
South African rand holds gains after SARB focuses on lower inflation target
JOHANNESBURG, May 30 (Reuters) - The South African rand held most of the previous day's gains in early trade on Friday, after the central bank stressed its strong preference for a lower inflation target at a monetary policy announcement.
The South African Reserve Bank (SARB) presented detailed modelling of the impact of a 3% inflation target, compared to the 4.5% level it aims for at the midpoint of its current 3% to 6% target range.
The SARB, which resumed interest rate cuts on Thursday after a pause in March, added that its Monetary Policy Committee felt a 3% target was "more attractive" and said it would continue to consider scenarios based on that target at future rate meetings.
"Investors focused on the implications of a lower target, namely lower inflation, reduced interest rates, bond market inflows, and stronger long-term growth, which further support the rand," ETM Analytics said.
Other factors that point to more rand resilience include a solid trade surplus, tight credit cycle and signs of prudence in government finances, the research firm added in a note.
At 0650 GMT, the rand traded at 17.8425 against the dollar , about 0.1% weaker than Thursday's closing level.
Weighing against the rand was a stronger dollar on global markets .
The benchmark 2035 government bond was stronger in early deals, as the yield fell 4 basis points to 10.13%.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
HAMISH MCRAE: Rising inflation leaving those with the least paying the most
Let's be honest. We're going to get a lot more inflation. Why? Two reasons. First, Rachel Reeves and the rest of this Government secretly quite welcome it. Second, the Bank of England isn't strong enough to tackle the scourge, even though that is its most important job. If you think that is too cynical, look at the evidence of the past few days. We had inflation figures showing that the Consumer Price Index, the CPI, was running at 3.4 per cent. It's bad enough that this is way above the Bank's 2 per cent target, but dig deeper and the numbers get worse. Allow for owner-occupied housing costs, the so-called CPIH, and the figure is 4 per cent. This is a more accurate tally for most of us since 64 per cent of our homes are owner-occupied. It gets worse. The RPI, the Retail Prices Index, which sets the costs of many business contracts and the charges on the index-linked portion of our national debt, rose 4.3 per cent. On any rational assessment, inflation is running at double the target rate. You would imagine there would be some debate at the Bank about increasing interest rates, particularly since it expects inflation to continue around this level, maybe higher, through the autumn. But no, three of the Monetary Policy Committee voted for a cut, the rest voted to keep rates where they are. This says that they are more worried about a soft economy, and in particular the job losses, that are feeding through as a result of the increase in employers' National Insurance, than they are about inflation. Of course, they are right to be concerned about the economy. We all are. But in effect, they are having to compensate for what most economists would agree was a mistake by Rachel Reeves: clobbering businesses in her Budget last year. Now look at all this from the Chancellor's perspective. She is in a jam. Revenues are weaker than she and the Office for Budget Responsibility expected, and it looks like there will have to be tax increases in the Autumn Budget. That is before all the extra money needed for defence and all the other pressures on spending pile in. There is, however, one thing that is helping: fiscal drag. Higher inflation boosts revenues as rising wages push people into higher tax brackets – even if in real terms their pay does not rise at all. Think back to Reeves' statement on public spending ten days ago. All that stuff about millions more for a list of projects, and a reference to lower interest rates, but barely a squeak about inflation. For what it's worth, the CPI in June last year – the month before Labour won the General Election – was exactly on target: 2 per cent. It's called the money illusion. The Government can say it is spending more money, but in real terms, it may end up spending less. In defence of our government, we are not alone. In the US, Donald Trump's tariffs will inevitably increase prices. In Europe, rearmament will be financed by more borrowing, which will pile pressure on prices there. But the fact is, our inflation figure of 3.4 per cent compares with 2.4 per cent in the US and 1.9 per cent in the eurozone. No wonder our government has to pay more to finance its national debt than any other G7 nation. The harsh judgment on the Bank of England is that it has been less effective in carrying out its prime duty than the US Federal Reserve or the European Central Bank. The thing that worries me most about inflation, even more than the economic costs, is the social damage it causes. Those with strong bargaining power, like heavily unionised train drivers, can negotiate above-inflation pay rises. But those in weaker positions cannot, and right now risk losing their jobs. If asset prices soar – and despite global mayhem, shares are close to all-time highs – those with the greatest wealth gain the most. The most sophisticated investors benefit. But those unable to pay for the best advice see the value of their savings whittled away. It is the fault of our government and our central bank. We deserve better.


Reuters
10 hours ago
- Reuters
Congo extends cobalt export ban by three months
KINSHASA, June 21 (Reuters) - The Democratic Republic of Congo has extended by three months a ban on exports of cobalt intended to curb oversupply of the electric vehicle battery material, a regulatory agency said on Saturday. The world's top cobalt supplier imposed a four-month suspension on exports in February after prices had hit a nine-year low at just $10 a pound. The ban was due to expire on Sunday. "The decision has been taken to extend the temporary suspension due to the continued high level of stock on the market," the Authority for the Regulation and Control of Strategic Mineral Substances' Markets (ARECOMS) said in a statement. ARECOMS said it expected to announce a subsequent decision to either modify, extend or terminate the suspension before the new three-month window closes in September. Reuters reported on Friday that Congolese authorities were considering extending the ban as they explored how to distribute quotas for shipments of cobalt among mining companies. A proposal to implement quotas has backing from miners including Glencore (GLEN.L), opens new tab, the world's second-largest cobalt-producing company. But Glencore's position differs from that of the number one producer, China's CMOC Group ( opens new tab, which has lobbied for the ban to be lifted.


The Sun
15 hours ago
- The Sun
Exact date 6.7million households on Universal Credit to get inflation-busting payment boost
MILLIONS of households on Universal Credit will receive a bumper pay rise within months. Almost seven million households claiming the benefit will see their standard allowance rise by more than inflation from April 2026. 1 This change will become law, pending Parliamentary approval of the DWP's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, which was introduced earlier this week. This means 6.7 million households could receive around £750 more per year in cash by 2030. The standard allowance is the basic payment for households on Universal Credit. Currently, single people under 25 receive £316.98 a month and couples under 25 get £497.55 a month. Meanwhile, single people over 25 get £400.14 a month and couples aged 25 or older receive £628.10 a month. Normally, benefit payments go up each spring to help people keep pace with the rising cost of living, like food, fuel, and household bills. These increases typically match the consumer price index of inflation from the previous September. But, the government has claimed that the four-year benefit freeze from 2015 to 2019 has caused millions of payments to fall behind rising inflation. As a result, from April 2026, the government wants to hike the standard allowance by more than inflation over the next four years. This means that by 2030, the amount a claimant receives will be almost 5% higher than if it had only risen to match inflation. Rachel Reeves delivers the Spring Budget in full The increases will be worked out by adding the inflation rate from the previous September, plus an extra fixed boost. These extra percentages will be set at: 2.3% for 2026-27 3.1% for 2027-28 4.0% for 2028-29 4.8% for 2029-30 The government wants to help more people return to work and rely less on incapacity benefits, which face huge cuts. To save £5billion a year by 2030, it plans to make PIP assessments stricter and freeze the extra health payments in Universal Credit for those unable to work. The government believes that raising the standard allowance for everyone while reducing the health top-up will make returning to work more financially worthwhile and possible. What is the Universal Credit standard allowance? UNIVERSAL Credit is a welfare scheme which was designed to combine several of the old "legacy benefits The standard allowance is the basic monthly payment provided to individuals or families who qualify. The amount you receive depends on your age and whether you're single or in a couple: Single, under 25: £316.98 Single, 25 or over: £400.14 Couple, both under 25: £497.55 Couple, one or both 25 or over: £628.09 You may also be eligible for additional amounts if you have children, have a disability or health condition, or need help with housing costs. Meanwhile, around 400,000 households receiving income-related employment and support allowance (ESA) are being urged to make the move to Universal Credit. The government is progressing with its plans to transfer all legacy benefit claimants onto Universal Credit, through a process referred to as "managed migration." The managed migration process officially began back in July 2022 after a successful pilot in July 2019. Since then, households receiving one of five legacy benefits, have been receiving postal notifications outlining the steps required to transition to Universal Credit. Upon receiving a migration letter, claimants are given up to three months to make the switch. Failure to act within this timeframe could result in the loss of existing benefits. The latest data from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) shows that 381,440 individuals lost their benefits after failing to act within this time frame. Initially, the government planned to transfer all ESA claimants to Universal Credit by the end of 2028. However, this deadline was brought forward to March 2026. How can I get help claiming Universal Credit? As well as benefit calculators, anyone moving from ESA to Universal Credit can find help in a number of ways. You can visit your local Jobcentre by searching at There's also a free service called Help to Claim from Citizen's Advice: England: 0800 144 8 444 Scotland: 0800 023 2581 Wales: 08000 241 220 You can also get help online from advisers at Will I be better off on Universal Credit? ANALYSIS by James Flanders, The Sun's Chief Consumer Reporter: Around 1.4million people on legacy benefits will be better off after switching to Universal Credit, according to the government. A further 300,000 would see no change in payments, while around 900,000 would be worse off under Universal Credit. Of these, around 600,000 can get top-up payments (transitional protection) if they move under the managed migration process, so they don't lose out on cash immediately. The majority of those - around 400,000 - are claiming employment support allowance (ESA). Around 100,000 are on tax credits, while fewer than 50,000 each on other legacy benefits are expected to be affected. Those who move voluntarily and are worse off won't get these top-up payments and could lose cash. Those who miss the managed migration deadline and later make a claim may not get transitional protection. The clock starts ticking on the three-month countdown from the date of the first letter, and reminders are sent via post and text message. There is a one-month grace period after this, during which any claim to Universal Credit is backdated, and transitional protection can still be awarded. Examples of those who may be entitled to less on Universal Credit include: Households getting ESA and the severe disability premium and enhanced disability premium Households with the lower disabled child addition on legacy benefits Self-employed households who are subject to the Minimum Income Floor after the 12-month grace period has ended In-work households that worked a specific number of hours (e.g. lone parent working 16 hours claiming working tax credits Households receiving tax credits with savings of more than £6,000 (and up to £16,000) Either way, if these households don't switch in the future, they risk missing out on any future benefit increase and seeing payments frozen.