property decisions can absolutely beat super, even in the short term,' Ms Roberts said. 'But it all comes down to timing and knowing where to buy. 'Sometimes the best move is to buy, wait for it to mature in value, and then reinvest somewhere else.' With Melbourne's housing market showing signs of recovery after a turbulent few years, experts say the combination of rising super balances, accessible government schemes, and flexible strategies like rentvesting could redefine the first-home buyer experience. It helps close the affordability gap for a generation of buyers priced out of the traditional path to homeownership. Ms Schubert said one of the scheme's biggest strengths was that it didn't require buyers to compromise their long-term financial wellbeing. 'It doesn't damage the safe deposit box that protects their employer super contributions, which they will need to deliver regular income to live on in retirement,' she said. 'It's a win-win, and we'd love to see more young Australians taking advantage of it.' Additional reporting by Nathan Mawby Disclaimer: OpenCorp does not provide financial advice about SMSFs or superannuation. Always consult a licensed financial adviser before making decisions regarding your super or establishing an SMSF. Melbourne suburbs where super outperformed houses Suburb Property Type 10-Year Property Return % Docklands H -1 Parkville H -0.3 Cranbourne South H 0.2 Werribee South H 0.3 Nar Nar Goon North H 0.9 Middle Park H 1.2 Carlton H 1.3 St Kilda West H 1.6 Toorak H 2.4 Armadale H 2.4 South Melbourne H 2.5 Williamstown North H 2.5 Glen Huntly H 2.6 Flemington H 2.6 Fitzroy North H 2.7 Box Hill H 2.8 Richmond H 2.8 Malvern East H 2.9 Cremorne H 2.9 Ashburton H 3 Prahran H 3 Elsternwick H 3.1 Princes Hill H 3.1 Mont Albert H 3.2 South Yarra H 3.2 St Kilda H 3.2 Bulleen H 3.2 Kew H 3.3 Mont Albert North H 3.3 Balaclava H 3.3 Windsor H 3.3 West Footscray H 3.3 Heidelberg Heights H 3.3 Caulfield North H 3.4 Caulfield South H 3.4 Doncaster H 3.4 Brooklyn H 3.4 Ripponlea H 3.5 Port Melbourne H 3.5 Maidstone H 3.5 Box Hill South H 3.6 Chadstone H 3.6 Maribyrnong H 3.6 Balwyn North H 3.7 Oakleigh East H 3.7 Collingwood H 3.7 Kensington H 3.7 Camberwell H 3.8 Glen Iris H 3.8 St Kilda East H 3.8 Belgrave South H 3.8 Seddon H 3.8 Footscray H 3.8 McKinnon H 3.9 Alphington H 3.9 Box Hill North H 3.9 Heidelberg H 3.9 Oakleigh H 3.9 Essendon North H 3.9 Heatherton H 3.9 Mount Dandenong H 3.9 Elwood H 4 Ivanhoe H 4 Fitzroy H 4 West Melbourne H 4 Balwyn H 4.1 Hawthorn East H 4.1 Surrey Hills H 4.1 Albert Park H 4.1 Templestowe H 4.1 Templestowe Lower H 4.1 Braybrook H 4.1 Bentleigh H 4.2 Mount Waverley H 4.2 Blackburn H 4.2 Williamstown H 4.2 Clifton Hill H 4.2 Burwood H 4.2 Ashwood H 4.2 Ascot Vale H 4.2 Forest Hill H 4.2 Yarraville H 4.2 Watsonia North H 4.2 Bundoora H 4.2 Springvale H 4.2 Brighton East H 4.3 Glen Waverley H 4.3 Burwood East H 4.3 Moorabbin H 4.3 Heathmont H 4.3 Knoxfield H 4.3 Keilor Park H 4.3 Warrandyte H 4.4 North Melbourne H 4.4 Blackburn North H 4.4 Abbotsford H 4.4 Viewbank H 4.4 Nunawading H 4.4 Pascoe Vale H 4.4 Croydon North H 4.4 Attwood H 4.4 Westmeadows H 4.4 Malvern H 4.5 Ormond H 4.5 Moonee Ponds H 4.5 Hughesdale H 4.5 Mitcham H 4.5 Huntingdale H 4.5 Bonbeach H 4.5 Ringwood H 4.5 Airport West H 4.5 Bayswater H 4.5 Caulfield H 4.6 Murrumbeena H 4.6 Ringwood East H 4.6 Altona North H 4.6 Avonsleigh H 4.6 Canterbury H 4.7 Brighton H 4.7 Kew East H 4.7 Carnegie H 4.7 Blackburn South H 4.7 Mentone H 4.7 Brunswick West H 4.7 Brunswick H 4.7 Macleod H 4.7 Kingsbury H 4.7 Eaglemont H 4.8 Ivanhoe East H 4.8 Sandringham H 4.8 Carlton North H 4.8 Donvale H 4.8 Hampton East H 4.8 Wheelers Hill H 4.8 Thornbury H 4.8 Coburg H 4.8 Rowville H 4.8 Bellfield H 4.8 Scoresby H 4.8 Gowanbrae H 4.8 New Gisborne H 4.8 Sunshine H 4.8 Brookfield H 4.8 Vermont H 4.9 Wantirna H 4.9 Clarinda H 4.9 Clayton South H 4.9 Sassafras H 4.9 Reservoir H 4.9 Croydon South H 4.9 Greenvale H 4.9 Boronia H 4.9 Caroline Springs H 4.9 Fairfield H 5 Brunswick East H 5 Newport H 5 Cheltenham H 5 Patterson Lakes H 5 Oakleigh South H 5 Yallambie H 5 Coburg North H 5 Wattle Glen H 5 Cairnlea H 5 The Basin H 5 Springvale South H 5 Glenroy H 5 Fawkner H 5 Broadmeadows H 5 Hampton H 5.1 Niddrie H 5.1 Clayton H 5.1 Seaholme H 5.1 South Kingsville H 5.1 Oak Park H 5.1 Keilor East H 5.1 Ferntree Gully H 5.1 Selby H 5.1 Eumemmerring H 5.1 Laverton H 5.1 Bentleigh East H 5.2 Parkdale H 5.2 Vermont South H 5.2 Mordialloc H 5.2 Ringwood North H 5.2 Preston H 5.2 Mulgrave H 5.2 Strathmore Heights H 5.2 Briar Hill H 5.2 Avondale Heights H 5.2 Croydon H 5.2 Hadfield H 5.2 Sunshine North H 5.2 Deepdene H 5.3 East Melbourne H 5.3 Black Rock H 5.3 Beaumaris H 5.3 Northcote H 5.3 Doncaster East H 5.3 Highett H 5.3 Rosanna H 5.3 Pascoe Vale South H 5.3 Greensborough H 5.3 Watsonia H 5.3 Taylors Hill H 5.3 Kalorama H 5.3 Noble Park H 5.3 Burnside Heights H 5.3 Roxburgh Park H 5.3 Tarneit H 5.3 Chelsea H 5.4 Carrum H 5.4 Albion H 5.4 Dandenong H 5.4 Altona Meadows H 5.4 Hawthorn H 5.5 Essendon H 5.5 Eltham North H 5.5 Botanic Ridge H 5.5 Chirnside Park H 5.5 Lilydale H 5.5 Mooroolbark H 5.5 Lynbrook H 5.5 Sunshine West H 5.5 Wallan H 5.5 Bacchus Marsh H 5.5 Plenty H 5.6 Kingsville H 5.6 Eltham H 5.6 Notting Hill H 5.6 Montmorency H 5.6 Upper Ferntree Gully H 5.6 Epping H 5.6 St Albans H 5.6 Melbourne suburbs where houses outperformed super Suburb Property Type 10-Year Property Return % Cobblebank H 14.6 Aintree H 14 Mickleham H 13.5 Weir Views H 12.6 Portsea H 11.3 Red Hill H 11.3 Wesburn H 10.7 Fraser Rise H 10.7 Bittern H 10.1 Cannons Creek H 10.1 St Andrews Beach H 9.7 Diggers Rest H 9.3 Kinglake H 9.2 Cape Schanck H 9.1 Harkaway H 9 Wandong H 8.8 Lang Lang H 8.8 Officer H 8.6 Mount Macedon H 8.3 Melton South H 8.3 Sorrento H 8.2 Pakenham Upper H 8.2 Balnarring H 8.2 Yarrambat H 8.1 Blairgowrie H 8.1 Frankston North H 8.1 Millgrove H 8.1 Safety Beach H 8 Nyora H 8 Baxter H 8 Cranbourne West H 8 Rockbank H 8 McCrae H 7.9 Kinglake West H 7.9 East Warburton H 7.9 Fingal H 7.8 Crib Point H 7.8 Belgrave Heights H 7.7 Gembrook H 7.7 Tyabb H 7.6 Launching Place H 7.6 Clyde North H 7.6 Junction Village H 7.6 Essendon West H 7.5 Somerville H 7.5 Mount Martha H 7.4 Frankston South H 7.4 Carrum Downs H 7.4 Devon Meadows H 7.3 Narre Warren North H 7.2 Seville East H 7.2 Warburton H 7.2 Gruyere H 7.1 North Warrandyte H 7.1 Hurstbridge H 7.1 Rye H 7.1 Tootgarook H 7.1 Melton H 7.1 Balnarring Beach H 7 Mount Eliza H 7 Diamond Creek H 7 Keilor Lodge H 7 Burnside H 7 Cranbourne North H 7 Beaconsfield Upper H 6.9 Warranwood H 6.9 Langwarrin H 6.9 Garfield H 6.9 Edithvale H 6.8 Ferny Creek H 6.8 Dromana H 6.8 Romsey H 6.8 Eynesbury H 6.8 Yarra Junction H 6.8 Hampton Park H 6.8 Cranbourne H 6.8 Werribee H 6.8 Kurunjang H 6.8 Frankston H 6.7 Capel Sound H 6.7 Woori Yallock H 6.7 Hastings H 6.7 Maddingley H 6.7 Wyndham Vale H 6.7 Coolaroo H 6.7 Lower Plenty H 6.6 Kilsyth South H 6.6 Macedon H 6.6 Keysborough H 6.6 Seville H 6.6 Rosebud H 6.6 Wollert H 6.6 Koo Wee Rup H 6.6 Research H 6.5 Lysterfield H 6.5 Aspendale Gardens H 6.5 Emerald H 6.5 Wandin North H 6.5 Mount Evelyn H 6.5 Coldstream H 6.5 Healesville H 6.5 Skye H 6.5 Narre Warren H 6.5 Sunbury H 6.5 Doveton H 6.5 Strathmore H 6.4 Wonga Park H 6.4 Keilor H 6.4 Sandhurst H 6.4 Gisborne H 6.4 Williams Landing H 6.4 Belgrave H 6.4 Albanvale H 6.4 St Helena H 6.3 Pearcedale H 6.3 Montrose H 6.3 Heathcote Junction H 6.3 Mill Park H 6.3 Hallam H 6.3 Blind Bight H 6.3 Pakenham H 6.3 Kings Park H 6.3 Dallas H 6.3 Melton West H 6.3 Aberfeldie H 6.2 Mornington H 6.2 Lyndhurst H 6.2 Narre Warren South H 6.2 Keilor Downs H 6.2 Mernda H 6.2 Hoppers Crossing H 6.2 Meadow Heights H 6.2 Longwarry H 6.2 Lysterfield South H 6.1 Altona H 6.1 Dingley Village H 6.1 Olinda H 6.1 Beaconsfield H 6.1 Taylors Lakes H 6.1 Yarra Glen H 6.1 Berwick H 6.1 Doreen H 6.1 Clyde H 6.1 Deer Park H 6.1 Truganina H 6.1 Badger Creek H 6.1 Somers H 6 Spotswood H 6 Tecoma H 6 Monbulk H 6 Seaford H 6 Hillside H 6 Noble Park North H 6 Seabrook H 6 Delahey H 6 Ardeer H 6 Darley H 6 Kallista H 5.9 Chelsea Heights H 5.9 Bayswater North H 5.9 Endeavour Hills H 5.9 Bunyip H 5.9 Thomastown H 5.9 Craigieburn H 5.9 Croydon Hills H 5.8 Riddells Creek H 5.8 Silvan H 5.8 Heidelberg West H 5.8 Dandenong North H 5.8 Gladstone Park H 5.8 Tullamarine H 5.8 Cranbourne East H 5.8 Lalor H 5.8 Campbellfield H 5.8 Park Orchards H 5.7 Waterways H 5.7 Aspendale H 5.7 Wantirna South H 5.7 Upwey H 5.7 Kilsyth H 5.7 Point Cook H 5.7 South Morang H 5.7 Lancefield H 5.7 Whittlesea H 5.7 Kealba H 5.7 Sydenham H 5.7 Beveridge H 5.7 Manor Lakes H 5.7 Jacana H 5.7 Harkness H 5.7

The Age

an hour ago

• The Age

The Libs have been handed a golden opportunity. Now, watch them stuff it up

One of the great entertainments of political commentary in Australia over the past decade-and-a-bit has been speculating on what new and inventive way the Liberal Party will find to comprehensively bugger itself up. I can't help thinking this must have crossed Treasurer Jim Chalmers' mind as he fronted the National Press Club this week to announce that he will undertake a process to develop a new productivity agenda. Chalmers' speech was solid, but then so it should be after so many have said the same things so often to so little avail. His words and aspirations have been written for him many times over, sometimes with hope, other times with emotions ranging from dull rage to despair. Sometimes even by the Coalition. We need productivity reform, politicians all know we need it, the media all know they know we need it, yet no-one ever does it. There's a simple reason for that: it's hard. The treasurer dwelt in his speech on why it's hard. Reforming an economic system requires trade-offs. Some choices will cost some people. They may or may not be recompensed in the rejig. Chalmers doesn't want the media to simplify economic reform by explaining it in terms of 'winners and losers', as they do after each budget, but there will be winners and losers in the short, medium, or long term as a result of any new tax system. And, naturally, the opposition will do what the name says on the tin. It will oppose. Given the last years of Liberal shenanigans, the real question is how it chooses to do that. In one scenario, Sussan Ley leads a team which analyses and criticises the government's productivity proposals to ensure the best outcome for Australia and Australians. Should they choose this version of their own adventure, there will be plenty of material to tackle. The prime minister has already shown that he has no instinct for making business more efficient or even any understanding that a healthy economy relies on the private sector, creating new wealth instead of just shifting existing money around. In the first term of the Albanese government, the size of the public sector grew relative to the size of the private sector, so now each private employee is supporting more public sector salaries. Loading Then-employment minister Tony Burke passed through an industrial relations bill which makes it harder for businesses to scale up without locking themselves into costly arrangements. Meanwhile, the 'Future Made in Australia' slush fund has been 'picking winners' (code for government making decisions on industries it poorly understands) by investing in bringing in an overseas quantum technology firm rather than backing existing quantum technology firms – ahem – made in Australia. Labor is even trashing its own legacy by changing the rules on the superannuation system it forced people to contribute to, undermining trust that the money you lock away for retirement is really yours for later. It's hard to see how a government which made policies of this sort a priority and prefers the public to the private sector will back a productivity agenda which turns Australia around. But one of the great paradoxes of politics is that sometimes you need the party which is seen to be the touchy-feely side to deliver hard-nosed decisions. Think Labour prime minister Tony Blair in the UK, Democrat president Bill Clinton in the USA, or chancellor Gerhard Schroeder in Germany, all of whom delivered welfare reform in the face of their countries' badly designed benefits systems, which were creating disincentives to work.