14,000-year-old ice age 'puppies' were actually wolf sisters that dined on woolly rhino for last meal
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
A pair of 14,000-year-old "puppies" found melting out of the permafrost in Siberia have undergone genetic testing, proving they were actually wolf cub sisters and not domesticated dogs as was previously assumed.
"Whilst many will be disappointed that these animals are almost certainly wolves and not early domesticated dogs, they have helped us get closer to understanding the environment at the time, how these animals lived, and how remarkably similar wolves from more than 14,000 years ago are to modern day wolves," Anne Kathrine Runge, an archaeologist at the University of York in the U.K., said in a statement.
Runge led an international team of researchers in analyzing the bones and DNA of the puppies. Their study, published Thursday (June 12) in the journal Quaternary Research, revealed that the mummified "puppies" were wolf littermates that died somewhere between 14,100 and 15,000 years ago.
The remarkably preserved and mummified animal carcasses were found in 2011 and 2015 near the rural settlement of Tumat in far northern Siberia. Along with the two canines, scientists discovered woolly mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius) bones that appeared to have been cut and burned by humans. This archaeological evidence suggested that the canines could have been very early domesticated dogs that were seeking food from humans — such as a piece of woolly rhino meat that was discovered in the belly of one of the animals.
Dogs and wolves are closely related, but they diverged genetically between 20,000 and 40,000 years ago. Humans then domesticated wild dogs around 15,000 years ago. But the title of the world's oldest domesticated dog has never been clearly claimed. One possibility is the Bonn-Oberkassel dog, found in Germany in a human burial dated to 14,200 years ago.
Because they were older than this, the ice age Tumat canines were previously assumed to be among the oldest domesticated dogs in the world. But DNA testing in 2019 showed that they likely belonged to a now-extinct wolf population unrelated to today's dogs.
Related: Frozen in time: 10 prehistoric animals found trapped in ice
In the new study, Runge and colleagues built on the 2019 study by analyzing genetic data from the animals' gut contents and investigated chemical "fingerprints" in their bones, teeth and tissue to learn more about the famous cubs.
The cubs — genetically determined to be sisters — were only a couple of months old when they died, but both were eating solid food, including meat from a woolly rhino (Coelodonta antiquitatis) and a small bird called a wagtail — but not from a mammoth, which may have indicated that ice age humans had fed them leftover scraps. Additionally, both were still being nursed by their mother, the researchers discovered.
"It was incredible to find two sisters from this era so well preserved, but even more incredible that we can now tell so much of their story, down to the last meal they ate," Runge said in the statement.
But there's no indication that the Tumat pups got this food directly from humans or even from scavenging humans' mammoth butchering sites, according to the researchers. The sisters "inhabited a diverse landscape that was also occupied by humans," they wrote, but "this study found no evidence that can conclusively link them to human activities."
RELATED STORIES
—Missing 'body' of ice age animal carving finally found — but nobody knows what the animal is
—Mini ice age was final death blow to Roman Empire, unusual rocks in Iceland suggest
—Ancient humans waited out last ice age in frigid Central Europe, surprising study finds
How the cubs died remains a mystery, as well. Given the cubs' lack of injuries, they may have been resting in an underground den when it collapsed, trapping them inside, the researchers wrote in the study.
"Today, litters are often larger than two, and it is possible that the Tumat Puppies had siblings that escaped their fate," study co-author Nathan Wales, an ancient-DNA specialist at the University of York, said in the statement. "There may also be more cubs hidden in the permafrost."
Additional research on the Tumat cubs may yet produce more information about ancient wolves and their evolutionary line, Wales noted in the statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ancient ‘Dragon Man' DNA reveals mysterious human relative
It's the end of a nearly 100-year-old mystery. Using DNA-analysis, scientists have identified an ancient human relative nicknamed "Dragon Man", new research showed. It all started with a 146,000-year-old skull found by a labourer in the northern Chinese city of Harbin in 1933. The man left his treasure at the bottom of a well, where it remained hidden until his family uncovered the fossil in 2018 and donated it to science. Experts initially failed to match the cranium with any known prehistoric human species. In 2021, they dubbed the discovery Homo longi or 'Dragon Man', a name derived from from Heilongjiang, or Black Dragon River, the province where the it was found. Now, scientists have managed to extract genetic material and proteins by scrapping tooth plaque from the fossil's mouth, an unusual technique that proved successful. The findings of the research were published in Cell and Science Analysis confirmed the skull belongs to the Denisovans, an extinct species of archaic human beings found across Asia. The species was first identified in 2010 thanks to DNA tests on small, fossilised bone fragments, but no complete Denisovan skull had ever been found. Related 4,000-year-old tablets found in Iraq reveal ancient red tape Archaeologists discover oldest section of China's Great Wall, dating back nearly 3,000 years The new discovery will make it easier for experts to identify further Denisovan fossils and seen the species finally assigned a scientific name. The new research might also give clues regarding the species' appearance. The Harbin skull is large, with strong and low brow ridges, similar to Neanderthals and modern humans. Qiaomei Fu, a professor at the Institute of Paleontology and Palaeoanthropology in Beijing which led the new research wrote: "the finding that the human DNA of the Harbin specimen is better preserved in the dental calculus than in the dense bones, including the petrous bone, suggests that dental calculus may be a more valuable source for investigating DNA in Middle Pleistocene hominins."
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Skull Discovered in 1933 Sheds Light on Ancient Human Species
Two new studies published in Science and Cell have shed light on a mysterious skull found in China, and in the process have provided insight into the lives of a previously little-known ancient human. The 'Dragon Man' skull was found in Harbin City, China, during an excavation in 1933. The skull, which was terrifically well-preserved, was kept by the discovering archaeologist because he feared authorities would confiscate the skull. In 2018, shortly before he died, the archaeologist donated the skull for analysis. The Dragon Man's skull was much larger than modern humans, bearing an expanded brain volume as well as deep, prominent eyebrow ridges, a flat face, a wide nose, and no chin. Scientists estimated that the person lived roughly 146,000 years ago. After studying molecules from a molar in the skull, Qiaomei Fu, a geneticist at Beijing's Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, determined that it likely belonged to a Denisovan. Denisovans have long been a mystery to scientists, as they only had the pinkie bone of an adolescent, which was discovered in 2010 and rumor genes fitfully present in modern humans available to study. Though DNA has long shown that Denisovans were interbred with Neandertals and modern humans, with as much as five percent of their genetic composition existing in people from Melanesia and other Southeast Asian regions, this is the first Denisovan skull which has been discovered. 'After 15 years, we give the Denisovan a face,' Fu told National Geographic. 'It's really a special feeling, I feel really happy.' In their study published in Cell, the researchers added: "This is the first detailed morphological blueprint for Denisovan populations.' The discovery redefines the history of human evolution in South Asia, with researchers now able to investigate how the Denisovans' contributions to ancient culture still reverberate in the modern day. "Having a well-preserved skull like this one allows us to compare the Denisovans to many more different specimens found in very different places,' Bence Viola, an archaeologist not involved with the study, told New Scientist. 'We can finally think about their adaptations to climate, mobility, and even social behavior.' Skull Discovered in 1933 Sheds Light on Ancient Human Species first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 20, 2025
Gizmodo
20 hours ago
- Gizmodo
New Study Backs Controversial Claim of 23,000-Year-Old Human Footprints in New Mexico
New research suggests the first Americans weren't who we thought they were. In 2021, researchers working in New Mexico published a paper that contributed to what remains one of the most controversial topics in American archaeology. The study describes human footprints in White Sands National Park dating to between 23,000 and 21,000 years ago, making them the oldest-known footprints in North America. This challenges long-held beliefs that the first North Americans were the Clovis people—named after artifacts found near Clovis, New Mexico—who arrived between 13,000 and 13,500 years ago during a relatively warm window near the end of the last Ice Age. Because footprints can't be directly dated, researchers estimated the age of these trace fossils—between 23,000 and 21,000 years old—by radiocarbon dating seeds found in the layers above and below the tracks. While critics continue to argue that the ancient seeds do not accurately represent the site's age, new research published earlier this week in the journal Science Advances adds further support to the original findings. As such, the seeds of the aquatic plant Ruppia cirrhosa are making another appearance at center stage in this debate. 'The issue of the arrival of the first Americans has long been contentious and the record from the White Sands locality generated considerable debate focused on the validity of the dating,' wrote the researchers in the new study, including University of Arizona archaeologist and geologist Vance Holliday, a co-author of the 2021 paper. 'This paper presents the results of an independent stratigraphic study with new associated dates, largely from a third source of radiocarbon that supports the initial dating.' In short, Holliday and his colleagues radiocarbon-dated new organic material, including Ruppia seeds, from new geological layers associated with the footprints. The team's new age estimate for the layers containing the footprints is between 23,000 and around 17,000 years ago, which overlaps with the original estimate of between 23,000 and 21,000 years ago. Radiocarbon dates of organic-rich sediments in one of the study areas, Gypsum Overlook, align more closely with the original estimate, yielding between around 22,400 years ago and 20,700 years ago. If the footprints are 23,000 years old, that means humans arrived in North America before the Last Glacial Maximum—when ice essentially created a barrier from the North Atlantic to the North Pacific coasts around 20,000 years ago. Even if the footprints are just 17,000 years old, that would still suggest that humans arrived in North America before the end of the last Ice Age around 11,700 years ago. 'This is a paradigm shift in the way we think about the peopling of the Americas, and human evolution more widely,' Nicholas Felstead, a researcher from Swansea University's Department of Geography who did not participate in the study, told Gizmodo in an email. 'This all but confirms multiple migration routes into the Americas, other than just the ice-free corridor around 14,000 years ago.' Early humans likely reached the Americas by island-hopping along the Bering Sea and Pacific coast, crossing the massive ice sheets of the Northern Hemisphere, or possibly drifting across the Pacific or Atlantic Oceans, Felstead explained. According to Karen Moreno, a paleobiologist at Austral University of Chile, the new research aligns with evidence from South American sites such as Monte Verde, Pilauco, Pedra Furada, and Arroyo del Vizcaino. The evidence from these sites suggest a human presence dating back 16,000 to 20,000 years ago, if not 30,000 years ago. 'South American evidence has certainly been overlooked, and I'm happy to know that North American work is finally pointing out to the direction our research in the South was supporting,' Moreno, who wasn't involved in the new study, told Gizmodo in an email. A study published in April, however, seems to call into question—once again—the validity of radiocarbon dating organic matter from the White Sands site. The main point of contention centers on what's known as the hard water effect. The effect occurs when aquatic plants like Ruppia draw carbon from groundwater, unlike terrestrial plants, which absorb carbon from the atmosphere, David Rachal, a geoarchaeologist with Vieja Consulting and a co-author of the April study, explained to Gizmodo in an email. The carbon in groundwater consists of very old dissolved limestone, which makes aquatic plants appear much older than they actually are in radiocarbon dating. As such, the hard water effect is 'baked in' to both the Ruppia seeds and other organic material from the mud layers in question, Rachal explained. 'According to their model, if the Ruppia grew within the site under these uniform-like conditions, shallow water, very well aerated, then the hard water effect is not a problem,' he said. Rachal and his colleague's model, however, indicates that the plant did not grow at the site, but rather washed into it. 'There's zero physical evidence that the plant grew within the site. And if it didn't grow within the site, the hard water effect is still there.' As such, any other samples that match the Ruppia seeds dates are also problematic, he added. Even without considering the hard water effect, 23,000-year-old footprints still raise more questions than it answers, according to Ben Potter, a University of Alaska Fairbanks anthropologist who also did not participate in the study. Namely, because they left no other known traces for 10,000 years. 'We need actual human-produced artifacts to understand the identity, behaviors, and potentially fate of these populations,' he told Gizmodo in an email. Ultimately, today's study represents the most recent volley in the highly contentious first-Americans debate. The ball is once again in the opposing side's court, and I'm sure their response will not take long.
