Tobacco Transparency Bill ‘will benefit all'
Aspire Aotearoa Research Centre co-director Professor Janet Hoek. PHOTO: SUPPLIED
When the government repealed smokefree legislation last year, questions were raised in the health and research sectors about why it was done, and if parties in the coalition government benefited from it.
Opposition health spokeswoman Dr Ayesha Verrall's new Tobacco Transparency Bill, launched yesterday, aims to increase transparency, improve policy making, and stop the government from supporting, endorsing or advocating for the tobacco industry's interests.
University of Otago researcher and Aspire Aotearoa co-director Prof Janet Hoek said the Bill was long overdue.
"What the Bill is trying to do is to bring to light the evidence that would enable us to find out whether the [coalition] parties were benefiting from it.
"At the moment, we don't know."
The Bill was partly inspired by the actions of Associate Health Minister Casey Costello, who led the repeal of the Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products (Smoked Tobacco) Amendment Act 2022.
It effectively scrapped laws aimed at slashing tobacco retailers from 6000 to 600, removing 95% of the nicotine from cigarettes and creating a smokefree generation by banning sales to those born after 2009.
Prof Hoek and Radio New Zealand sought information under the Official Information Act (OIA) to see what justification the ministry used to repeal the Act.
Initially, Ms Costello refused to release any documents, citing a clause in the OIA legislation protecting confidential advice tendered by ministers and officials.
So Prof Hoek and RNZ referred their OIA requests to chief ombudsman Peter Boshier, who ordered Ms Costello to release the information.
Prof Hoek said they eventually received "a flood" of emails and documents, which had been heavily redacted by the ministry.
"It's very difficult when a lot of the material is being heavily redacted because obviously you don't know what you don't know and it makes it difficult to undertake any kind of rigorous analysis.
"All we do know is that we've seen a move towards decisions that align with the tobacco industry's interests.
"And that's not just the repeal of the smokefree measures.
"There were tax reductions on heated tobacco products, and there have been proposals to introduce oral nicotine products, which the tobacco industry has been pushing."
Prof Hoek said it left many in the health and research sectors asking questions.
"Does this new direction align with the research evidence? The answer to that is no.
"Does it follow the expert advice from the Ministry of Health or from people like me working in the area? The answer to that is no.
"Is there really resounding public support for this new direction of travel? Again, the answer to that is quite clearly no.
"You end up thinking, who is going to benefit from these decisions and I think that's where you inevitably have to start considering the tobacco industry and what influence they've had."
Under the Tobacco Transparency Bill, the prime minister would have to issue policies requiring ministers to declare any interests they have in tobacco companies; the minister of health would provide guidance for public officials explaining the potential for tobacco industry influence; and the public service commissioner would set standards for officials involved in developing tobacco control policies.
Prof Hoek said the Bill would stop the government from supporting, endorsing or advocating for the tobacco industry's interests, and promote stronger compliance with Article 5.3 of the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which calls on parties to protect "policies from commercial and other vested interests of the tobacco industry".
The Bill would also prevent people with interests in the tobacco industry from working on tobacco policy, and limit officials' ability to move directly from government roles to positions in tobacco companies.
"If politicians have got nothing to hide, that would be really obvious, and I think the net effect would be that some of the trust that's been lost in the government could potentially be regained.
"The repeal of measures that would have seen New Zealand realise the Smokefree 2025 goal appalled the public health community.
"This Bill will protect policies that promote wellbeing and equity, and that will benefit all New Zealanders," she said.
john.lewis@odt.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Defence Heads Face Scrutiny Week Hearing, Promise To Be Fiscally Responsible
Defence heads have assured politicians their huge new budget takes into account soldiers actually having to fire their weapons. They fronted up to an even-tempered scrutiny week hearing with MPs at Parliament on Thursday afternoon. Greens MP Lawrence Xu-Nan asked whether the budget boost of $9 billion new spending over four years allowed for buying the likes of replacement Javelin missiles, which cost $400,000 each. Defence secretary Brook Barrington responded that the increased budget meant troops could now move past the approach from the last 50 years of being only partly equipped. "The defence force is actually being provided with funding to ensure that, if we upgrade the capabilty, we are also able to shoot things with it," he said. Along with defence force Chief Air Marshal Tony Davies, Barrington laid out a raft of measures they said would enable them to buy weapons and other systems faster and smarter. "The demand queue is growing," Barrington said. "The longer it takes us to lodge an order, someone else has got their place in the queue before us and some of this stuff takes three years. "You know, you lose your place in the queue... and you're losing time." They felt a sense of urgency, but also had to ensure quality thresholds were set, so that in 3-4 years he was not up before MPs again being told, "We knew we couldn't trust you folk to bloody get your way out of a paper bag", he said. "We've got to find a sweet spot between rigour, confidence and pace." He added defence had already met with 280 people from 174 companies, both last month and this month, and that an industry strategy would be put out soon. They would be fiscally responsible with the billions of taxpayer money, Davies said. To accelerate, they would drop the old approach of trying to get 30 years of life from gear and retreading it, and instead, look at getting a "minimum viable product" quickly out to the field, he said. "Simple... quick... lean." On the personnel front, they had to rebuild forces, he said. The budget and plan had "buoyed" personnel, but their thinned-back ranks still constrained how much notice they needed to deploy, how long they could deploy for and whether they could mount multiple operations. Personnel turnover had fallen to less than seven percent, but vacancy rates in February were about 30 percent, an Official Information Act request (OIA) showed. The army was short 1500 people, Air Force 660 and navy 630. Defence was "over-training" people to hit 100 percent, when it did not need to, so was reviewing how to speed training up, Davies said. The 15-year plan was to add 20 percent to combat forces - or 2500 people - and the only way to do that currently was to cut civilian jobs down, he said. "At the moment, we've got ships tied up that can't go to sea, because we haven't got the sailors. We've got people that are going on their fifth deployment overseas, because we don't have the number of soldiers. "We've got Joint Force headquarters out at Trentham with watchfloors that can't be filled, because we haven't got the uniformed people with those skills. "We need those. The money is tight, still, even with uplifts." An OIA response showed that, in March, a hefty 313 positions were vacant at Joint Defence Services, far more than in other sections. Defence Minister Judith Collins said the point was to be able to defend against anybody who "threatened our people, or our assets". "Our people are not going to have to wave a white flag anymore. They are going to be able to get out there and protect themselves." She said she had told "prime" multinational defence contractors their best bet for getting a share of the business was to involve New Zealand firms. The small firms would not be written "out of the equation", Barrington said. He added the business cases for two very large projects - replacing the 757s and the maritime helicopters - were well advanced. Other business cases would be made short and sharp. The fleet renewal planning was by far the biggest job, but the budget gave the ministry a couple of million dollars extra for teams to do that. "What happens in two years, if the world situation's got worse and we need to step it up again?" Davies said. "How are we going to accelerate our capability acquisition process. It might be that we need to double our efforts there, so we are constantly looking at ways to fine tune it." The budget set aside $155m over four years for new military allowances for deployments and hundreds of millions for more operations.
Otago Daily Times
17 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Bid to help families results in discovery
Louise Bicknell. PHOTO: SUPPLIED A journey to help 10 New Zealand families get answers for rare brain disorders affecting their children has led to the discovery of the genetic cause. Co-author and associate professor at the University of Otago Rare Disorder Genetics Laboratory Louise Bicknell said the discovery shed new light on the "incredibly complex" process by which human bodies created the "instruction manuals" essential for building and maintaining our brains. "Our bodies rely on a precise process called 'splicing', to read and process genetic instructions from our DNA and help generate the building blocks required in our body. "While it's known that problems with the machinery that co-ordinates splicing can cause various genetic disorders, this new finding adds to a small but growing recognition of the potential severe impact on brain development in particular." The research team studied 10 New Zealand families impacted by a severe genetic disorder that resulted in affected individuals having profound pre- and postnatal microcephaly (smaller head circumference), with pontocerebellar hypoplasia (underdevelopment in brain stem and cerebellum), seizures and severe intellectual disability. The findings, published in the American Journal of Human Genetics, pinpointed specific changes in a gene called CRNKL1. "Our journey to this discovery began here in New Zealand, through trying to help New Zealand families get answers for genetic disorders affecting their children," Prof Bicknell said. "Then, using our international connections, we were able to identify other families around the world, which was crucial for confirming our findings and understanding the full impact of these genetic changes." In a striking discovery, nine of these families showed genetic changes in the exact same spot in the CRNKL1 gene, she said. All the affected children shared the same severe features, highlighting the strong link between these specific genetic changes and the disorder. Lead author and postdoctoral fellow at the University of Otago Rare Disorder Genetics Laboratory Dr Sankalita Ray Das said the research showed CRNKL1 was crucial for healthy brain development, and that specific parts of the splicing machine had highly specialised roles — far more intricate than scientists previously thought. She said the finding also offered further clues into the complex ways human genes guided brain development.
Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Plan to end census criticised
The days of the government counting (almost) everything on a five-yearly basis are over, but a leading academic is worried its replacements will not be as effective. Yesterday, the government announced it would can the census, and instead it will be replaced with a combination of administrative data from other government agencies and smaller annual surveys that a sample of the population will complete. This means there will be no 2028 census. The announcement drew a mixed response from University of Otago professor of public health Michael Baker, who told the Otago Daily Times while he was aware that changes had been mooted, it was nonetheless surprising the government had taken this approach. "We know we depend on the census for so much decision-making in New Zealand. "It's not just at the national level. A lot of it is the fine-grained data you need at the local level, which has always been the strength of the census because it basically aims, of course, to get total population enumeration and total coverage of all dwellings in New Zealand." Prof Baker said this was the "great strength" of the census in its existing format. "Right down to even the smallest local authority in New Zealand can get a sense of what is the population they're looking after and what is the distribution, particularly of dwellings, and all the services they need." Prof Baker acknowledged although the census attempted to capture everyone, there were some groups — in particular minorities or Pacific communities — that did not have as definitive information as others. "The groups that have been under-counted have been more recent migrants, like Pacific communities, and I think some groups who perhaps have less trust in government. "So that's always been a challenge, and that may get worse with a system that relies on administrative data, because it can, if you like ... magnify current inequalities in the way some groups are measured." The government's announcement was made just as England and Wales look set to abandon a similar approach for their 2031 census, with the UK Statistical Agency recommending that a traditional census go ahead instead. However, Statistics Minister Dr Shane Reti told RNZ he was confident the approach would work in New Zealand. "Among other things, we've got a smaller population, so it's a smaller problem to grapple with," he said. The change followed a major review carried out last year, after the 2023 census. Dr Reti said the traditional census was "no longer financially viable". "Despite the unsustainable and escalating costs, successive censuses have been beset with issues or failed to meet expectations," he said. Prof Baker said the census was "actually an investment in making good decisions that will save vastly more if we get it right and cost far more if we get it wrong". "I don't think from what I've seen, that we can be as confident in the shift to an admin data first model that it will actually fix those deficiencies, limitations of the census, and give us something that's at least as good to replace it." Prof Baker said there had been other proposals, such as a a centralised register-based system, which could potentially be more effective and encapsulating than the present census approach. This method had been proposed in a Public Health Communication Centre briefing, released yesterday to coincide with the government announcement. "It would go a step further in that it would actually have everyone on a unique register. "So that would give you ongoing high-quality data, but also it would be much better at avoiding under-counting of some groups. "It would be updated every time someone had an encounter with the system. "Also, you'd give the public access to their records so they could correct it, and that would probably enhance trust."
