Republicans put healthcare cuts front and center to advance agenda
House Republicans are putting cuts to Medicaid at the top of their list of budget cuts to help pay for their wide-ranging agenda that spans tax cuts, energy production and border security.
Republicans are eyeing changes to how much the federal government, as opposed to states, will contribute to Medicaid expenditures, an amount called the federal medical assistance percentage, or FMAP.
Republicans see Medicaid as a program rife with fraud and abuse and have long sought to rein in its spending.
The joint federal-state program provides health coverage for more than 70 million people, with the federal government covering anywhere from 50 to about 75 percent of the costs for traditional Medicaid but 90 percent for states that expanded coverage under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
The House Budget Committee on Thursday considered a plan that would instruct the Energy and Commerce Committee – which has jurisdiction over Medicaid – to find $880 billion in savings over the next 10 years.
Possible changes that Republicans are floating include capping Medicaid spending on a per capita basis at a potential savings of $900 billion per year; rolling back the enhanced federal matching rate for ACA expansion states to save $561 billion; and lowering the 50 percent floor for the traditional Medicaid population, for a savings of up to $387 billion.
The latter change would primarily affect wealthier states like California and New York, but every state would bear the brunt of reduced federal spending, forcing difficult tradeoffs.
Rep. Russ Fulcher (R-Idaho) told The Hill that Republicans have to go after Medicaid for cuts because 'that's where the money is.'
The GOP's budget reconciliation bill is designed to move much of President Trump's legislative agenda through special rules that sidestep a Senate filibuster. The bill could add trillions to deficits without off-setting tax hikes or spending cuts to pay for it.
'We got the word that we've got to come up with $900 billion [in cuts]. There's only one place you can go, and that's Medicaid. That's where the money is,' Fulcher said. 'There's others – don't get me wrong. But if you're going to get to $900 billion, something has to be reformed on the Medicaid front.'
'[FMAP] will clearly be debated,' he added.
Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) said his conference was considering how Medicaid 'formulas are applied in terms of state-by-state.'
'Whether you have more state administration, you can save money. There are things we can do that don't go directly touching benefits, but that's what we're having conversations about on the spending side,' he said.
Asked during an interview on C-SPAN Tuesday what a Republican re-envisioning of U.S. health insurance programs would look like, Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), a member of the Freedom Caucus, responded: 'Re-envisioning is [to] block granting dollars to the states. Let them decide how it wants to be allocated. [And it's] getting illegals off any federal program, including Medicaid.'
'It's not cutting Medicare – it's reforming it,' he added.
Republicans are also considering establishing work requirements for Medicaid. An expansion of the Child Tax Credit failed to pass last year because it didn't include work requirements, among other reasons.
Certain groups of people in the Republican proposal wouldn't have to work in order to get health coverage through Medicaid, including pregnant women, primary caregivers, people with disabilities, and full-time students.
'With respect to Medicaid, we just want to make sure that we're putting in the reforms that most Americans support – things like able-bodied Americans working if they're on Medicaid benefits,' Roy told reporters Tuesday.
Critics of work requirements say they're mostly geared to getting people unenrolled in federal programs rather than increasing work.
'In practice, work requirements result in large levels of unenrollment with no increase in work,' labor economist Kathryn A. Edwards wrote in a recent commentary. 'The work requirement is in fact a paperwork requirement, one onerous enough that people forego help.'
No changes have officially been proposed at this early stage of the budget reconciliation process, but Democrats are sounding the alarm.
'Folks, they are coming after your Medicaid. They are coming after your healthcare period in order to pay for their large tax cuts to billionaires,' House Budget Committee ranking member Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) said Thursday.
The first Trump administration actively encouraged states to implement work requirements, but the plan envisioned by House Republicans would require it nationwide.
In 2018, Arkansas was the first state to implement requirements that people work, volunteer or attend school or job training in order to receive benefits. A federal judge struck the requirement down in 2019, but not before more than 18,000 people lost coverage.
The Congressional Budget Office has found work requirements would save the federal government just $109 billion over a 10-year period while doing little to increase employment. CBO found it would also lead to 1.5 million people losing Medicaid.
A policy brief from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a philanthropy focused on healthcare, found that 'work requirements reduce access to healthcare and health-promoting programs, keep eligible people from acquiring assistance, and drive people deeper into poverty.'
Republicans must also face the political reality that not all GOP lawmakers, especially those in competitive districts, will be on board with severe Medicaid cuts.
The GOP attempt to cut Medicaid spending as part of an Affordable Care Act repeal during Trump's first administration failed, and the ensuing controversy contributed to their loss of the majority in the 2018 midterm elections.
Republicans have only a slim majority in the House and will need every vote to pass the budget resolution on the floor.
They will also face a formidable obstacle in hospitals and health providers who will lobby heavily against any cuts to Medicaid.
'While some have suggested dramatic reductions in the Medicaid program as part of a reconciliation vehicle, we would urge Congress to reject that approach. Medicaid provides health care to many of our most vulnerable populations, including pregnant women, children, the elderly, disabled and many of our working class,' Rick Pollack, president and CEO of the American Hospital Association, said in a statement.
Another potential complicating factor is Trump himself, who recently included Medicaid in the list of programs he vowed not to touch — with a catch.
'We're not going to do anything with that, unless we can find some abuse or waste,' Trump said, vowing to 'love and cherish' Medicaid.
'The people won't be affected. It will only be more effective and better,' Trump said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
26 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful' Bill Gets Slimmed Down in Senate
WASHINGTON—President Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill is getting smaller just as Republicans head into a crucial week, after the Senate's rules arbiter decided several controversial provisions don't qualify for the special procedure the GOP is using to bypass Democratic opposition. The tax-and-spending megabill centers on extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts, delivering on the spirit of his campaign promises to eliminate taxes on tips and overtime, and providing big lump sums of money for border security and defense. Those new costs are partially offset by spending cuts, in particular to Medicaid.
USA Today
27 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump rips Massie over Iran strike comments, threatens to campaign for primary challenger
Massie said his "side of the MAGA base" is made up of "non-interventionists" who are "tired from all these wars." President Donald Trump lashed out at Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, a fellow Republican, over his criticism of U.S. airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites and threatened to campaign for the person running against him in the Republican primary next year. Soon after the military operation amid the Israel-Iran war was announced on June 21, Massie said the move was 'not Constitutional' on X. The day after the strike, Massie said it was 'a good week for the neocons and the military-industrial complex, who want war all the time" on CBS's "Face the Nation." Massie said his 'side of the MAGA base' is made up of 'non-interventionists" who are "tired from all these wars." Trump ripped into the lawmaker shortly afterward saying he was 'not MAGA, even though he likes to say he is.' 'Actually, MAGA doesn't want him, doesn't know him, and doesn't respect him,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on June 22. 'He is a negative force who almost always Votes 'NO,' no matter how good something may be.' Massie and Rep. Ro Khanna, D-California, had also introduced a resolution on June 17 to prohibit U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran war without Congressional approval. Describing the bombings of the three nuclear sites as a 'spectacular military success' Trump called Massie a 'lightweight' congressman who was 'weak and ineffective.' The lawmaker was one of two Republicans who voted against his tax bill in the House of Representatives last month. 'He'll undoubtedly vote against the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill, even though non-passage means a 68% Tax Increase for everybody, and many things far worse than that,' wrote Trump. 'MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague!'
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel says it has destroyed Iran's internal security HQ
Israel's military destroyed the headquarters of Iran's domestic policing arm, expanding its blows beyond Tehran's military and nuclear facilities as it continues to bombard its Middle East rival, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said Wednesday. 'Air Force planes have just destroyed the headquarters of the Iranian regime's internal security — the central suppression arm of the Iranian dictator,' Katz wrote Wednesday in a post on social platform X, according to translation. 'As we promised — we will continue to target symbols of power and strike the ayatollahs' regime everywhere,' he continued. 'The tornado storm continues to strike Tehran.' Iran's internal security operations include the country's massive Basij Resistance Force, which polices dissent in the country. The latest target comes days after Israel launched a surprise attack on Iranian nuclear facilities and military outposts, killing several officials and scientists and setting off retaliatory attacks from Tehran. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has argued that his country's strikes are crucial to ending a nuclear threat from the Islamic republic, which has long maintained that its uranium enrichment program is meant for civilian purposes. President Trump has meanwhile edged closer toward U.S. intervention in the military conflict to back up Israel. 'I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do,' he told reporters Wednesday. 'I can tell you this, that Iran's got a lot of trouble.' 'And they want to negotiate,' the president added, referring to talks with the U.S. to dismantle its nuclear program. 'And I say why didn't you negotiate with me before all this death and destruction.' Despite increasing pressure on Iran amid the conflict, Trump has thus far pushed back on plans to target Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei directly. The president said Tuesday Khamenei would be an 'easy target' but that there are no plans in the works to take him out — 'at least right now.' Iran on Wednesday cautioned the U.S. against intervening, with the supreme leader saying it could lead to an 'all-out war' and pledging to 'never surrender.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
