Ending emergency housing aid cuts a lifeline for domestic violence survivors
For most people, home is a place where they can relax and feel safe. But for people like me who have experienced domestic violence, an abusive home can feel more like a prison. Resources that help survivors escape from violent relationships and quickly find a safe place to live can literally be the difference between life and death.
But right now, we are facing a looming crisis. The Emergency Housing Voucher program, a life-saving rental assistance initiative that has helped over 70,000 households experiencing homelessness or fleeing domestic violence, will run out of funding if the federal government doesn't act quickly.
Loss of the program would push countless survivors back to their abusers, force tens of thousands of people into homelessness and hurt landlords across every state financially.
Back in 2021, during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal government allocated $5 billion to create the Emergency Housing Voucher program. It was the first time that this type of rental assistance was made available to people at immediate risk of homelessness, escaping domestic violence and without a shelter history.
The vouchers not only came with significant rental assistance, which is essential for people living in high-cost cities with low housing vacancies like New York, but they also provided individualized housing navigation. This service, which pairs a voucher recipient with a housing expert to help them quickly find a new apartment, was instrumental in helping me and thousands of others find our homes.
These vouchers have helped house people faster than any other new Department of Housing and Urban Development voucher program — and now, they are at risk.
The Emergency Housing Voucher program was designed to last 10 years, but the funding has been used faster than expected due to the significant increase in rental costs. More than 59,000 households across the country, including thousands of domestic violence survivors, currently rely on the program to afford their homes.
If funding is not continued, many of us would be unable to make rent, forcing us onto the streets, into an overcrowded shelter or back with our abuser. I know it would be a struggle for my family and me, and for voucher holders in different circumstances, it would be an unmitigated, life-threatening disaster. As our country continues to grapple with the worst housing crisis in decades, this is simply not a tenable position.
But the reasons to protect the Emergency Housing Voucher program go beyond the recipients who hold a voucher right now. The success of the program has been, in part, due to landlords willingly participating in the program and renting to voucher holders with the knowledge that the federal government could be trusted to pay their portion of the rent.
In New York State alone, more than 5,700 property owners participate in the Emergency Housing Voucher program. If we cut off funding, landlords won't receive the rent they are owed and will be hurt financially, but also, they may forever lose the trust they had in voucher programs.
It's already incredibly difficult for voucher holders to find an apartment — it took me almost an entire year, even with the help of a housing navigator — and if fewer landlords are willing to take them, their effectiveness will be greatly diminished. As a result, people are likely to stay in shelters even longer, which costs more than vouchers.
Once you've escaped from an abusive relationship, a safe and stable home is a sanctuary. It's a place where you can unwind, heal from the trauma you experienced and begin to rebuild your new life free from violence and coercive control.
Housing literally saves lives — it certainly saved mine. But now, that could all go away.
We must remember that domestic violence can affect anyone, from Republicans to Democrats and everyone in between. Let me be clear: This is not a partisan issue.
We need our elected leaders, from the White House to House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), to stand up and fight for the Emergency Housing Voucher program.
We cannot afford to let almost 60,000 families fall into homelessness. We cannot afford to push domestic violence survivors like me, who depend on vouchers, back to unsafe situations. The federal government must provide additional funding for the Emergency Housing Voucher program and protect survivors.
Daniris Espinal is a domestic violence survivor and an Emergency Housing Voucher program recipient.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
The Question Dividing New Yorkers: Is the City Sinking or Bouncing Back?
Heading into the June 24 primary for mayor, New Yorkers say their city is in trouble. In four recent surveys, majorities said that the quality of life was fair or poor, that they were afraid to ride the subway at night, that housing and child care were unaffordable, and that city government and the public schools were dysfunctional. Yet on a muggy evening in Manhattan's meatpacking district, that pessimism was nowhere to be found. A skateboard ramp the size of a dollar van had been erected on the cobblestone street outside an art gallery, and skateboarders showed off tricks as onlookers with tattoos, baggy pants and stylish scarves shouted encouragement. Inside the exhibition space, a very 'if you know, you know' collection of New Yorkers — graffiti artists, skaters, photographers, musicians — mingled, hugged and laughed in front of huge photographs of a deceased actor slash skateboard legend who was being honored. As the D.J. played a mix of old-school hip-hop and Brazilian lounge music, two bartenders mixed bespoke cocktails made from a small batch spirit splashed with a lime-and-yuzu soda. It certainly didn't feel like a scene from a city in crisis. New York, which was hit hard as the country's epicenter of the Covid pandemic, remains a beacon for people across the country and the world, a destination for immigrants, artists, entrepreneurs and business scions. Watchful outsiders and New Yorkers themselves anxiously question whether the city is 'back' from the troubles of recent years. And every New Yorker could have a different answer about what a comeback looks like — what the city should be, and what it is right now. 'From where I'm sitting, it looks pretty good,' said Lloyd Blankfein, who grew up in public housing in Brooklyn and went on to run Goldman Sachs until his retirement in 2018. He compared the city today with the one of the late 1970s, when the Son of Sam serial killer terrorized locals and the city was on the verge of default. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
San Francisco Chronicle
6 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Former S.F. Mayor London Breed reveals her post-City Hall career plans
Former San Francisco Mayor London Breed has been quiet about her professional plans since she left office in January, but that's starting to change. The Aspen Policy Academy announced Wednesday that Breed and G.T. Bynum, the Republican former mayor of Tulsa, are its first bipartisan 'civic innovation' advisers-in-residence. The academy, a Bay Area-based operation of the Washington, D.C. think tank Aspen Institute, said Breed and Bynum will spend six months mentoring fellows on policy projects, representing the academy at events and working on projects about policy subjects of their choosing. It's not a full-time job, though it does come with a stipend, and Breed is believed to be exploring other unspecified career opportunities as well. Still, the academy's announcement provided the first public indication of how San Francisco's former mayor is spending some of her time following 12 years as an elected official in the city. 'This program is about more than learning how government works — it's about inspiring a new era of civic leadership,' Breed said in a statement released by the academy. Aspen Institute CEO Dan Porterfield said in a statement that mayors 'bring distinctive insights to the work of policymaking given their proximity to the people and communities they serve.' Breed and Bynum 'will be an invaluable resource to future policy leaders,' Porterfield said. The Aspen Institute has connections to Bloomberg Philanthropies, the charitable organization tied to former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg. He was one of Breed's top benefactors when she ran for reelection last year. Breed also appointed a former Bloomberg staffer to the board of supervisors during her final weeks in office. Breed was elected mayor in 2018 and served in the role for more than six years, until she was unseated in November by Daniel Lurie. A native of the city who grew up in public housing in the Western Addition, she was the first Black woman mayor of San Francisco. Her tenure at City Hall was marked by a series of overlapping crises, including the pandemic, which hurt the city's economy and upended the agenda on which she campaigned. Breed won praise for her early response to COVID-19, but her tenure quickly became dominated by public outrage over rampant drug use on city streets and record overdose deaths driven by the rise of fentanyl. As downtown offices emptied out, major retailers fled Union Square and viral videos of brazen property crimes spread online. San Francisco's reputation took a nosedive, further complicating Breed's fight for another term. Her reelection campaign last year centered around a hopeful message, pointing to a drop in reported crime and other developments as evidence that she was leading San Francisco out of its pandemic doldrums. But Lurie, a political outsider who'd never held elected office before, ultimately defeated her by 10 points
The Hill
16 hours ago
- The Hill
Ending emergency housing aid cuts a lifeline for domestic violence survivors
For most people, home is a place where they can relax and feel safe. But for people like me who have experienced domestic violence, an abusive home can feel more like a prison. Resources that help survivors escape from violent relationships and quickly find a safe place to live can literally be the difference between life and death. But right now, we are facing a looming crisis. The Emergency Housing Voucher program, a life-saving rental assistance initiative that has helped over 70,000 households experiencing homelessness or fleeing domestic violence, will run out of funding if the federal government doesn't act quickly. Loss of the program would push countless survivors back to their abusers, force tens of thousands of people into homelessness and hurt landlords across every state financially. Back in 2021, during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal government allocated $5 billion to create the Emergency Housing Voucher program. It was the first time that this type of rental assistance was made available to people at immediate risk of homelessness, escaping domestic violence and without a shelter history. The vouchers not only came with significant rental assistance, which is essential for people living in high-cost cities with low housing vacancies like New York, but they also provided individualized housing navigation. This service, which pairs a voucher recipient with a housing expert to help them quickly find a new apartment, was instrumental in helping me and thousands of others find our homes. These vouchers have helped house people faster than any other new Department of Housing and Urban Development voucher program — and now, they are at risk. The Emergency Housing Voucher program was designed to last 10 years, but the funding has been used faster than expected due to the significant increase in rental costs. More than 59,000 households across the country, including thousands of domestic violence survivors, currently rely on the program to afford their homes. If funding is not continued, many of us would be unable to make rent, forcing us onto the streets, into an overcrowded shelter or back with our abuser. I know it would be a struggle for my family and me, and for voucher holders in different circumstances, it would be an unmitigated, life-threatening disaster. As our country continues to grapple with the worst housing crisis in decades, this is simply not a tenable position. But the reasons to protect the Emergency Housing Voucher program go beyond the recipients who hold a voucher right now. The success of the program has been, in part, due to landlords willingly participating in the program and renting to voucher holders with the knowledge that the federal government could be trusted to pay their portion of the rent. In New York State alone, more than 5,700 property owners participate in the Emergency Housing Voucher program. If we cut off funding, landlords won't receive the rent they are owed and will be hurt financially, but also, they may forever lose the trust they had in voucher programs. It's already incredibly difficult for voucher holders to find an apartment — it took me almost an entire year, even with the help of a housing navigator — and if fewer landlords are willing to take them, their effectiveness will be greatly diminished. As a result, people are likely to stay in shelters even longer, which costs more than vouchers. Once you've escaped from an abusive relationship, a safe and stable home is a sanctuary. It's a place where you can unwind, heal from the trauma you experienced and begin to rebuild your new life free from violence and coercive control. Housing literally saves lives — it certainly saved mine. But now, that could all go away. We must remember that domestic violence can affect anyone, from Republicans to Democrats and everyone in between. Let me be clear: This is not a partisan issue. We need our elected leaders, from the White House to House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), to stand up and fight for the Emergency Housing Voucher program. We cannot afford to let almost 60,000 families fall into homelessness. We cannot afford to push domestic violence survivors like me, who depend on vouchers, back to unsafe situations. The federal government must provide additional funding for the Emergency Housing Voucher program and protect survivors. Daniris Espinal is a domestic violence survivor and an Emergency Housing Voucher program recipient.
