Washington considering ‘rare earths' deal with African state
The US is exploring a deal with the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to access its natural resources in exchange for American security assistance, the Financial Times has reported.
Violence escalated in the resource-rich country's eastern provinces in January, with M23 group militants seizing several key cities. Last month, Prime Minister Judith Suminwa estimated that the conflict had caused 7,000 fatalities.
The DRC has repeatedly accused neighboring Rwanda of backing the militants, claims that have been echoed by the West. Rwanda has consistently denied the allegations.
On Saturday, the FT cited unnamed sources as saying that US-DRC discussions about a potential mineral deal have intensified recently, 'although several obstacles remain' and they are 'at a relatively early stage.'
Last month, Tina Salama, a spokesperson of DRC President Felix Tshisekedi, wrote on X that Kinshasa 'invites the USA, whose companies source strategic raw materials from Rwanda, materials that are looted from the DRC and smuggled to Rwanda while our populations are massacred, to purchase them directly from us the rightful owners.' Rwanda has denied any involvement in mineral smuggling.
Prior to that, DRC Senator Pierre Kanda Kalambayi sent a letter to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying that 'The United States is well-positioned to forge an enduring partnership with the DRC – a nation that possesses over $24 trillion in untapped reserves of critical minerals.'
Among the resources mentioned are cobalt, which is of particular interest to the aerospace and defense sectors, as well as of lithium, tantalum, and uranium.
Kinshasa would expect Washington to step up military cooperation, as well as efforts to train and equip the DCR military, Kalambayi stated.
Since assuming office in January, US President Donald Trump has expressed interest in gaining access to overseas deposits of crucial minerals, most notably in Greenland and Ukraine.
A minerals deal with Kiev was expected to be signed last week. However, a heated exchange between Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky and Trump at the White House put the process on hold. Trump accused Zelensky of disrespect, ingratitude for past US aid, reluctance to seek peace with Russia, and 'gambling with World War III.' He was asked to leave and return only when he was ready for serious talks.
In a post on X on Tuesday, Zelensky indicated that Ukraine was prepared to proceed with the arrangement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
The end of Israeli exceptionalism
Israel has now been at war with its neighbours for nearly two years. The latest round began with the Hamas-led terrorist attack on 7 October 2023. In response, West Jerusalem launched an aggressive military campaign that has since expanded to touch nearly every country in the region. The escalation has placed the Jewish state at the centre of Middle Eastern geopolitics once again – this time, dragging in Iran, a state that had long avoided direct confrontation through strategic caution. Now, even Tehran finds itself under fire, with US backing making the stakes far higher. Iran is left facing a grim choice between the bad and the very bad. But this isn't about Iran. It's about Israel, a country that has for decades functioned as the West's forward operating base in the Middle East. Since the mid-20th century, Israel has enjoyed a privileged position – a bridgehead of Western power in a volatile region, while also deeply enmeshed in its politics and rivalries. Its success has rested on two pillars: the unshakable support of the United States, and its own internal capacity for innovation, military strength, and a unique social model. That second pillar, however, has weakened. The clearest sign is in demographics: Israel is facing rising negative migration. In 2024, some 82,700 people are expected to leave the country – a 50% increase from the year before. It is not the unskilled or disengaged who are leaving, but the young and educated. The people who are needed to sustain a modern state are choosing to go. Of course, Israel's troubles are not unique. Like many developed nations, it is struggling under the weight of a decaying neoliberal economic system. The pandemic made things worse, exposing the fragility of the model and encouraging a shift toward a 'mobilisation' mode of governance – rule through emergency and constant readiness for conflict. In the West more broadly, war and geopolitical confrontation have become a way to delay or disguise necessary systemic reform. In this regard, Israel has become a laboratory for the West's emerging logic: permanent war as a method of governance. In the autumn of 2023, the Israeli establishment embraced this fully. Conflict became not just a tactic, but a way of life. Its leaders no longer see peace as the goal, but war as the mechanism for national unity and political survival. In this, Israel mirrors the broader Western embrace of conflict with Russia and China – proxy wars chosen when actual reform is off the table. At the global level, nuclear deterrence limits how far such wars can go. But in the Middle East, where Israel wages war directly, those constraints don't apply. This allows war to serve as a pressure valve – politically useful, even as it becomes self-destructive. But even war has limits. It cannot indefinitely mask economic decay or social unrest. And while conflict tends to cement elite power – even among incompetent leadership – it also drains national strength. Israel is now consuming more and more of its own resources to sustain this permanent state of war. Its social cohesion is fraying. Its once-vaunted model of technological and civic progress is no longer functioning as it did. Some in West Jerusalem may dream of 'reformatting' the Middle East – reshaping the region through force and fear. If successful, it could buy Israel a few decades of security and breathing room. But such outcomes are far from guaranteed. Crushing a neighbour doesn't eliminate the threat; it merely brings distant enemies closer. Most importantly, Israel's deepest problems aren't external – they are internal, rooted in its political and social structures. War can define a state, yes. But such states – Sparta, North Korea – tend to be 'peculiar,' to put it mildly. And even for them, war cannot substitute for real diplomacy, policy, or growth. So has Israel, always at war, truly developed? Or has it simply been sustained – politically, militarily, and financially – as a subdivision of American foreign policy? If it continues down this path of permanent conflict and right-wing nationalism, it risks losing even that status. It may cease to be the West's bridge in the Middle East – and become something else entirely: a militarised garrison state, isolated, brittle, and increasingly article was first published by the magazine Profile and was translated and edited by the RT team.
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
Americans irritated by Zelensky's top aide
A growing number of American officials – from Capitol Hill to the Trump administration – are expressing deep frustration with Vladimir Zelensky's powerful chief of staff, Andrey Yermak, according to a Politico report. Yermak's repeated visits to Washington since the escalation of the conflict with Moscow in 2022 have been seen as increasingly unproductive and even counterproductive, according to ten people familiar with his interactions, the publication reported on Thursday. US officials describe Yermak as 'abrasive,' prone to pressing unclear demands, and 'uninformed' about the realities of US politics. His most recent trip to DC earlier this month included poorly attended briefings, last-minute meeting cancellations – including with Secretary Rubio – and confusion among aides about his purpose in town. 'We don't know why he's here,' one of the sources said, while another Trump administration source branded him a 'bipartisan irritator.' The Biden White House reportedly tolerated Yermak as an acceptable source of friction during wartime. But with President Donald Trump pressuring Kiev toward diplomacy, he now appears to have become an 'existential liability' for Ukraine, according to another source. Yermak dismissed the criticism, telling Politico through a spokesperson: 'If that means being considered 'challenging' by others — so be it,' stressing that he is focused on championing Ukraine's sovereignty regardless of political niceties. However, Yermak was reportedly 'extremely frustrated' with the results of his visit, according to another Politico source. One person described the trip as 'a disaster from the Ukrainian perspective.' Yermak is a former film producer whom Zelensky – an actor turned politician – brought into government in 2019. The 53-year-old has previously been described as 'Zelensky's right-hand man' and 'Ukraine's real power broker,' with some officials even claiming that he de facto runs the country.
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
Kremlin comments on possible US strike on Iran
Washington would make a serious mistake by deciding to attack Iran, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told RT. Direct involvement by the US in the ongoing conflict between the Islamic Republic and Israel will only worsen the situation in the region, he warned. Tensions escalated last week after Israel launched a large-scale bombing campaign against Iran, claiming that Tehran was close to producing a nuclear bomb. Iran dismissed the accusations and retaliated with waves of drone and missile strikes. The two nations have continued exchanging strikes ever since. US President Donald Trump has made direct threats against Tehran in recent days, demanding its complete surrender and abandonment of its nuclear program. The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that an attack plan on Iran had already been secretly approved, but the president said the publication 'has no idea.' The White House added that Trump would make a final decision 'within the next two weeks.' 'Moscow believes it is a wrong move,' Peskov said when asked about Russia's response to the hypothetical action. 'This is a step that is bound to lead to further escalation, a major escalation, and would only complicate the situation in the region.' 'Such conflicts are capable of setting the entire region on fire,' Peskov warned. He added that Russia remains ready and willing to assist in resolving the conflict. When asked about the possibility of regime change in Iran at the hands of the US or Israel, Peskov echoed President Vladimir Putin's view that such discussions are unacceptable. 'We believe that it is unacceptable to have such conversations, and even more so to take such actions,' he said. The Russian president reportedly has a 'complete picture' of the situation and the potential to act as a mediator, according to Peskov. He noted that Putin has been in contact with both Israel and Iran, and was one of the few world leaders to speak with both countries' leaders after hostilities began. However, Peskov admitted there is currently 'little ground' for talks as both Israel and Iran remain determined to continue the fighting. Putin himself told journalists at a late-night Q&A on Wednesday that Moscow has proposed several compromise frameworks to all parties – including the US, Israel, and Iran. He also suggested that a potential settlement could include mutual security guarantees protecting both Iran's right to peaceful nuclear technology and Israel's right to security.
