&w=3840&q=100)
Apple executives hold internal talks about buying AI startup Perplexity
Adrian Perica, the company's head of mergers and acquisitions, has weighed the idea with services chief Eddy Cue and top AI decision-makers
Bloomberg
Apple Inc. executives have held internal discussions about potentially bidding for artificial intelligence startup Perplexity AI, seeking to address the need for more AI talent and technology.
Adrian Perica, the company's head of mergers and acquisitions, has weighed the idea with services chief Eddy Cue and top AI decision-makers, according to people with knowledge of the matter. The discussions are at an early stage and may not lead to an offer, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the matter is private.
Such a deal would help Apple develop an AI-based search engine, part of efforts to cope with the potential loss of a longstanding arrangement with Google. That partnership, which involves making Google the default browser on devices, generates roughly $20 billion a year for Apple — and is now under threat from US antitrust enforcers.
To date, Apple executives haven't discussed a bid with Perplexity management. Bloomberg News reported earlier Friday that Meta Platforms Inc. tried to buy Perplexity earlier this year.
'We have no knowledge of any current or future M&A discussions involving Perplexity,' the AI startup said in a statement. Apple declined to comment.
The Perplexity service provides real-time answers to questions using the latest information from the web. If Apple were to engage in talks to buy the startup, such a move likely wouldn't happen until a decision is made in the Google antitrust trial. That's when Apple would know whether its lucrative Google agreement may have to be unwound.
Perplexity recently completed an investment round that valued it at $14 billion. A deal anywhere near that level would be the largest acquisition in Apple's history. The company's biggest transaction until now remains the $3 billion takeover of Beats in 2014 — though Apple made more recent billion-dollar deals for Intel Corp.'s modem unit and a stake in Chinese ride-sharing company DiDi.
After Meta failed to reach an agreement with Perplexity, it bought a 49 per cent slice of Scale AI for $14.3 billion. That deal is part of Meta's attempts to create a so-called superintelligence AI team, which will now include Scale co-founder Alexandr Wang.
Apple and Meta have been waging a broader fight for talent. Meta recently engaged in discussions to hire Daniel Gross, the co-founder of AI company Safe Superintelligence Inc. While the discussions between Meta and Gross are advanced, Apple has attempted to persuade him to join it instead.
In 2013, Gross sold a startup named Cue to Apple. That purchase helped form the basis of some early AI features in iOS, the operating system for the iPhone. And one of Gross' Cue co-founders, Robby Walker, oversaw the Siri voice assistant until this year. Walker is now leading an Apple project dubbed Knowledge with the goal of creating a rival to OpenAI's ChatGPT that can use data from the open web.
Gross didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Perica and Eddy Cue, who both report to Apple Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook, are leading the AI acquisition and recruiting efforts.
The hunt for talent is part of a bid to catch up in generative AI. The company was slow to deliver its Apple Intelligence platform and still lags rivals in key features. A revamped Siri was delayed indefinitely this year, with the company now aiming to have it ready by next spring.
Apple unveiled a relatively meager slate of new AI enhancements at its Worldwide Developers Conference earlier this month. The latest features include live translation capabilities and a deeper partnership with OpenAI on ChatGPT-based image generation.
Buying Perplexity would give Apple an infusion of AI talent, a known brand in the AI space and a consumer product. A deal could also potentially assist with future recruiting efforts.
Apple has also discussed an alternative plan: teaming up with Perplexity instead of buying it. A partnership would involve adding Perplexity as an AI search engine option in Apple's Safari web browser and integrating it into Siri.
Apple has met multiple times in recent months with Perplexity, and its AI team has been actively evaluating the technology — a sign that it's at least considering a close relationship with the company.
One major snag in the process could be an in-the-works deal between Perplexity and Samsung Electronics Co., which plans to announce a deep partnership with the startup. Samsung is Apple's biggest competitor in smartphones, and AI features have become a critical new arena for the two rivals.
In its statement, Perplexity said it shouldn't be surprising that top manufacturers want to offer the 'best search and more accurate AI for their users.'
'That's Perplexity,' the startup said.
Cue, whose department includes Apple's streaming services and iCloud, previously expressed an interest in Perplexity. While testifying at the Google antitrust trial in May, he told jurors that the industry is shifting away from standard internet searches to AI tools. He outlined a scenario in which AI search engines could quickly supersede Google's current offering.
'We've been pretty impressed with what Perplexity has done, so we've started some discussions with them about what they're doing,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cybernews unearth 16 billion login credential leaks involving Google, Telegram, others
The research team at Cybernews has discovered what is reportedly the largest-ever data breach , involving 16 billion login credentials spread across 30 different databases. According to the media outlet's report, 'Information in the leaked datasets opens the doors to pretty much any online service imaginable, from Apple, Facebook, and Google , to GitHub, Telegram, and various government services.' Not a new breach, say experts However, despite all the commotion surrounding the reported incident, experts are reluctant to call it a 'new breach', claiming that there is no evidence that the dataset is the result of a recent compromise. 'To be clear, this is not a new data breach, or a breach at all,' cybersecurity publication BleepingComputer said. Live Events 'The websites involved were not recently compromised to steal these credentials,' it added. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories They claimed that the stolen credentials were likely circulating for some time, if not for years. It was then collected by a cybersecurity firm, researchers, or threat actors and repackaged into a database that was exposed on the Internet. Instead, it appears that the data, much of which may have been circulating for years, has simply been collated and repackaged. This compilation could have originated from security researchers, cybersecurity companies, or threat actors themselves, and was later exposed online. What's the story? The scale of the breach made headlines for being the largest credential exposure known, with the news creating a buzz in the media and discussions online. Researchers at Cybernews had warned: 'This is not just a leak – it's a blueprint for mass exploitation. With over 16 billion login records exposed, cybercriminals now have unprecedented access to personal credentials that can be used for account takeover, identity theft , and highly targeted phishing.' However, since many overlapping records were present, the report said that it's difficult to determine exactly how many individuals or accounts are affected. The inclusion of both old and recent infostealer logs—often with tokens, cookies, and metadata—makes this data particularly dangerous for organisations lacking multi-factor authentication or credential hygiene practices, the team said. May not be new, but is still dangerous Before heaving a sigh of relief, one must know that data, whether new or recycled, still contains risk quotients. Cybernews researcher Aras Nazarovas suggested that the massive breach could be signalling a shift in how cybercriminals operate, moving away from go-to places for obtaining stolen data, like Telegram groups. 'Some of the exposed datasets included information such as cookies and session tokens, which makes the mitigation of such exposure more difficult. These cookies can often be used to bypass 2FA ( two-factor authentication ) methods, and not all services reset these cookies after changing the account password,' said Nazarovas. So how to protect yourself? 'Best bet in this case is to change your passwords, enable 2FA, if it is not yet enabled, closely monitor your accounts, and contact customer support if suspicious activity is detected,' he advised.
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Apple AI troubles continue, sued by shareholders over Apple Intelligence and Siri delays; here's what lawsuit claims
Apple is facing a proposed securities fraud class action lawsuit from its shareholders, a report claims. According to a report by the news agency Reuters, the lawsuit claims that the Cupertino-based tech giant understated the time required to integrate advanced artificial intelligence into its Siri voice assistant, which caused a delay in rolling out these features and has allegedly harmed iPhone sales and Apple's stock price. The complaint covers shareholders who experienced significant losses in the year leading up to early June, when Apple introduced new product features but limited AI advancements. The lawsuit, filed in San Francisco federal court, names Apple, CEO Tim Cook , CFO Kevan Parekh, and former CFO Luca Maestri as defendants. What the Apple shareholders' lawsuit against the company claims As per the Reuters report, a group of shareholders led by Eric Tucker has alleged that Apple misled investors during its June 2024 Worldwide Developers Conference by suggesting that AI would be a key selling point for the upcoming iPhone 16, particularly through its Apple Intelligence features aimed at enhancing Siri. However, the lawsuit claims Apple did not have a working prototype of the AI-based Siri upgrades and had no reasonable basis to believe the features would be ready in time for the iPhone 16 launch. Apple shareholders have argued that concerns started to surface in March, when the company postponed some Siri improvements to 2026, the Reuters report notes. The issue continued into Apple's WWDC developer event in June, where the company's update on its AI progress fell short of analyst expectations. Since its peak in December 2024, Apple's share value has dropped by nearly 25%, resulting in an estimated $900 billion decline in the company's market capitalisation, the report adds. World Music Day 2025: Tech That Changed How We Listen to Music AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
ICICI Bank once wanted to acquire HDFC, Deepak Parekh spills the secret
Deepak Parekh revealed Chanda Kochhar's merger proposal between ICICI and HDFC, predating HDFC's reverse merger. Parekh cited regulatory pressure from the RBI as the primary driver for the HDFC-HDFC Bank merger, emphasizing the need for larger Indian banks. Post-merger, ICICI Bank has outperformed HDFC Bank in key metrics like profit growth and net interest margin. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Former HDFC chairman Deepak Parekh has revealed that former ICICI Bank chief Chanda Kochhar once proposed a merger between ICICI and HDFC, well before HDFC's reverse merger with its own banking a conversation with Kochhar on her YouTube channel, Parekh recounted, "I remember you talking to me once. I remember it very clearly. It's never been talked about in public, but I'm willing to share it now. You said that ICICI started HDFC. 'Why don't you come back home?' That was your offer."Parekh said he declined the offer at the time, saying it "won't be fair" or "proper with our name and the bank and all."Parekh described the eventual HDFC-HDFC Bank merger, completed in July 2023, as a move driven by regulatory compulsions rather than business ambition. The Reserve Bank of India had classified large NBFCs like HDFC, which then held assets exceeding ₹5 lakh crore, as systemically important — well above the ₹50,000-crore threshold."RBI supported us and they pushed us into it to some extent and they helped us," Parekh said. However, he added that there were "no concessions, no relief, no time, nothing."Parekh also said the deal had been executed with extreme confidentiality. 'It was kept a secret. No one knew about it—when it hit the press in the morning, that's when everyone found out. The government was aware because RBI was in touch with them, and we kept it so close—just lawyers, due diligence, accountants,' he on the conclusion of the merger, Parekh called it "a sad day and a happy day." He added, "It's good for the institution. It's good for the country to have large banks. Look at how large Chinese banks are. We have to be bigger, larger in India."On April 4, 2022, HDFC Bank announced its plan to acquire mortgage lender HDFC in a deal valued at about $40 billion, creating one of the largest financial institutions in Indian history. The merger gave rise to a banking entity worth $172 billion, affecting tens of millions of customers and shareholders across both companies, along with their group insurance and asset management said Indian banks must grow through acquisitions in order to become stronger in the also listed key concerns for chief executives, including continuing uncertainty in supply chains, trade policies, and export the insurance front, Parekh described it as the "least understood product" and criticised "mis-selling by banks" which, he said, was driven by the lure of high upfront HDFC Bank , in April this year, crossed the ₹15 lakh crore market capitalisation mark — an elite milestone — a quieter shift has been unfolding in the private banking space. ICICI Bank has steadily pulled ahead of HDFC Bank on several key performance Bank is now seen as a frontrunner among private sector lenders in India. HDFC Bank, meanwhile, has been navigating the after-effects of the 2023 merger, which have affected its growth FY25, ICICI Bank recorded profit growth of 15%, while HDFC Bank's profits rose by 11%. Both banks registered similar net interest income (NII) growth, but ICICI had a stronger net interest margin (NIM) of 4.41% compared with HDFC Bank's NIM of 3.65%.ICICI Bank also reported 14% growth in both advances and deposits for FY25. HDFC Bank, however, saw its advances grow at nearly half the pace of its merger added a substantial loan portfolio to HDFC Bank but did not bring in a matching level of deposits. This resulted in a spike in the loan-to-deposit ratio (LDR) to over 100% post-merger. Although HDFC Bank reduced this figure to 96.5% by the end of FY25, it still faces pressure to either increase deposits or slow down contrast, ICICI Bank's LDR stood at a healthier 82.4% as of March to the elevated LDR, HDFC Bank deliberately slowed down its credit expansion during FY25 to maintain balance. The bank's management believes that improving systemic liquidity will help raise deposits going forward.A high LDR suggests a bank is lending a large proportion of its deposits, which can become a risk if too many depositors withdraw funds at once and liquidity tightens.
