Legislators circulate bill aim to attract TV shows, movies to film in Wisconsin
MADISON - Wisconsin legislators hope to incentivize TV shows and movies to film in the state with a package of bills that would provide tax credits and create a state office dedicated to working with producers and crews.
A package of bills proposed by Reps. Dave Armstrong, R-Rice Lake, Calvin Callahan, R-Tomahawk, and Karen Hurd, R-Withee and Sens. Julian Bradley, R-New Berlin, and Patrick Testin, R-Stevens Point, would offer benefits to shows like "Top Chef," which filmed in Madison and Milwaukee in recent years.
Here's what you should know about the new bills.
The first in the set of proposed bills would establish tax incentives to draw in productions that be disbursed after the production expenses are spent and justified, according to the memo circulated for co-sponsorship of the bills.
The incentives include:
A tax credit equal to 30% of the salary or wages paid to the company's employees in the tax year for services rendered in the state, for employees who were residents of the state at the time.
An income and franchise tax credit in an amount that is equal to 30% of the production expenditures paid by the company in the taxable year to produce a film, video, broadcast advertisement, or television production. If the total amount of the credits claimed by the company exceeded the company's tax liability, the state would issue a refund.
An income and franchise tax credit in an amount that is equal to the amount of sales and use taxes that the claimant paid for tangible personal property and taxable services used to produce a film, video, broadcast advertisement, or television production in this state.
The proposed bills would also establish a formal state office dedicated to attracting productions to the state and handling the incentives.
A similar bill was proposed last session but did not make it to Gov. Tony Evers' desk.
Wisconsin recently saw what the impact of a high-level production could have, thanks to the filming and release of season 21 of "Top Chef."
According to the memo, "Top Chef" spent about $5 million filming in Wisconsin and received about $500,000 as a part of a state incentive package.
As a result of the show, Milwaukee saw a $1.5 million boost in hotel room bookings, the memo says.
More: 'I know my way around a curd': How Wisconsin native Kat Turner fared on Episode 2 of 'Top Chef' Season 22
Another project, a Christmas movie filming in Door County, has spent $600,000 over three weeks.
"Now imagine the benefits to the state and local economies if Wisconsin had a state film office dedicated to attracting productions, instead of the current ad hoc approach," the memo says.
You may recognize the iconic peach included on movies or T.V. shows that are filmed in Georgia. Or maybe you've seen a movie that contains the Chicago skyline.
Georgia and Illinois are two of many states that incentivize the filming of shows or movies. According to the bill memo, Wisconsin is one of only five states without a film office or commission, and one of only 10 states that does not provide production incentives.
"Without production incentives and a state film office to market Wisconsin, we're leaving money on the table," the memo says.
In addition to Illinois, Indiana, Ohio and Minnesota also all invest in film and T.V.
The memo also highlights the filming of the show "Yellowstone" in Montana generating a large amount of spending from both the production and from resulting tourism. Overall, the production resulted in $730.1 million in spending to the state's economy.
It also generated 10,200 jobs across industries and resulted in 1 million visitors in 2021 who decided to visit the state as a result of the show.
Laura Schulte can be reached at leschulte@jrn.com and on X @SchulteLaura.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Proposed bills aim to attract TV shows, movies to film in Wisconsin
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Republicans line up behind Trump after strike on Iran — with few detractors
Republicans on Capitol Hill quickly lined up behind President Trump after he announced that the U.S. conducted a strike on three Iranian nuclear facilities, a strong show of support for the White House with few detractors inside the GOP. Trump announced on Truth Social just before 8 p.m. EDT on Saturday that the U.S. 'completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran,' including Fordow, the nuclear site hidden in a mountain south of Tehran. He is scheduled to address the nation from the White House at 10 p.m. Republican leaders in the House and Senate backed the action, which had become a debate of sorts in Washington — especially among GOP — since Israel struck Iranian nuclear facilities earlier this month in what it called a 'pre-emptive' attack. Live updates: US bombs Iranian nuclear sites, Trump to address nation 'The military operations in Iran should serve as a clear reminder to our adversaries and allies that President Trump means what he says,' Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) wrote in a statement on X. 'The President gave Iran's leader every opportunity to make a deal, but Iran refused to commit to a nuclear disarmament agreement. President Trump has been consistent and clear that a nuclear-armed Iran will not be tolerated. That posture has now been enforced with strength, precision, and clarity.' 'The President's decisive action prevents the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism, which chants 'Death to America,' from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet,' he added. 'This is America First policy in action. God bless our brave men and women in uniform – the most lethal fighting force on the planet – as we pray for their safe return home. May God bless America.' Johnson was briefed on the strike beforehand, a source familiar with the matter told The Hill. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) wrote in a statement with X: 'I stand with President Trump.' 'The regime in Iran, which has committed itself to bringing 'death to America' and wiping Israel off the map, has rejected all diplomatic pathways to peace. The mullahs' misguided pursuit of nuclear weapons must be stopped,' he said. 'As we take action tonight to ensure a nuclear weapon remains out of reach for Iran, I stand with President Trump and pray for the American troops and personnel in harm's way.' Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford (R-Ark.), similarly, backed Trump after the strike and applauded him for making the 'right call.' 'Iran has waged a war of terror against the United States for 46 years. We could never allow Iran to get nuclear weapons. God bless our brave troops. President Trump made the right call and the ayatollahs should recall his warning not to target Americans,' Cotton wrote on X. 'As I have said multiple times recently, I regret that Iran has brought the world to this point,' Crawford echoed in a statement. 'That said, I am thankful President Trump understood that the red line — articulated by President of both parties for decades — was real. The United States and our allies, including Israel, are making it clear that the world would never accept Iran's development of a nuclear weapon.' While the majority of Republicans backed Trump in the wake of the strike, there were some GOP detractors on Capitol Hill. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who has been advocating for the U.S. to avoid intervention in the Israel-Iran conflict, wrote on X minutes after Trump announced the offensive: 'This is not Constitutional.' Massie helped lead a bipartisan war powers resolution to prohibit U.S. involvement in the Middle East dispute. Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) suggested that the move was unconstitutional. 'While President Trump's decision may prove just, it's hard to conceive a rationale that's Constitutional. I look forward to his remarks tonight,' he wrote on X. Trump's decision to strike a trio of Iranian nuclear sites came after a week of debate on Capitol Hill over whether the U.S. should take action in Iran after Israel launched an attack on Iran, prompting a back-and-forth between the two countries. Trump on Thursday said he would decide whether to take action within the next two weeks. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiation that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go in the next two weeks,' Trump said in the statement read by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. The big question had been whether the U.S. would deploy a large bomb known as a 'bunker buster' to strike the Fordow facility, which is underground. While some lawmakers advocated for the move, others — including some of the president's most vocal supporters on the right-flank — pushed against the U.S. directly getting involved in the conflict. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), for example, said 'Me and my district support President Trump and his MAGA agenda, it's what we voted for in November, and foreign wars weren't a part of it.' On Saturday night, she offered prayers for the safety of U.S. troops and Americans in the Middle East. 'Let us pray that we are not attacked by terrorists on our homeland after our border was open for the past 4 years and over 2 Million gotaways came in.🙏 Let us pray for peace. 🙏,' she added. But across the GOP conferences on Capitol Hill, Republicans were quick to back the move by the president. 'Our commander-in-chief has made a deliberate —and correct— decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime,' Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) wrote in a statement on X. 'We now have very serious choices ahead to provide security for our citizens and our allies and stability for the middle-east. Well-done to our military personnel. You're the best!' House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), the No. 3 House Republican, said Trump 'was right then, and he is right today: NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE.' 'A nuclear Iran posed a threat to the Middle East and to the world. @POTUS has been consistent that this dangerous regime should NEVER possess a nuclear weapon,' he added in a statement on X. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
5 takeaways as US enters war with Iran, strikes nuclear sites
President Trump announced Saturday night that the United States has bombed three nuclear sites in Iran, engaging U.S. forces in a war that Israel launched two weeks ago. In a brief address on Saturday night, Trump warned of continued U.S. attacks on Iran if 'peace does not come quickly.' 'This cannot continue,' he said, flanked by Vice President Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. 'There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran, far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days,' Trump said. The White House had said on Thursday that Trump would make a decision on bombing Iran within two weeks, but B-2 bombers started crossing the Pacific on Saturday afternoon. Trump announced the 'very successful' strikes in a Truth Social post around 8 p.m. EDT Saturday. In his remarks on Saturday night, the president said those facilities 'have been completely and totally obliterated.' Live updates: Trump calls for peace after bombing 3 Iran nuclear sites Here are the key takeaways on the bombings: In his Truth Social post, Trump said 'a full payload of BOMBS' was dropped on Iran's primary nuclear enrichment plant, Fordow — a deep underground facility viewed as key to Tehran's nuclear program — as well as on Natanz and Isfahan. Multiple outlets reported that six bunker buster bombs were dropped on the Fordow facility, and that 30 Tomahawk missiles were fired at Natanz and Isfahan. Trump, in his address, said Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Dan Caine would give a press conference on the strikes at 8 a.m. EDT Sunday. Experts say the 30,000-pound bunker busters, officially known as the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator and capable of striking the mountain where Fordow is located, had reportedly been requested by Israel. In the hours before the U.S. unleashed airstrikes, the Defense Department reportedly moved B-2 bombers, the only aircraft capable of dropping the GBU-57, from their holding base in Missouri to across the Pacific to Guam. Iranian officials and state media have confirmed the bombings but said the three nuclear facilities had previously been evacuated. The immediate response from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle pointed to the deep divisions over whether the U.S. should enter a new war in the Middle East. 'This is not Constitutional,' Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) posted on the social platform X. Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) struck a similar note, referencing Trump's post announcing the attacks, which said, 'Thank you for your attention to this matter.' 'According to the Constitution we are both sworn to defend, my attention to this matter comes BEFORE bombs fall. Full stop,' Himes wrote. Massie had sponsored legislation that would have required congressional approval for any strikes on Iran. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) reacted to the news during a rally in Tulsa, Okla., calling it 'grossly unconstitutional' after the crowd chanted 'no more war.' Leading Republicans and at least one Democrat were supportive of the attacks. 'The President's decisive action prevents the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism, which chants 'Death to America,' from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet. This is America First policy in action,' Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) wrote on X. 'Good. This was the right call. The regime deserves it,' Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) wrote on X. Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), meanwhile, said Trump had made 'a deliberate —and correct— decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime.' Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) also backed the strikes. 'As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS . Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities,' he wrote on X. Some 40,000 U.S. service members are spread out across the Middle East at bases in Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, offering Iran a broad opportunity to hit back at American citizens, equipment and interests. In the days before the U.S. strike on Iran, Tehran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, warned that any American military intervention in its conflict with Israel 'will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage.' And on Saturday, a news anchor on Iranian state television declared that Trump 'started it, and we will end it,' seeming to refer to a larger conflict between Washington and Tehran. The broadcast also showed a graphic of American bases in the Middle East with the headline, 'Within the fire range of Iran,' as reported by The New York Times. Experts say Iran within hours could decide to launch a retaliatory strike on the nearby Al-Asad Air Base in Iraq or other locations close to its borders, and within minutes of such a decision could have its missiles delivered. 'If [Iran] had the ballistic missiles ready to go, those strikes could happen in under 15 minutes. Launched to target,' retired Col. Seth Krummrich, vice president at security consultancy firm Global Guardian, told The Hill on Friday. A former Special Forces officer in Iraq and Afghanistan, Krummrich also predicted that if the U.S. were to use the GBU-57, 'you would see an Iranian missile strike aimed at one or multiple U.S. bases.' Tehran last significantly targeted U.S. troops in January 2020 after Trump, in his first term, ordered an airstrike that killed Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani, the head of Iran's elite Quds Force. Iran reacted swiftly, days later hammering Al-Asad and another U.S. base in Erbil with 13 ballistic missiles in the largest such attack ever against U.S. forces abroad. No Americans were killed in the strikes, but more than 100 were later diagnosed and treated for traumatic brain injuries. The strikes came less than 48 hours after Trump said he would make up his mind within two weeks, suggesting there was still time for a diplomatic solution. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiation that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go in the next two weeks,' Trump said in a statement read aloud by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Friday afternoon. The U.S. has reportedly maintained dialogue with Iranian officials since Israel first struck Iran on June 13, but Trump had expressed growing skepticism about the chances of a deal. Iran has reportedly agreed to resume direct talks with the U.S. after a meeting between European foreign ministers and Iran's top diplomat on Friday. This weekend saw a flurry of diplomatic activity across the Middle East. Ambassadors from Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait on Saturday met with Rafael Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), to express concerns about the consequences of a U.S. attack. It could take days for the U.S., Israel and IAEA to assess the damage from the U.S. strikes, which were carried out in close coordination with the Israel Defense Forces. One of the key questions will be how much the U.S. strikes, together with more than a week of Israeli attacks, have set back Tehran's nuclear program. Trump said in recent days he believed Iran was on the verge of being able to build a nuclear bomb, though U.S. intelligence agencies believed it would take more than a year for Tehran to turn enriched uranium into a usable nuclear weapon. Israeli officials have also suggested that regime change in Iran is among the goals of their war, and that Khamenei could be a target for assassination. Iran's supreme leader, believed to be hiding out in a bunker, has named three senior clerics to replace him should he die, according to The New York Times. On Iranian state television after the attacks, an anchor said, 'Mr. Trump, you started it, and we will end it,' along with a graphic of American bases in the Middle East within Iran's reach, according to the Times. Both Russia and China had condemned Israel's war on Iran and are certain to criticize the U.S. strikes as well. However, Russia has shown little interest in sending military support to Iran. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rounds says Trump notified congressional leaders of strikes ‘well within' 48-hour window
Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) said on Sunday that President Trump notified Congress of the strikes on Iranian nuclear sites 'well within' the 48-hour window defined by the War Powers Resolution. In an interview on NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday,' Rounds pushed back against critics who say the president acted outside his constitutional authority by ordering strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, including Fordow. 'The Constitution clearly gives the President the authority to act on our nation's behalf,' Rounds said. 'Second of all, the War Powers Act, which is in place, was responded to appropriately. They were supposed to notify congressional leaders within 48 hours. They were well within that range of notifying them of the actions [that] were taken, so the law has been complied with. The Constitution is being complied with,' Rounds continued. Rounds said the Constitution was acting just as 'the founders wanted it to work.' 'The president is the chief. The commander in chief has the responsibility. Our Founding Fathers were brilliant in the way they wrote the Constitution. They understood that Congress takes a long time to act. They also understood that in times in military conflict or in times of great danger or emergencies that the president needed the authority to be able to respond quickly and effectively and decisively,' he said. 'This president did just exactly that. It is working the way the founders wanted it to work in the first place,' Rounds added. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said on Sunday that congressional leaders were informed of the strikes after 'the planes were safely out' of Iranian airspace, adding that the administration's actions 'complied with the notification requirements of the War Powers Act.' Some reports have indicated that Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) were briefed about the strikes. But House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) has criticized the administration for not seeking congressional approval and has called for Congress to be 'fully and immediately briefed' on the strikes in a classified setting, in a statement shortly after the attacks. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
