Claim govt setting up polytechs to fail

The government has been accused of setting up polytechnics to fail after the revelation that almost one in 10 jobs have been cut in the past year.
Papers released under the Official Information Act showed staff figures at Te Pukenga dropped from 10,480 in 2023 to 9625 in 2024, a cut of about 8%.
While the data did not break down into individual units, the information comes as Otago Polytechnic looks to slim down, announcing changes to the Capable NZ programme last week, and cutting nine courses before last Christmas.
Te Pukenga was formed in 2020 by bringing together the country's 16 institutes of technology and polytechnics (ITPs).
Green MP Francisco Hernandez said the staff cuts had been demoralising.
"The damage of the government's destructive reforms to Te Pūkenga and their underfunding of our tertiary sector are being felt right across the country, with nearly one in 10 jobs being lost at Te Pūkenga.
"These cuts will not just hurt staff and students but also the regional communities that depend on Te Pūkenga to deliver skills, jobs and training to our regions."
He said communities were already feeling the impacts. Recent reports of cuts to Capable NZ were on top of cuts already made to courses such as the horticulture, health and English language programmes.
"Instead of forcing critical polytechs to cut staff and programmes to stay afloat under the government's new model, the government needs to recognise the valuable work that polytechs and universities do and give them the resourcing and support they need to succeed."
The government introduced legislation breaking up Te Pukenga last month, but it is not yet known which polytechnics would stand alone and which would be absorbed into the federation model.
Vocational Education Minister Penny Simmonds said the government asked the Tertiary Education Commission to work with Te Pūkenga to support polytechnics in reviewing their operations — an exercise that "really should have taken place when Te Pūkenga was established", she said.
"While the operational decisions are made by the institutions themselves, I believe it's appropriate that each polytechnic is taking the steps needed to ensure their long-term viability.
"These decisions are never easy, but they are necessary to build a more stable and sustainable vocational education system."
Asked about the potential loss of institutional memory at the polytechnics, Ms Simmonds conceded it could be an issue.
"We need to ensure that as we transition into a new system, we retain the best of what our institutions and people have built over time.
"That's why we are taking a measured approach to reform — ensuring there is continuity, while also creating a system that is better aligned with the needs of learners, employers, and regional economies."
Tertiary Education Union assistant general secretary Daniel Benson-Guiu said the "real concern" was that nothing had been formally established to replace Te Pukenga.
Several "strategic" courses had already faced cuts, he said.
"We would like to see a vocational education system that can cater for all of the communities.
"With these cuts, the government is setting itself up to fail."
Ms Simmonds said the reforms to the system would make it more efficient.
"It will be up to each polytechnic to manage its workforce in a way that reflects its financial situation, enrolment patterns, and local training needs.
"Under the new system, I expect institutions to be more accountable and better equipped to make prudent, forward-looking staffing and operational choices."
matthew.littlewood@odt.co.nz

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

RNZ News

2 days ago

• RNZ News

Ministers quizzed over bottom trawling, freshwater, axing Predator Free 2050

Environment Minister Penny Simmonds has defended deep cuts to environment funding at a sometimes scrappy scrutiny hearing, which also saw opposition MPs challenging the government over weakening freshwater rules, bottom trawling near Auckland, and axing funding for Predator Free 2050. Green MP Lan Pham asked Simmonds what risks she saw from about $650 million in cuts to funding for the Ministry for the Environment across the previous two Budgets. "When you compare that to an annual budget of $528m in total, you san see that it's significant," Pham said. "Minister, you've been overseeing those cuts and some of the most damaging legislative changes we've seen in decades." Simmonds said budgets for the ministry were decreasing anyway under previous government. "We are doing things like using the much greater waste levy to go across a range of environmental issues," she said. "It's about getting value for money." "This country could not afford to keep spending the way it had been," Simmonds said. Labour MP Rachel Brooking said none of the government's strategic priorities for reforming environment laws talked about improving the environment and asked if a better environment was Simmonds' goal. "Your strategic priority document talks about improving the RMA (Resource Management Act) to be more efficient and effective but... there is nothing here about improving the environment." Brooking said waste management policies had been weakened. "You're consulting on removing the national bottom lines for freshwater," Brooking said. "These are all things that seem to go in the opposite direction from improving the environment." Simmonds said she did want a better environment but was focused on action. "The question highlights very clearly the difference between ideological statements and commentary and getting things done, and that's what this government is about, getting things done, getting product stewardship schemes in place, getting waste funding used to improve the environment," she said. The government reallocated much of the money from waste levies from purely funding waste-cutting schemes towards paying for broader environmental work in the Budget. "You're quite right, we haven't indulged in ideological rhetoric of the previous government but we are getting on with doing the things [that will help]." Simmonds was asked by Pham for the evidence behind her statements that the balance had swung too far in favour of the environment. "We are managing risk, risk if there is not economic growth, risk if there is not sufficient housing... there is risk of not having development and there is risk of any development that we do on the environment," Simmonds said. In a scrappy exchange over conservation, Minister Tama Potaka was asked about the decision to axe funding for Predator Free 2050 as well as changes to the protection of the Hauraki Gulf from bottom trawling. Green MP Celia Wade Brown said axing funding for Predator Free would only shift the work to an "overstretched" Department of Conservation and asked how volunteers were expected to keep investing their time in culling pests when the government was pulling funding out of conservation. Labour's Priyanca Radhakrishan asked Potaka how he squared the decision to disestablish funding for the Predator Free 2050 company with his statements a few months earlier about its crucial role in eradicating pests. Potaka said the Department of Conservation had had to go through a process of cost savings just as "nearly all portfolios have had to give up something". "One of those choices was to remove the funding for Predator Free 2050 Limited and disestablish that company." He said there had been some duplication between the company and the department, and "a lot of the mahi" could be undertaken by the department. "I think it is important to delineate between opinions and facts," Potaka said. "There is a strong opinion that we are not committed to Predator Free 2050 (the goal) and that is entirely inaccurate, we are consulting right now on a predator free strategy and... we have allocated a significant amount of money." He said 14 jobs would be lost from the closure of the company but some might be redeployed. Potaka accused Brooking of being "out of control" during a heated conversation about wildfire protection rules sparked by a herd of Wapiti deer, a type of elk, which the government recently decided to protect in Fiordland National park. Brooking asked Potaka if Wapiti ate the undergrowth of native forests in National Parks. "Yes, they do eat undergrowth but they also contribute significantly to tourism and getting the economy moving again and we're really thrilled to have partnered with the [Fiordland] Wapiti Foundation... and others," Potaka said. Potaka said he was carrying out conservation reforms because of some "archaic arrangements". Brooking asked, "Is the New Zealand Conservation Authority an archaic arrangement?" and noted it was included in the proposed reforms. "I've never said that, and you imputing that I did I think is out of control," Potaka said. Brooking could be heard saying "settle" during Potaka's answer. Potaka also defended changes to bottom trawling in the Hauraki Gulf under questioning from Green co-leader Marama Davidson, which became another heated discussion. Davidson asked if the minister had sought advice from officials "about the impact of continuing to allow for disruptive trawling and how that will impact on his purview of protection of ecosystems and indigenous species, and what further extra cost or work it might take to fix up that destruction?". "I'm not aware of any extensive advice that has been proffered to me on trawl corridors in the Hauraki Gulf but what I am aware of is extensive advice that's very celebratory of our tripling of the protection [area] in the Hauraki Gulf, which we are going to follow through," Potaka said. On freshwater, Associate Environment Minister Andrew Hoggard said he knew of a vegetable grower producing a quarter of the country's leafy greens who was operating illegally because the council couldn't give him a consent. He defended the proposal to get rid of national bottom lines for water quality. "I'm aware of catchments where water is coming out of nature at quality worse than bottom lines." "We can't just live with no jobs, no economy in an idyllic little paradise." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Scoop

2 days ago

• Scoop

Commemorating World Refugee Day

Immigration New Zealand (INZ) commemorates World Refugee Day—an opportunity to recognise the courage, resilience, and contributions of refugees to New Zealand. Established by the United Nations in 2001, this year's theme, 'solidarity with refugees,' calls on us to honour refugees not just with words, but with meaningful action. This year, INZ proudly marks a significant milestone: New Zealand has reached its 2024/25 Refugee Quota Programme target, reaffirming our commitment to providing protection and opportunity to some of the world's most vulnerable people. Qemajl Murati, Head of Refugee Quota Programme, says the milestone is a testament to the strength of New Zealand's resettlement system and the collective effort behind it. 'New Zealand's refugee resettlement programme is globally unique,' says Qemajl Murati. 'At our Māngere Refugee Resettlement Centre,Te Āhuru Mōwai o Aotearoa, we provide newly arrived refugees with essential services during their first five weeks—English language classes, health and mental health support, community orientation, and tailored resettlement plans to help them thrive in their new communities.' INZ works closely with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) to offer safe pathways through the Refugee Quota Programme. Additional support is provided through the Refugee Family Support Category and the Community Organisation Refugee Sponsorship pilot. This work is guided by New Zealand's Refugee Resettlement Strategy, which envisions former refugees and their families settling successfully, achieving their goals, and thriving in New Zealand. 'Achieving this vision wouldn't be possible without the dedication of our partners—non-government organisations, community groups, volunteers, and other government agencies,' says Qemajl Murati. 'We also acknowledge our staff, many of whom come from refugee backgrounds themselves, who work tirelessly to create a safe and welcoming environment for those starting a new life here.' Echoing this message, Karen Gulick, Acting Representative of the UNHCR Multi-Country Office for Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific, adds: 'At a time of global uncertainty, with record numbers of forcibly displaced people and critical funding gaps, it's more important than ever to show solidarity with refugees. New Zealand's warm welcome and continued support for global humanitarian efforts are powerful examples of solidarity in action.' For more information on Immigration New Zealand's work to support refugees:

Scoop

3 days ago

• Scoop

Supported Learners Carry The Burden Of Minister's Delusion

Minister of Vocational Education Penny Simmonds told the Education and Workforce Select Committee yesterday that she thinks most polytechnics are overstaffed, describing what she considers high staffing levels as 'abysmal'. Te Hautū Kahurangi | Tertiary Education Union is pointing to cuts currently proposed to educational opportunities for supported learners as a prime example of the human cost of her delusion. Weltec and Whitieria are proposing to disestablish both of their existing Level 1 Certificates in Skills for Living; and Skills for Learning and Working for Supported Learners. Along with the four full time equivalent staff members, the greater Wellington region will lose the only programmes of this kind for learners with disabilities if the proposal goes ahead. Kaiwhakahaere | Organiser Drew Mayhem says 'there is considerable demand for both these programmes within the community. Student numbers have not decreased. These cuts are purely due to the government's inability and unwillingness to provide a level of baseline funding that will avoid further contraction of the sector before it is in a permanent death spiral.' Te Pou Ahurei | National Secretary Sandra Grey says 'the Minister uses an 18:1 student/staff ratio as a blunt instrument to measure viability but this misses the point of why we need polytechnics. If 12 disabled young people want to gain work skills in Porirua, why wouldn't we fund that? By her reckoning those 12 young people miss out on the future they deserve and 12 businesses miss out on great workers.' 'Furthermore, the Minister's Education and Training (Vocational Education and Training System) Amendment Bill, if passed, will only further destabilise the provision of vocational education, as the bill provides no clarity on what the future of the sector looks like beyond closures and possible privatisation. New Zealanders deserve better. They were promised regional autonomy but instead are having our tertiary providers hollowed out from within.' To have your say on the Bill, click here for the TEU's submission guide, and here to make your submission by midnight tonight.