Bell Canada urges federal government to overturn CRTC decision stalling critical investment
This news release contains forward-looking statements. For a description of the related risk factors and assumptions, please see the section entitled "Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Statements" later in this news release.
MONTRÉAL, June 20, 2025 /CNW/ - Robert Malcolmson, Executive Vice President and Chief Legal and Regulatory Officer of Bell Canada, today issued the following statement in response to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) ruling upholding its August 2024 decision to allow large well-capitalized communications incumbents to resell services on each other's fibre networks:
"Bell Canada is profoundly disappointed that the CRTC has reaffirmed its decision to allow Canada's large telecommunications companies to resell services on each other's fibre networks – despite overwhelming opposition from the vast majority of Internet service providers, many suppliers, unions, municipalities, provinces and consumer advocacy groups.
This decision has already significantly undermined the business case for future network expansion. As a direct result, Bell has reduced its capital expenditures by $500 million in 2025 alone and by over $1.2 billion since the CRTC's initial decision in November 2023. The CRTC policy will continue to have major negative impacts well into the future.
Today's decision calls into question the regulator's ability to objectively evaluate its original decision on this issue. The CRTC has again chosen to ignore the relevant evidence that was before it. The CRTC's claim that there was no 'evidence demonstrating a causal link' between the decision and Bell's previously announced reduction in fibre investment, affecting more than 1 million homes and businesses in more than 150 communities, is simply false.
The evidence provided to the CRTC by Bell alone included previous statements from Bell's CEO to investors as well as confidential internal documents, such as communications among Bell's most senior executives, business case modelling, and network planning scenarios. It is extremely concerning that the CRTC did not even acknowledge this evidence in its decision.
Today's ruling underscores the need for quick action from the federal government to overturn the CRTC decision and implement policies that will unlock billions of dollars of private sector investment in critical infrastructure that will drive Canada's future economic growth.
As Bell and others have consistently warned, this policy is stalling investment, diminishing network resiliency and leaving rural, remote and Indigenous communities behind. Over the long-term, it will reduce competition as smaller Internet service providers, who cannot offer the same promotions and bundles as large players, are squeezed out of the market. It will also reduce the effectiveness of government subsidy programs, as large carriers will have little incentive to build infrastructure to the benefit of their main competitors.
Canada's future prosperity depends on nation-building investments from strong Canadian companies – investments that will power and transform Canada's economy. Had the CRTC reversed course, it would have unlocked billions of dollars in new investment from Bell and other industry players.
A recent report from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) found that the telecommunications sector contributed an estimated $87.3 billion to Canada's GDP last year, including $57.2 billion in productivity gains and business enablement beyond the industry itself. 1 Sustaining this level of economic impact requires a regulatory environment that supports continued investment.
As the CRTC continues to pursue the wrong policy at the wrong time, the federal government must act to ensure we have the right policies to build, connect and grow Canada."
About Bell
Bell is Canada's largest communications company, 2 providing advanced broadband Internet, wireless, TV, media and business communication services. Founded in Montréal in 1880, Bell is wholly owned by BCE Inc. To learn more, please visit Bell.ca or BCE.ca.
Through Bell for Better, we are investing to create a better today and a better tomorrow by supporting the social and economic prosperity of our communities. This includes the Bell Let's Talk initiative, which promotes Canadian mental health with national awareness and anti-stigma campaigns like Bell Let's Talk Day and significant Bell funding of community care and access, research and workplace leadership initiatives throughout the country. To learn more, please visit Bell.ca/LetsTalk.
Media inquiries:
Investor inquiries:
Richard Bengian
[email protected]
Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements made in this news release are forward-looking statements, including statements relating to Bell Canada's expected reductions in capital expenditures and other statements that are not historical facts. All such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the "safe harbour" provisions of applicable Canadian securities laws and of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties and are based on several assumptions which give rise to the possibility that actual results or events could differ materially from our expectations. These statements are not guarantees of future performance or events, and we caution you against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release describe Bell Canada's expectations at the date of this news release and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. Except as may be required by applicable securities laws, Bell Canada does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this news release, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Bell Canada's expected reductions in capital expenditures are subject to certain risks and uncertainties and are based on certain assumptions including, without limitation, the prevailing regulatory environment as well as Bell Canada's financial performance and available liquidity to fund capital expenditures. For additional information on assumptions and risks underlying certain of our forward-looking statements made in this news release, please consult BCE Inc.'s (BCE) 2024 Annual MD&A dated March 6, 2025, BCE's 2025 First Quarter MD&A dated May 7, 2025 and BCE's news release dated May 8, 2025 announcing its financial results for the first quarter of 2025, filed with the Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities (available at sedarplus.ca) and with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (available at SEC.gov). These documents are also available at BCE.ca.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Cision Canada
4 hours ago
- Cision Canada
Bell Canada urges federal government to overturn CRTC decision stalling critical investment
This news release contains forward-looking statements. For a description of the related risk factors and assumptions, please see the section entitled "Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Statements" later in this news release. MONTRÉAL, June 20, 2025 /CNW/ - Robert Malcolmson, Executive Vice President and Chief Legal and Regulatory Officer of Bell Canada, today issued the following statement in response to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) ruling upholding its August 2024 decision to allow large well-capitalized communications incumbents to resell services on each other's fibre networks: "Bell Canada is profoundly disappointed that the CRTC has reaffirmed its decision to allow Canada's large telecommunications companies to resell services on each other's fibre networks – despite overwhelming opposition from the vast majority of Internet service providers, many suppliers, unions, municipalities, provinces and consumer advocacy groups. This decision has already significantly undermined the business case for future network expansion. As a direct result, Bell has reduced its capital expenditures by $500 million in 2025 alone and by over $1.2 billion since the CRTC's initial decision in November 2023. The CRTC policy will continue to have major negative impacts well into the future. Today's decision calls into question the regulator's ability to objectively evaluate its original decision on this issue. The CRTC has again chosen to ignore the relevant evidence that was before it. The CRTC's claim that there was no 'evidence demonstrating a causal link' between the decision and Bell's previously announced reduction in fibre investment, affecting more than 1 million homes and businesses in more than 150 communities, is simply false. The evidence provided to the CRTC by Bell alone included previous statements from Bell's CEO to investors as well as confidential internal documents, such as communications among Bell's most senior executives, business case modelling, and network planning scenarios. It is extremely concerning that the CRTC did not even acknowledge this evidence in its decision. Today's ruling underscores the need for quick action from the federal government to overturn the CRTC decision and implement policies that will unlock billions of dollars of private sector investment in critical infrastructure that will drive Canada's future economic growth. As Bell and others have consistently warned, this policy is stalling investment, diminishing network resiliency and leaving rural, remote and Indigenous communities behind. Over the long-term, it will reduce competition as smaller Internet service providers, who cannot offer the same promotions and bundles as large players, are squeezed out of the market. It will also reduce the effectiveness of government subsidy programs, as large carriers will have little incentive to build infrastructure to the benefit of their main competitors. Canada's future prosperity depends on nation-building investments from strong Canadian companies – investments that will power and transform Canada's economy. Had the CRTC reversed course, it would have unlocked billions of dollars in new investment from Bell and other industry players. A recent report from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) found that the telecommunications sector contributed an estimated $87.3 billion to Canada's GDP last year, including $57.2 billion in productivity gains and business enablement beyond the industry itself. 1 Sustaining this level of economic impact requires a regulatory environment that supports continued investment. As the CRTC continues to pursue the wrong policy at the wrong time, the federal government must act to ensure we have the right policies to build, connect and grow Canada." About Bell Bell is Canada's largest communications company, 2 providing advanced broadband Internet, wireless, TV, media and business communication services. Founded in Montréal in 1880, Bell is wholly owned by BCE Inc. To learn more, please visit or Through Bell for Better, we are investing to create a better today and a better tomorrow by supporting the social and economic prosperity of our communities. This includes the Bell Let's Talk initiative, which promotes Canadian mental health with national awareness and anti-stigma campaigns like Bell Let's Talk Day and significant Bell funding of community care and access, research and workplace leadership initiatives throughout the country. To learn more, please visit Media inquiries: Investor inquiries: Richard Bengian [email protected] Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements made in this news release are forward-looking statements, including statements relating to Bell Canada's expected reductions in capital expenditures and other statements that are not historical facts. All such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the "safe harbour" provisions of applicable Canadian securities laws and of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties and are based on several assumptions which give rise to the possibility that actual results or events could differ materially from our expectations. These statements are not guarantees of future performance or events, and we caution you against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release describe Bell Canada's expectations at the date of this news release and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. Except as may be required by applicable securities laws, Bell Canada does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this news release, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Bell Canada's expected reductions in capital expenditures are subject to certain risks and uncertainties and are based on certain assumptions including, without limitation, the prevailing regulatory environment as well as Bell Canada's financial performance and available liquidity to fund capital expenditures. For additional information on assumptions and risks underlying certain of our forward-looking statements made in this news release, please consult BCE Inc.'s (BCE) 2024 Annual MD&A dated March 6, 2025, BCE's 2025 First Quarter MD&A dated May 7, 2025 and BCE's news release dated May 8, 2025 announcing its financial results for the first quarter of 2025, filed with the Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities (available at and with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (available at These documents are also available at
Globe and Mail
5 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
CRTC upholds decision allowing large telecoms to resell internet services on each other's networks
Canada's telecom regulator has upheld its decision allowing large telecoms to resell internet services by piggybacking on competitors' networks, siding with arguments made by Telus Corp. versus most of its competitors in the latest development of a multi-year, industry-wide policy debate. Under the fibre wholesale framework, designed to improve internet affordability and competition, the government previously required three carriers - BCE Inc.'s Bell Canada, Telus and SaskTel - to give competitors access to their fibre networks at regulator-set rates. Given the steep cost of building infrastructure, the framework was designed to give new market entrants an opportunity to enter the market and offer competitive internet services and prices. From 2024: Ottawa orders CRTC review of Rogers, Bell and Telus reselling services on each other's networks The latest question under review was whether, in addition to smaller regional companies, the country's three largest carriers would be allowed to take advantage of the mandated rates as well. In its decision, issued Friday morning, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission held firm on its previous decision that Telus, Bell and Rogers are allowed to expand into each others' fibre networks where they don't already have their own infrastructure. In order to overturn the CRTC's decision, those not in favour of incumbent access had to prove there was 'substantial doubt' as to whether the CRTC had made errors in its original policy allowing the sharing. But the regulator said that they had not done so. 'While the Commission appreciates the significance of the applicants' claims, the balance of the evidence does not establish a substantial doubt as to the correctness of the Commission's decision. Therefore, the Commission declines to vary the Final Decision,' the CRTC said in its decision. Opinion: The CRTC has failed to protect the Canadian broadcasting industry This means that Telus, whose network is primarily in the west, can expand over Bell's networks in the east, and vice versa. Rogers has infrastructure spanning the country, so it is excluded from accessing the mandated rates near-nationally. The company has some fibre, but it is not yet being required to grant competitors access to it. The CRTC said that several thousand Canadian households have already purchased new internet plans offered by dozens of providers using the access enabled by the framework. 'Changing course now would reverse the benefits of this increased competition and would prevent more Canadians from having new choices of ISPs in the future,' the CRTC said. The decision may not yet be final. Cabinet has the power to make changes to the regulator's decision itself, or require that the CRTC review its policies again, until August 13. Their involvement is considered a last hope by those in favour of blocking incumbent access. CRTC considers standardized labels in hearing on home internet plans The country's biggest telecoms have been facing increasing pressure in recent years, given an overall market slowdown, reduced immigration meaning fewer new customers, and high debt loads. The country's biggest telecoms have been facing pressure due to high debt loads and the mature market's overall slowdown. The policy debate created a rare industry split that saw nearly every one of the country's largest telecoms in agreement and only one major carrier, Telus, split from the rest. Telus argued it should be allowed to resell on SaskTel and Bell's network, saying that where an incumbent operates out-of-territory, it is acting as a new competitor with the potential to disrupt the status quo, to the benefit of consumers. Bell, Rogers, Cogeco Inc., Quebecor Inc., Bragg Communications Inc.'s Eastlink, Teksavvy and the Competitive Network Operators of Canada - representing independent companies - all argued that the regulator should bar the three incumbents from mandated access, disagreeing that Telus would be a 'new entrant.' Bell and Rogers said allowing the incumbents to resell internet would put a chill on network investment, and Rogers added that none of the large incumbent players need to be enabled by mandated wholesale access to compete. Others argued that because of their scale and ability to bundle internet with other services, incumbents like Telus operating in their networks could swallow up smaller competition and lead to more market consolidation in the long term. Telus called this view an attempt to stifle competition. The Competition Bureau, for its part, supported incumbent sharing out-of-network, noting the risks of increased market coordination and possible negative impacts on small competitors but saying the benefits outweighed the risks. But the CRTC found that industry projections suggested allowing the incumbents to share networks would only have a 'modest near-term impact' on regional competitors, despite applicants' claims that the sharing would severely harm those providers. It also found that internet providers would be encouraged to continue investing in their networks, given continued pressure to compete, the cost savings of operating fibre compared to copper networks, and other protections included in the decision. It said it will monitor the use of the framework and will make adjustments if necessary. The federal government has yet to finalize the access rates.
Cision Canada
5 hours ago
- Cision Canada
CRTC Decision Threatens Investments in Critical Telecom Infrastructure: Canadian Telecommunications Association
Government Action Needed Following CRTC Decision on Wholesale Internet Access OTTAWA, ON, June 20, 2025 /CNW/ - The Canadian Telecommunications Association is deeply disappointed by the CRTC's decision to uphold its earlier ruling that allows Canada's largest national telecommunications companies—Bell, Rogers, and TELUS—to operate as resellers on the networks of their competitors, including smaller regional providers. If this decision stands, it will lead to reduced investments in network infrastructure, including in rural and remote communities, and ultimately less choice for Canadians. The Association is calling on the Government of Canada to overturn the CRTC's decision and prohibit the three largest providers from reselling service over their competitors' networks. "Canada's telecom networks are more than just wires and cell towers. They are vital, strategic infrastructure that powers our economy, connects our communities, and are critical to our security and safety," said Robert Ghiz, President and CEO, Canadian Telecommunications Association. "Today's decision sends the wrong signal to the companies that build networks. It will reduce investment, undercut smaller regional providers who took on the risk of building their own networks, and ultimately harm the very consumers the policy claims to protect." In 2024 alone, Canada's telecom industry invested over $12 billion in network infrastructure—representing 18% of industry revenues and a higher share than counterparts in most developed countries. These investments support not only faster speeds and broader coverage, but also the economic vitality of rural and remote communities where building is hardest and most expensive. The Commission's decision threatens to reverse that progress. It allows the country's largest network operators to use competitors' network infrastructure at regulated rates rather than continuing to expand and upgrade their own networks. This disincentivizes new builds, harms smaller regional providers, and weakens Canada's ability to deliver next-generation connectivity to all Canadians, especially rural Canadians. Facilities-based competition—not resale—is the foundation of a sustainable and innovative telecom sector. It is what drives network improvements, affordability, and service differentiation. "In a time of economic uncertainty and growing digital dependence, now is not the time to undermine investment," said Mr. Ghiz. "Canadians deserve a resilient, future-ready telecom system built on strong, sustained competition among those committed to building and improving our nation's networks. The Government of Canada must act now to ensure that network builders continue to build."
