Grand Wiltshire home of former Prime Minister gets top award
A former Prime Minister's home has been been recognised as one of the top visitor attractions in the country.
Arundells, the former home of Conservative leader Sir Edward Heath, has been awarded VisitEngland's Quality Assured Visitor Attraction status.
The historic house, located in Cathedral Close, Salisbury, was given an overall quality score of 86 per cent following its first inspection by VisitEngland.
The house was described as "unexpectedly captivating" with a "refreshingly personal and authentic" atmosphere and "immersive charm."
Read more: Why Thames Water was hit with record breaking fine by Ofwat
The volunteers were also praised for their warmth and knowledge.
The report also highlighted the well-maintained gardens, preserved interiors, and the unique opportunity to step into the private world of one of Britain's former Prime Ministers.
Luke Futcher, events and marketing manager at Arundells, said: "We are delighted to receive this national recognition from VisitEngland.
"It reflects the care and commitment of our staff and volunteers, and the distinctive, high-quality experience we strive to offer every visitor."
This recognition adds to a successful year for Arundells.
Earlier in 2025, the house achieved Arts Council England Accredited Museum status, and in the spring, it won the Visitor Experience Award at the Salisbury Business Excellence Awards.
Arundells was originally a medieval canonry, with the first recorded occupant being Henry of Blunston, Archdeacon of Dorset, who lived there from 1291 until his death in 1316.
The house has seen many occupants over the centuries, including Leonard Bilson, who was pilloried and imprisoned for acts of sorcery and magic in 1571, and Sir Richard Mompesson, who undertook major restoration works in 1609.
The name "Arundells" comes from James Everard Arundell, son of the 6th Lord Arundell, who married John Wyndham's daughter, Ann.
The Arundells were a distinguished Roman Catholic family.
Read more: Building 700 homes at old golf course 'best option' for the area
Arundells hosted the Godolphin Girls School (and later a boys boarding school) between 1839 and 1844.
During the Second World War, the house was used by the Red Cross as a centre for their library service and as a wool depot.
The property fell into disrepair and demolition was considered following a long period of neglect.
Extensive refurbishment works were undertaken by Mr and Mrs Robert Hawkings in 1964.
Sir Edward Heath, who lived at Arundells from 1985 until his death in 2005, bequeathed the house to the Charitable Foundation set up in his name.
He wanted as many people as possible to "share the beauty of Arundells" and enjoy his diverse and personal collection of artwork, photographs, sailing memorabilia and political cartoons.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How your MP voted in assisted dying bill
Assisted dying is one step closer to becoming legal in the UK following a landmark vote in the House of Commons. A Bill that would allow terminally ill adults with a life expectancy of less than six months to end their lives was backed by a majority of MPs today (Friday). It came despite warnings from opponents, who argued it had been rushed through Parliament. During a three hour debate on Friday, MPs on both sides of the issue recalled personal stories of loved ones who had died. READ MORE: UK Ryanair Boeing 737 flight crashes at Greek airport READ MORE: Why UK heatwaves feel hotter than 30C heat abroad Former Conservative minister Sir James Cleverly, who led the opposition to the Bill in the Commons, spoke of a close friend who died 'painfully' from cancer. He said he comes at the divisive issue 'not from a position of faith nor from a position of ignorance', and was driven in his opposition by 'concerns about the practicalities' of the Bill. See how your MP voted in the widget below... Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. But the proposed legislation took another step in the parliamentary process, which means the Bill will move to the House of Lords for further debate and scrutiny. Labour MP Kim Leadbeater has argued her Bill will 'correct the profound injustices of the status quo and to offer a compassionate and safe choice to terminally ill people who want to make it'. Due to the four-year implementation period, it could be 2029 – potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's Parliament – before assisted dying is offered. Today's historic vote was the first time the Bill was debated and voted on in its entirety since last year, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55 at second reading. MPs voted 314 to 291, majority 23, to approve Ms Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill at third reading. They had a free vote on the Bill, meaning they decided according to their conscience rather than along party lines.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Vladimir Putin is more vulnerable than ever
It is not just Iran's ayatollahs who will be fretting about the impact of Israel's devastating military assault on their country. The destruction wrought on Iran's military infrastructure is also bad news for other despotic regimes, such as Russia, that have come to rely heavily on Tehran for support. Ever since it finally dawned on Russian president Vladimir Putin that his so-called 'special military operation' in February 2022 was not, as he boasted, going to be completed within a number of days, Moscow has invested a great deal of effort in forging closer ties with Tehran. Russia and Iran are not natural allies. The Iranian people retain bitter memories of the Soviet invasion during the Second World War. Despite this, a mutually beneficial alliance has developed between Moscow and Tehran: the Russians were heavily involved in construction of Iran's Bushehr nuclear power plant. The Ukraine conflict, though, has resulted in a serious upgrade in ties between the two countries. This started in the summer of 2022 when Putin visited Tehran and negotiated a deal for Iran to supply his beleaguered Russian forces with drones and missiles. These weapons have subsequently been used in attacks on the Ukrainian military and critical infrastructure. Russia's deepening reliance on Iran for military support, moreover, resulted in Putin signing a 20-year 'comprehensive strategic partnership' with Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian in Moscow in January this year – just three days before Donald Trump's inauguration to serve a second term as president. In return for Iran maintaining supplies of drones, missiles and other military equipment for Russia's military campaign in Ukraine, Moscow indicated its willingness to boost Iran's air defences and air forces. This has clearly failed to deter Israel from launching its military offensive. The partnership also includes a vague commitment for both sides to provide military assistance in the event of either side being invaded or attacked. Putin is unlikely to fulfil this because of his close ties with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Putin's primary concern, though, will be the impact that Israel's continuing assault on Iran's nuclear and military infrastructure will have on Tehran's ability to continue its support for Russia's war effort in Ukraine. From the start of Israel's attack last week, the Israel Defence Forces have deliberately targeted Iran's drone and missile production facilities, as well as their launch systems, to limit Iran's ability to target Israel. The strategy appears to have paid dividends. The number of Iranian drones and missiles being reportedly fired at Israel has fallen significantly. If the Iranians are unable to provide sufficient weaponry for their own military campaign against Israel, they will be in no position to support Russia's offensive in Ukraine. Another consideration that will be weighing heavily on Putin's mind is the prospect of losing another important ally in the Middle East, so soon after the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria at the end of last year. A key factor in Putin's effort to rebuild Russia's global stature has been to increase its influence in this region, with the Kremlin making a concerted effort to demonstrate that it is a more reliable ally, especially for the Arab world, than the US. In this respect Russia's military intervention in Syria in 2015 to prevent Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad from being overthrown by Islamist rebels played an important role in burnishing Moscow's credentials; it also enabled Moscow to develop two important military bases in the eastern Mediterranean. With Assad now languishing in exile in Moscow, and the ayatollahs locked in an existential fight for survival against Israel, Putin's standing in the region is in danger of precipitous collapse. Iran's plight also places Putin in a quandary because of his close relationship with Netanyahu. The Russian leader has previously had no qualms about turning a blind eye to Israeli attacks against Iran when it suited his interests. During the Syria conflict, when Russian and Iranian forces were both fighting for the common cause of keeping Assad in power, the Russians frequently turned off their air defence systems to allow Israel to attack Iranian positions in Syria. Nor is Russia the only member of the recently formed axis of despotic states – the other members being North Korea, China and Iran – that will be casting anxious looks at the unfolding drama in Tehran. Pyongyang has a long-established cooperation pact with Tehran: the two countries have worked closely on the development of their respective nuclear and ballistic missile programmes. Beijing, meanwhile, has its own strategic partnership with Tehran dating back to 2021. China, the world's largest energy consumer, is keen to take full advantage of Iran's vast resources. But this arrangement is now in question; Israel is directly targeting Iran's oil and gas infrastructure. Israel's military campaign against Iran is not just threatening the ayatollahs' survival. It will have serious repercussions for all those other despotic regimes who mistakenly thought their interests would be best served by aligning themselves with Tehran. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Historic vote brings assisted dying closer to becoming law in England and Wales
Assisted dying is a step closer to being made legal in England and Wales after the proposed legislation cleared the House of Commons in a historic vote. A majority of MPs backed a Bill that would allow terminally ill adults with a life expectancy of less than six months to end their lives. Despite warnings from opponents around the safety of a Bill they argued has been rushed through, the proposed legislation took another step in the parliamentary process. MPs voted 314 to 291, majority 23, to approve Kim Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill at third reading. This means the Bill has completed its first stages in the Commons and will move to the House of Lords for further debate and scrutiny. Both Houses must agree the final text of the Bill before it can be signed into law. Due to the four-year implementation period, it could be 2029 – potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's Parliament – before assisted dying is offered. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. Supporters of assisted dying have described the current law as not being fit for purpose, with desperate terminally ill people feeling the need to end their lives in secret or go abroad to Dignitas alone, for fear loved ones will be prosecuted for helping them. Friday was the first time the Bill was debated and voted on in its entirety since last year's historic yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55 at second reading. Labour MP Ms Leadbeater has argued her Bill will 'correct the profound injustices of the status quo and to offer a compassionate and safe choice to terminally ill people who want to make it'. During an hours-long date on Friday, MPs on both sides of the issue recalled personal stories of loved ones who had died. Conservative former minister Sir James Cleverly, who led the opposition to the Bill in the Commons, spoke of a close friend who died 'painfully' from cancer. He said he comes at the divisive issue 'not from a position of faith nor from a position of ignorance', and was driven in his opposition by 'concerns about the practicalities' of the Bill. MPs had a free vote on the Bill, meaning they decided according to their conscience rather than along party lines. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Public support for a change in the law remains high, according to a YouGov poll published on the eve of the vote. The survey of 2,003 adults in Great Britain, suggested 73% of those asked last month were supportive of the Bill, while the proportion of people who feel assisted dying should be legal in principle stood at 75%.
