Cardinals wrap up pre-conclave meetings unsure about who should follow Francis

Cardinals have wrapped up their pre-conclave meetings, trying to identify a possible new pope who could follow Pope Francis and make the 2,000-year-old Catholic Church credible and relevant today, especially to young people.
Although they come from 70 different countries, the 133 cardinal electors seem fundamentally united in insisting that the question before them is not so much whether the church gets its first Asian or African pontiff, or a conservative or progressive.
Rather, they say the primary task facing them when the conclave opens on Wednesday is to find a pope who can be both a pastor and a teacher, a bridge who can unite the church and preach peace.
Cardinals leave at the end of a Mass on the eighth of nine days of mourning for Pope Francis in St Peter's Basilica at the Vatican (Alessandra Tarantino/AP)
'We need a superman!' said Cardinal William Seng Chye Goh, the 67-year-old archbishop of Singapore.
ADVERTISEMENT
It is indeed a tall task, given the sexual abuse and financials scandals that have harmed the church's reputation and the secularising trends in many parts of the world that are turning people away from organised religion.
Add to that the Holy See's dire financial state and often dysfunctional bureaucracy, and the job of being pope in the 21st century seems almost impossible.
Francis named 108 of the 133 electors and selected cardinals in his image.
But there is an element of uncertainty about the election since many of them did not know one another before last week, meaning they have not had much time to suss out who among them is best suited to lead the 1.4-billion-strong church.
The cardinals held their last day of pre-conclave meetings on Tuesday morning, during which Francis' fisherman's ring and his official seal were destroyed in one of the final formal rites of the transition of his pontificate to the next.
ADVERTISEMENT
The cardinals will begin trying to find the new pope on Wednesday afternoon, when those 'princes of the church' walk solemnly into the Sistine Chapel to the meditative chant of the 'Litany of the Saints'.
They will take their oaths of secrecy under the daunting vision of heaven and hell in Michelangelo's 'Last Judgment', hear a meditation from a senior cardinal, and then cast their first ballot.
Cardinal Fridolin Ambongo Besungu arrives to celebrate Mass at his titular church, San Gabriele Arcangelo all'Acqua Traversa, three days before the conclave (Andrew Medichini/AP)
Assuming no candidate secures the necessary two-thirds majority, or 89 votes, the cardinals will retire for the day and return on Thursday.
They will have two ballots in the morning and then two in the afternoon, until a winner is found.
Asked what the priorities of the cardinal electors were, Cardinal Goh told reporters this week that the number one issue was that the new pope must be able to spread the Catholic faith and 'make the church relevant in today's time. How to reach out to young people, how to show a face of love, joy and hope'.
ADVERTISEMENT
– A pope for the future
But beyond that, there are some real-world geopolitical concerns to take into consideration.
The Catholic Church is growing in Africa and Asia, both in numbers of baptised faithful and vocations to the priesthood and women's religious orders.
It is shrinking in traditionally Catholic bastions of Europe, with empty churches and the faithful formally leaving the church in places like Germany, many citing the abuse scandals.
'Asia is ripe for evangelisation and the harvest of vocations,' said the Reverend Robert Reyes, who studied in the seminary with Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle, the Filipino prelate considered a contender to be the first Asian pope.
Vatican employees sign the oath of secrecy for all those assigned to the conclave during a ceremony in the Pauline Chapel (Vatican Media/AP)
But should the pope necessarily reflect the new face of the Catholic Church, and inspire the faithful especially in the parts of the world where the momentum of growth is already under way?
ADVERTISEMENT
Pope Francis was the first Latin American pope, and the region still counts the majority of the world's Catholics.
Indian Cardinal Oswald Gracias, the retired archbishop of Mumbai, said the church needs to become more Asian, culturally and spiritually.
The 'centre of gravity of the world is shifting toward Asia,' he said. 'The Asian church has much to give to the world.'
At 80, Gracias will not be participating in the conclave, but India has four cardinal-electors, and overall Asia counts 23, making it the second-biggest voting bloc after Europe, which has 53 (or likely 52, given that one is not expected to participate for health reasons).
One of the big geopolitical issues facing the cardinals is China and the plight of the estimated 12 million Chinese Catholics there.
Under Francis, the Vatican in 2018 inked a controversial agreement with Beijing governing the appointment of bishops, which many conservatives decried as a sellout of the underground Chinese Catholics who had remained loyal to Rome during decades of communist persecution.
Cardinals Ruben Salazar Gomez, left is flanked by Cardinal Luis Jose Rueda Aparicio as they arrive in the New Hall of the Synod at the Vatican (Gregorio Borgia/AP)
The Vatican has defended the accord as the best deal it could get, but it remains to be seen if Francis' successor will keep the policy.
– The church in Africa
According to Vatican statistics, Catholics represent 3.3% of the population in Asia, but their numbers are growing, especially in terms of seminarians, as they are in Africa, where Catholics represent about 20% of the population.
Cardinal Fridolin Ambongo Besungu, the archbishop of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, said he is in Rome to elect a pope for all the world's Catholics.
'I am not here for the Congo, I am not here for Africa, I am here for the universal church. That is our concern, the universal church,' he told reporters.
'When we are done, I will return to Kinshasa and I will put back on my archbishop of Kinshasa hat and the struggle continues.'
Cardinal Jean-Paul Vesco, the chatty French-born archbishop of Algiers, Algeria, lamented last week that there had not been enough time for the cardinals to get to know one another, since many of them had never met before and hail from 70 countries in the most geographically diverse conclave in history.
'Every day, I say to myself, 'Ah! Oh my God! There we have it!'' he said.
– The role of the Holy Spirit
For the cardinals, there is also the belief that they are guided by the Holy Spirit.
Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle, centre, takes part in the procession carrying the body of Pope Francis to St Peter's Basilica at the Vatican (Alessandra Tarantino/AP)
There is a famous quote attributed to then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger in 1997, in comments to a Bavarian television station.
The future Pope Benedict XVI said the Holy Spirit acted like a good educator in a conclave, allowing cardinals to freely choose a pope without dictating the precise candidate.
'Probably the only assurance he offers is that the thing cannot be totally ruined,' Cardinal Ratzinger reportedly said.
'There are too many contrary instances of popes the Holy Spirit would obviously not have picked.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CNN

an hour ago

• CNN

Trump's Iran strike is a huge win for Netanyahu but the endgame is as unclear as ever

The smile on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's face was impossible to hide. Minutes after President Donald Trump announced that the US had bombed three of Iran's nuclear facilities, Netanyahu effusively praised the American leader as someone whose decisions could lead the region to a 'future of prosperity and peace.' Since Israel launched its attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities and other targets, Netanyahu and the country's other political echelon had been careful not to be perceived as dragging Trump into another war in the Middle East. In the end, the US joining the campaign – and taking credit for the results – is arguably an even bigger success for Netanyahu, who brought the world's superpower into what had been Israel's mission. Netanyahu has talked about the threat of Iran for much of his political career, parading out visual aids on occasion – like a cartoon of a bomb at the UN General Assembly in 2012 – to help his audience. But the longstanding criticism was that Netanyahu's rhetoric was all bark, no bite. For all the talk of the threat Iran posed to Israel and the wider region, Netanyahu never pulled the trigger on a major military operation. Instead, he authorized sporadic high-risk, high-reward operations from Israel's Mossad spy agency, including the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists and the stealing of the country's nuclear archive. But Iran's nuclear program survived largely unscathed, and Netanyahu was left for years with no measurable achievement against an issue he came to see as an existential threat to Israel. The last 10 days rewrote the script. Aviv Bushinsky, who worked with Netanyahu during his first term in the late-90s, called the attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities 'no doubt his greatest accomplishment.' Israel's initial waves of attacks and its establishment of air superiority over Iran began a clear string of military successes, which the Trump administration ultimately joined. 'Netanyahu is being seen as someone who managed to orchestrate this operation from the beginning to the end,' Bushinsky told CNN. The scale of the success is so great that Bushinsky argued it made Netanyahu's one of the country's top two or three leaders since the country's founding in 1948. The 'stain' of failing to stop the Hamas-led attack on October 7 remains with Netanyahu, Bushinsky said, but the attack on Iran has immediately become part of his legacy. 'Netanyahu has a signature of taking down the nuclear capabilities of the Iranians,' he said. Now Netanyahu immediately faces another challenge: deciding what to do next. At least publicly, the US has made it clear that it sees the Iran strikes as finished as long as Iranian forces don't attack US troops in the region. But after starting the campaign alone, Israel is still pressing its advantage. Israel Defense Forces (IDF) spokesman Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin said Sunday that Israel was preparing for the 'campaign to prolong.' Before the weekend, Israel had conducted the military campaign against Iran on its own, and it has since carried out more strikes after the US bombing of the nuclear facilities. 'If the war was designed to obliterate Iran's nuclear infrastructure, and the president of the United States says they destroyed the three facilities, then why isn't Israel announcing mission accomplished?' former Israeli consul general Alon Pinkas asked rhetorically. 'This military solution for everything is fine, as long as you understand that it is aligned with political goals. And I don't see them.' Since the start of the Trump administration, the friction between Trump and Netanyahu has been on full display as the White House pursued a series of steps in the region that left Israel sidelined. Trump's first trip to the Middle East blew right past Israel without stopping, the American president signed a ceasefire deal with the Houthis in Yemen that cut out Israel, and he surprised Netanyahu in April by announcing nuclear negotiations with Iran. The US decisions raised questions about whether Netanyahu was able to handle a second Trump administration, especially one with a far more vocal isolationist wing. All of those questions disappeared in a puff of bunker buster smoke in the aftermath of the US strikes as the two leaders heaped praise on one another The issue of Iran had broad consensus among much of Israeli society, with a majority of the country viewing a nuclear Iran as an existential threat. According to a survey from the Israel Democracy Institute done before the US strikes, approximately 70% of Israelis supported the campaign against Iran, while nearly as many believe it was right to launch the strikes without a guarantee of US involvement. That level of support has drawn accolades for Netanyahu even from his detractors. 'You don't have to like Netanyahu in order to admit yes, he achieved something,' said Ben-Dror Yemini, a political analyst for Israel's prominent Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper. But the current moment – one in which Israel and the US have carried out punishing strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities – requires sensitive diplomacy and a willingness to back off the military successes that appear to have come so easily, Yemini said. 'We have to be clever,' Yemini told CNN. 'I hope Netanyahu will be clever in order to understand where we are right now.' The decision to act and the decision to wait each involved its own elements of risk, according to former US Ambassador to Israel Dan Shapiro. 'There's risk in any use of forces and certainly in a major decision like this one from the United States,' Shapiro said. 'But there was risk in not acting and leaving Iran within weeks of a nuclear bomb at the time of their choosing.' But having made the critical choice to go after Iran's nuclear facilities, Shapiro said it would be a grave mistake to assume the conflict is over. 'I don't think we should consider this to be the end of the story. Much depends on how we manage the aftermath of this so that the outcome is positive,' Shapiro told CNN. Asked if the Middle East was safer now than it was before US involvement in the strikes against Iran, Shapiro said it depends on whether the bombing campaign destroyed or significantly damaged Iranian nuclear facilities. It also depends on how Iran chooses to respond, which he said requires the international community to lead Iran away from escalation. 'It's too early to celebrate the achievement.'

Yahoo

4 hours ago

• Yahoo

Iran almost certainly will retaliate against the U.S. But when, where and how?

What comes next? Iran − and its hard-line supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei – are almost certainly going to strike back in response to historic U.S. military strikes on three of its suspected nuclear facilities. But if history is any guide, that response could happen at any time − and anywhere, and in any form, former U.S. intelligence officials and diplomatic experts say. 'Missiles, militias and acts of hostage-taking – that's their go-to' range of options, the Biden administration coordinator for the Middle East, Brett McGurk, said in an interview June 21 with CNN. 'I suspect Iran will have to do something.' More: Who is Iran's Supreme Leader? Like Trump, he controls a real-estate empire But like others wondering about Iran's intentions, McGurk said he has no idea what the Islamic regime's next step will be. That's especially the case given President Donald Trump's warning that any retaliatory act will be met with even greater force than what he says obliterated the uranium enrichment sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. 'If peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill,' Trump said in an address to the nation late June 21. 'Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes.' In an early morning briefing June 22, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said he hoped the scope of the surprise attack would persuade Tehran's mullahs not to retaliate. "We believe that will have a clear psychological impact on how they view the future," Hegseth said, "and we certainly hope they take the path of negotiated peace." Former Trump National Security Adviser John Bolton told USA TODAY that Iran 'may well retaliate, but this is the kind of decision that can fragment the regime at the top, and ultimately bring it down.' "Right now, Iran has one military adversary which is pounding it and its terrorist proxies with great success,' Bolton said in reference to Israel, which also had attacked Tehran's suspected nuclear sites. 'Is Iran really eager to add the United States as a second military adversary? Some Iranian ayatollahs and military flag officers may not be suicidal.' Former top U.S. counterterrorism official Javed Ali agreed that a strong Iranian counterpunch is 'possible but very risky, and the situation is very different than in January 2020 when the U.S. and Iran last attacked each other" after the first Trump administration assassinated Iranian military leader Qasem Soleimani. On Jan. 8, 2020, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched ballistic missiles at Iraqi bases housing U.S. troops, wounding more than 100 service members. Karim Sadjadpour, a Carnegie Endowment for International Peace senior fellow and longtime Iran watcher, said it's 'unlikely the Iranians will see it the same way' as Trump and Hegseth 'This is more likely to open a new chapter of the 46-year-old US-Iran war than conclude it,' Sadjadpour, who regularly advises senior U.S., European and Asian officials on Iran, said in a series of posts on X. More: Iran warns it 'reserves all options' after US airstrikes on nuclear sites: Recap But he, too, said many of Iran's retaliatory options are 'the strategic equivalent of a suicide bombing' given the potential response by the United States and Israel. The Tehran regime, with its powerful military and numerous proxy fighting forces in the Middle East, could strike U.S. troops in the region, experts and former officials said. It also could attack U.S. embassies and civilian targets frequented by Americans, they said, and launch cyberattacks against crucial infrastructure in the United States. Another option: attacking oil facilities in the Persian Gulf or mining the Strait of Hormuz to shut down international shipping lanes, with the help of the Houthi militias that Tehran trains and funds in Yemen. Iran also could launch terrorist attacks using Hezbollah fighters that have been blowing up U.S. military and civilian targets in the region since the 1983 bombings of the U.S. Embassy and a Marine Corps barracks in Lebanon that killed 300 people. And Iran could launch some of its vast arsenal of missiles against Israel, though that would risk having many of them shot down by Israel's Iron Dome defense apparatus. Tehran also has some of the world's most accomplished cyberwarriors, and it could cause chaos and disruption by attacking U.S. critical infrastructure. That risk is both credible and growing, said Rear Adm. Mark Montgomery, a former executive director of the Cyberspace Solarium Commission, after a 700% increase in similar attacks on Israeli infrastructure. 'If you ask me, 'Is it possible?' Yes,' said Montgomery, a senior fellow at the McCrary Institute at Auburn University. 'Is it likely? Yes.' Much, if not all, of Iran's response will be dictated not by its civilian government but by Khamenei, the Iranian cleric who has served as the second supreme leader of Iran since 1989. Khameini is considered one of the longest-serving dictators in the world, who rules the oil-rich Islamic republic with an iron fist. But he's also a savvy politician who knows his regime 'may not survive the blowback' that a response would trigger, Sadjadpour said The U.S. intelligence community has, for years, made similar assessments. In its most recent annual assessment, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence concluded Tehran would continue to use its loose consortium of like-minded terrorist and militant actors, known as the 'Axis of Resistance,' against the U.S. and Israel. Although Iran has seen some of its proxies destroyed or degraded, 'these actors still represent a wide range of threats' that could be mobilized in a counterattack, the ODNI said. But the ODNI also concluded that Khamenei 'continues to desire to avoid embroiling Iran in an expanded, direct conflict with the United States and its allies.' Though Khamenei is not considered reckless, he has also painted himself into a corner by saying publicly that Tehran would never cave in to U.S. pressure. On June 18, he warned the United States that it would suffer 'irreparable damage' if it took military action against Iran amid its conflict with Israel. As a result, Sadjadpour said, 'his survival instincts and defiant instincts are in great tension now.' Iran's response undoubtedly will be hampered by lethal attacks on its military and proxy forces by Washington and Israel in recent years, beginning with the first Trump administration's targeted killing of Soleimani. Soleimani's death prompted 'real and specific threats' and assassination plots against Trump and former Trump administration officials on U.S. soil, including Bolton. More: Trump says US intel briefed him about how Iran wants to assassinate him to sow discord in US Tehran's regional power also has been eroded by the death of its strongest regional ally, Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad. Israel has decimated its most powerful proxy, Hezbollah, by a series of military strikes and assassinations. And Trump, since returning to office, has launched numerous military strikes on Yemen's Houthis. For now, the United States will be watching and waiting to see if Khameini and Iran decide to launch some kind of 'one-off' unilateral response, or a coordinated effort with – or through – one of those proxy groups – or a third, Hamas. 'We have to be ready for that,' McGurk said. Like others, McGurk said it's also possible that Iran will stand down and heed Trump's warning not to retaliate or face a potential regime-ending response. 'I hope that's where this goes,' McGurk said. 'We've got to be prepared for the worst while hoping and working for the best. … These next few days will be quite something. These are unprecedented times.' By 1 a.m. Washington time on June 22, Iran had already fired its first retaliatory missile, according to media reports citing the Israel Defense Forces. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Iran is likely to retaliate for U.S. strikes. But when, where and how?

Bloomberg

5 hours ago

• Bloomberg

How a Cornered Iran Could Wreak Havoc on Global Oil Trade

US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities are sharpening the focus on one option Iran has yet to really deploy in the conflict: disrupting regional oil trade, especially through the critical Strait of Hormuz. Iran has over the years threatened multiple times to shut the strait — a narrow stretch of water through which a fifth of the world's oil supply flows each day. But in practice, Tehran has numerous less-drastic options at its disposal to calibrate a response that hurts its enemies while limiting the impact on allies like China, its biggest oil buyer.